Re: wine font changes system look and feel

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le Mar 5 juin 2012 19:58, Kevin Kofler a écrit :

 Can we make the font available as Tahoma to WINE only and as Wine Tahoma
 or something like that (with font substitutions for plain Tahoma NOT
 configured by default) to systemwide fontconfig?

At the fontconfig level all kinds of renaming tricks are possible (see the
examples in fontpackages-devel) though as a rule it's better to avoid doing it
here since it tends to have subtle side-effects

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Releasing ownership of many audio packages (and a little more)

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

Hi,

On 06/05/2012 11:53 PM, Anthony Green wrote:
 raptor -- Raptor RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
I just noticed that there are vulnerabilities reported against raptor
packages in Fedora and EPEL 5 -- if they have they been resolved, that's
not reflected in Bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805938
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805941

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  sali...@fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de   | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: wine font changes system look and feel

[Kamil Paral]

 We could of course aim for a dual-solution: Let
 wine-tahoma-fonts put the fonts in the wine font dir (mandatory for
 wine) and add a wine-tahoma-fonts-system package (names suggestions
 welcome) which also puts the fonts in the system wide font path
 (optional).

I believe this would be the best solution available.

The -system package can contain just a symlink to the wine-specific font 
directory.

 If this would be a feasible solution I would still like some opinions
 if
 this should be done for both fonts or just for the reported bugs
 about
 the bold version.

I wonder, are all wine-provided fonts just (non-identical) replacements for 
Microsoft fonts, or is this the case only for WineTahoma?

If there are likely to be similar issues with other wine fonts, could we just 
install all of them to wine-specific font directory and then create a new 
package wine-fonts-system that would depend on wine-fonts and installed 
symlinks into system-wide font directory for all the wine fonts?

The result would be:
* If you install wine, all wine fonts are installed just for wine, the rest of 
the system is not touched.
* If you install wine-fonts-system, all the wine fonts are available 
system-wide.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[Jiri Popelka]

On 06/05/2012 04:33 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:

On 06/05/2012 03:52 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:

Systemd includes libudev.so.1, while the old libudev.rpm provided
libudev.so.0. Therefore, all packages using udev need to be rebuilt.


Here's a list of owners with packages that currently require
libudev.so.0 in Rawhide.

twaugh system-config-printer


fixed

--
Jiri

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Releasing ownership of many audio packages (and a little more)

[Michael Schwendt]

On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:47:20 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:

  I'll take this if none of the co-maintainers steps up soon.
 
  Hi Jon,
  As one of the comaintainers, I have been doing the actual maintaining of
  Hydrogen for the last few years. Do you mind if I take the ownership?
 
 Certainly not.  Re-orphaned.  I don't particularly care who owns it,
 so long as it's well cared for. :)

If your hands aren't full already, there are problems with tuxmath
and t4k_common waiting for a response from you:

  http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/t4k_common
  http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tuxmath

-- 
Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64
loadavg: 0.74 0.62 0.47
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: *countable infinities only

[Bryn M. Reeves]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 06/01/2012 06:53 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
 Jon Ciesla wrote:
 For all available firmware vendors and models?
 
 For the ones that end users are actually likely to have, which
 aren't that many. There are much fewer BIOS vendors than hardware
 vendors.

That unfortunately does not translate to fewer BIOS variations. I had
a case in the last three months of a system from a major OEM that did
not follow any of the common conventions for their desktop systems for
accessing the configuration menu during POST.

This is particularly common with all those dinky/funky/cute small form
factor home and media PCs; they just seem to toss in whatever firmware
was lying around the factory floor that day and hope for the best. ;)

This is the reality that Peter is talking about when he describes the
difficulty of documenting this sufficiently well. Considering the
whole of the interwebs can't manage to document how to enter the
configuration menu for all systems I'd say he's got a point.

I'd also guess that a disproportionate number of owners of these
systems are in the POST my what to the who? camp.

Regards,
Bryn.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/PHh0ACgkQ6YSQoMYUY97AcwCglOl47UpcwiNhWUY5o4mPKpcP
UVEAoJwUCOueZXUzmcIsRagxq6tlXDOc
=KkzP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: another upgrade, another disaster

[Benny Amorsen]

Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:

 3. yum *if you follow the instructions carefully*

Those instructions include dracut doing unspecified magic. For other
releases I'd agree with you and do a yum upgrade, but I must admit I
don't dare try this time.

Preupgrade is a bit higher priority for this release.


/Benny

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

koji build fail but not with mock

[jonathan]

Dear,

I search to know for which reason th build fail through koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4131995

I have try to build with mock:
wget
http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/ldc-2-20.20120605git6ad085a.fc17.src.rpm
mock -r fedora-17-x86_64 rebuild
ldc-2-20.20120605git6ad085a.fc17.src.rpm


the build success

I have send to some friend the src.rpm and same they get a successful
rebuild.

koji seem to use same: gcc cpp llvm gc glibc

if someone can tell to me what is wrong?

thanks

kind regards

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: another upgrade, another disaster

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote:
 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:

 3. yum *if you follow the instructions carefully*

 Those instructions include dracut doing unspecified magic. For other

The magic was quite specified.  You rebuild the initramfs with the
convertfs module included, and pass the approriate arguments on boot.
There's a wiki page covering exactly that.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: koji build fail but not with mock

[Niels de Vos]

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:46 PM, jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear,

 I search to know for which reason th build fail through koji:
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4131995

 I have try to build with mock:
 wget
 http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/ldc-2-20.20120605git6ad085a.fc17.src.rpm
 mock -r fedora-17-x86_64 rebuild
 ldc-2-20.20120605git6ad085a.fc17.src.rpm


 the build success

 I have send to some friend the src.rpm and same they get a successful
 rebuild.

 koji seem to use same: gcc cpp llvm gc glibc

 if someone can tell to me what is wrong?

