Re: Next SystemML Release
I have made quite a few changes related to refactoring package name to org.apache.sysml, please review at https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/4 On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Shirish Tatikonda < shirish.tatiko...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for *sysml* name > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Deron Eriksson > wrote: > > > With regards to package refactoring, I think short package names are > great, > > unless there is an Apache expectation for the full project name to be in > > the package. Luciano, are you aware any standards in regards to this? I > > would highly favor org.apache.sysml over org.apache.dml, since (1) sysml > > reflects the project name, and (2) DML has very strongly entrenched > meaning > > in the database world. > > > > Deron > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Matthias Boehm > > wrote: > > > > > first week of December for our 0.8.1 release sounds good to me. > > > > > > Apart from bug fixes and performance features, the focus should be > mostly > > > on increasing robustness of our spark backend. Since 0.8.0, we already > > > added important features like "partitioned broadcasts" (in order to > > > overcome the 2GB broadcast limitation) and "improved guarded collect" > (to > > > overcome OOM situations on RDD collect). There are still some open > issues > > > w/ regard to (1) potential OOMs, (2) repeated lazy evaluation of common > > > subexpressions, and (3) data converter utils for external formats. > > > Resolving these known issues would be a nice cut for this minor > release. > > > > > > Regarding the package refactoring, I agree that we should do this right > > > away; I would, however, prefer a short package name such as > > > 'org.apache.dml' or 'org.apache.sysml'. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Matthias > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51 > > > AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, t]Deron > > > Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51 AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an > > Apache > > > Incubator project, the packages need to be > > > > > > From: Deron Eriksson > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > Date: 11/20/2015 11:09 AM > > > Subject: Re: Next SystemML Release > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, the packages need to > be > > > updated, right? (com.ibm.bi.dml.* to org.apache.systemml.*) Since the > > > project just moved to its new repo, it would probably be a good time to > > > make this update since this would minimize impact on developers. This > > > affects all Java files in the project. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > Deron > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Shirish Tatikonda < > > > shirish.tatiko...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Luciano, > > > > > > > > First week of December sounds good. That should give sufficient time > to > > > fix > > > > a few known issues. > > > > > > > > Shirish > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Luciano Resende < > luckbr1...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I would like to get our first official Apache release soon, which > > will > > > > > incorporate minor bug fixes and anything else post our 0.8.0 > release. > > > > Any > > > > > other big enhancement we should target for this release ? > > > > > > > > > > How about targeting to cut a release in the first week of December > ? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Next SystemML Release
+1 for *sysml* name On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > With regards to package refactoring, I think short package names are great, > unless there is an Apache expectation for the full project name to be in > the package. Luciano, are you aware any standards in regards to this? I > would highly favor org.apache.sysml over org.apache.dml, since (1) sysml > reflects the project name, and (2) DML has very strongly entrenched meaning > in the database world. > > Deron > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Matthias Boehm > wrote: > > > first week of December for our 0.8.1 release sounds good to me. > > > > Apart from bug fixes and performance features, the focus should be mostly > > on increasing robustness of our spark backend. Since 0.8.0, we already > > added important features like "partitioned broadcasts" (in order to > > overcome the 2GB broadcast limitation) and "improved guarded collect" (to > > overcome OOM situations on RDD collect). There are still some open issues > > w/ regard to (1) potential OOMs, (2) repeated lazy evaluation of common > > subexpressions, and (3) data converter utils for external formats. > > Resolving these known issues would be a nice cut for this minor release. > > > > Regarding the package refactoring, I agree that we should do this right > > away; I would, however, prefer a short package name such as > > 'org.apache.dml' or 'org.apache.sysml'. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51 > > AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, t]Deron > > Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51 AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an > Apache > > Incubator project, the packages need to be > > > > From: Deron Eriksson > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > Date: 11/20/2015 11:09 AM > > Subject: Re: Next SystemML Release > > -- > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, the packages need to be > > updated, right? (com.ibm.bi.dml.* to org.apache.systemml.*) Since the > > project just moved to its new repo, it would probably be a good time to > > make this update since this would minimize impact on developers. This > > affects all Java files in the project. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Deron > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Shirish Tatikonda < > > shirish.tatiko...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Luciano, > > > > > > First week of December sounds good. That should give sufficient time to > > fix > > > a few known issues. > > > > > > Shirish > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Luciano Resende > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to get our first official Apache release soon, which > will > > > > incorporate minor bug fixes and anything else post our 0.8.0 release. > > > Any > > > > other big enhancement we should target for this release ? > > > > > > > > How about targeting to cut a release in the first week of December ? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Next SystemML Release
