Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Darshana Gunawardana]

Hi VIndula,

Impressive progress so far..!!

As discussed let's have more focus on the the maximizing re-usability
aspects of this test suite. So the test suit will be easy to tryout, easy
to contribute & easy to integrate with test automation frameworks..

Regards,

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As I demonstrated at the demo held today, I have been able to complete a
> milestone of the project as per the timeline. As decided at the meeting, I
> sent a PR[1] to the scim2-compliance-test-suite repo. Please review and
> merge.
>
> As I explained at the meeting, the current implementation[1] covers
> approximately 75% of compliance test suite. A brief overview of the
> implemented tests is as follows.
>
> 1. All tests for /Users Endpoint
> 2. All tests for /Groups Endpoint
> 3. /ServiceproviderConfig Endpoint
> 4. /ResourceType Endpoint
>
> Following are yet to be developed.
>
> 1. /Bulk Endpoint
>
> Since the project can accommodate additional features with the time
> remaining, as Darshana pointed out, I will also be working on the following
> value adding feature as well.
>
> 1. Ability to run custom test cases
>
> Thank you
>
> [1] : https://github.com/wso2-incubator/scim2-compliance-test-suite/pull/1
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 10 July 2017 at 20:27, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>
>> Hi VIndula,
>>
>> You can use https://github.com/wso2-incubator/scim2-compliance-test-suite
>> for your development. Please send a PR with the current code.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Omindu.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Omindu Rathnaweera 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Scheduled the meeting on 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm. Hope you've got the
>>> request.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 Yes I can do a demo on the current implementation. How about the June
 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm ?

 Please find the following details to test the /ServiceProviderConfig
 endpoint.

 1. Start the IS instance locally.
 2. Deploy the scimproxycompliance.war
 3. On the UI, select Compliance Test 2.0 tab
 4. Enter the IS SCIM base url as : https://localhost:9443

 I have tested with mocked IS 5.3.0 instance with SCIM 2.0 support.

 Thank you.

 *Vindula Jayawardana*
 Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
 University of Moratuwa
 mobile : +713462554
 Email : vindul...@gmail.com

 
 
 
 

 *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
 "*


 *-Richard Branson-*



 On 26 June 2017 at 10:42, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:

> Hi Vindula,
>
> Would it possible for you to arrange the demo within the evaluation
> time period (26th - 30th)? Also please share the instructions to try out
> the 'ServiceProviderConfig' test.
>
> Thanks,
> Omindu.
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was able to implement /ServiceProviderConfig endpoint compliance
>> test as an end to end test [1].
>>
>> As discussed I used feign JAX-RS client. I did not directly use
>> Charon core objects [1][2] in REST client due to json encoding and
>> decoding problem as mentioned by Gayan in the previous mail. Hence
>> I implemented separate object object models for this purpose.
>>
>> I am hoping to arrange a demo of the currently implemented test and
>> also it will be better if I can get your opinions on verifying the
>> architecture of the current implementation. Shall we have a quick demo
>> session on Thursday (22nd) ?
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/Vindulamj/SCIM-2.0-Complience-Test-Suite
>> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
>> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
>> [3] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
>> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>> University of Moratuwa
>> mobile : +713462554
>> 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Vindula Jayawardana]

Hi,

As I demonstrated at the demo held today, I have been able to complete a
milestone of the project as per the timeline. As decided at the meeting, I
sent a PR[1] to the scim2-compliance-test-suite repo. Please review and
merge.

As I explained at the meeting, the current implementation[1] covers
approximately 75% of compliance test suite. A brief overview of the
implemented tests is as follows.

1. All tests for /Users Endpoint
2. All tests for /Groups Endpoint
3. /ServiceproviderConfig Endpoint
4. /ResourceType Endpoint

Following are yet to be developed.

1. /Bulk Endpoint

Since the project can accommodate additional features with the time
remaining, as Darshana pointed out, I will also be working on the following
value adding feature as well.

1. Ability to run custom test cases

Thank you

[1] : https://github.com/wso2-incubator/scim2-compliance-test-suite/pull/1

*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com






*“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*


*-Richard Branson-*



On 10 July 2017 at 20:27, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:

> Hi VIndula,
>
> You can use https://github.com/wso2-incubator/scim2-compliance-test-suite
> for your development. Please send a PR with the current code.
>
> Regards,
> Omindu.
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Omindu Rathnaweera 
> wrote:
>
>> Scheduled the meeting on 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm. Hope you've got the
>> request.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Yes I can do a demo on the current implementation. How about the June
>>> 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm ?
>>>
>>> Please find the following details to test the /ServiceProviderConfig
>>> endpoint.
>>>
>>> 1. Start the IS instance locally.
>>> 2. Deploy the scimproxycompliance.war
>>> 3. On the UI, select Compliance Test 2.0 tab
>>> 4. Enter the IS SCIM base url as : https://localhost:9443
>>>
>>> I have tested with mocked IS 5.3.0 instance with SCIM 2.0 support.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>>> University of Moratuwa
>>> mobile : +713462554
>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
>>> "*
>>>
>>>
>>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 June 2017 at 10:42, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vindula,

 Would it possible for you to arrange the demo within the evaluation
 time period (26th - 30th)? Also please share the instructions to try out
 the 'ServiceProviderConfig' test.

 Thanks,
 Omindu.

 On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
 vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was able to implement /ServiceProviderConfig endpoint compliance
> test as an end to end test [1].
>
> As discussed I used feign JAX-RS client. I did not directly use
> Charon core objects [1][2] in REST client due to json encoding and
> decoding problem as mentioned by Gayan in the previous mail. Hence
> I implemented separate object object models for this purpose.
>
> I am hoping to arrange a demo of the currently implemented test and
> also it will be better if I can get your opinions on verifying the
> architecture of the current implementation. Shall we have a quick demo
> session on Thursday (22nd) ?
>
> [1] https://github.com/Vindulamj/SCIM-2.0-Complience-Test-Suite
> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
> [3] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java
>
> Thank you.
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to
> impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 11 June 2017 at 19:02, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vindula,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Omindu Rathnaweera]

Hi VIndula,

You can use https://github.com/wso2-incubator/scim2-compliance-test-suite
for your development. Please send a PR with the current code.