Your mock command shows x86_64, koji failed for i686. You may want to
try building x86_64 in koji, or i686 in mock.

The build.log contains the errors:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ldc-20120605git6ad085a/bin/ldc2 --output-o
--output-bc -c 
-I/builddir/build/BUILD/ldc-20120605git6ad085a/runtime/druntime/src
-I/builddir/build/BUILD/ldc-20120605git6ad085a/runtime/druntime/src/gc
/builddir/build/BUILD/ldc-20120605git6ad085a/runtime/phobos/std/datetime.d
-of/builddir/build/BUILD/ldc-20120605git6ad085a/runtime/std/datetime.o
-g -w -d -relocation-model=pic
-I/builddir/build/BUILD/ldc-20120605git6ad085a/runtime/phobos
/builddir/build/BUILD/ldc-20120605git6ad085a/runtime/phobos/std/datetime.d:
Error: module std.datetime Attributes inreg byval are incompatible!
  %tmp8 = call x86_stdcallcc i8
@_D3std8bitmanip28__T17bigEndianToNativeTaVk1Z17bigEndianToNativeFNaNbNfG1hZa([1
x i8]* inreg byval %buff), !dbg !5950
Broken module found, compilation terminated.

This may point to some problems in the code depending on 32-bit vs
64-bit architectures.

Good luck,
Niels
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

fedpkg(1) completion for zsh

[Alexey I. Froloff]

Hi,

Just sharing my fedpkg(1) completion for zsh :-)  Put this file
somewhere in your $fpath as usual.

-- 
Regards,--
Sir Raorn.   --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
#compdef fedpkg

(( $+functions[_fedpkg_targets] )) ||
_fedpkg_targets()
{
  local expl

  _wanted koji-targets expl 'target' compadd \
${${(f)$(_call_program koji-targets koji list-targets --quiet 
2/dev/null)}%% *}
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg_arches] )) ||
_fedpkg_arches()
{
  local expl
  local -a arches

  arches=( /etc/mock/[^-]##-[^-]##-[^-]##.cfg )
  _wanted mock-arches expl 'arch' compadd \
${(u)${arches#/etc/mock/[^-]##-[^-]##-}%.cfg}
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg_packages] )) ||
_fedpkg_packages()
{
  local expl

  _wanted repo-packages expl 'package' compadd \
${${(fu)$(repoquery -Cs -- $words[CURRENT]*)}%-[^-]##-[^-]##.src.rpm}
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg_branches] )) ||
_fedpkg_branches()
{
  local expl
  local -a git_opts
  local -a branches

  (( ${words[(I)--path]} )) 
git_opts=( --git-dir ${words[${words[(i)--path]}+1]} )

  branches=(${${(f)$(git $git_opts for-each-ref --format='%(refname)' 
refs/heads 2/dev/null)}#refs/heads/})
  branches+=(${${(f)$(git $git_opts for-each-ref --format='%(refname)' 
refs/remotes 2/dev/null)}##refs/remotes/*/})

  _wanted branch-names expl 'branch-name' compadd \
${(u)branches}
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-help] )) ||
_fedpkg-help () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-build] )) ||
_fedpkg-build () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]' \
'--arches[build for specific arches]:*:arch:_fedpkg_arches' \
'--md5[use md5 checksums]' \
'--nowait[on'\''t wait on build]' \
'--target[define build target to build into]:target:_fedpkg_targets' \
'--background[run the build at a low priority]' \
'--skip-tag[do not attempt to tag package]' \
'--scratch[rerform a scratch build]' \
'--srpm[build from an srpm]::srpm:_files -g *.src.rpm'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-chain-build] )) ||
_fedpkg-chain-build () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]' \
'--arches[build for specific arches]:*:arch:_fedpkg_arches' \
'--md5[use md5 checksums]' \
'--nowait[on'\''t wait on build]' \
'--target[define build target to build into]:target:_fedpkg_targets' \
'--background[run the build at a low priority]' \
'*:package:_fedpkg_packages'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-clean] )) ||
_fedpkg-clean () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]' \
'(-n --dry-run)'{-n,--dry-run}'[perform a dry-run]' \
'-x[do not follow .gitignore rules]'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-clog] )) ||
_fedpkg-clog () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]' \
'--raw[generate a more raw clog without twiddling the contents]'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-clone] )) ||
_fedpkg-clone () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]' \
'(-B --branches)'{-B,--branches}'[do an old style checkout with subdirs for 
branches]' \
'(-b --branch)'{-b,--branch}'[check out a specific 
branch]:branch:_fedpkg_branches' \
'(-a --anonymous)'{-a,--anonymous}'[check out a module anonymously]' \
':package:_fedpkg_packages'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-commit] )) ||
_fedpkg-commit () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]' \
'(-c --clog)'{-c,--clog}'[generate the commit message from the %changelog 
section]' \
'--raw[make the clog raw]' \
'(-t --tag)'{-t,--tag}'[create a tag for this commit]' \
'(-m --message)'{-m,--message}'[use the given commit message]:message' \
'(-F --file)'{-F,--file}'[take the commit message from the given 
file]:file:_files' \
'(-p --push)'{-p,--push}'[commit and push as one action]' \
'*:file:_files'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-compile] )) ||
_fedpkg-compile () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]' \
'--builddir[define an alternate builddir]:builddir:_files -/' \
'--arch[prep for a specific arch]:arch:_fedpkg_arches' \
'--short-circuit[short-circuit compile]'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-diff] )) ||
_fedpkg-diff () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]' \
'--cached[view staged changes]' \
'*:file:_files'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-gimmespec] )) ||
_fedpkg-gimmespec () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-gitbuildhash] )) ||
_fedpkg-gitbuildhash () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]' \
':build'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-giturl] )) ||
_fedpkg-giturl () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message and exit]'
}

