Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

[pieter-gmail]

I just upgraded and things are looking good.

Cheers

Pieter


On 14/10/2016 20:50, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> It's been fairly quiet on this thread for this release for some reason. I
> assume that can only mean that this is to be the best release ever!
>
> I just published the latest 3.2.3-SNAPSHOT again to Apache Snapshots
> Repository and also republished the docs:
>
> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.3-SNAPSHOT/
>
> and they look pretty good (there was a problem with upgrade doc
> formatting). Upgrade docs look really solid for this release. Hopefully,
> master is fully stable now and we won't need any more changes before I
> build up the release for vote on monday.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Ted Wilmes  wrote:
>
>> I was getting failures earlier today off of master.  Just did a pull and
>> things are looking good.
>>
>> --Ted
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Stephen Mallette 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Push a commit to master earlier today to fix that issue we talked about
>>> last week regarding the failing TraversalInterruptionTest. Travis has
>> been
>>> happy and I can't seem to get it to fail locally. I think it's in good
>>> shape. If you were having problems with that before, please give it a try
>>> now. Marko is still planning to some work to fix up PeerPressure test
>>> (can't say I've have trouble with that one myself).
>>>
>>> Also, I published a 3.2.3 -SNAPSHOT earlier today btw to the Apache
>>> snapshot repository for testing.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Stephen Mallette 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 We're supposed to start code freeze tomorrow, but we are a little
>> behind.
 Still have one PR left to merge and it needs a rebase:

 https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/448

 So expect that to get merged for 3.2.3 during code freeze week, but
 nothing in that PR should preclude providers from testing their
 implementations.  Other than that, I think everything else of substance
>>> is
 in.

 I do have one worry about that TraversalInterruption test that has been
 failing randomly since the LazyBarrierStrategy stuff went in (i think).
 Marko also mentioned the PeerPressure test. We'll put some elbow grease
 into that next week and try to get those figured out and more stable.

 As a reminder Ted will be release manager for 3.1.5 and I'll be doing
 3.2.3. As usual, we will use this thread to coordinate during code
>> freeze
 week. Please bring up relevant issues here.

 Thanks,

 Stephen

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #448: Python glv graphson update

[al3xandru]

Github user al3xandru commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/448
  
A bit late to the conversation as I've noticed this hasn't been merged yet.

> I don't think there's a use case in the context of the python GLV, but we 
have that use case in GraphSON in legacy support for TinkerPop 2.x based 
GraphSON (the migration scenario mentioned). I don't know that we'd extend that 
to Python. 

Considering that the GraphSONIO provides both a simpler API and easier 
integration as noted by @davebshow, plus it doesn't need to account for the 
legacy support, there are only benefits with this approach.

> I guess the point here is to try to maintain API consistency across all 
the languages, even if we don't quite have all the support for all the features 
from Java applicable to Python just yet.

That's indeed a very good point. Assuming the main users of this API are 
the GLV implementors, then I'm wondering if making it idiomatic for the target 
platform shouldn't be the top goal.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

[Stephen Mallette]

It's been fairly quiet on this thread for this release for some reason. I
assume that can only mean that this is to be the best release ever!

I just published the latest 3.2.3-SNAPSHOT again to Apache Snapshots
Repository and also republished the docs:

http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.3-SNAPSHOT/

and they look pretty good (there was a problem with upgrade doc
formatting). Upgrade docs look really solid for this release. Hopefully,
master is fully stable now and we won't need any more changes before I
build up the release for vote on monday.


