Re: [PATCH] Sender as shortnumber with CIMD2
On Dienstag, Februar 4, 2003, at 08:33 Uhr, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote: Hi, I think this patch is very useful (for me too), but I would like to ask, should there be operator permission to set ANY short number as the number of the sender? and if so, what is the difference between 'shortnumber' and 'from' number? because, for example, SMPP (if operator permits) allows to set any number, iregarding of it's lenght, using, for example, the same 'from' variable in send-sms. I don't understand what's the issue here. If you send the number as 123 it arrives on the phone as 123, if you send it as +123 it will arrive as +123. So is this not good enough?? in GSM transmission, a from number is the originator of the number. it can be of different type. In reality any phone number is specified by 3 parameters which are: TON: type of number NPI: network plan indicator Address: A short ID is nothing else than TON = shortid while an international number (+...) would be TON=international. the receiving phone would display the + if the originator has TON=international set but not if TON is unknown or national or shortid. In Kannel, if your number starts with +, it will set TON=international automatically. At least thats the case in SMPP. In EMI it puts 00 instead because EMI doesnt support TON field and only knows international numbers as numbers which start with 00... (international prefix in europe). So the correct approach for CIMD would be to set TON=international only if the number starts with +. If this is not the case, then this is a bug to be fixed but forcing it to another type is for sure not the right approach. Andreas Fink Global Networks Switzerland AG -- Tel: +41-61-333 Fax: +41-61-334 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Member of the GSM Association
Re: [PATCH] Sender as shortnumber with CIMD2
Andreas Fink wrote: On Dienstag, Februar 4, 2003, at 08:33 Uhr, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote: Hi, I think this patch is very useful (for me too), but I would like to ask, should there be operator permission to set ANY short number as the number of the sender? and if so, what is the difference between 'shortnumber' and 'from' number? because, for example, SMPP (if operator permits) allows to set any number, iregarding of it's lenght, using, for example, the same 'from' variable in send-sms. I don't understand what's the issue here. If you send the number as 123 it arrives on the phone as 123, if you send it as +123 it will arrive as +123. So is this not good enough?? Not it looks like the operators MC adds the + sign even when sending just 123. in GSM transmission, a from number is the originator of the number. it can be of different type. In reality any phone number is specified by 3 parameters which are: TON: type of number NPI: network plan indicator Address: A short ID is nothing else than TON = shortid while an international number (+...) would be TON=international. the receiving phone would display the + if the originator has TON=international set but not if TON is unknown or national or shortid. In Kannel, if your number starts with +, it will set TON=international automatically. At least thats the case in SMPP. In EMI it puts 00 instead because EMI doesnt support TON field and only knows international numbers as numbers which start with 00... (international prefix in europe). So the correct approach for CIMD would be to set TON=international only if the number starts with +. If this is not the case, then this is a bug to be fixed but forcing it to another type is for sure not the right approach. I can not find any way in the CIMD2 specifications to set this. To quote the specifications If an origination address is given in the submit message, it is regarded as a subaddress and it is appended to the end of the address that is set in the interface profile. The specs state that there are two optional (none mandatory) sender parameters - originator address and alphanumeric originator address. Without using the patch all numerical values in the 'from=' field will be sent