(( $+functions[_fedpkg-import] )) ||
_fedpkg-import () {
  _arguments -C \
'(-h --help)'{-h,--help}'[show help message 

Re: fedpkg(1) completion for zsh

[Thomas Moschny]

2012/6/6 Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name:
 Just sharing my fedpkg(1) completion for zsh :-)  Put this file
 somewhere in your $fpath as usual.

You might want to add it here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-packager/ticket/81

Regards,
Thomas
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: fedpkg(1) completion for zsh

[Alexey I. Froloff]

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:11:36PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
  Just sharing my fedpkg(1) completion for zsh :-)  Put this file
  somewhere in your $fpath as usual.
 You might want to add it here:
 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-packager/ticket/81
I've added it here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829012

Do you think fedora-packager is a better place for this file?  Or
I could submit it directly to zsh upstream.

P.S. %{_datadir}/zsh/site-functions is a better place for
third-party zsh functions.

-- 
Regards,--
Sir Raorn.   --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Releasing ownership of many audio packages (and a little more)

[Jon Ciesla]

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:47:20 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:

  I'll take this if none of the co-maintainers steps up soon.
 
  Hi Jon,
  As one of the comaintainers, I have been doing the actual maintaining of
  Hydrogen for the last few years. Do you mind if I take the ownership?

 Certainly not.  Re-orphaned.  I don't particularly care who owns it,
 so long as it's well cared for. :)

 If your hands aren't full already, there are problems with tuxmath
 and t4k_common waiting for a response from you:

  http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/t4k_common
  http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tuxmath

I'll try to get to those today.

-J

 --
 Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64
 loadavg: 0.74 0.62 0.47
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: *countable infinities only

[Paulo César Pereira de Andrade]

2012/6/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
 Tomas Mraz wrote:
 That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not
 just technical obstacle. If it is just a technical obstacle in the code,
 you can remove it and run the software on any crippled machine at your
 will. So no, making your software not to work on particular machines
 does not make it non-free at all.

 That doesn't mean we should ship it in that state.

 If Fedora decides to support Secure Boot, it needs to be distro-wide.

  Could it be done in a pretend to be supported mode, somewhat
like having a known public grub key, and then provide some Linux
certified stickers :-) Then let grub load any OS, or chain load windows
as usual.
  If it is required to validate every built kernel, every module, etc, then
there is no point on it for Linux. The certification for Linux should be
a signed source tarball and secure channel updates, not some entity
signing some specific binary as guaranteed secure.
  For the truly paranoid, could also provide some kind of boot image,
like memtest, providing all source code of course, and can be built for
a bootable device, and let it do any security audit (need to trust
whatever binary is in firmware).

        Kevin Kofler

Paulo
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[Adam Jackson]

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 01:12 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:

 #yum update mesa-libgbm
 [...]
 --- Package mesa-libgbm.i686 0:8.1-0.5.fc18 will be updated
 --- Package mesa-libgbm.x86_64 0:8.1-0.5.fc18 will be updated
 --- Package mesa-libgbm.i686 0:8.1-0.6.fc18 will be an update
 -- Processing Dependency: libudev.so.1(LIBUDEV_183) for package: 
 mesa-libgbm-8.1-0.6.fc18.i686
 -- Processing Dependency: libudev.so.1 for package: 
 mesa-libgbm-8.1-0.6.fc18.i686
 --- Package mesa-libgbm.x86_64 0:8.1-0.6.fc18 will be an update
 -- Running transaction check
 --- Package systemd.i686 0:185-2.fc18 will be installed
 
 After having had some funny issues in the past due to there being two 
 systemds (x86_64, i686) installed for some reason, something tells me 
 that it's a bad idea to proceed with the update. Or am I wrong?

Having two systemd packages installed isn't necessarily a problem, rpm's
color concept on ELF objects should mean that x86_64 should win
wherever the two packages' files collide, which should only be
in /usr/*bin.  It's still not the prettiest thing in the world, I admit;
I'd be happier if there were a systemd-libs even if it were effectively
not optional.

But if there's not going to be a systemd-libs subpackage, any issues you
do have with this scenario are systemd bugs.

- ajax


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: *countable infinities only

[drago01]

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
 2012/6/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
 Tomas Mraz wrote:
 That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not
 just technical obstacle. If it is just a technical obstacle in the code,
 you can remove it and run the software on any crippled machine at your
 will. So no, making your software not to work on particular machines
 does not make it non-free at all.

