Re: TeamCity 5.0 upgrade
Apparently it also needs port 8111 to be able to register with the server... See: http://wicketstuff.org/teamcity/agents.html?unauthorized=true and if you're logged on to the server: /home/wicket/teamcity-5.0/buildAgent/conf /home/wicket/teamcity-5.0/buildAgent/logs/teamcity-agent.log /home/wicket/tomcat/logs/catalina.out On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > Except that teamcity can't connect to the agent... apparently port > 9090 is blocked... > > Martijn > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Johan Compagner wrote: >> maven and postgres are updated. >> >> so everything should start working now >> >> On 14/12/2009, nino martinez wael wrote: >>> It's been a while since I've dabbled with FreeBsd, almost a decade... Would >>> be real nice with the maven upgrade, since all the snapshots unique are >>> giving us problems. And very sad with db problem, is it solved? >>> >>> 2009/12/11 Martijn Dashorst >>> Downgrading the supplied JDBC driver didn't help :/ Martijn On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:58 PM, nino martinez wael > wrote: >> And Martijn will you upgrade Maven aswell? It should be very simple :)) > > Not without root password... and I'm not that versed in freebsd too > (though it is strikingly similar to OS X). > > I've already installed maven 2.2.1, but it is not available in the > right location... > > > The teamcity upgrade failed with a database error... > > ERROR: function pg_try_advisory_lock(bigint) does not exist > > Martijn > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 >>> >> > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4
Re: TeamCity 5.0 upgrade
Except that teamcity can't connect to the agent... apparently port 9090 is blocked... Martijn On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Johan Compagner wrote: > maven and postgres are updated. > > so everything should start working now > > On 14/12/2009, nino martinez wael wrote: >> It's been a while since I've dabbled with FreeBsd, almost a decade... Would >> be real nice with the maven upgrade, since all the snapshots unique are >> giving us problems. And very sad with db problem, is it solved? >> >> 2009/12/11 Martijn Dashorst >> >>> Downgrading the supplied JDBC driver didn't help :/ >>> >>> Martijn >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Martijn Dashorst >>> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:58 PM, nino martinez wael >>> > wrote: >>> >> And Martijn will you upgrade Maven aswell? It should be very simple :)) >>> > >>> > Not without root password... and I'm not that versed in freebsd too >>> > (though it is strikingly similar to OS X). >>> > >>> > I've already installed maven 2.2.1, but it is not available in the >>> > right location... >>> > >>> > >>> > The teamcity upgrade failed with a database error... >>> > >>> > ERROR: function pg_try_advisory_lock(bigint) does not exist >>> > >>> > Martijn >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications >>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 >>> >> > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4
Re: TeamCity 5.0 upgrade
maven and postgres are updated. so everything should start working now On 14/12/2009, nino martinez wael wrote: > It's been a while since I've dabbled with FreeBsd, almost a decade... Would > be real nice with the maven upgrade, since all the snapshots unique are > giving us problems. And very sad with db problem, is it solved? > > 2009/12/11 Martijn Dashorst > >> Downgrading the supplied JDBC driver didn't help :/ >> >> Martijn >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Martijn Dashorst >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:58 PM, nino martinez wael >> > wrote: >> >> And Martijn will you upgrade Maven aswell? It should be very simple :)) >> > >> > Not without root password... and I'm not that versed in freebsd too >> > (though it is strikingly similar to OS X). >> > >> > I've already installed maven 2.2.1, but it is not available in the >> > right location... >> > >> > >> > The teamcity upgrade failed with a database error... >> > >> > ERROR: function pg_try_advisory_lock(bigint) does not exist >> > >> > Martijn >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 >> >
Re: Wicket 1.5?
Okay, will you tell when some of the ajax are working, when you get there? Or if you need a hand I could do something if I have time. 2009/12/14 Matej Knopp : > 1.5 is nowhere near usable, and the new ajax stuff is not even in (nor > will it be any time soon). > > -Matej > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:25 PM, nino martinez wael > wrote: >> Jurgen, this is the one right? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk >> .. >> >> If so, documenttation here are wrong: >> http://wicket.apache.org/building-from-svn.html , it refers to wicket >> 1.4 being trunk >> >> 2009/12/14 nino martinez wael >>> >>> Ok, i'll grab it from trunk then and fiddle around :) >>> >>> 2009/12/14 Juergen Donnerstag imo it's work in progress but of course we are happy the more people start using and testing it. Juergen On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:03 PM, nino martinez wael wrote: > Hi Guys > > How stable are wicket 1.5? Im thinking the JS side of it, is now a good > time > to begin upgrading my wicketstuff components or? > > > regards Nino > >>> >> >
Re: Wicket 1.5?