Regards,
Omindu.

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Omindu Rathnaweera 
wrote:

> Scheduled the meeting on 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm. Hope you've got the
> request.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes I can do a demo on the current implementation. How about the June
>> 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm ?
>>
>> Please find the following details to test the /ServiceProviderConfig
>> endpoint.
>>
>> 1. Start the IS instance locally.
>> 2. Deploy the scimproxycompliance.war
>> 3. On the UI, select Compliance Test 2.0 tab
>> 4. Enter the IS SCIM base url as : https://localhost:9443
>>
>> I have tested with mocked IS 5.3.0 instance with SCIM 2.0 support.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>> University of Moratuwa
>> mobile : +713462554
>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>>
>>
>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26 June 2017 at 10:42, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vindula,
>>>
>>> Would it possible for you to arrange the demo within the evaluation time
>>> period (26th - 30th)? Also please share the instructions to try out the '
>>> ServiceProviderConfig' test.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Omindu.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 I was able to implement /ServiceProviderConfig endpoint compliance test
 as an end to end test [1].

 As discussed I used feign JAX-RS client. I did not directly use Charon
 core objects [1][2] in REST client due to json encoding and decoding
 problem as mentioned by Gayan in the previous mail. Hence I implemented
 separate object object models for this purpose.

 I am hoping to arrange a demo of the currently implemented test and
 also it will be better if I can get your opinions on verifying the
 architecture of the current implementation. Shall we have a quick demo
 session on Thursday (22nd) ?

 [1] https://github.com/Vindulamj/SCIM-2.0-Complience-Test-Suite
 [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
 n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
 [3] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
 n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java

 Thank you.

 *Vindula Jayawardana*
 Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
 University of Moratuwa
 mobile : +713462554
 Email : vindul...@gmail.com

 
 
 
 

 *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
 "*


 *-Richard Branson-*



 On 11 June 2017 at 19:02, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:

> Hi Vindula,
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kindly find the weekly update below.
>>
>> Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp
>> component proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked
>> in to implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the 
>> scimcore
>> component, as we discussed in the previous mails, I used the Charon code
>> (which relates to scheme specifications only) as a base code.
>>
> You suppose to use feign JAX-RS client right ? Can you directly use
> charon core objects [1][2] in REST client or did you implement your own
> object model ? I guess you may find json encoding and decoding problem 
> with
> charon core standard objects.
>
> [1] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-co
> re/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-co
> re/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java
>
>>
>> In this week, I am planning on look into the scimcore component more
>> with adhering to schema specification. Also I did not mock the SCIM 1.1
>> /Schemas endpoint in IS yet since it is not that urgent at the moment (it
>> is helpful in understanding the protocol specification). Hence I will 
>> look
>> into mock that as well since now I can work with protocol 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Vindula Jayawardana]

Hi,

Yes I can do a demo on the current implementation. How about the June 28th
Wednesday at 3.00 pm ?

Please find the following details to test the /ServiceProviderConfig
endpoint.

1. Start the IS instance locally.
2. Deploy the scimproxycompliance.war
3. On the UI, select Compliance Test 2.0 tab
4. Enter the IS SCIM base url as : https://localhost:9443

I have tested with mocked IS 5.3.0 instance with SCIM 2.0 support.

Thank you.

*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com






*“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*


*-Richard Branson-*



On 26 June 2017 at 10:42, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:

> Hi Vindula,
>
> Would it possible for you to arrange the demo within the evaluation time
> period (26th - 30th)? Also please share the instructions to try out the '
> ServiceProviderConfig' test.
>
> Thanks,
> Omindu.
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was able to implement /ServiceProviderConfig endpoint compliance test
>> as an end to end test [1].
>>
>> As discussed I used feign JAX-RS client. I did not directly use Charon
>> core objects [1][2] in REST client due to json encoding and decoding
>> problem as mentioned by Gayan in the previous mail. Hence I implemented
>> separate object object models for this purpose.
>>
>> I am hoping to arrange a demo of the currently implemented test and also
>> it will be better if I can get your opinions on verifying the
>> architecture of the current implementation. Shall we have a quick demo
>> session on Thursday (22nd) ?
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/Vindulamj/SCIM-2.0-Complience-Test-Suite
>> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
>> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
>> [3] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
>> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>> University of Moratuwa
>> mobile : +713462554
>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>>
>>
>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 June 2017 at 19:02, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vindula,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 Kindly find the weekly update below.

 Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp component
 proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked in to
 implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the scimcore
 component, as we discussed in the previous mails, I used the Charon code
 (which relates to scheme specifications only) as a base code.

>>> You suppose to use feign JAX-RS client right ? Can you directly use
>>> charon core objects [1][2] in REST client or did you implement your own
>>> object model ? I guess you may find json encoding and decoding problem with
>>> charon core standard objects.
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-co
>>> re/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
>>> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-co
>>> re/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java
>>>

 In this week, I am planning on look into the scimcore component more
 with adhering to schema specification. Also I did not mock the SCIM 1.1
 /Schemas endpoint in IS yet since it is not that urgent at the moment (it
 is helpful in understanding the protocol specification). Hence I will look
 into mock that as well since now I can work with protocol specification as
 well.

>>> Could you able to run SCIM 1.1 compliance test if you mock /Schemas
>>> endpoint ? This task also important to get an understanding about
>>> compliance test.
>>>

 Thank you.

 *Vindula Jayawardana*
 Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
 University of Moratuwa
 mobile : +713462554
 Email : vindul...@gmail.com

 
 
 
 

 *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
 "*


 *-Richard Branson-*

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Omindu Rathnaweera]

Scheduled the meeting on 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm. Hope you've got the
request.