as originator address. The operator will/may prepend the pluss sign, thus ruining the ability to answer directly. What the patch does is just that it treats all numerical 'from=' fields up to shortnumber= digits as an alphanumeric sender. This avoids the MC prepending the pluss sign. So if shortnumber=4 - from=2030 will be received without the pluss sign. As long as the operator allows you to use the alphanumeric originator address (it has been in the specs. since Feb. 2001) this should be perfectly legal. -- Med vennlig hilsen, Eurobate ASA Arne K. Haaje Senior Network Engineer Eurobate ASA - Postboks 4589 Nydalen - 0404 Oslo - Norway Phone: +47 23 22 73 73 - Fax: +47 23 22 73 74 - Mob: +47 92 88 44 66 http://www.eurobate.com/
[Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Sender as shortnumber with CIMD2]
In case anybody is interested, here is a short discussion Andreas Fink and I had about my patch and its usability (or lack of). -- Med vennlig hilsen, Eurobate ASA Arne K. Haaje Senior Network Engineer Eurobate ASA - Postboks 4589 Nydalen - 0404 Oslo - Norway Phone: +47 23 22 73 73 - Fax: +47 23 22 73 74 - Mob: +47 92 88 44 66 http://www.eurobate.com/ ---BeginMessage--- On Dienstag, Februar 4, 2003, at 10:48 Uhr, Arne K. Haaje wrote: Andreas Fink wrote: On Dienstag, Februar 4, 2003, at 10:14 Uhr, Arne K. Haaje wrote: Andreas Fink wrote: On Dienstag, Februar 4, 2003, at 08:33 Uhr, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote: Hi, I think this patch is very useful (for me too), but I would like to ask, should there be operator permission to set ANY short number as the number of the sender? and if so, what is the difference between 'shortnumber' and 'from' number? because, for example, SMPP (if operator permits) allows to set any number, iregarding of it's lenght, using, for example, the same 'from' variable in send-sms. I don't understand what's the issue here. If you send the number as 123 it arrives on the phone as 123, if you send it as +123 it will arrive as +123. So is this not good enough?? Not it looks like the operators MC adds the + sign even when sending just 123. The specs state that there are two optional (none mandatory) sender parameters - originator address and alphanumeric originator address. Without using the patch all numerical values in the 'from=' field will be sent as originator address. The operator will/may prepend the pluss sign, thus ruining the ability to answer directly. What the patch does is just that it treats all numerical 'from=' fields up to shortnumber= digits as an alphanumeric sender. This avoids the MC prepending the pluss sign. So if shortnumber=4 - from=2030 will be received without the pluss sign. Well then its an alphanumeric sender. This is not good because the end user will not be able to use the "reply" function. No, it works! We have tested on both Nokia and Ericsson phones, and it works just fine. well then nokia again makes something really weird and the number is not sent really alphanumeric. My recommendation would be to throw away a CIMD SMSC and replace it with something serious ;-). CIMD is very limited in many ways. (Nokia is now going to love me for this...). In our case we where not able to set any originator as our originator was automatically prepended with the user ID (which was a short id). We have the same situation with one operator where we are using MT billing. This patch would not make a difference with that operator. However, we have a large account with another operator (no billing) sending bulk sms, sms from web, and other content. Here we are using this patch setting the sender to our shortnumber with the first operator. This allows the user to reply directly to our services on that operator. BTW, you replied directly to me (outside the list) so I reply privately. If you think the discussion relevant (I do) to the list perhaps you could forward or continue there?. just a mistake... feel free to forward. Andreas Fink Global Networks Switzerland AG -- Tel: +41-61-333 Fax: +41-61-334 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Member of the GSM Association ---End Message---
MMS files.