 That doesn't mean we should ship it in that state.

 If Fedora decides to support Secure Boot, it needs to be distro-wide.

  Could it be done in a pretend to be supported mode, somewhat
 like having a known public grub key, and then provide some Linux
 certified stickers :-) Then let grub load any OS, or chain load windows
 as usual.

That makes no sense at all.

1) How would you get OEMs to support add that key?
2) How do you prevent malware authors to use this public available key
to sign there malware?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[Michal Schmidt]

On 06/06/2012 03:26 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:

But if there's not going to be a systemd-libs subpackage, any issues you
do have with this scenario are systemd bugs.


We discussed it recently with Kay. We will split out a systemd-libs 
subpackage to be more multilib-friendly. That said, we are not aware of 
any specific issues with having both systemd.{x86_64,i686} installed.


Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: another upgrade, another disaster

[Michal Schmidt]

On 06/06/2012 12:15 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote:

3. yum *if you follow the instructions carefully*


Those instructions include dracut doing unspecified magic. For other
releases I'd agree with you and do a yum upgrade, but I must admit I
don't dare try this time.


Upgrading with Anaconda causes the same 'magic' to be run.

Despite having to do more steps manually, I had better success with 
upgrading to F17 using yum than with the other methods.


One problem with upgrading using Anaconda from F15 was when it 
encountered the qt-examples package. Anaconda just reported an error 
in the middle of the upgrade and offered no way to continue. Recovering 
from that was quite painful. Further investigation showed the likely 
reason was a case of the known symlink vs. directory rpm issue.
With yum upgrade the issue affects only the one package, but allows the 
transaction to finish.


Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[Sandro Mani]

 We discussed it recently with Kay. We will split out a systemd-libs
 subpackage to be more multilib-friendly. That said, we are not aware of any
 specific issues with having both systemd.{x86_64,i686} installed.

 Just to elaborate: The issues I was referring to happened during a
F16-rawhide upgrade last December, when mistakenly doing yum upgrade
instead of distro-sync. I don't recall the specific symptoms, and didn't
investigate further since they went away with a yum erase --remove-leaves
systemd.i686. However, they might also have been caused by one of systemd's
dependencies.

Anyway, thanks for the clarifications.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

Hello,

I'm starting with perl 5.16 rebuild.

All changes will be comitted into `master' git branch and built into separate
`f18-perl' build-root. That means standard rawhide will be unaffected
(including the perl_bootstrap macro) until we merge the f18-perl build-root
back to f18.

I use special script to handle the rebuild (updating sources, computing
dependencies, submitting builds to koji, checking for build result, etc.), so
you do not need to build into f18-perl too. Actually it harms my script
because it looses synchronization resulting in double rebuild commits and
builds which is not necessary.

You can continue to develop in f18, I will check in your changes into
f18-build later.

You can watch the plan and progress at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/perl5.16.

I'd like to thank to Paul for breaking (hopefully) all the cyclic
dependencies.

-- Petr


pgpkZo2tCkTKS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: *countable infinities only

[Paulo César Pereira de Andrade]

2012/6/6 drago01 drag...@gmail.com:
 On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
 paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
 2012/6/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
 Tomas Mraz wrote:
 That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not
 just technical obstacle. If it is just a technical obstacle in the code,
 you can remove it and run the software on any crippled machine at your
 will. So no, making your software not to work on particular machines
 does not make it non-free at all.

 That doesn't mean we should ship it in that state.

 If Fedora decides to support Secure Boot, it needs to be distro-wide.

  Could it be done in a pretend to be supported mode, somewhat
 like having a known public grub key, and then provide some Linux
 certified stickers :-) Then let grub load any OS, or chain load windows
 as usual.

 That makes no sense at all.

 1) How would you get OEMs to support add that key?
 2) How do you prevent malware authors to use this public available key
 to sign there malware?

  That is the part of pretend to be supported, just to avoid needing
users to go to some setup mode to disable secure boot, and then
offer other means of security audit, like a custom boot image for
an external device. For windows, it could be some certified bootable
DVD, that would be guaranteed to be clean, and from there run
anti virus, or any scanning tools.

Paulo
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[Nathanael D. Noblet]

On 06/05/2012 09:30 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:

On 6/4/12 9:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:

We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd
repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore.

The version of systemd which includes udev has landed in rawhide a
couple of days ago. Fedora 18 will not have a udev.rpm, no libudev.rpm
and no libudev-devel.rpm.


I think we can also take this to mean that an explicit:

Requires: udev

is now redundant? In which case the following (F17) packages can be
cleaned up:


I presume that I can remove the requires from packages in the list 
below, and that no changes to parts such as


%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/*

are required?

Come to think of it... shouldn't the rules that come with a package be 
in /lib/udev/rules.d?





% repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora --qf=%{sourcerpm}
--whatrequires udev | sort -u
aic94xx-firmware-30-3.fc17.src.rpm
alsa-firmware-1.0.25-1.fc17.src.rpm
alsa-tools-1.0.25-2.fc17.src.rpm
android-tools-20111220git1b251bd-2.fc17.src.rpm
ar9170-firmware-2009.05.28-4.fc17.src.rpm
argyllcms-1.3.6-2.fc17.src.rpm
b43-openfwwf-5.2-7.fc17.src.rpm
barry-0.17.1-7.fc17.src.rpm
bfa-firmware-3.0.0.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
biosdevname-0.3.11-6.fc17.src.rpm
bluez-4.98-3.fc17.src.rpm
btkbdd-1.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
clamtk-4.39-1.fc17.src.rpm
crda-1.1.2_2011.04.28-2.fc17.src.rpm
cups-1.5.2-12.fc17.src.rpm
device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-25.fc17.src.rpm
dracut-018-35.git20120510.fc17.src.rpm
drbd-8.3.11-5.fc17.src.rpm
em8300-0.18.0-6.fc17.src.rpm
fbterm-1.6-5.fc17.src.rpm
fxload-2002_04_11-11.fc17.src.rpm
gpsd-3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm
hplip-3.12.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
i2c-tools-3.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
initscripts-9.37-1.fc17.src.rpm
iscan-firmware-2.26.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
isdn4k-utils-3.2-81.fc17.src.rpm
isight-firmware-tools-1.6-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl1000-firmware-39.31.5.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl5150-firmware-8.24.2.2-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000-firmware-9.221.4.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000g2b-firmware-17.168.5.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6050-firmware-41.28.5.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
libconcord-0.23-9.fc17.src.rpm
libdrm-2.4.33-1.fc17.src.rpm
libertas-sd8686-firmware-9.70.20.p0-2.fc17.src.rpm
libftdi-0.19-3.fc17.src.rpm
libgpod-0.8.2-4.fc17.src.rpm
libguestfs-1.17.36-2.fc17.src.rpm
libmtp-1.1.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
libnjb-2.2.7-2.fc17.src.rpm
libosinfo-0.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
libphidget-2.1.8.20120123-1.fc17.src.rpm
libvirt-0.9.11.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
linux-firmware-20120206-0.3.git06c8f81.fc17.src.rpm
lvm2-2.02.95-6.fc17.src.rpm
MAKEDEV-3.24-10.fc17.src.rpm
mdadm-3.2.3-6.fc17.src.rpm
media-player-info-16-1.fc17.src.rpm
microcode_ctl-1.17-24.fc17.src.rpm
NetworkManager-0.9.4.0-7.git20120403.fc17.src.rpm
netxen-firmware-4.0.534-5.fc17.src.rpm
nut-2.6.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
olpc-utils-2.0.7-1.fc17.src.rpm
openct-0.6.20-3.fc17.src.rpm
openni-primesense-5.0.3.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
os-prober-1.53-1.fc17.src.rpm
ovirt-node-2.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
pcmciautils-018-2.fc17.src.rpm
pulseaudio-1.1-9.fc17.src.rpm
rdma-1.0-11.fc17.src.rpm
sane-backends-1.0.22-9.fc17.src.rpm
svxlink-11.11.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
synce-sync-engine-0.15.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
systemd-44-8.fc17.src.rpm
udev-182-1.fc17.src.rpm
udisks-1.0.4-6.fc17.src.rpm
udisks2-1.94.0-4.fc17.src.rpm
upower-0.9.16-1.fc17.src.rpm
usb_modeswitch-data-20111023-2.fc17.src.rpm
util-linux-2.21.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
v4l-utils-0.8.7-1.fc17.src.rpm
vdr-1.7.27-1.fc17.src.rpm
vdr-remote-0.4.0-19.fc17.src.rpm
xen-4.1.2-15.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.6.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-12.8.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.14.0-2.fc17.src.rpm

- ajax




--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[Garrett Holmstrom]

On 2012-06-06 6:26, Adam Jackson wrote:

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 01:12 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:

After having had some funny issues in the past due to there being two
systemds (x86_64, i686) installed for some reason, something tells me
that it's a bad idea to proceed with the update. Or am I wrong?


Having two systemd packages installed isn't necessarily a problem, rpm's
color concept on ELF objects should mean that x86_64 should win
wherever the two packages' files collide, which should only be
in /usr/*bin.  It's still not the prettiest thing in the world, I admit;
I'd be happier if there were a systemd-libs even if it were effectively
not optional.


Does rpm handle binaries' colors everywhere, or just in selected 
locations?  I'm especially curious about /usr/lib.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

File IO-Socket-IP-0.11.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

[Petr Šabata]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-IP:

0a6d1743d32d08a33a1e4ebf543e255a  IO-Socket-IP-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-IO-Socket-IP] 0.11 bump

[Petr Šabata]

commit ac5edd59c1036670d81b6376fe1821b061e55ccb
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 17:53:49 2012 +0200

0.11 bump

 .gitignore |1 +
 perl-IO-Socket-IP.spec |7 +--
 sources|2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 146b822..900d79c 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 /IO-Socket-IP-0.08.tar.gz
 /IO-Socket-IP-0.09.tar.gz
 /IO-Socket-IP-0.10.tar.gz
+/IO-Socket-IP-0.11.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-IO-Socket-IP.spec b/perl-IO-Socket-IP.spec
index 569ba78..e9207e7 100644
--- a/perl-IO-Socket-IP.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-Socket-IP.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-IO-Socket-IP
-Version:0.10
+Version:0.11
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Drop-in replacement for IO::Socket::INET supporting both IPv4 
and IPv6
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Socket)
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Socket::INET)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Socket)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Socket) = 1.97
 BuildRequires:  perl(Socket6)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.11-1
+- 0.11 bump
+
 * Fri May 11 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.10-1
 - 0.10 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index ac80db9..b40eca7 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-881caafd09122665462e293262ea0bd5  IO-Socket-IP-0.10.tar.gz
+0a6d1743d32d08a33a1e4ebf543e255a  IO-Socket-IP-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: *countable infinities only

[drago01]

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
 2012/6/6 drago01 drag...@gmail.com:
 On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
 paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
 2012/6/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
 Tomas Mraz wrote:
 That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not
 just technical obstacle. If it is just a technical obstacle in the code,
 you can remove it and run the software on any crippled machine at your
 will. So no, making your software not to work on particular machines
 does not make it non-free at all.