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes I can do a demo on the current implementation. How about the June
> 28th Wednesday at 3.00 pm ?
>
> Please find the following details to test the /ServiceProviderConfig
> endpoint.
>
> 1. Start the IS instance locally.
> 2. Deploy the scimproxycompliance.war
> 3. On the UI, select Compliance Test 2.0 tab
> 4. Enter the IS SCIM base url as : https://localhost:9443
>
> I have tested with mocked IS 5.3.0 instance with SCIM 2.0 support.
>
> Thank you.
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 26 June 2017 at 10:42, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vindula,
>>
>> Would it possible for you to arrange the demo within the evaluation time
>> period (26th - 30th)? Also please share the instructions to try out the '
>> ServiceProviderConfig' test.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Omindu.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was able to implement /ServiceProviderConfig endpoint compliance test
>>> as an end to end test [1].
>>>
>>> As discussed I used feign JAX-RS client. I did not directly use Charon
>>> core objects [1][2] in REST client due to json encoding and decoding
>>> problem as mentioned by Gayan in the previous mail. Hence I implemented
>>> separate object object models for this purpose.
>>>
>>> I am hoping to arrange a demo of the currently implemented test and also
>>> it will be better if I can get your opinions on verifying the
>>> architecture of the current implementation. Shall we have a quick demo
>>> session on Thursday (22nd) ?
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/Vindulamj/SCIM-2.0-Complience-Test-Suite
>>> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
>>> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
>>> [3] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
>>> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>>> University of Moratuwa
>>> mobile : +713462554
>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
>>> "*
>>>
>>>
>>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 June 2017 at 19:02, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vindula,

 On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
 vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Kindly find the weekly update below.
>
> Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp component
> proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked in to
> implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the scimcore
> component, as we discussed in the previous mails, I used the Charon code
> (which relates to scheme specifications only) as a base code.
>
 You suppose to use feign JAX-RS client right ? Can you directly use
 charon core objects [1][2] in REST client or did you implement your own
 object model ? I guess you may find json encoding and decoding problem with
 charon core standard objects.

 [1] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-co
 re/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
 [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-co
 re/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java

>
> In this week, I am planning on look into the scimcore component more
> with adhering to schema specification. Also I did not mock the SCIM 1.1
> /Schemas endpoint in IS yet since it is not that urgent at the moment (it
> is helpful in understanding the protocol specification). Hence I will look
> into mock that as well since now I can work with protocol specification as
> well.
>
 Could you able to run SCIM 1.1 compliance test if you mock /Schemas
 endpoint ? This task also important to get an understanding about
 compliance test.

>
> Thank you.
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Omindu Rathnaweera]

Hi Vindula,

Would it possible for you to arrange the demo within the evaluation time
period (26th - 30th)? Also please share the instructions to try out the '
ServiceProviderConfig' test.

Thanks,
Omindu.

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was able to implement /ServiceProviderConfig endpoint compliance test as
> an end to end test [1].
>
> As discussed I used feign JAX-RS client. I did not directly use Charon
> core objects [1][2] in REST client due to json encoding and decoding
> problem as mentioned by Gayan in the previous mail. Hence I implemented
> separate object object models for this purpose.
>
> I am hoping to arrange a demo of the currently implemented test and also
> it will be better if I can get your opinions on verifying the
> architecture of the current implementation. Shall we have a quick demo
> session on Thursday (22nd) ?
>
> [1] https://github.com/Vindulamj/SCIM-2.0-Complience-Test-Suite
> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
> [3] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charo
> n-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java
>
> Thank you.
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 11 June 2017 at 19:02, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vindula,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Kindly find the weekly update below.
>>>
>>> Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp component
>>> proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked in to
>>> implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the scimcore
>>> component, as we discussed in the previous mails, I used the Charon code
>>> (which relates to scheme specifications only) as a base code.
>>>
>> You suppose to use feign JAX-RS client right ? Can you directly use
>> charon core objects [1][2] in REST client or did you implement your own
>> object model ? I guess you may find json encoding and decoding problem with
>> charon core standard objects.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-
>> core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
>> [2] https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-
>> core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java
>>
>>>
>>> In this week, I am planning on look into the scimcore component more
>>> with adhering to schema specification. Also I did not mock the SCIM 1.1
>>> /Schemas endpoint in IS yet since it is not that urgent at the moment (it
>>> is helpful in understanding the protocol specification). Hence I will look
>>> into mock that as well since now I can work with protocol specification as
>>> well.
>>>
>> Could you able to run SCIM 1.1 compliance test if you mock /Schemas
>> endpoint ? This task also important to get an understanding about
>> compliance test.
>>
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>>> University of Moratuwa
>>> mobile : +713462554
>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
>>> "*
>>>
>>>
>>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29 May 2017 at 10:50, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:
>>>


 On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Vindula Jayawardana <
 vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 test
> suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following
> possibilities.
>
 +1

>
> 1. Apart from the specification specific implementation aspects, a
> significant amount of code reuse can be done from the current code base.
> However as per the SCIM mailing list [1] some concerns were raised
> regarding the current structure of the implementation.
> 2. For the proposed scim core component, we can make use of the Charon
> [2] code base as a start.
>
> As Identity Server currently supports SCIM 2.0 in the C5 architecture
> only, I have added a PR [3] and a jira [4] to make it available for C4
> architecture as well. Greatly appreciate if you can review it and merge.
>
 We will review 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Gayan Gunawardana]

Hi Vindula,

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Kindly find the weekly update below.
>
> Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp component
> proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked in to
> implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the scimcore
> component, as we discussed in the previous mails, I used the Charon code
> (which relates to scheme specifications only) as a base code.
>
You suppose to use feign JAX-RS client right ? Can you directly use charon
core objects [1][2] in REST client or did you implement your own object
model ? I guess you may find json encoding and decoding problem with charon
core standard objects.