Does anyone know if there is a difference between MMS formats between nokia 7650 sony ericsson T68i and the GX10. Thanks, Maria Turk Applications Specialist Wizcom(Singlepoint4u) Tel:+44(0)1782600450 Mob: +44(0)7775837460
Re: Kannel cvs problem
Citando Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks Bruno, I did a cvs diff across 1.2.1 vs 1.3.0 to find ... ./.cvsignore 5,6d4 config.guess config.sub 9,11d6 diff diff2 build-stamp looks like someone has removed the config.sub and config.guess files from cvs repository - these are required as part of the build process. [ ie: if I copy them from 1.2.1 source bundle things compile nicely ]. I did it. Both files are generated when you run autoconf in you kannel directory. I've deleted them after seeing that debian package building system have replaced them by new ones and, after built the package, lintian complain about these two automatic generated files inside it. They are in cvs again. Cheers, Alan On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 16:26, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: Quoting Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I suspect there is a problem with current cvs. ie: [ clean checkout ] ... gateway$ ./configure loading cache ./config.cache Configuring for Kannel gateway version 1.3.1 ... Running system checks ... configure: error: can not run ./config.sub I'll fix that in some minutes. -- br/ - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Re: Where's my FOO ? [Was: Daily patch: gateway]
Citando Konstantin Vayner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Actually... What is really the reason for not having really descriptive status text? There is already a list of definitions for status-codes... So i believe it would not be a problem to make same for status-text... or is it? Having OK as status-text is really confusing... but so also having Foo/Bar in some cases... So... [ if i may really vote on anything ;) ] i would vote +2 on making status-text be real rfc compliant (and thus descriptive) or +1 for having at least Foo/Bar instead of OK Are you offering to build that table in .c for kannel ? ; -- br/ - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
RE: EMI Driver Bug
Citando Michael Mulcahy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi All, Comments Below: You're mixing up the SMSC response with the delivery report. When you send a message, you send a type 51 message. you will get a 50ACK back saying the SMSC has accepted the SMS. Is this a typo on your part? According to the EMI spec 4.0 the response to the submit short message operation 51 should contain an operation type of 51 not 50. Indeed 51/R This is NOT the delivery report. The SMSC response is acknowledging that the SMSC has accepted the message but it doesnt say that the message has been delivered to the handset. I think there is a misunderstanding of terminology here. I use the term submission notification to mean that the message was submitted to the SMSC not delivered to the handset. I guess you are right, although old versions didn't have this problem - I use dlr=255 to activate every kind of dlr in my some-month-old kannel in production. This code handles only receiving and 'R' packets. It's an if( OR=R OT=51) then, so there's no 50_AMSG field available. Then there's a different code to handle OR=O, OT=53 at line 721, and there is an if((emimsg-fields[E50_AMSG]) == NULL) msg-sms.msgdata = octstr_create(Delivery Report without text); else msg-sms.msgdata = octstr_duplicate(emimsg-fields[E50_AMSG]); This looks like a copy-paste to me. Your patch is cleaner that doing something like this lines because, indeed, there's no 50_AMSG in OR=R I'm +1 for it Look forward to hearing from you, Warm Regards, Michael. ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +353 1 284 7555 Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland -Original Message- From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 February 2003 13:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 01:23 Uhr, Michael Mulcahy wrote: Hi All, Summary: The assigning of a nonexistent field in the EMI driver when creating a submission report results in an out of bounds read. Scenario: The EMI driver checks for a DLR when a response is received for a submitted message. If there is a DLR requested for that message then the driver does the following: /* * Recode the msg structure with the given msgdata. * Note: the DLR URL is delivered in msg-sms.dlr_url already. */ dlrmsg-sms.msgdata = octstr_duplicate(emimsg-fields[E50_AMSG]); octstr_hex_to_binary(dlrmsg-sms.msgdata); dlrmsg-sms.sms_type = report; Why does the driver assign the value of the E50_AMSG field to the msgdata of the dlr message? The AMSG field does contain the delivery report text of the SMSC. This is a text of style The message to 12345 with referenfce number 1847127 has been delivered on 12.1.2003 14:25 This field is not available in the EMI response. The response EMI message only has three fields so the above code accesses data beyond the array bounds as E50_AMSG has a value of 20. You're mixing up the SMSC response with the delivery report. When you send a message, you send a type 51 message. you will get a 50ACK back saying the SMSC has accepted the SMS. This is NOT the delivery report. The SMSC response is acknowledging that the SMSC has accepted the message but it doesnt say that the message has been delivered to the handset. When the message has been delivered to the handset, the SMSC generates an incoming message of type Delivery Report which has all fields, much similar to an incoming SMS. Andreas Fink Global Networks Switzerland AG -- Tel: +41-61-333 Fax: +41-61-334 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Member of the GSM Association -- br/ - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Re: MMS files.
