Re: rawhide report: 20100115 changes
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Compose started at Fri Jan 15 08:15:05 UTC 2010 firefox-3.6.1-0.10.rc1.fc13 --- * Wed Jan 13 2010 Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com - 3.6.1-0.10.rc1 - Update to 3.6.1 RC1 Summary: Added Packages: 5 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 106 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Just a tad bit late but isn't this supposed to be Firefox 3.6.0 RC1 or did I miss something? :) -- With kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Eelko Berkenpies http://blog.berkenpies.nl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning some packages
Henrique Junior wrote: Hello folks, Due to an increasing lack of time I'm leaving my packages orphaned. Even if I want, I will not be able to devote the attention they deserve. I would like to thank all the kind help I received over time in the task of maintaining these packages. bkchem and python-oasa, preferably, should be maintained by the same person, since it is an essential component of bkchem... In fact, these packages require little maintenance. basket https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/basket?_csrf_token=2657d7a19f0deda0c03fe730f01b30909f25c462 -- Taking care of your ideas bkchem https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bkchem?_csrf_token=2657d7a19f0deda0c03fe730f01b30909f25c462 -- Chemical drawing program pdumpfs https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pdumpfs?_csrf_token=2657d7a19f0deda0c03fe730f01b30909f25c462 -- Daily backup system python-oasa https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python-oasa?_csrf_token=2657d7a19f0deda0c03fe730f01b30909f25c462 -- Python library for manipulation of chemical formats Again, thank you -- Henrique LonelySpooky Junior I'll take bkchem and python-oasa, but happily relinquish if one of the co-maintainers wants them. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora packages for upcoming wxWidgets 3.0 available
Hello, wxWidgets developers are hard working on the upcoming major version 3.0. To make life of Fedora users and maintainers easier I started building recent snapshots and pre-releases as Fedora-compatible RPM packages. The libraries are installable in parallel with the regular 2.8.x, devel sub-package will replace the one from 2.8.x. Downloads for Fedora 12 and Rawhide are available at http://fedora.danny.cz/danny-wx/ Dan -- Fedora and Red Hat package maintainer -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: libcdio update
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:31:50AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:43:49 +0100, Adrian wrote: I would like to update libcdio to the latest version (0.82). This requires a rebuild of its dependencies: audacious-plugins gvfs kover libcddb oxine pycdio qmmp xfce4-cddrive-plugin xmms2 If the maintainers of the above packages do not object I would do all the necessary rebuilds. Only in Rawhide I assume. No objections wrt audacious-plugins (with the caveat that I don't know about the changes in libcdio 0.82 yet). Sure. Only rawhide. Forgot to mention that. F-12 would be a different case. No intention at all. Adrian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: After some talk on IRC yesterday, skvidal is the person doing work on this at them moment. His plan is to implement tests that try to tell if individual packages are maintained and get people to orphan those that are not. Here's his general plan for what to test: 1. all the pkgs which have no devel checkins in 365 days 1a, if the only checkins they have correspond to a massrebuild date - then they still get counted as potentially abandoned 2. all the pkgs which have no builds, other than mass rebuilds in 365 days then take that set of pkgs and if it is a LARGE number of pkgs - then intersect that with pkgs which have bugs open to reduce the set a bit b/c open bugs AND not looked at == problems for fedora We discussed whether to do reporting from this via bugzilla or another tool and I'm leaning towards another tool so it's easy for a maintainer to look through and a list of packages and check which ones they still care about. skvidal would like to get the tests working first to see if we're talking about a huge number of packages or only a few. I'm going to try and generate a couple of lists today if I can get all my koji-foo working properly. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: libcdio update
- Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:31:50AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:43:49 +0100, Adrian wrote: I would like to update libcdio to the latest version (0.82). This requires a rebuild of its dependencies: audacious-plugins gvfs kover libcddb oxine pycdio qmmp xfce4-cddrive-plugin xmms2 If the maintainers of the above packages do not object I would do all the necessary rebuilds. Only in Rawhide I assume. No objections wrt audacious-plugins (with the caveat that I don't know about the changes in libcdio 0.82 yet). Sure. Only rawhide. Forgot to mention that. F-12 would be a different case. No intention at all. Adrian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel I maintain pycdio; no objections here. - Jay -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
2010/1/18 Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org: 1. extraordinarily stable [...] in ANY of those cases I'd want to start thinking about nuking the pkg from fedora. Are you serious? - Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Thomas Moschny wrote: 2010/1/18 Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org: 1. extraordinarily stable [...] in ANY of those cases I'd want to start thinking about nuking the pkg from fedora. Are you serious? As a heart attack. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
On 01/17/2010 07:41 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The request to give the RAM some testing is not impolite. I absolutely agree---it is usually a simple test that people can run with minimal guidance, and it can possibly detect problems that would otherwise be very hard to diagnose (I personally had a failing Toshiba laptop that the factory service couldn't find and fix, and I was able to convince them with the memtest results that the motherboard was faulty). A thorough overnight run should be enough to detect any memory subsystem related failure, and is not obtrusive. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
KDE-SIG meeting report (03/2010)