[1]
https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/User.java
[2]
https://github.com/wso2/charon/blob/master/modules/charon-core/src/main/java/org/wso2/charon3/core/objects/Group.java

>
> In this week, I am planning on look into the scimcore component more with
> adhering to schema specification. Also I did not mock the SCIM 1.1 /Schemas
> endpoint in IS yet since it is not that urgent at the moment (it is helpful
> in understanding the protocol specification). Hence I will look into mock
> that as well since now I can work with protocol specification as well.
>
Could you able to run SCIM 1.1 compliance test if you mock /Schemas
endpoint ? This task also important to get an understanding about
compliance test.

>
> Thank you.
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 29 May 2017 at 10:50, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 test
>>> suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following
>>> possibilities.
>>>
>> +1
>>
>>>
>>> 1. Apart from the specification specific implementation aspects, a
>>> significant amount of code reuse can be done from the current code base.
>>> However as per the SCIM mailing list [1] some concerns were raised
>>> regarding the current structure of the implementation.
>>> 2. For the proposed scim core component, we can make use of the Charon
>>> [2] code base as a start.
>>>
>>> As Identity Server currently supports SCIM 2.0 in the C5 architecture
>>> only, I have added a PR [3] and a jira [4] to make it available for C4
>>> architecture as well. Greatly appreciate if you can review it and merge.
>>>
>> We will review [3],[4] btw can you continue the work with IS 6.0.0 in C5
>> ? I guess for compliance test it won't make much difference.
>>
>>>
>>> I am currently working in the webapp of the component architecture
>>> proposed and hoping to start implementing the scimcore component in the
>>> coming week. Apart from that, will look into mocking the /Schemas endpoint
>>> in the SCIM 1.1 implementation of Identity Server to get a better
>>> understanding on how the SCIM 1.1 test suite works with IS.
>>>
>> Great progress Vindula keep it up.
>>
>>>
>>> [1] - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/JYFpusDrtQ94hnghv
>>> EPjczU4laE
>>> [2] - https://github.com/wso2/charon
>>> [3] - https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provis
>>> ioning-scim2/pull/16
>>> [4] - https://wso2.org/jira/projects/IDENTITY/issues/IDENTITY-5942
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>>> University of Moratuwa
>>> mobile : +713462554
>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
>>> "*
>>>
>>>
>>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2 April 2017 at 18:29, Vindula Jayawardana 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Omindu,

 Thank you for the prompt feedback on the draft proposal. I incorporated
 the suggestions you made on the proposal.

 As also mentioned in the proposal, I made the configuration options
 more flexible by giving the manual configuration feasibility to the tester
 as an optional feature apart from what is mandatory in the project. I hope
 that would give us the required flexibility in the SCIM 2.0 compliance test
 suite in terms of configuration options.

 Thank you,

 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Vindula Jayawardana]

Hi,

Kindly find the weekly update below.

Within the week time span, I have been working on the webapp component
proposed in the system architecture. In parallel, I also looked in to
implementing scimcore component as well. In implementing the scimcore
component, as we discussed in the previous mails, I used the Charon code
(which relates to scheme specifications only) as a base code.

In this week, I am planning on look into the scimcore component more with
adhering to schema specification. Also I did not mock the SCIM 1.1 /Schemas
endpoint in IS yet since it is not that urgent at the moment (it is helpful
in understanding the protocol specification). Hence I will look into mock
that as well since now I can work with protocol specification as well.

Thank you.

*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com






*“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*


*-Richard Branson-*



On 29 May 2017 at 10:50, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Vindula Jayawardana <
> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 test
>> suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following
>> possibilities.
>>
> +1
>
>>
>> 1. Apart from the specification specific implementation aspects, a
>> significant amount of code reuse can be done from the current code base.
>> However as per the SCIM mailing list [1] some concerns were raised
>> regarding the current structure of the implementation.
>> 2. For the proposed scim core component, we can make use of the Charon
>> [2] code base as a start.
>>
>> As Identity Server currently supports SCIM 2.0 in the C5 architecture
>> only, I have added a PR [3] and a jira [4] to make it available for C4
>> architecture as well. Greatly appreciate if you can review it and merge.
>>
> We will review [3],[4] btw can you continue the work with IS 6.0.0 in C5 ?
> I guess for compliance test it won't make much difference.
>
>>
>> I am currently working in the webapp of the component architecture
>> proposed and hoping to start implementing the scimcore component in the
>> coming week. Apart from that, will look into mocking the /Schemas endpoint
>> in the SCIM 1.1 implementation of Identity Server to get a better
>> understanding on how the SCIM 1.1 test suite works with IS.
>>
> Great progress Vindula keep it up.
>
>>
>> [1] - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/JYFpusDrtQ94hnghv
>> EPjczU4laE
>> [2] - https://github.com/wso2/charon
>> [3] - https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provis
>> ioning-scim2/pull/16
>> [4] - https://wso2.org/jira/projects/IDENTITY/issues/IDENTITY-5942
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>> University of Moratuwa
>> mobile : +713462554
>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>>
>>
>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2 April 2017 at 18:29, Vindula Jayawardana 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Omindu,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the prompt feedback on the draft proposal. I incorporated
>>> the suggestions you made on the proposal.
>>>
>>> As also mentioned in the proposal, I made the configuration options
>>> more flexible by giving the manual configuration feasibility to the tester
>>> as an optional feature apart from what is mandatory in the project. I hope
>>> that would give us the required flexibility in the SCIM 2.0 compliance test
>>> suite in terms of configuration options.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>>> University of Moratuwa
>>> mobile : +713462554
>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
>>> "*
>>>
>>>
>>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2 April 2017 at 17:08, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>>>
 Will have a look Vindula.

 Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The intention
 behind it was to get a general idea on what to include in the 2.0 test
 suite and the areas to be improved. What you have obtained should be enough
 to understand the nature of the tests and basics 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Gayan Gunawardana]

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 test
> suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following
> possibilities.
>
+1

>
> 1. Apart from the specification specific implementation aspects, a
> significant amount of code reuse can be done from the current code base.
> However as per the SCIM mailing list [1] some concerns were raised
> regarding the current structure of the implementation.
> 2. For the proposed scim core component, we can make use of the Charon [2]
> code base as a start.
>
> As Identity Server currently supports SCIM 2.0 in the C5 architecture
> only, I have added a PR [3] and a jira [4] to make it available for C4
> architecture as well. Greatly appreciate if you can review it and merge.
>
We will review [3],[4] btw can you continue the work with IS 6.0.0 in C5 ?
I guess for compliance test it won't make much difference.