Citando Maria Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Does anyone know if there is a difference between MMS formats between nokia 7650 sony ericsson T68i and the GX10. Yes, they are. But there's a common mms format that works in them all (including Panasoinc GAD87). My experience says that it's too much dependent of your mmsc, specially through email interface. You need to try to send and try with combinations of start tag and content-id Thanks, Maria Turk Applications Specialist Wizcom(Singlepoint4u) Tel:+44(0)1782600450 Mob: +44(0)7775837460 -- br/ - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
MMS binary
Does anyone have an mms binary file that they know works with GX10 or T68i. Or if anyone know where I can find something like that.. Thanks, Maria Turk Applications Specialist Wizcom(Singlepoint4u) Tel:+44(0)1782600450 Mob: +44(0)7775837460
RE: MMS binary
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maria Turk Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:41 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: MMS binary Does anyone have an mms binary file that they know works with GX10 or T68i. Or if anyone know where I can find something like that.. The Nokia EAIF emulator comes with several sample binary MMS files. You can download it from Forum Nokia - http://forum.nokia.com
RE: MMS binary
I tried those but they don't work with T68i and GX10. any suggestions. Thanks, -Original Message- From: Paul Keogh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2003 12:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MMS binary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maria Turk Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:41 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: MMS binary Does anyone have an mms binary file that they know works with GX10 or T68i. Or if anyone know where I can find something like that.. The Nokia EAIF emulator comes with several sample binary MMS files. You can download it from Forum Nokia - http://forum.nokia.com
Text messages with UDH, bad DCS
I tried to send text messages with UDH with emi2 driver. This feature appears as y? (driver probably has this feature, has not been tested). I would like generate TP-DCS = 00h (it's good also 11h or 12h), I need 7 bit coding in DCS I use these parameters: UDHI = 1; MClass = 2; // this should be for 12h; or MClass = '1' for 11h; or MClass = '' for 00h Coding = 1; MWI = ''; DLRmask = 0; PID = 0; AltDCS = 0; Note: UDH is 8bit encoded, Body is 7 bit encoded! But i get DCS = 14h, that's 8 bit coding, not 7 bit! kannel userguide says: If unset, defaults to 7 bits unless a udh is defined, which sets coding to 8bits. Is this a bug in emi2 kannel driver or doesn't emi2 support text messages with UDH ? Please reply, this bug should interest a lot of developers!
kwtls and verisign WTLS certificates
Hello. I wanted to see if anyone has any updates or detailed steps on the usage of kwtls with a verisign generated WTLS certificate. I found the following previous posting but it is unclear if the author had actually tried and had success using a verisign generated WTLS certificate. http://www.mail-archive.com/devel@kannel.3glab.org/msg00158.html Regards, - Joe N.
Re: Where's my FOO ? [Was: Daily patch: gateway]
Bruno Rodrigues wrote: Citando Konstantin Vayner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Actually... What is really the reason for not having really descriptive status text? There is already a list of definitions for status-codes... So i believe it would not be a problem to make same for status-text... or is it? Having OK as status-text is really confusing... but so also having Foo/Bar in some cases... So... [ if i may really vote on anything ;) ] i would vote +2 on making status-text be real rfc compliant (and thus descriptive) or +1 for having at least Foo/Bar instead of OK Are you offering to build that table in .c for kannel ? ; Yes... that is just an array of strings, nothing more ;) [ and i would put it in .h - where the definitions for http-status are ;) ] Note: i am not offerring to make kannel parse these values from RFC although it is also a possability ;-)) Regards, Konstantin Vayner Appcell MT
Does Kannel log support logrotation
Does Kannel log support logrotation???Please advice regarding this matter cause im running kannel-1.2.1 on linux box 7.2 that forwards sms to a EMI2 server.Currently all logs does'nt have rotate mechanismhas anyone implemented this already __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Need assistance....