On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Ted Wilmes  wrote:

> I was getting failures earlier today off of master.  Just did a pull and
> things are looking good.
>
> --Ted
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Stephen Mallette 
> wrote:
>
> > Push a commit to master earlier today to fix that issue we talked about
> > last week regarding the failing TraversalInterruptionTest. Travis has
> been
> > happy and I can't seem to get it to fail locally. I think it's in good
> > shape. If you were having problems with that before, please give it a try
> > now. Marko is still planning to some work to fix up PeerPressure test
> > (can't say I've have trouble with that one myself).
> >
> > Also, I published a 3.2.3 -SNAPSHOT earlier today btw to the Apache
> > snapshot repository for testing.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Stephen Mallette 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We're supposed to start code freeze tomorrow, but we are a little
> behind.
> > > Still have one PR left to merge and it needs a rebase:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/448
> > >
> > > So expect that to get merged for 3.2.3 during code freeze week, but
> > > nothing in that PR should preclude providers from testing their
> > > implementations.  Other than that, I think everything else of substance
> > is
> > > in.
> > >
> > > I do have one worry about that TraversalInterruption test that has been
> > > failing randomly since the LazyBarrierStrategy stuff went in (i think).
> > > Marko also mentioned the PeerPressure test. We'll put some elbow grease
> > > into that next week and try to get those figured out and more stable.
> > >
> > > As a reminder Ted will be release manager for 3.1.5 and I'll be doing
> > > 3.2.3. As usual, we will use this thread to coordinate during code
> freeze
> > > week. Please bring up relevant issues here.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Stephen
> > >
> >
>

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

[Ted Wilmes]

Cool, sounds good.  I'll get a 3.1.5 snapshot published and then prep for
vote.

--Ted

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Stephen Mallette 
wrote:

> It's been fairly quiet on this thread for this release for some reason. I
> assume that can only mean that this is to be the best release ever!
>
> I just published the latest 3.2.3-SNAPSHOT again to Apache Snapshots
> Repository and also republished the docs:
>
> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.3-SNAPSHOT/
>
> and they look pretty good (there was a problem with upgrade doc
> formatting). Upgrade docs look really solid for this release. Hopefully,
> master is fully stable now and we won't need any more changes before I
> build up the release for vote on monday.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Ted Wilmes  wrote:
>
> > I was getting failures earlier today off of master.  Just did a pull and
> > things are looking good.
> >
> > --Ted
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Stephen Mallette 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Push a commit to master earlier today to fix that issue we talked about
> > > last week regarding the failing TraversalInterruptionTest. Travis has
> > been
> > > happy and I can't seem to get it to fail locally. I think it's in good
> > > shape. If you were having problems with that before, please give it a
> try
> > > now. Marko is still planning to some work to fix up PeerPressure test
> > > (can't say I've have trouble with that one myself).
> > >
> > > Also, I published a 3.2.3 -SNAPSHOT earlier today btw to the Apache
> > > snapshot repository for testing.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Stephen Mallette  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > We're supposed to start code freeze tomorrow, but we are a little
> > behind.
> > > > Still have one PR left to merge and it needs a rebase:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/448
> > > >
> > > > So expect that to get merged for 3.2.3 during code freeze week, but
> > > > nothing in that PR should preclude providers from testing their
> > > > implementations.  Other than that, I think everything else of
> substance
> > > is
> > > > in.
> > > >
> > > > I do have one worry about that TraversalInterruption test that has
> been
> > > > failing randomly since the LazyBarrierStrategy stuff went in (i
> think).
> > > > Marko also mentioned the PeerPressure test. We'll put some elbow
> grease
> > > > into that next week and try to get those figured out and more stable.
> > > >
> > > > As a reminder Ted will be release manager for 3.1.5 and I'll be doing
> > > > 3.2.3. As usual, we will use this thread to coordinate during code
> > freeze
> > > > week. Please bring up relevant issues here.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Stephen
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1510) Inline comments in Gremlin console

[stephen mallette (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15576123#comment-15576123
 ] 

stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1510:
-

Maybe this should be an issue for Groovy thenseems like it would a good 
thing for their body of work.