>
> I am currently working in the webapp of the component architecture
> proposed and hoping to start implementing the scimcore component in the
> coming week. Apart from that, will look into mocking the /Schemas endpoint
> in the SCIM 1.1 implementation of Identity Server to get a better
> understanding on how the SCIM 1.1 test suite works with IS.
>
Great progress Vindula keep it up.

>
> [1] - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/
> JYFpusDrtQ94hnghvEPjczU4laE
> [2] - https://github.com/wso2/charon
> [3] - https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-
> provisioning-scim2/pull/16
> [4] - https://wso2.org/jira/projects/IDENTITY/issues/IDENTITY-5942
>
> Thank you
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 2 April 2017 at 18:29, Vindula Jayawardana 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Omindu,
>>
>> Thank you for the prompt feedback on the draft proposal. I incorporated
>> the suggestions you made on the proposal.
>>
>> As also mentioned in the proposal, I made the configuration options more
>> flexible by giving the manual configuration feasibility to the tester as an
>> optional feature apart from what is mandatory in the project. I hope that
>> would give us the required flexibility in the SCIM 2.0 compliance test
>> suite in terms of configuration options.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>> University of Moratuwa
>> mobile : +713462554
>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>>
>>
>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2 April 2017 at 17:08, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>>
>>> Will have a look Vindula.
>>>
>>> Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The intention
>>> behind it was to get a general idea on what to include in the 2.0 test
>>> suite and the areas to be improved. What you have obtained should be enough
>>> to understand the nature of the tests and basics information to be
>>> captured. I agree on the fact that the configuration options should be more
>>> flexible. Let's capture this in the project proposal if you haven't already.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Omindu.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly request your
 feedback in improving the proposal.

 Thank you,

 *Vindula Jayawardana*
 Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
 University of Moratuwa
 mobile : +713462554
 Email : vindul...@gmail.com

 
 
 
 

 *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
 "*


 *-Richard Branson-*



 On 30 March 2017 at 23:13, Vindula Jayawardana <
 vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite
> [1]. Due to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet
> facing SCIM 1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity
> Server instance in AWS [2]. However when the 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Vindula Jayawardana]

Hi,

I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 test
suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following
possibilities.

1. Apart from the specification specific implementation aspects, a
significant amount of code reuse can be done from the current code base.
However as per the SCIM mailing list [1] some concerns were raised
regarding the current structure of the implementation.
2. For the proposed scim core component, we can make use of the Charon [2]
code base as a start.

As Identity Server currently supports SCIM 2.0 in the C5 architecture only,
I have added a PR [3] and a jira [4] to make it available for C4
architecture as well. Greatly appreciate if you can review it and merge.

I am currently working in the webapp of the component architecture proposed
and hoping to start implementing the scimcore component in the coming week.
Apart from that, will look into mocking the /Schemas endpoint in the SCIM
1.1 implementation of Identity Server to get a better understanding on how
the SCIM 1.1 test suite works with IS.

[1] - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/JYFpusDrtQ94hnghvEPjczU4laE
[2] - https://github.com/wso2/charon
[3] -
https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim2/pull/16
[4] - https://wso2.org/jira/projects/IDENTITY/issues/IDENTITY-5942

Thank you

*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com






*“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*


*-Richard Branson-*



On 2 April 2017 at 18:29, Vindula Jayawardana 
wrote:

> Hi Omindu,
>
> Thank you for the prompt feedback on the draft proposal. I incorporated
> the suggestions you made on the proposal.
>
> As also mentioned in the proposal, I made the configuration options more
> flexible by giving the manual configuration feasibility to the tester as an
> optional feature apart from what is mandatory in the project. I hope that
> would give us the required flexibility in the SCIM 2.0 compliance test
> suite in terms of configuration options.
>
> Thank you,
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 2 April 2017 at 17:08, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>
>> Will have a look Vindula.
>>
>> Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The intention
>> behind it was to get a general idea on what to include in the 2.0 test
>> suite and the areas to be improved. What you have obtained should be enough
>> to understand the nature of the tests and basics information to be
>> captured. I agree on the fact that the configuration options should be more
>> flexible. Let's capture this in the project proposal if you haven't already.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Omindu.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly request your
>>> feedback in improving the proposal.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>>> University of Moratuwa
>>> mobile : +713462554
>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
>>> "*
>>>
>>>
>>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 March 2017 at 23:13, Vindula Jayawardana >> > wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite
 [1]. Due to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet
 facing SCIM 1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity
 Server instance in AWS [2]. However when the test are run, it fails due to
 /ServiceProviderConfigs and /Schemas endpoints. As WSO2 SCIM 1.1 support
 [3] is not covering the mentioned two endpoints, tests are
 failing when run.

 However in order to get an idea on how the result representation had
 been done in SCIM 1.1 compliance test suit, I mocked the
 /ServiceProviderConfigs endpoint [4] and was able to get the
 following output.


 ​

 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Vindula Jayawardana]

Hi Omindu,

Thank you for the prompt feedback on the draft proposal. I incorporated the
suggestions you made on the proposal.

As also mentioned in the proposal, I made the configuration options more
flexible by giving the manual configuration feasibility to the tester as an
optional feature apart from what is mandatory in the project. I hope that
would give us the required flexibility in the SCIM 2.0 compliance test
suite in terms of configuration options.