Dear Sir, Sir, I am working on kannel as a gateway for my smsc. I ran at a problem with test my nokia card (nokia GSM Phone), please, how can I configure my smskannel.conf to solve my problem. This is the smsc configuration written below. Note that I am not using Linux, rather, I am using a cygwin version for windows 2000 advanced server family. group = smsc smsc = at2 smsc-id = check modemtype = nokiaphone device = COM1 validityperiod = 167 speed = 9600 Is this correct for device.. variable under windows because it's not working with /dev/ttyS0? Also, what can be responsible for the error output in smsbox shell when a http resquest is made to the smsbox. 2003-01-13 17:19:22 [5] INFO: smsbox: Got HTTP request /cgi-bin/sendsms from 192.168.77.84 2003-01-13 17:19:22 [5] INFO: sendsms used by tester 2003-01-13 17:19:22 [5] INFO: sendsms sender:tester:13013 (192.168.77.84) to:08024569875 msg:I will always love u. 2003-01-13 17:20:27 [3] ERROR: Error reading from fd 24: 2003-01-13 17:20:27 [3] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset by peer 2003-01-13 17:20:27 [3] ERROR: Error reading from fd 24: 2003-01-13 17:20:27 [3] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset by peer 2003-01-13 17:30:48 [5] INFO: smsbox: Got HTTP request /cgi-bin/sendsms from 192.168.77.84 2003-01-13 17:30:48 [5] INFO: sendsms used by tester 2003-01-13 17:30:48 [5] INFO: sendsms sender:tester:13013 (192.168.77.84) to:08024569875 msg:I will always love u. 2003-01-13 17:31:19 [0] ERROR: Error reading from fd 21: 2003-01-13 17:31:19 [0] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset by peer 2003-01-13 17:31:19 [0] ERROR: Error reading from fd 21: 2003-01-13 17:31:19 [0] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset by peer from the above ERROR: Error reading from fd 24: 2003-01-13 17:20:27 [3] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset by peer 2003-01-13 17:20:27 [3] ERROR: Error reading from fd 24: 2003-01-13 17:20:27 [3] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset by so, what can I do to eradicate the error and what can be responsible for this? Thanks Niran Oke _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re: EMI does not ACk message send at once
Soory, for the delaybut i already done thatbut no improvements at allspecially in our office location where i mostly do the testing but in other location it works fine. --- Cipher Strength [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: send messages with some milliseconds delay to kannel. CIPHER Citando joseph mercado [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi list; Im trying to push a very long message to EMI2 server. after the request has been answered by external API my smsbox.log got the message and split it into 3.Same things happened to the bearebox.log...it recieved 3 sms message and tries to push it on SMSC ...problem is i only get 2 smswhats wrong ???did i miss something is bearerbox sending three messages to smsc and only receiving two ack ? This looks like your smsc having a small windowing or even a window value of 1. You should set flow-control = true. Basically, smsc windowing is how many messages you can send before receiving an ack. If smsc have window=3 you can send MSG1 to 3 and then you'll have to wait for ACK1 before sending MSG4. If you send any more messages, they'll be discarder. flow-control = true is like window=1 - kannel only sends another message after receiving ack from last one. -- BR/ _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Re: EMI does not ACk message send at once
Thank for the advicewe tried to test it on different location and its work i got 3 msg almost at the same time and milisec intervalbut from office location i only get two and sometimes the 2 msg arrives 5 min later...was it something to do with the traffic load around our location?? Ill try to set flow-control to true, so far i embedded a 1 sec interval in my API to send 480 charcters in three separate 160 msg. Any advice or should i return my sending to normal and let kannel to the splitting?? Thanks, jmer --- Bruno David Simões Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Citando joseph mercado [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi list; Im trying to push a very long message to EMI2 server. after the request has been answered by external API my smsbox.log got the message and split it into 3.Same things happened to the bearebox.log...it recieved 3 sms message and tries to push it on SMSC ...problem is i only get 2 smswhats wrong ???did i miss something is bearerbox sending three messages to smsc and only receiving two ack ? This looks like your smsc having a small windowing or even a window value of 1. You should set flow-control = true. Basically, smsc windowing is how many messages you can send before receiving an ack. If smsc have window=3 you can send MSG1 to 3 and then you'll have to wait for ACK1 before sending MSG4. If you send any more messages, they'll be discarder. flow-control = true is like window=1 - kannel only sends another message after receiving ack from last one. -- BR/ __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Re: EMI does not ACk message send at once