 That doesn't mean we should ship it in that state.

 If Fedora decides to support Secure Boot, it needs to be distro-wide.

  Could it be done in a pretend to be supported mode, somewhat
 like having a known public grub key, and then provide some Linux
 certified stickers :-) Then let grub load any OS, or chain load windows
 as usual.

 That makes no sense at all.

 1) How would you get OEMs to support add that key?
 2) How do you prevent malware authors to use this public available key
 to sign there malware?

  That is the part of pretend to be supported, just to avoid needing
 users to go to some setup mode to disable secure boot, and then
 offer other means of security audit, like a custom boot image for
 an external device. For windows, it could be some certified bootable
 DVD, that would be guaranteed to be clean, and from there run
 anti virus, or any scanning tools.

Now back to reality ... how do you intend to support that?
Talking about how things should be done is nice and all but not
really productive.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[perl-threads] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 3ff71c948eff2c3c9319f8c8789fda1b8af523e3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 18:11:47 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-threads.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-threads.spec b/perl-threads.spec
index 833e519..4080b49 100644
--- a/perl-threads.spec
+++ b/perl-threads.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-threads
 Version:1.86
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl interpreter-based threads
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.86-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Sat Jan 14 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.86-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Socket] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 169540b257ff5215b37116df546da96ec04cd80c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 18:11:47 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Socket.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Socket.spec b/perl-Socket.spec
index 1cea97b..f3d6027 100644
--- a/perl-Socket.spec
+++ b/perl-Socket.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 %global cpan_version 2.001
 Name:   perl-Socket
 Version:%(eval echo '%{cpan_version}' | tr '_' '.')
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:C socket.h defines and structure manipulators
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.001-2
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Wed Mar 28 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.001-1
 - 2.001 bump (bug-fixing release)
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Carp] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 8e76c05a07ab7562946ed129fac9644e42ba9b85
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 18:11:47 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Carp.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Carp.spec b/perl-Carp.spec
index 3731b24..6a1a397 100644
--- a/perl-Carp.spec
+++ b/perl-Carp.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Carp
 Version:1.25
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:Alternative warn and die for modules
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.25-2
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Thu Mar 15 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.25-1
 - 1.25 bump
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[Michal Schmidt]

On 06/06/2012 05:39 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:

Come to think of it... shouldn't the rules that come with a package be
in /lib/udev/rules.d?


Yes, but add the /usr prefix: %{_prefix}/lib/udev/rules.d/

Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[Michal Schmidt]

On 06/06/2012 05:52 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:

Does rpm handle binaries' colors everywhere, or just in selected
locations? I'm especially curious about /usr/lib.


I don't know the answer in the general case, but it definitely works for 
binaries in /usr/lib/systemd/. No conflicts are reported when installing 
systemd for both archs and all ELFs there come out as 64-bit as they should.


Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[John Reiser]

On 06/06/2012 07:25 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:

  We will split out a systemd-libs subpackage to be more multilib-friendly. 
 That said, we are not aware of any specific issues with having both 
 systemd.{x86_64,i686} installed.

As long as systemd.rpm has content that is platform-dependent, then
it is likely that there will be overlap in some files; in this
case, such as x86_64 and i686 versions of the same binary executable
file.  In theory the rpm feature of executable flavors should resolve
such an overlap (in favor of .x86_64 in this case), but this feature
relies on the corresponding .x86_64 and .i686 packages always having
the same n-v-r. The mirror system isn't that reliable [I see a sync
failure a few times per year], so the dreaded yum error protected
multilib versions likely will occur.

-- 
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

[Pavel Alexeev]

06.06.2012 03:09, Tadej Janež написал:

On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 13:55 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:


I'll plan unpush that update and work on patching ImageMagick to handle
these issues locally. But I'm not security expert and can't guarantee
something except mentioned patch apply (contrary leave it on upstream
authors, as I was want do first).

Even though this means a lot of your work has been waisted, I think it's
the right decision to patch ImageMagick to fix the security issues
instead of doing a large-scale update of Fedora 16.

I'm doubt... But I think it is not have worth start it dispute again.


With regard to the packages that depend on ImageMagick that you already
updated: will you revert those commits in git

I'm unsure I known how doing that correctly.
Does it enough do just:
git revert 56e05f..HEAD

or I must do something like:

|git reset 56e05f
git reset --soft HEAD@{1}
git commit -m Revert to 56e05fced
git reset --hard|

?

  and delete the
corresponding builds in koji?
Do you mean koji untag-pkg or something other? Could you please provide 
link on such procedure description?


Regards,
Tadej Janež




-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Update impacting users (not so many I hope)

[Simone Caronni]

Hello,

I need an advice on how to push an update without impacting users too much.