Thank you,

*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com






*“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*


*-Richard Branson-*



On 2 April 2017 at 17:08, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:

> Will have a look Vindula.
>
> Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The intention behind
> it was to get a general idea on what to include in the 2.0 test suite and
> the areas to be improved. What you have obtained should be enough to
> understand the nature of the tests and basics information to be captured. I
> agree on the fact that the configuration options should be more flexible.
> Let's capture this in the project proposal if you haven't already.
>
> Regards,
> Omindu.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly request your
>> feedback in improving the proposal.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>> University of Moratuwa
>> mobile : +713462554
>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>>
>>
>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30 March 2017 at 23:13, Vindula Jayawardana 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite [1].
>>> Due to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet facing
>>> SCIM 1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity Server
>>> instance in AWS [2]. However when the test are run, it fails due to
>>> /ServiceProviderConfigs and /Schemas endpoints. As WSO2 SCIM 1.1 support
>>> [3] is not covering the mentioned two endpoints, tests are failing when
>>> run.
>>>
>>> However in order to get an idea on how the result representation had
>>> been done in SCIM 1.1 compliance test suit, I mocked the
>>> /ServiceProviderConfigs endpoint [4] and was able to get the
>>> following output.
>>>
>>>
>>> ​
>>>
>>> Due to the complexity of mocking the /Schemas endpoint and also as the
>>> test on one endpoint ( /ServiceProviderConfigs) could give the nature
>>> of the result representation as seen above, I did not try to mock /Schemas
>>> endpoint and run the test suit again. However I tried by mocking the
>>> endpoint with 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5] as the output, but that was not
>>> accepted by the test suit as a valid return object.
>>>
>>> However, in my opinion, the SCIM test suit should be flexible in nature
>>> to skip any test which was given the input from the SCIM server as 501 NOT
>>> IMPLEMENTED [5]. I encourage such kind of implementation to be adopted in
>>> the proposed SCIM 2.0 compliance test suit as in that way the test suit
>>> acknowledges the SP's inability to provide those endpoints while making
>>> sure such kind of inability does not compromise the ability to run the test
>>> suit on other endpoints.
>>>
>>> [1] - http://www.simplecloud.info/#complianceTest
>>> [2] - https://aws.amazon.com/
>>> [3] - https://github.com/wso2/charon/tree/release-2.0.7
>>> [4] - https://github.com/Vindulamj/mocked-identity-inbound-provi
>>> sioning-scim/tree/master/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim-master
>>> [5] - http://www.simplecloud.info/specs/draft-scim-api-01.html#anchor6
>>>
>>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>>> University of Moratuwa
>>> mobile : +713462554
>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
>>> "*
>>>
>>>
>>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 March 2017 at 16:42, Vindula Jayawardana >> > wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into the points
 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Omindu Rathnaweera]

Will have a look Vindula.

Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The intention behind
it was to get a general idea on what to include in the 2.0 test suite and
the areas to be improved. What you have obtained should be enough to
understand the nature of the tests and basics information to be captured. I
agree on the fact that the configuration options should be more flexible.
Let's capture this in the project proposal if you haven't already.

Regards,
Omindu.





On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly request your
> feedback in improving the proposal.
>
> Thank you,
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 30 March 2017 at 23:13, Vindula Jayawardana 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite [1].
>> Due to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet facing
>> SCIM 1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity Server
>> instance in AWS [2]. However when the test are run, it fails due to
>> /ServiceProviderConfigs and /Schemas endpoints. As WSO2 SCIM 1.1 support
>> [3] is not covering the mentioned two endpoints, tests are failing when
>> run.
>>
>> However in order to get an idea on how the result representation had been
>> done in SCIM 1.1 compliance test suit, I mocked the /ServiceProviderConfigs
>> endpoint [4] and was able to get the following output.
>>
>>
>> ​
>>
>> Due to the complexity of mocking the /Schemas endpoint and also as the
>> test on one endpoint ( /ServiceProviderConfigs) could give the nature of
>> the result representation as seen above, I did not try to mock /Schemas
>> endpoint and run the test suit again. However I tried by mocking the
>> endpoint with 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5] as the output, but that was not
>> accepted by the test suit as a valid return object.
>>
>> However, in my opinion, the SCIM test suit should be flexible in nature
>> to skip any test which was given the input from the SCIM server as 501 NOT
>> IMPLEMENTED [5]. I encourage such kind of implementation to be adopted in
>> the proposed SCIM 2.0 compliance test suit as in that way the test suit
>> acknowledges the SP's inability to provide those endpoints while making
>> sure such kind of inability does not compromise the ability to run the test
>> suit on other endpoints.
>>
>> [1] - http://www.simplecloud.info/#complianceTest
>> [2] - https://aws.amazon.com/
>> [3] - https://github.com/wso2/charon/tree/release-2.0.7
>> [4] - https://github.com/Vindulamj/mocked-identity-inbound-
>> provisioning-scim/tree/master/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim-master
>> [5] - http://www.simplecloud.info/specs/draft-scim-api-01.html#anchor6
>>
>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>> University of Moratuwa
>> mobile : +713462554
>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>>
>>
>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10 March 2017 at 16:42, Vindula Jayawardana 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into the points
>>> you have mentioned and will keep you updated here.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>>> University of Moratuwa
>>> mobile : +713462554
>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
>>> "*
>>>
>>>
>>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9 March 2017 at 21:22, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vindula,

 If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the generated output,
 that will be a good point to start. However we'll need to host an IS
 instance publicly to run the tests on it.

 Regards,
 Omindu.



 On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana 
 wrote:

> Hi Vindula,
>
> Thanks for your interest in this project.
> Since you have good 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Vindula Jayawardana]

Hi,

I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly request your
feedback in improving the proposal.