With regards to package refactoring, I think short package names are great, unless there is an Apache expectation for the full project name to be in the package. Luciano, are you aware any standards in regards to this? I would highly favor org.apache.sysml over org.apache.dml, since (1) sysml reflects the project name, and (2) DML has very strongly entrenched meaning in the database world. Deron On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Matthias Boehm wrote: > first week of December for our 0.8.1 release sounds good to me. > > Apart from bug fixes and performance features, the focus should be mostly > on increasing robustness of our spark backend. Since 0.8.0, we already > added important features like "partitioned broadcasts" (in order to > overcome the 2GB broadcast limitation) and "improved guarded collect" (to > overcome OOM situations on RDD collect). There are still some open issues > w/ regard to (1) potential OOMs, (2) repeated lazy evaluation of common > subexpressions, and (3) data converter utils for external formats. > Resolving these known issues would be a nice cut for this minor release. > > Regarding the package refactoring, I agree that we should do this right > away; I would, however, prefer a short package name such as > 'org.apache.dml' or 'org.apache.sysml'. > > Regards, > Matthias > > [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51 > AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, t]Deron > Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51 AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an Apache > Incubator project, the packages need to be > > From: Deron Eriksson > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 11/20/2015 11:09 AM > Subject: Re: Next SystemML Release > -- > > > > Hello, > > Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, the packages need to be > updated, right? (com.ibm.bi.dml.* to org.apache.systemml.*) Since the > project just moved to its new repo, it would probably be a good time to > make this update since this would minimize impact on developers. This > affects all Java files in the project. > > Any thoughts? > > Deron > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Shirish Tatikonda < > shirish.tatiko...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Luciano, > > > > First week of December sounds good. That should give sufficient time to > fix > > a few known issues. > > > > Shirish > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Luciano Resende > > wrote: > > > > > I would like to get our first official Apache release soon, which will > > > incorporate minor bug fixes and anything else post our 0.8.0 release. > > Any > > > other big enhancement we should target for this release ? > > > > > > How about targeting to cut a release in the first week of December ? > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > >
Re: Next SystemML Release
first week of December for our 0.8.1 release sounds good to me. Apart from bug fixes and performance features, the focus should be mostly on increasing robustness of our spark backend. Since 0.8.0, we already added important features like "partitioned broadcasts" (in order to overcome the 2GB broadcast limitation) and "improved guarded collect" (to overcome OOM situations on RDD collect). There are still some open issues w/ regard to (1) potential OOMs, (2) repeated lazy evaluation of common subexpressions, and (3) data converter utils for external formats. Resolving these known issues would be a nice cut for this minor release. Regarding the package refactoring, I agree that we should do this right away; I would, however, prefer a short package name such as 'org.apache.dml' or 'org.apache.sysml'. Regards, Matthias From: Deron Eriksson To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 11/20/2015 11:09 AM Subject:Re: Next SystemML Release Hello, Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, the packages need to be updated, right? (com.ibm.bi.dml.* to org.apache.systemml.*) Since the project just moved to its new repo, it would probably be a good time to make this update since this would minimize impact on developers. This affects all Java files in the project. Any thoughts? Deron On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Shirish Tatikonda < shirish.tatiko...@gmail.com> wrote: > Luciano, > > First week of December sounds good. That should give sufficient time to fix > a few known issues. > > Shirish > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > I would like to get our first official Apache release soon, which will > > incorporate minor bug fixes and anything else post our 0.8.0 release. > Any > > other big enhancement we should target for this release ? > > > > How about targeting to cut a release in the first week of December ? > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > >
Re: Next SystemML Release
Hello, Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, the packages need to be updated, right? (com.ibm.bi.dml.* to org.apache.systemml.*) Since the project just moved to its new repo, it would probably be a good time to make this update since this would minimize impact on developers. This affects all Java files in the project. Any thoughts? Deron On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Shirish Tatikonda < shirish.tatiko...@gmail.com> wrote: > Luciano, > > First week of December sounds good. That should give sufficient time to fix > a few known issues. > > Shirish > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > I would like to get our first official Apache release soon, which will > > incorporate minor bug fixes and anything else post our 0.8.0 release. > Any > > other big enhancement we should target for this release ? > > > > How about targeting to cut a release in the first week of December ? > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > >
Re: Next SystemML Release
Luciano, First week of December sounds good. That should give sufficient time to fix a few known issues. Shirish On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > I would like to get our first official Apache release soon, which will > incorporate minor bug fixes and anything else post our 0.8.0 release. Any > other big enhancement we should target for this release ? > > How about targeting to cut a release in the first week of December ? > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