1.5 is nowhere near usable, and the new ajax stuff is not even in (nor will it be any time soon). -Matej On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:25 PM, nino martinez wael wrote: > Jurgen, this is the one right? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk .. > > If so, documenttation here are wrong: > http://wicket.apache.org/building-from-svn.html , it refers to wicket > 1.4 being trunk > > 2009/12/14 nino martinez wael >> >> Ok, i'll grab it from trunk then and fiddle around :) >> >> 2009/12/14 Juergen Donnerstag >>> >>> imo it's work in progress but of course we are happy the more people >>> start using and testing it. >>> >>> Juergen >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:03 PM, nino martinez wael >>> wrote: >>> > Hi Guys >>> > >>> > How stable are wicket 1.5? Im thinking the JS side of it, is now a good >>> > time >>> > to begin upgrading my wicketstuff components or? >>> > >>> > >>> > regards Nino >>> > >> >
Re: Wicket 1.5?
Jurgen, this is the one right? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk .. If so, documenttation here are wrong: http://wicket.apache.org/building-from-svn.html , it refers to wicket 1.4 being trunk 2009/12/14 nino martinez wael > > Ok, i'll grab it from trunk then and fiddle around :) > > 2009/12/14 Juergen Donnerstag >> >> imo it's work in progress but of course we are happy the more people >> start using and testing it. >> >> Juergen >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:03 PM, nino martinez wael >> wrote: >> > Hi Guys >> > >> > How stable are wicket 1.5? Im thinking the JS side of it, is now a good >> > time >> > to begin upgrading my wicketstuff components or? >> > >> > >> > regards Nino >> > >
Re: Wicket 1.5?
Ok, i'll grab it from trunk then and fiddle around :) 2009/12/14 Juergen Donnerstag > imo it's work in progress but of course we are happy the more people > start using and testing it. > > Juergen > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:03 PM, nino martinez wael > wrote: > > Hi Guys > > > > How stable are wicket 1.5? Im thinking the JS side of it, is now a good > time > > to begin upgrading my wicketstuff components or? > > > > > > regards Nino > > >
Re: Wicket 1.5?
imo it's work in progress but of course we are happy the more people start using and testing it. Juergen On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:03 PM, nino martinez wael wrote: > Hi Guys > > How stable are wicket 1.5? Im thinking the JS side of it, is now a good time > to begin upgrading my wicketstuff components or? > > > regards Nino >
Re: TeamCity 5.0 upgrade
It's been a while since I've dabbled with FreeBsd, almost a decade... Would be real nice with the maven upgrade, since all the snapshots unique are giving us problems. And very sad with db problem, is it solved? 2009/12/11 Martijn Dashorst > Downgrading the supplied JDBC driver didn't help :/ > > Martijn > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Martijn Dashorst > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:58 PM, nino martinez wael > > wrote: > >> And Martijn will you upgrade Maven aswell? It should be very simple :)) > > > > Not without root password... and I'm not that versed in freebsd too > > (though it is strikingly similar to OS X). > > > > I've already installed maven 2.2.1, but it is not available in the > > right location... > > > > > > The teamcity upgrade failed with a database error... > > > > ERROR: function pg_try_advisory_lock(bigint) does not exist > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 >
Wicket 1.5?
Hi Guys How stable are wicket 1.5? Im thinking the JS side of it, is now a good time to begin upgrading my wicketstuff components or? regards Nino
Re: Request for input on new feature idea: wicket:for attribute
Nice! It must be a good idea then :) If you go beyond a simple sibling, the referred component can be anywhere on the page. I know of no reasonable simple way to refer such a component (except through code). Therefor I think it is reasonable to limit this feature to sibling components only. The route through code is always present. Regards, Erik. Jonas wrote: There's already a feature request in jira for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1469 I tried implementing it once, but I run into trouble with component hierarchy. Only allowing labels for sibling components would probably make the implementation a lot easier, but I'm not sure if this a too big limitation to only allow siblings. Consider the situation when the input field and the label are in different table cells, e.g. but you need to append some attributes to the td tags (e.g. for coloring). If I understood correctly what you suggested, this usecase wouldn't be covered. cheers, Jonas -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