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply to this email or add it to the related meeting page. -- = Weekly KDE Summary = Week: 03/2010 Time: 2010-01-19 14:00 UTC Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-01-19 Meeting minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-19/kde- sig.2010-01-19-14.01.html Meeting log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-19/kde- sig.2010-01-19-14.01.log.html -- = Participants = * JaroslavReznik * KevinKofler * MaryEllenFoster * RexDieter * SebastianVahl * StevenParrish * ThanNgo * ThomasJanssen -- = Agenda = o Proposal: split of kdegames [1] o Bug 549687 - kdm: no autologin on first start [2] = Summary = Proposal: split of kdegames: * Following a proposal by upstream [3] kdegames will introduce a new minimal subpackage which only contains kpat, kmines and kmahjongg. * The kdegames main package will include the remaining games and will require the minimal subpackage. * The live images will only contain kdegames-minimal to save space for more relevant packages. Bug 549687 - kdm: no autologin on first start: * We're still waiting for response from ConsoleKit maintainers. * The bug is now marked as a F13 Alpha blocker. Open discussion: * Sesame2 are awaiting a licensing clarification [4] for some required packages. -- = Next Meeting = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-01-26 -- = Links = [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-01-19/kdegames-split [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549687 [3] http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdegames/README.PACKAGERS?revision=885625view=markup [4] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=f58861e01001140635p2cf1597dv49337a12a445be42%40mail.gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rb_libtorrent has broken deps in Rawhide
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Leigh Scott wrote: At the moment I am unable to build qbittorrent and torium (springlobby as well) at Koji due to broken deps. I have emailed Peter and requested commit rights for the devel branch but received no response. Maybe he's still offline? http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-December/043435.html Would it be possible for a proven packager to rebuild rb_libtorrent against the latest boost version ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1931990 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rb_libtorrent has broken deps in Rawhide
Thank you for bumping and rebuilding it. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=151914 On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 18:55 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Leigh Scott wrote: At the moment I am unable to build qbittorrent and torium (springlobby as well) at Koji due to broken deps. I have emailed Peter and requested commit rights for the devel branch but received no response. Maybe he's still offline? http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-December/043435.html Would it be possible for a proven packager to rebuild rb_libtorrent against the latest boost version ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1931990 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:18:33 +0100 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: thm:BADSOURCE:httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz:httperf Project URLs changed. Fixed in CVS, not rebuilt. (But why was this BADSOURCE? Checked, and both tar files at old url ftp://ftp.hpl.hp.com/pub/httperf/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz and new url http://httperf.googlecode.com/files/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz have the same md5 that is also in the sources file.) Looks like the hp server had some issues and gave up a broken version? --2010-01-07 14:50:53-- ftp://ftp.hpl.hp.com/pub/httperf/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz = `./.listing' Resolving ftp.hpl.hp.com... 192.6.29.21 Connecting to ftp.hpl.hp.com|192.6.29.21|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! == SYST ... done.== PWD ... done. == TYPE I ... done. == CWD /pub/httperf ... done. == PASV ... done.== LIST ... done. 0K . 70.5M=0s 2010-01-07 14:50:55 (70.5 MB/s) - `./.listing' saved [1264] Removed `./.listing'. --2010-01-07 14:50:55-- ftp://ftp.hpl.hp.com/pub/httperf/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz = `./httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz' == CWD not required. == PASV ... done.== RETR httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz ... done. Length: 425297 (415K) 0K .. .. .. .. .. 12% 73.2K 5s 50K .. 14% 17.0K=1.3s 2010-01-07 15:05:59 (47.1 KB/s) - Data connection: Connection timed out; Data transfer aborted. Retrying. --2010-01-07 15:06:00-- ftp://ftp.hpl.hp.com/pub/httperf/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz (try: 2) = `./httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz' == CWD not required. == PASV ... Error in server response, closing control connection. Retrying. --2010-01-07 15:06:02-- ftp://ftp.hpl.hp.com/pub/httperf/httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz (try: 3) = `./httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz' Connecting to ftp.hpl.hp.com|192.6.29.21|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! == SYST ... done.== PWD ... done. == TYPE I ... done. == CWD /pub/httperf ... done. == PASV ... done.== REST 425297 ... done. == RETR httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz ... done. Length: 425297 (415K), 0 (0) remaining [ skipping 400K ] 400K ,, , 100% 0.00 =0s 2010-01-07 15:06:04 (0.00 B/s) - `./httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz' saved [425297] thm:BADURL:guitone-0.9-1.tgz:guitone In this case, the upstream server uses a mismatching certificate, not sure what to do here besides asking upstream to use another certificate. yeah, not much to be done except that I fear. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:48:25 +0100 Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:39:54 +0100 Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: Indeed. I don't see much activity from them. Have you tried sending them an email? If not, I can. No, please go ahead. I took the liberty right after I posted. Did also contact the recordmydesktop maintainer? I didn't then, but I did just now. (Of course that meant I had to send two emails... perhaps next time you could just mail them directly? :) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 544738] cpanspec doesn't escape / in --filter-requires leading to bad sed statements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544738 --- Comment #3 from Need Real Name bugzi...@kosowsky.org 2010-01-19 22:54:57 EST --- Thanks for the update - my query was not a complaint as much as just trying to find out if anybody out there was following this bug. Although I am no Perl expert, I believe that Perl has some very useful paradigms for making sure that regex's are appropriately quoted. Incidentally, it is a bit ironic that this perl-oriented program (it is cpan2spec afterall) uses 'sed' rather than more powerful 'perl' paradigms to filter. Switching to perl should be simple and would solve the problem using something like the \Q...\E expression. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