> Inline comments in Gremlin console
> --
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1510
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1510
> Project: TinkerPop
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: console
>Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
>
> A while back it was no issue to have inline comments in multi-line Gremlin 
> traversals; code samples from the docs could easily be copied and pasted. Now 
> I just tried to paste a code block and ended up with this:
> {noformat}
> gremlin> g.V(input.head()).
> ..1>repeat(out('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
> groovysh_parse: 3: unexpected token: . @ line 3, column 51.
>t('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
> {noformat}
> [~robertdale], could this have something to do with any of your recent 
> changes?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1510) Inline comments in Gremlin console

[Robert Dale (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15576072#comment-15576072
 ] 

Robert Dale commented on TINKERPOP-1510:


Groovysh doesn't seem to support that so it would have been something added to 
gremlin-console. It would be neat if console did support that then 
TINKERPOP-1447 probably wouldn't be necessary.

> Inline comments in Gremlin console
> --
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1510
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1510
> Project: TinkerPop
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: console
>Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
>
> A while back it was no issue to have inline comments in multi-line Gremlin 
> traversals; code samples from the docs could easily be copied and pasted. Now 
> I just tried to paste a code block and ended up with this:
> {noformat}
> gremlin> g.V(input.head()).
> ..1>repeat(out('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
> groovysh_parse: 3: unexpected token: . @ line 3, column 51.
>t('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
> {noformat}
> [~robertdale], could this have something to do with any of your recent 
> changes?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1510) Inline comments in Gremlin console

[Daniel Kuppitz (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15576005#comment-15576005
 ] 

Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1510:
---

Hmm, interesting, it doesn't even work in {{tp31}}. I'm confused as I'm pretty 
sure that it worked at some point.

> Inline comments in Gremlin console
> --
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1510
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1510
> Project: TinkerPop
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: console
>Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
>
> A while back it was no issue to have inline comments in multi-line Gremlin 
> traversals; code samples from the docs could easily be copied and pasted. Now 
> I just tried to paste a code block and ended up with this:
> {noformat}
> gremlin> g.V(input.head()).
> ..1>repeat(out('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
> groovysh_parse: 3: unexpected token: . @ line 3, column 51.
>t('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
> {noformat}
> [~robertdale], could this have something to do with any of your recent 
> changes?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1510) Inline comments in Gremlin console

[Robert Dale (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15575932#comment-15575932
 ] 

Robert Dale commented on TINKERPOP-1510:


I don't think so.  I see the same issue going back to 
apache-gremlin-console-3.2.0-incubating.  Haven't tried earlier versions.

> Inline comments in Gremlin console
> --
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1510
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1510
> Project: TinkerPop
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: console
>Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
>
> A while back it was no issue to have inline comments in multi-line Gremlin 
> traversals; code samples from the docs could easily be copied and pasted. Now 
> I just tried to paste a code block and ended up with this:
> {noformat}
> gremlin> g.V(input.head()).
> ..1>repeat(out('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
> groovysh_parse: 3: unexpected token: . @ line 3, column 51.
>t('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
> {noformat}
> [~robertdale], could this have something to do with any of your recent 
> changes?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1510) Inline comments in Gremlin console

[Daniel Kuppitz (JIRA)]

Daniel Kuppitz created TINKERPOP-1510:
-

 Summary: Inline comments in Gremlin console
 Key: TINKERPOP-1510
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1510
 Project: TinkerPop
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: console
Affects Versions: 3.2.2
Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz


A while back it was no issue to have inline comments in multi-line Gremlin 
traversals; code samples from the docs could easily be copied and pasted. Now I 
just tried to paste a code block and ended up with this:

{noformat}
gremlin> g.V(input.head()).
..1>repeat(out('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
groovysh_parse: 3: unexpected token: . @ line 3, column 51.
   t('hasParent')).emit().as('x'). //(1)
{noformat}

[~robertdale], could this have something to do with any of your recent changes?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Tree Recipe

[Stephen Mallette]

Added a tree recipe:

http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.3-SNAPSHOT/recipes/#tree

I think that's the last one I'm writing up for 3.2.3.