Thank you,

*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com






*“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*


*-Richard Branson-*



On 30 March 2017 at 23:13, Vindula Jayawardana 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite [1].
> Due to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet facing
> SCIM 1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity Server
> instance in AWS [2]. However when the test are run, it fails due to
> /ServiceProviderConfigs and /Schemas endpoints. As WSO2 SCIM 1.1 support
> [3] is not covering the mentioned two endpoints, tests are failing when
> run.
>
> However in order to get an idea on how the result representation had been
> done in SCIM 1.1 compliance test suit, I mocked the /ServiceProviderConfigs
> endpoint [4] and was able to get the following output.
>
>
> ​
>
> Due to the complexity of mocking the /Schemas endpoint and also as the
> test on one endpoint ( /ServiceProviderConfigs) could give the nature of
> the result representation as seen above, I did not try to mock /Schemas
> endpoint and run the test suit again. However I tried by mocking the
> endpoint with 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5] as the output, but that was not
> accepted by the test suit as a valid return object.
>
> However, in my opinion, the SCIM test suit should be flexible in nature to
> skip any test which was given the input from the SCIM server as 501 NOT
> IMPLEMENTED [5]. I encourage such kind of implementation to be adopted in
> the proposed SCIM 2.0 compliance test suit as in that way the test suit
> acknowledges the SP's inability to provide those endpoints while making
> sure such kind of inability does not compromise the ability to run the test
> suit on other endpoints.
>
> [1] - http://www.simplecloud.info/#complianceTest
> [2] - https://aws.amazon.com/
> [3] - https://github.com/wso2/charon/tree/release-2.0.7
> [4] - https://github.com/Vindulamj/mocked-identity-
> inbound-provisioning-scim/tree/master/identity-inbound-
> provisioning-scim-master
> [5] - http://www.simplecloud.info/specs/draft-scim-api-01.html#anchor6
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 10 March 2017 at 16:42, Vindula Jayawardana 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into the points
>> you have mentioned and will keep you updated here.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>> University of Moratuwa
>> mobile : +713462554
>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>>
>>
>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9 March 2017 at 21:22, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vindula,
>>>
>>> If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the generated output,
>>> that will be a good point to start. However we'll need to host an IS
>>> instance publicly to run the tests on it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Omindu.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vindula,

 Thanks for your interest in this project.
 Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, could you
 please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source code [1]. SCIM 2.0
 compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just get an idea from
 SCIM 1.1 compliance test. Further you can extract test scenarios from [2]
 as well.

 [1]https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info
 
 [2]https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provi
 sioning-scim2/tree/master/tests

 Thanks,
 Gayan

 On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
 vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Vindula Jayawardana]

Hi,

As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite [1]. Due
to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet facing SCIM
1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity Server instance
in AWS [2]. However when the test are run, it fails due to
/ServiceProviderConfigs and /Schemas endpoints. As WSO2 SCIM 1.1 support [3] is
not covering the mentioned two endpoints, tests are failing when run.

However in order to get an idea on how the result representation had been
done in SCIM 1.1 compliance test suit, I mocked the /ServiceProviderConfigs
endpoint [4] and was able to get the following output.


​

Due to the complexity of mocking the /Schemas endpoint and also as the test
on one endpoint ( /ServiceProviderConfigs) could give the nature of the
result representation as seen above, I did not try to mock /Schemas
endpoint and run the test suit again. However I tried by mocking the
endpoint with 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5] as the output, but that was not
accepted by the test suit as a valid return object.

However, in my opinion, the SCIM test suit should be flexible in nature to
skip any test which was given the input from the SCIM server as 501 NOT
IMPLEMENTED [5]. I encourage such kind of implementation to be adopted in
the proposed SCIM 2.0 compliance test suit as in that way the test suit
acknowledges the SP's inability to provide those endpoints while making
sure such kind of inability does not compromise the ability to run the test
suit on other endpoints.

[1] - http://www.simplecloud.info/#complianceTest
[2] - https://aws.amazon.com/
[3] - https://github.com/wso2/charon/tree/release-2.0.7
[4] -
https://github.com/Vindulamj/mocked-identity-inbound-provisioning-scim/tree/master/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim-master
[5] - http://www.simplecloud.info/specs/draft-scim-api-01.html#anchor6

*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com






*“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*


*-Richard Branson-*



On 10 March 2017 at 16:42, Vindula Jayawardana 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into the points
> you have mentioned and will keep you updated here.
>
> Thank you.
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>
> On 9 March 2017 at 21:22, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vindula,
>>
>> If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the generated output,
>> that will be a good point to start. However we'll need to host an IS
>> instance publicly to run the tests on it.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Omindu.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vindula,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your interest in this project.
>>> Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, could you
>>> please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source code [1]. SCIM 2.0
>>> compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just get an idea from
>>> SCIM 1.1 compliance test. Further you can extract test scenarios from [2]
>>> as well.
>>>
>>> [1]https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info
>>> 
>>> [2]https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provi
>>> sioning-scim2/tree/master/tests
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gayan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 I am Vindula Jayawardana, a final year undergraduate of Computer
 Science and Engineering Department of University of Moratuwa. I am
 interested in applying for the "Proposal 21: [IS] SCIM 2.0 compliance
 test suite" which you have offered for the GSoC project idea pool.

 I have a good understanding on SCIM core and protocol specifications
 for both SCIM 1.1 and SCIM 2.0. Based on my knowledge I have written few
 blog posts specifically catering on SCIM [1] and the use cases of SCIM [2].
 Also I have tried SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 APIs of wso2 IS. I went though the
 references provided and would like to know more on the scope of the
 coverage report and detailed analysis view need to be generated as a
 deliverable. Could you kindly guide me on 

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Vindula Jayawardana]

Hi,

Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into the points you
have mentioned and will keep you updated here.

Thank you.

