Re: Johnzon release
Great. Thanks
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:24 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> As mentionned on the related thread 1.2.0, master is ready normally
>
> Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 18:18, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> a écrit :
>
> > Now that the JSONB spec jar is released, I pushed the changes to move to
> > non snapshot dependencies.
> >
> > Question guys: are the changes for passing TCK small so we do a 1.1.14 or
> > do we consider they are significant enough to produce a 1.2 instead?
> >
> > thoughts?
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:05 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > As mentionned in the related thread ("JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs") it
> sounds
> > ok
> > > for me.
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau | Blog
> > > | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn | Book
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 11:57, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> > > a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Romain and Mark have done a great work with the TCK. I'd like to open
> > up
> > > a
> > > > vote to get a release out and fill a certification request like this
> > one
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/175
> > > >
> > > > Any problem?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Johnzon release
As mentionned on the related thread 1.2.0, master is ready normally
Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 18:18, Jean-Louis Monteiro
a écrit :
> Now that the JSONB spec jar is released, I pushed the changes to move to
> non snapshot dependencies.
>
> Question guys: are the changes for passing TCK small so we do a 1.1.14 or
> do we consider they are significant enough to produce a 1.2 instead?
>
> thoughts?
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:05 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > As mentionned in the related thread ("JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs") it sounds
> ok
> > for me.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau | Blog
> > | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 11:57, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Romain and Mark have done a great work with the TCK. I'd like to open
> up
> > a
> > > vote to get a release out and fill a certification request like this
> one
> > >
> > > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/175
> > >
> > > Any problem?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> >
>
Re: Johnzon release
Now that the JSONB spec jar is released, I pushed the changes to move to
non snapshot dependencies.
Question guys: are the changes for passing TCK small so we do a 1.1.14 or
do we consider they are significant enough to produce a 1.2 instead?
thoughts?
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:05 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> As mentionned in the related thread ("JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs") it sounds ok
> for me.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog
> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 11:57, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> a écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Romain and Mark have done a great work with the TCK. I'd like to open up
> a
> > vote to get a release out and fill a certification request like this one
> >
> > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/175
> >
> > Any problem?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
>
Re: Johnzon release
As mentionned in the related thread ("JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs") it sounds ok
for me.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog
| Github |
LinkedIn | Book
Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 11:57, Jean-Louis Monteiro
a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Romain and Mark have done a great work with the TCK. I'd like to open up a
> vote to get a release out and fill a certification request like this one
>
> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/175
>
> Any problem?
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
Johnzon release
Hi, Romain and Mark have done a great work with the TCK. I'd like to open up a vote to get a release out and fill a certification request like this one https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/175 Any problem? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com
