Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do
Thanks for digging in! I never expected deliverability problems in this direction before, but the root cause makes sense. On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 9:32 AM Craig Russell wrote: > > That would explain it. Case closed. Thanks for analyzing the logs. > > Craig > > > On Jun 8, 2022, at 07:13, sebb wrote: > > > > Infra made a change to a mailbox size limit which caused problems for > > the mail system. > > > > The Whimsy mail.log has lots of messages such as: > > > > fatal: main.cf configuration error: mailbox_size_limit is smaller > > than message_size_limit > > > > These errors started at Jun 6 02:26:54 and stopped at Jun 7 18:38:26 > > > > AFAICT this allowed messages to be delivered to Whimsy, but they could > > not be forwarded to the mailbox. > > > > It appears that the mail system did eventually deliver the messages to > > the Whimsy process. > > > > I think this is the cause of the delayed appearance of the mails. > > > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 14:54, Craig Russell wrote: > >> > >> Hi Sebb, > >> > >> I've privately forwarded the four ICLAs mentioned in my previous email. > >> These did eventually show up in secretary workbench after more than a day. > >> > >>> Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > >>> Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > >>> ICLA 05:56 85KB > >>> Invitation to become Linkis committer: 08:44 254KB (script > >>> signature) > >> > >> I hope you can figure out what happened. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Craig > >> > >> > >>> On Jun 8, 2022, at 02:52, sebb wrote: > >>> > >>> AFAICT the new entries in the workbench were all created recently. > >>> > >>> When I wrote, I'm pretty sure that there were no outstanding emails. > >>> Unfortunately I did not keep the data I used. > >>> Maybe there was a delay in sending some of the mails. > >>> > >>> If you have got some examples that you think should have been > >>> displayed, please send me details (privately, or to secretary@) and I > >>> will have a look. > >>> > >>> Sebb > >>> > >>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 21:19, Craig Russell wrote: > > After 30 hour outage, the workbench is back. > > What happened? > > Craig > > > On Jun 7, 2022, at 13:13, Craig Russell wrote: > > > > Maybe we should consider sending secretary workbench over to infra... > > > > Craig > > > >> On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:33, Craig Russell wrote: > >> > >> Sorry for not replying all... > >> > >> There is still nothing in the workbench and more ICLAs have come in > >> since yesterday. > >> > >> I cannot troubleshoot this one... > >> > >> Craig > >> > >> > >>> On Jun 6, 2022, at 16:14, Craig Russell wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Sebb, > >>> > >>> I see these in my inbox to secretary: > >>> > >>> subject/date (PDT)/size > >>> > >>> Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > >>> Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > >>> ICLA 05:56 85KB > >>> Invitation to become Linkis committer: 08:44 254KB > >>> (script signature) > >>> > >>> Have these been handled, or are they missing from others' inboxes? Is > >>> there a mail trail to follow? I can send headers if that will help... > >>> > >>> Craig > >>> > On Jun 6, 2022, at 15:45, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 23:08, Craig Russell > wrote: > > > > while several ICLAs have been received. > > The workbench only displays emails that have attachments and that are > not marked as deleted. > > AFAICT there are no such emails. > > > Craig L Russell > > c...@apache.org > > > >>> > >>> Craig L Russell > >>> c...@apache.org > >>> > >> > >> Craig L Russell > >> c...@apache.org > >> > > > > Craig L Russell > > c...@apache.org > > > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org > > >> > >> Craig L Russell > >> c...@apache.org > >> > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org >
Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do
That would explain it. Case closed. Thanks for analyzing the logs. Craig > On Jun 8, 2022, at 07:13, sebb wrote: > > Infra made a change to a mailbox size limit which caused problems for > the mail system. > > The Whimsy mail.log has lots of messages such as: > > fatal: main.cf configuration error: mailbox_size_limit is smaller > than message_size_limit > > These errors started at Jun 6 02:26:54 and stopped at Jun 7 18:38:26 > > AFAICT this allowed messages to be delivered to Whimsy, but they could > not be forwarded to the mailbox. > > It appears that the mail system did eventually deliver the messages to > the Whimsy process. > > I think this is the cause of the delayed appearance of the mails. > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 14:54, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> Hi Sebb, >> >> I've privately forwarded the four ICLAs mentioned in my previous email. >> These did eventually show up in secretary workbench after more than a day. >> >>> Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB >>> Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) >>> ICLA 05:56 85KB >>> Invitation to become Linkis committer: 08:44 254KB (script >>> signature) >> >> I hope you can figure out what happened. >> >> Thanks, >> Craig >> >> >>> On Jun 8, 2022, at 02:52, sebb wrote: >>> >>> AFAICT the new entries in the workbench were all created recently. >>> >>> When I wrote, I'm pretty sure that there were no outstanding emails. >>> Unfortunately I did not keep the data I used. >>> Maybe there was a delay in sending some of the mails. >>> >>> If you have got some examples that you think should have been >>> displayed, please send me details (privately, or to secretary@) and I >>> will have a look. >>> >>> Sebb >>> >>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 21:19, Craig Russell wrote: After 30 hour outage, the workbench is back. What happened? Craig > On Jun 7, 2022, at 13:13, Craig