*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com






*“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*


*-Richard Branson-*



On 9 March 2017 at 21:22, Omindu Rathnaweera  wrote:

> Hi Vindula,
>
> If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the generated output,
> that will be a good point to start. However we'll need to host an IS
> instance publicly to run the tests on it.
>
> Regards,
> Omindu.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vindula,
>>
>> Thanks for your interest in this project.
>> Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, could you
>> please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source code [1]. SCIM 2.0
>> compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just get an idea from
>> SCIM 1.1 compliance test. Further you can extract test scenarios from [2]
>> as well.
>>
>> [1]https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info
>> 
>> [2]https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provi
>> sioning-scim2/tree/master/tests
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gayan
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
>> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am Vindula Jayawardana, a final year undergraduate of Computer Science
>>> and Engineering Department of University of Moratuwa. I am interested in
>>> applying for the "Proposal 21: [IS] SCIM 2.0 compliance test suite"
>>> which you have offered for the GSoC project idea pool.
>>>
>>> I have a good understanding on SCIM core and protocol specifications for
>>> both SCIM 1.1 and SCIM 2.0. Based on my knowledge I have written few blog
>>> posts specifically catering on SCIM [1] and the use cases of SCIM [2]. Also
>>> I have tried SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 APIs of wso2 IS. I went though the references
>>> provided and would like to know more on the scope of the coverage
>>> report and detailed analysis view need to be generated as a deliverable.
>>> Could you kindly guide me on the said matter.
>>>
>>> [1] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/scim-make-it-fast-che
>>> ap-and-easy-b2bd56492c15#.ec1kncbde
>>> [2] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/5-things-that-will-no
>>> t-be-a-nightmare-anymore-if-you-support-scim-9353d73836a7#.ihcm9aqub
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>>> University of Moratuwa
>>> mobile : +713462554
>>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress.
>>> "*
>>>
>>>
>>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gayan Gunawardana
>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
>> Email: ga...@wso2.com
>> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Omindu Rathnaweera
> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc.
> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211>
>
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Omindu Rathnaweera]

Hi Vindula,

If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the generated output,
that will be a good point to start. However we'll need to host an IS
instance publicly to run the tests on it.

Regards,
Omindu.



On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana  wrote:

> Hi Vindula,
>
> Thanks for your interest in this project.
> Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, could you
> please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source code [1]. SCIM 2.0
> compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just get an idea from
> SCIM 1.1 compliance test. Further you can extract test scenarios from [2]
> as well.
>
> [1]https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info
> 
> [2]https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-
> provisioning-scim2/tree/master/tests
>
> Thanks,
> Gayan
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
> vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am Vindula Jayawardana, a final year undergraduate of Computer Science
>> and Engineering Department of University of Moratuwa. I am interested in
>> applying for the "Proposal 21: [IS] SCIM 2.0 compliance test suite"
>> which you have offered for the GSoC project idea pool.
>>
>> I have a good understanding on SCIM core and protocol specifications for
>> both SCIM 1.1 and SCIM 2.0. Based on my knowledge I have written few blog
>> posts specifically catering on SCIM [1] and the use cases of SCIM [2]. Also
>> I have tried SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 APIs of wso2 IS. I went though the references
>> provided and would like to know more on the scope of the coverage report
>> and detailed analysis view need to be generated as a deliverable. Could you
>> kindly guide me on the said matter.
>>
>> [1] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/scim-make-it-fast-
>> cheap-and-easy-b2bd56492c15#.ec1kncbde
>> [2] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/5-things-that-will-
>> not-be-a-nightmare-anymore-if-you-support-scim-9353d73836a7#.ihcm9aqub
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> *Vindula Jayawardana*
>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
>> University of Moratuwa
>> mobile : +713462554
>> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>>
>>
>> *-Richard Branson-*
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gayan Gunawardana
> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
> Email: ga...@wso2.com
> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
>



-- 
Omindu Rathnaweera
Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc.
Mobile: +94 771 197 211
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Gayan Gunawardana]

Hi Vindula,

Thanks for your interest in this project.
Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, could you
please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source code [1]. SCIM 2.0
compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just get an idea from
SCIM 1.1 compliance test. Further you can extract test scenarios from [2]
as well.

[1]https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info

[2]
https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim2/tree/master/tests

Thanks,
Gayan

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vindula Jayawardana <
vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am Vindula Jayawardana, a final year undergraduate of Computer Science
> and Engineering Department of University of Moratuwa. I am interested in
> applying for the "Proposal 21: [IS] SCIM 2.0 compliance test suite" which
> you have offered for the GSoC project idea pool.
>
> I have a good understanding on SCIM core and protocol specifications for
> both SCIM 1.1 and SCIM 2.0. Based on my knowledge I have written few blog
> posts specifically catering on SCIM [1] and the use cases of SCIM [2]. Also
> I have tried SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 APIs of wso2 IS. I went though the references
> provided and would like to know more on the scope of the coverage report
> and detailed analysis view need to be generated as a deliverable. Could you
> kindly guide me on the said matter.
>
> [1] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/scim-make-
> it-fast-cheap-and-easy-b2bd56492c15#.ec1kncbde
> [2] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/5-things-
> that-will-not-be-a-nightmare-anymore-if-you-support-scim-
> 9353d73836a7#.ihcm9aqub
>
> Thank you,
>
> *Vindula Jayawardana*
> Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
> University of Moratuwa
> mobile : +713462554
> Email : vindul...@gmail.com
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*
>
>
> *-Richard Branson-*
>
>
>


-- 
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: ga...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

[Dev] [GSoC 2017][IS] SCIM 2.0 Compliance Test Suite

[Vindula Jayawardana]

Hi,

I am Vindula Jayawardana, a final year undergraduate of Computer Science
and Engineering Department of University of Moratuwa. I am interested in
applying for the "Proposal 21: [IS] SCIM 2.0 compliance test suite" which
you have offered for the GSoC project idea pool.

I have a good understanding on SCIM core and protocol specifications for
both SCIM 1.1 and SCIM 2.0. Based on my knowledge I have written few blog
posts specifically catering on SCIM [1] and the use cases of SCIM [2]. Also
I have tried SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 APIs of wso2 IS. I went though the references
provided and would like to know more on the scope of the coverage report
and detailed analysis view need to be generated as a deliverable. Could you
kindly guide me on the said matter.

[1] -
https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/scim-make-it-fast-cheap-and-easy-b2bd56492c15#.ec1kncbde
[2] -
https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/5-things-that-will-not-be-a-nightmare-anymore-if-you-support-scim-9353d73836a7#.ihcm9aqub

Thank you,

*Vindula Jayawardana*
Computer Science and Engineering Dept.
University of Moratuwa
mobile : +713462554
Email : vindul...@gmail.com






*“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "*


*-Richard Branson-*
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev