Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Internationalization (i18n) Working Group and Interest Group
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:13 PM L. David Baron wrote: > > On Tuesday 2019-04-09 13:55 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:32 PM L. David Baron wrote: > > > > > > The W3C is proposing revised charters for: > > > > > > Internationalization (i18n) Working Group > > > https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-wg-charter.html > > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html > > > diff from previous charter: > > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fcore%2Fcharter-2016.html=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-wg-charter.html > > > > > > Internationalization (i18n) Interest Group > > > https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-ig-charter.html > > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html > > > diff from previous charter: > > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fig%2Fcharter-2016.html=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-ig-charter.html > > > > > > Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through > > > Friday, May 3. > > > > > > Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should > > > say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should > > > support or oppose it. (Absent specific comments, I'd be inclined to > > > support the charters, because I think the i18n work at W3C has been > > > generally effective.) > > > > Is the WG expected to continue to issue revisions to > > https://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-norm/ ? The document itself suggests > > sending comments via GitHub issues. I don't see a charter item that > > clearly covers the maintenance of this document. Should we ask for an > > item that ensures that the group is explicitly chartered to continue > > to maintain this document? > > I expect the wording at the start of section 2.1 (Normative > Specifications) that says: > > The formal documents produced by the Working Group are guidelines, > best practices, requirements, and the like. These are best > published as Working Group Notes. > > probably covers this. Or does this document not fit within that > description? Oops. Sorry. Yes, those sentences cover it. Thanks. (I searched for the case-insensitive string "note", but somehow I managed to miss the second sentence you quoted.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@mozilla.com ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Internationalization (i18n) Working Group and Interest Group
On Tuesday 2019-04-09 13:55 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:32 PM L. David Baron wrote: > > > > The W3C is proposing revised charters for: > > > > Internationalization (i18n) Working Group > > https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-wg-charter.html > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html > > diff from previous charter: > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fcore%2Fcharter-2016.html=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-wg-charter.html > > > > Internationalization (i18n) Interest Group > > https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-ig-charter.html > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html > > diff from previous charter: > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fig%2Fcharter-2016.html=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-ig-charter.html > > > > Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through > > Friday, May 3. > > > > Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should > > say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should > > support or oppose it. (Absent specific comments, I'd be inclined to > > support the charters, because I think the i18n work at W3C has been > > generally effective.) > > Is the WG expected to continue to issue revisions to > https://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-norm/ ? The document itself suggests > sending comments via GitHub issues. I don't see a charter item that > clearly covers the maintenance of this document. Should we ask for an > item that ensures that the group is explicitly chartered to continue > to maintain this document? I expect the wording at the start of section 2.1 (Normative Specifications) that says: The formal documents produced by the Working Group are guidelines, best practices, requirements, and the like. These are best published as Working Group Notes. probably covers this. Or does this document not fit within that description? -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914) signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Internationalization (i18n) Working Group and Interest Group
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:32 PM L. David Baron wrote: > > The W3C is proposing revised charters for: > > Internationalization (i18n) Working Group > https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-wg-charter.html > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html > diff from previous charter: > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fcore%2Fcharter-2016.html=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-wg-charter.html > > Internationalization (i18n) Interest Group > https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-ig-charter.html > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html > diff from previous charter: > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fig%2Fcharter-2016.html=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-ig-charter.html > > Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through > Friday, May 3. > > Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should > say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should > support or oppose it. (Absent specific comments, I'd be inclined to > support the charters, because I think the i18n work at W3C has been > generally effective.) Is the WG expected to continue to issue revisions to https://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-norm/ ? The document itself suggests sending comments via GitHub issues. I don't see a charter item that clearly covers the maintenance of this document. Should we ask for an item that ensures that the group is explicitly chartered to continue to maintain this document? -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@mozilla.com ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Proposed W3C Charters: Internationalization (i18n) Working Group and Interest Group
The W3C is proposing revised charters for: Internationalization (i18n) Working Group https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-wg-charter.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html diff from previous charter: https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fcore%2Fcharter-2016.html=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-wg-charter.html Internationalization (i18n) Interest Group https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed-i18n-ig-charter.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Apr/0004.html diff from previous charter: https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FInternational%2Fig%2Fcharter-2016.html=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F04%2Fproposed-i18n-ig-charter.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through Friday, May 3. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. (Absent specific comments, I'd be inclined to support the charters, because I think the i18n work at W3C has been generally effective.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914) signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