Id probably contact then our smsc provider...thanks for the help --- Bruno Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sáb, 2003-02-01 at 05:50, Cipher Strength wrote: send messages with some milliseconds delay to kannel. That's not a solution. Just ask your smsc provider which flow-control they are using - stop-and-wait or windowing - and if it's windowing, how which size it have CIPHER Citando joseph mercado [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi list; Im trying to push a very long message to EMI2 server. after the request has been answered by external API my smsbox.log got the message and split it into 3.Same things happened to the bearebox.log...it recieved 3 sms message and tries to push it on SMSC ...problem is i only get 2 smswhats wrong ???did i miss something is bearerbox sending three messages to smsc and only receiving two ack ? This looks like your smsc having a small windowing or even a window value of 1. You should set flow-control = true. Basically, smsc windowing is how many messages you can send before receiving an ack. If smsc have window=3 you can send MSG1 to 3 and then you'll have to wait for ACK1 before sending MSG4. If you send any more messages, they'll be discarder. flow-control = true is like window=1 - kannel only sends another message after receiving ack from last one. -- BR/ _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail -- Bruno Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature name=signature.asc __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
kwtls and verisign WTLS certificates
Hello. I wanted to see if anyone has any updates or detailed steps on the usage of kwtls with a verisign generated WTLS certificate. I found the following previous posting but it is unclear if the author had actually tried and had success using a verisign generated WTLS certificate. http://www.mail-archive.com/devel@kannel.3glab.org/msg00158.html Regards, - Joe N. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where's my FOO ? [Was: Daily patch: gateway]
Citando Konstantin Vayner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bruno Rodrigues wrote: Citando Konstantin Vayner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, i would vote +2 on making status-text be real rfc compliant (and thus descriptive) or +1 for having at least Foo/Bar instead of OK Are you offering to build that table in .c for kannel ? ; Yes... that is just an array of strings, nothing more ;) [ and i would put it in .h - where the definitions for http-status are ;) ] Nice : Can I still have my octstr_send_random_foo_sometimes() ? :))) or a if(user-agent =~ /ms.xmlhttp/) do array[202] = I therefor accept your message but I don't fscking know if I'd want to sent it ? (kidding) Note: i am not offerring to make kannel parse these values from RFC although it is also a possability ;-)) No need for that. Status is the one that matters, status text doesn't matter at all. Regards, Konstantin Vayner Appcell MT -- br/
MMS binary code..
Does anyone have any code that produces the .mms file. I tried to Nokia version but it's not that conformant.. doesn't work on many phones. Thanks Maria Turk Applications Specialist Wizcom(Singlepoint4u) Tel:+44(0)1782600450 Mob: +44(0)7775837460
Re: Text messages with UDH, bad DCS
Citando Enzo dell'Aquila [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I tried to send text messages with UDH with emi2 driver. This feature appears as y? (driver probably has this feature, has not been tested). Weird. I've fixed it now in cvs. EMI2 supports everything. Unless.. I would like generate TP-DCS = 00h (it's good also 11h or 12h), I need 7 bit coding in DCS Is this a bug in emi2 kannel driver or doesn't emi2 support text messages with UDH ? In my kannel instance from Aug 2002, requesting ...text=testudh=%01% 00coding=1mclass=2 gives me DCS=11 text=testudh=%01%00coding=1mclass=0 results in DCS=00 If this don't work with you, please say so because there might be some new bug and someone will have to fix it :| -- br/
Re: Kannel cvs problem