Russell wrote: > > Maybe we should consider sending secretary workbench over to infra... > > Craig > >> On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:33, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> Sorry for not replying all... >> >> There is still nothing in the workbench and more ICLAs have come in >> since yesterday. >> >> I cannot troubleshoot this one... >> >> Craig >> >> >>> On Jun 6, 2022, at 16:14, Craig Russell wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sebb, >>> >>> I see these in my inbox to secretary: >>> >>> subject/date (PDT)/size >>> >>> Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB >>> Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) >>> ICLA 05:56 85KB >>> Invitation to become Linkis committer: 08:44 254KB >>> (script signature) >>> >>> Have these been handled, or are they missing from others' inboxes? Is >>> there a mail trail to follow? I can send headers if that will help... >>> >>> Craig >>> On Jun 6, 2022, at 15:45, sebb wrote: On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 23:08, Craig Russell wrote: > > while several ICLAs have been received. The workbench only displays emails that have attachments and that are not marked as deleted. AFAICT there are no such emails. > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org > >>> >>> Craig L Russell >>> c...@apache.org >>> >> >> Craig L Russell >> c...@apache.org >> > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org > Craig L Russell c...@apache.org >> >> Craig L Russell >> c...@apache.org >> Craig L Russell c...@apache.org
Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do
Infra made a change to a mailbox size limit which caused problems for the mail system. The Whimsy mail.log has lots of messages such as: fatal: main.cf configuration error: mailbox_size_limit is smaller than message_size_limit These errors started at Jun 6 02:26:54 and stopped at Jun 7 18:38:26 AFAICT this allowed messages to be delivered to Whimsy, but they could not be forwarded to the mailbox. It appears that the mail system did eventually deliver the messages to the Whimsy process. I think this is the cause of the delayed appearance of the mails. On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 14:54, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > I've privately forwarded the four ICLAs mentioned in my previous email. These > did eventually show up in secretary workbench after more than a day. > > > Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > > Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > > ICLA 05:56 85KB > > Invitation to become Linkis committer: 08:44 254KB (script > > signature) > > I hope you can figure out what happened. > > Thanks, > Craig > > > > On Jun 8, 2022, at 02:52, sebb wrote: > > > > AFAICT the new entries in the workbench were all created recently. > > > > When I wrote, I'm pretty sure that there were no outstanding emails. > > Unfortunately I did not keep the data I used. > > Maybe there was a delay in sending some of the mails. > > > > If you have got some examples that you think should have been > > displayed, please send me details (privately, or to secretary@) and I > > will have a look. > > > > Sebb > > > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 21:19, Craig Russell wrote: > >> > >> After 30 hour outage, the workbench is back. > >> > >> What happened? > >> > >> Craig > >> > >>> On Jun 7, 2022, at 13:13, Craig Russell wrote: > >>> > >>> Maybe we should consider sending secretary workbench over to infra... > >>> > >>> Craig > >>> > On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:33, Craig Russell wrote: > > Sorry for not replying all... > > There is still nothing in the workbench and more ICLAs have come in > since yesterday. > > I cannot troubleshoot this one... > > Craig > > > > On Jun 6, 2022, at 16:14, Craig Russell wrote: > > > > Hi Sebb, > > > > I see these in my inbox to secretary: > > > > subject/date (PDT)/size > > > > Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > > Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > > ICLA 05:56 85KB > > Invitation to become Linkis committer: 08:44 254KB > > (script signature) > > > > Have these been handled, or are they missing from others' inboxes? Is > > there a mail trail to follow? I can send headers if that will help... > > > > Craig > > > >> On Jun 6, 2022, at 15:45, sebb wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 23:08, Craig Russell > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> while several ICLAs have been received. > >> > >> The workbench only displays emails that have attachments and that are > >> not marked as deleted. > >> > >> AFAICT there are no such emails. > >> > >>> Craig L Russell > >>> c...@apache.org > >>> > > > > Craig L Russell > > c...@apache.org > > > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org > > >>> > >>> Craig L Russell > >>> c...@apache.org > >>> > >> > >> Craig L Russell > >> c...@apache.org > >> > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org >
Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do
Hi Sebb, I've privately forwarded the four ICLAs mentioned in my previous email. These did eventually show up in secretary workbench after more than a day. > Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > ICLA 05:56 85KB > Invitation to become Linkis committer: 08:44 254KB (script > signature) I hope you can figure out what happened. Thanks, Craig > On Jun 8, 2022, at 02:52, sebb wrote: > > AFAICT the new entries in the workbench were all created recently. > > When I wrote, I'm pretty sure that there were no outstanding emails. > Unfortunately I did not keep the data I used. > Maybe there was a delay in sending some of the mails. > > If you have got some examples that you think should have been > displayed, please send me details (privately, or to secretary@) and I > will have a look. > > Sebb > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 21:19, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> After 30 hour outage, the workbench is back. >> >> What happened? >> >> Craig >> >>> On Jun 7, 2022, at 13:13, Craig Russell wrote: >>> >>> Maybe we should consider sending secretary workbench over to infra... >>> >>> Craig >>> On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:33, Craig Russell wrote: Sorry for not replying all... There is still nothing in the workbench and more ICLAs have come in since yesterday. I cannot troubleshoot this one... Craig > On Jun 6, 2022, at 16:14, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > I see these in my inbox to secretary: > > subject/date (PDT)/size > > Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > ICLA 05:56 85KB > Invitation to become Linkis committer: 08:44 254KB (script > signature) > > Have these been handled, or are they missing from others' inboxes? Is > there a mail trail to follow? I can send headers if that will help... > > Craig > >> On Jun 6, 2022, at 15:45, sebb wrote: >> >> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 23:08, Craig Russell wrote: >>> >>> while several ICLAs have been received. >> >> The workbench only displays emails that have attachments and that are >> not marked as deleted. >> >> AFAICT there are no such emails. >> >>> Craig L Russell >>> c...@apache.org >>> > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org > Craig L Russell c...@apache.org >>> >>> Craig L Russell >>> c...@apache.org >>> >> >> Craig L Russell >> c...@apache.org >> Craig L Russell c...@apache.org
?????? [HELP] How to check the website check
Thanks, I am very appreciate it. ---- ??: "dev" https://linkis.incubator.apache.org If you click the Uri link [1] you will see that almost all other podlings include '.incubator' in their URLs. There is an easy fix to this, just change the published URL in the yml file, i.e. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings/linkis.yml To save time, I have fixed the links in the linkis and kyuubi files. These will take a little while to filter through to the website checker. Sebb [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/check/uri On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 04:38, NewBeacon <1963697...@qq.com.invalid wrote: Dear IPMC: This is from Linkis community. This is our website [1]. I noticed that our website didn't pass the website check here [2]. I don't know how to fix it. The checker prompts me that the URL does not match regular expression: https?://[^.]+\.incubator\.apache\.org. What is the problem? I would appreciate it if someone could tell me. [1]nbsp;https://linkis.apache.org [2] https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/project/linkis
Re: [HELP] How to check the website check
It looks like the code expects the URL to be https://linkis.incubator.apache.org If you click the Uri link [1] you will see that almost all other podlings include '.incubator' in their URLs. There is an easy fix to this, just change the published URL in the yml file, i.e. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings/linkis.yml To save time, I have fixed the links in the linkis and kyuubi files. These will take a little while to filter through to the website checker. Sebb [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/check/uri On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 04:38, NewBeacon <1963697...@qq.com.invalid> wrote: > > Dear IPMC: > > This is from Linkis community. This is our website [1]. > I noticed that our website didn't pass the website check here [2]. I don't > know how to fix it. > > The checker prompts me that the URL does not match regular expression: > https?://[^.]+\.incubator\.apache\.org. What is the problem? > > I would appreciate it if someone could tell me. > > > [1]https://linkis.apache.org > [2] https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/project/linkis
Re: Secretary workbench has nothing to do
AFAICT the new entries in the workbench were all created recently. When I wrote, I'm pretty sure that there were no outstanding emails. Unfortunately I did not keep the data I used. Maybe there was a delay in sending some of the mails. If you have got some examples that you think should have been displayed, please send me details (privately, or to secretary@) and I will have a look. Sebb On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 21:19, Craig Russell wrote: > > After 30 hour outage, the workbench is back. > > What happened? > > Craig > > > On Jun 7, 2022, at 13:13, Craig Russell wrote: > > > > Maybe we should consider sending secretary workbench over to infra... > > > > Craig > > > >> On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:33, Craig Russell wrote: > >> > >> Sorry for not replying all... > >> > >> There is still nothing in the workbench and more ICLAs have come in since > >> yesterday. > >> > >> I cannot troubleshoot this one... > >> > >> Craig > >> > >> > >>> On Jun 6, 2022, at 16:14, Craig Russell wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Sebb, > >>> > >>> I see these in my inbox to secretary: > >>> > >>> subject/date (PDT)/size > >>> > >>> Apache Linkis Committer ICLA 03:29 5.4 MB > >>> Filled example 05:22 98KB (detached signature) > >>> ICLA 05:56 85KB > >>> Invitation to become Linkis committer: 08:44 254KB (script > >>> signature) > >>> > >>> Have these been handled, or are they missing from others' inboxes? Is > >>> there a mail trail to follow? I can send headers if that will help... > >>> > >>> Craig > >>> > On Jun 6, 2022, at 15:45, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 23:08, Craig Russell wrote: > > > > while several ICLAs have been received. > > The workbench only displays emails that have attachments and that are > not marked as deleted. > > AFAICT there are no such emails. > > > Craig L Russell > > c...@apache.org > > > >>> > >>> Craig L Russell > >>> c...@apache.org > >>> > >> > >> Craig L Russell > >> c...@apache.org > >> > > > > Craig L Russell > > c...@apache.org > > > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org >