Thanks Bruno On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 23:18, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: Citando Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks Bruno, I did a cvs diff across 1.2.1 vs 1.3.0 to find ... ./.cvsignore 5,6d4 config.guess config.sub 9,11d6 diff diff2 build-stamp looks like someone has removed the config.sub and config.guess files from cvs repository - these are required as part of the build process. [ ie: if I copy them from 1.2.1 source bundle things compile nicely ]. I did it. Both files are generated when you run autoconf in you kannel directory. I've deleted them after seeing that debian package building system have replaced them by new ones and, after built the package, lintian complain about these two automatic generated files inside it. They are in cvs again. Cheers, Alan On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 16:26, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: Quoting Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I suspect there is a problem with current cvs. ie: [ clean checkout ] ... gateway$ ./configure loading cache ./config.cache Configuring for Kannel gateway version 1.3.1 ... Running system checks ... configure: error: can not run ./config.sub I'll fix that in some minutes. -- Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Kannel log support logrotation
Citando Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This might be useful for you ... (add to /etc/logrotate.d or similar). Note: you need to restart Kannel as it doesn't have full signal support. you just need to killall -HUP bearerbox smsbox wapbox. -HUP doesn't re-read configuration, but it reopens log files. And yes, logrotate is the way to go On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 18:18, joseph mercado wrote: Does Kannel log support logrotation???Please advice regarding this matter cause im running kannel-1.2.1 on linux box 7.2 that forwards sms to a EMI2 server.Currently all logs does'nt have rotate mechanismhas anyone implemented this already __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- Alan McNatty [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- br/
Re: MMS binary code..
Citando Maria Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Does anyone have any code that produces the .mms file. I tried to Nokia version but it's not that conformant.. doesn't work on many phones. This one should work with Nokia, Sharp and Ericsson. I've lost all my email and I've already asked for the mail with panasonic changes, but I think it's something like having 1. boundary without spaces and a start tag boundary=---X; start=s.smil 2. in smil, having an header Content-ID: s.smil 3. have in every content part an aditional Content-ID with the name inside Content-Type: ; name=foo.jpg Content-ID: foo.jpg 4. Content-Disposition shouldn't be required Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 22:00:17 + (WET) From: ... To: ... Subject: test Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary==_Part_191_16701175.1044396017841 --=_Part_191_16701175.1044396017841 Content-Type: application/smil; name=mail.smil Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mail.smil smil head layout root-layout / region id=Image height=100% width=100% left=0% top=0% / /layout /head body par dur=5000ms audio src=Telephone.amr / img src=BI_BG_2_MMS_7650.jpg region=Image / /par /body /smil --=_Part_191_16701175.1044396017841 Content-Type: audio/amr; name=Telephone.amr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Telephone.amr snip base64 --=_Part_191_16701175.1044396017841 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=BI_BG_2_MMS_7650.jpg Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=BI_BG_2_MMS_7650.jpg snip base64 --=_Part_191_16701175.1044396017841-- -- br/
Re: PPG: wap-push-user specific smsc-id config
Citando Andreas Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 12:52 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote: Hi list, Hi Aarno, a) if smsc=... is set on the push, use it otherwhise use the one defined in group=ppg b) if group wap-push user has a default-smsc-id, use it if smsc=.. is not set by step a) c) if group wap-push user has a smsc-id, discard any already set smsc-id and force it to the value of the config file. Don't we have a forced-smsc-id in sendsms ? please use it instead of smsc-id to maintain consistency ;) -- br/
kannel,devicehome,urgent
Hi guys! I have the kannel 1.3 running in linux redhat, but I have a problem with my cellphone (motorola iden). When I try to connect kannel with my cellphone, it doesn't start the device-home that I have set, and the cell ask me for enter a device home(the url for this card is /internal/home?home): Enter a homepage to proceed http://www.phone.com ok alpha , the same happens when I try to connect kannel with the uplink. I know that the kannel 1.3 doesn't support wtls, so I'm using the kwtls-patch. I don't know how to solve it!, please help me with any idea. Is the problem with my installation or only with the config file? I'm setting it in the file.cnf like that: device:home=http//www.mypag.asp map_url = DEVICE:home* http://www.mypag.asp/*; Thanks a lot! _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re: kannel,devicehome,urgent
Hi Andreas! Thanks for your help, Yes, it is a motorola, How I can set the device-home whith the kannel? does the kannel is cleaning the device:home of my device? I read that other solve is maping the openwave but, I don't want to map that page because this involve to push Ok and set the openwave in the device, but I could't change it after, I want to do it automatically with the gateway, so how I can do it? thanks in advance, Mary From: Andreas Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mary McCarter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: kannel,devicehome,urgent Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 01:30:52 +0100 On Mittwoch, Februar 5, 2003, at 12:41 Uhr, Mary McCarter wrote: Hi guys! I have the kannel 1.3 running in linux redhat, but I have a problem with my cellphone (motorola iden). When I try to connect kannel with my cellphone, it doesn't start the device-home that I have set, and the cell ask me for enter a device home(the url for this card is /internal/home?home): Enter a homepage to proceed http://www.phone.com ok alpha , the same happens when I try to connect kannel with the uplink. I know that the kannel 1.3 doesn't support wtls, so I'm using the kwtls-patch. I don't know how to solve it!, please help me with any idea. Is the problem with my installation or only with the config file? I'm setting it in the file.cnf like that: device:home=http//www.mypag.asp map_url = DEVICE:home* http://www.mypag.asp/*; Thanks a lot! its a problem of your phone I would say. Is it a Motorola? Andreas Fink Global Networks Switzerland AG -- Tel: +41-61-333 Fax: +41-61-334 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Member of the GSM Association _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Re: kannel,devicehome,urgent
Hi Andreas! Thanks for your help, Yes, it is a motorola, How I can set the device-home whith the kannel? does the kannel is cleaning the device:home of my device? I read that other solve is maping the openwave but, I don't want to map that page because this involve to push Ok and set the openwave in the device, but I could't change it after, I want to do it automatically with the gateway, so how I can do it? thanks in advance, Mary From: Andreas Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mary McCarter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: kannel,devicehome,urgent Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 01:30:52 +0100 On Mittwoch, Februar 5, 2003, at 12:41 Uhr, Mary McCarter wrote: Hi guys! I have the kannel 1.3 running in linux redhat, but I have a problem with my cellphone (motorola iden). When I try to connect kannel with my cellphone, it doesn't start the device-home that I have set, and the cell ask me for enter a device home(the url for this card is /internal/home?home): Enter a homepage to proceed http://www.phone.com ok alpha , the same happens when I try to connect kannel with the uplink. I know that the kannel 1.3 doesn't support wtls, so I'm using the kwtls-patch. I don't know how to solve it!, please help me with any idea. Is the problem with my installation or only with the config file? I'm setting it in the file.cnf like that: device:home=http//www.mypag.asp map_url = DEVICE:home* http://www.mypag.asp/*; Thanks a lot! its a problem of your phone I would say. Is it a Motorola? Andreas Fink Global Networks Switzerland AG -- Tel: +41-61-333 Fax: +41-61-334 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Member of the GSM Association _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Re: kannel,devicehome,urgent
On Mittwoch, Februar 5, 2003, at 02:19 Uhr, Mary McCarter wrote: Hi Andreas! Thanks for your help, Yes, it is a motorola, How I can set the device-home whith the kannel? does the kannel is cleaning the device:home of my device? I read that other solve is maping the openwave but, I don't want to map that page because this involve to push Ok and set the openwave in the device, but I could't change it after, I want to do it automatically with the gateway, so how I can do it? thanks in advance, Mary The issue here is that the end user phone doesnt request device:home which you can then map to your default page but your device requests the URL www.phone.com. So the only way to fix this is to change the settings of the phone to request something else. This is not an issue of Kannel but of the crappy Motorola phones. If you got it from some US carrier, you might not even be able to set the startup page. Welcome to stone age in mobile communications (also known as USA) Andreas Fink Global Networks Switzerland AG -- Tel: +41-61-333 Fax: +41-61-334 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Member of the GSM Association