There's a problem in the current shipped Bacula in Fedora 17 related to
shared libraries.
This is related to the fact that upstream changed things so many times to
remove the multiple builds in the past 6 months.
I'll try to make the story as short as possible:

Starting from 5.0.3, there were multiple binaries built from the same
source inside the package, lots of symlinks in the alternatives system and
lot of patches to support the various database backends.

Starting from 5.2.x, upstream developers moved all the common code into
libraries and made the selection of the database through a single symlink
on a versioned library.
At the beginning this was done with multiple versioned libraries offering a
single shared object name and tricks like that. This made packaging almost
impossible (packages requiring libraries contained in themselves, yum going
crazy) and ended up with the developers changing everything a couple of
times (and the spec file followed, with %ghost, etc.).

In the latest incarnation of the package that was released with Fedora 17
(5.2.6-2.fc17 - unchaged for a long time), the backend was chosen with an
alternative (+ a slave):

# alternatives --config libbaccats.so

There are 3 programs which provide 'libbaccats.so'.

  SelectionCommand
---
   1   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql-5.2.6.so
 + 2   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.6.so
*  3   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-postgresql-5.2.6.so

Enter to keep the current selection[+], or type selection number:

The problem is that when I tried to install 5.2.7-2.fc17 from a freshly
built package I ended up in this situation:

# alternatives --config libbaccats.so

There are 6 programs which provide 'libbaccats.so'.

  SelectionCommand
---
   1   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql-5.2.6.so
 + 2   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.6.so
*  3   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-postgresql-5.2.6.so
   4   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql-5.2.7.so
   5   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.7.so
   6   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-postgresql-5.2.7.so

I fixed the thing in 5.2.7-3.fc17 (in koji), simply linking the unversioned
shared object to the alternatives file and removing the slave.

# alternatives --config libbaccats.so

There are 3 programs which provide 'libbaccats.so'.

  SelectionCommand
---
   1   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql.so
   2   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3.so
*+ 3   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-postgresql.so

What's the procedure to push this update into updates-testing (and
updates)? There's some cleanup of alternatives involved.

Thanks,
--Simone




-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Update impacting users (not so many I hope)

[Simone Caronni]

As suggested in bug 829219; another option could be to explicitly
check the state of the user's preferences, e.g.:

if readlink /etc/alternatives/libbaccats.so | grep --silent mysql; then
# set up for mysql backend
elif readlink /etc/alternatives/libbaccats.so | grep --silent sqlite; then
# set up for sqlite backend
else
# default to postgresql backend
fi

That approach would default to postgresql backend but would retain
previously-set preferences even on version updates.

Regards,
--Simone




On 6 June 2012 19:58, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I need an advice on how to push an update without impacting users too much.

 There's a problem in the current shipped Bacula in Fedora 17 related to 
 shared libraries.
 This is related to the fact that upstream changed things so many times to 
 remove the multiple builds in the past 6 months.
 I'll try to make the story as short as possible:

 Starting from 5.0.3, there were multiple binaries built from the same source 
 inside the package, lots of symlinks in the alternatives system and lot of 
 patches to support the various database backends.

 Starting from 5.2.x, upstream developers moved all the common code into 
 libraries and made the selection of the database through a single symlink on 
 a versioned library.
 At the beginning this was done with multiple versioned libraries offering a 
 single shared object name and tricks like that. This made packaging almost 
 impossible (packages requiring libraries contained in themselves, yum going 
 crazy) and ended up with the developers changing everything a couple of times 
 (and the spec file followed, with %ghost, etc.).

 In the latest incarnation of the package that was released with Fedora 17 
 (5.2.6-2.fc17 - unchaged for a long time), the backend was chosen with an 
 alternative (+ a slave):

 # alternatives --config libbaccats.so

 There are 3 programs which provide 'libbaccats.so'.

   Selection    Command
 ---
    1   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql-5.2.6.so
  + 2   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.6.so
 *  3   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-postgresql-5.2.6.so

 Enter to keep the current selection[+], or type selection number:

 The problem is that when I tried to install 5.2.7-2.fc17 from a freshly built 
 package I ended up in this situation:

 # alternatives --config libbaccats.so

 There are 6 programs which provide 'libbaccats.so'.

   Selection    Command
 ---
    1   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql-5.2.6.so
  + 2   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.6.so
 *  3   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-postgresql-5.2.6.so
    4   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql-5.2.7.so
    5   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.7.so
    6   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-postgresql-5.2.7.so

 I fixed the thing in 5.2.7-3.fc17 (in koji), simply linking the unversioned 
 shared object to the alternatives file and removing the slave.

 # alternatives --config libbaccats.so

 There are 3 programs which provide 'libbaccats.so'.

   Selection    Command
 ---
    1   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql.so
    2   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3.so
 *+ 3   /usr/lib64/libbaccats-postgresql.so

 What's the procedure to push this update into updates-testing (and updates)? 
 There's some cleanup of alternatives involved.

 Thanks,
 --Simone




 --
 You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of 
 the shore (R. W. Emerson).




--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose
sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: *countable infinities only

[Paulo César Pereira de Andrade]

2012/6/6 drago01 drag...@gmail.com:
 On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
 paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
 2012/6/6 drago01 drag...@gmail.com:
 On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
 paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
 2012/6/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
 Tomas Mraz wrote:
 That's a total nonsense unless the restriction is by-license and not
 just technical obstacle. If it is just a technical obstacle in the code,
 you can remove it and run the software on any crippled machine at your
 will. So no, making your software not to work on particular machines
 does not make it non-free at all.

 That doesn't mean we should ship it in that state.

 If Fedora decides to support Secure Boot, it needs to be distro-wide.

  Could it be done in a pretend to be supported mode, somewhat
 like having a known public grub key, and then provide some Linux
 certified stickers :-) Then let grub load any OS, or chain load windows
 as usual.

 That makes no sense at all.

 1) How would you get OEMs to support add that key?
 2) How do you prevent malware authors to use this public available key
 to sign there malware?

  That is the part of pretend to be supported, just to avoid needing
 users to go to some setup mode to disable secure boot, and then
 offer other means of security audit, like a custom boot image for
 an external device. For windows, it could be some certified bootable
 DVD, that would be guaranteed to be clean, and from there run
 anti virus, or any scanning tools.

 Now back to reality ... how do you intend to support that?
 Talking about how things should be done is nice and all but not
 really productive.

  That suggestion is impractical for end users, but a way to do
a truly assurance that the system is secure (provided that it has
an as up to date as possible information on known exploits).

  Anyway, I am pretty sure several distros will ignore this issue,
possibly until too late, and the end solution at worst, for
computers where secure boot cannot be disabled should
be to have someone providing a signed first stage loader
(until such key is revoked...)

Paulo
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

[Tom Callaway]

Here is the latest set of changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:

---

In Fedora, you can assume that the default shell (/bin/sh) is bash.
Thus, all scriptlets can safely assume that if they are running in shell
code, they are running within bash.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Default_Shell

---

A bundling exception was granted for calibre to bundle their forked
version of pyPdf.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_granted_exceptions

---

A new set of MinGW guidelines are in place for Fedora 17+. These
guidelines reflect the existence of mingw32 and mingw64.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW

Older guidelines remain in place for older versions of Fedora (and RHEL
6 or older):

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW_Old

---

A section of the Ruby Guidelines concerning the appropriate place to
copy C extensions in the spec file template has been clarified and enhanced:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Building_gems

---

Guidelines for usage of tmpfiles.d have been updated to better reflect
the current stage of Fedora and other Fedora guidelines. In summary:

* Dropped the irrelevant talk of both systemd and upstart
* Prefer talking of /run everywhere instead of /var/run
* Ship the packaged files in %{_prefix}/lib/tmpfiles.d/, not
  %{_sysconfdir}/tmpfiles.d/.
* Do not mark the files as %config and add an explanation why.
* Use the more usual 'd' specifier instead of 'D'.
* Nudge packagers into thinking about the permission mode of their
  directories, rather than copying the 0710 dogmatically.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tmpfiles.d

---
The systemd guidelines have been update to reflect the fact that unit
files should avoid using StandardOutput= or StandardError=. The default
is the right choice for almost all cases, and using the default allows
users to change global defaults in /etc/systemd/system.conf.

Also, all references to After=syslog.target have been dropped, as that
is no longer correct or relevant in current versions of Fedora.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd

---

The packaging guidelines now mention that the %make_install macro (*not*
to be confused with %makeinstall) may be used instead of make
DESTDIR=%{buildroot}.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used

---

A new section was added to the guidelines to indicate that Fedora uses
gcc as the compiler (for all languages that gcc supports). Packages may
only build with an alternative compiler to gcc if upstream does not
support gcc.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler

---

These guidelines (and changes) were approved by the Fedora Packaging
Committee (FPC).

Many thanks to Kevin Fenzi, Hans de Goede, Vít Ondruch, Erik van
Pienbroek, Petr Pisar, Lennart Poettering, Michal Schmidt, Rahul
Sundaram, and all of the members of the FPC, for assisting in drafting,
refining, and passing these guidelines.

As a reminder: The Fedora Packaging Guidelines are living documents! If
you find something missing, incorrect, or in need of revision, you can
suggest a draft change. The procedure for this is documented here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Committee#GuidelineChangeProcedure

Thanks,

~tom
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fedora ARM status meeting minutes 2012-06-06

[Paul Whalen]

Good day all,

Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today. 
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:

Minutes: 
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-06-06/fedora-meeting-1.2012-06-06-20.00.html
Minutes (text): 
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-06-06/fedora-meeting-1.2012-06-06-20.00.txt
Log: 
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-06-06/fedora-meeting-1.2012-06-06-20.00.log.html

Paul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: glusterfs rename

[Ric Wheeler]

On 06/06/2012 07:56 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com  wrote:

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEYkkeit...@redhat.com  wrote:

On 05/30/2012 02:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:

Yes, for the Fedora side of things I think gluster 3.2 is the best
strategy with a fedorapeople repo of 3.3 if it's considered worthwhile
for those that wish to play. For gluster 3.3 I suggest a feature page
for F-18 / rawhide. Is it feasible for the missing hekafs features to
be merged into the 3.3 release train by October when F-18 is due to be
released?


I was under the impression that glusterfs would be automatically carried
forward from f17 into f18, as it apparently was from f16 into f17.

It will be carried forward but a major change of features and
enhancements is worth doing a feature page to advertise the feature
improvements (see the gnome feature page as an example[1] ), it's
something for marketing to use and allows you to also detail things
like the removal or merge of HekaFS.


F18 builds (of 3.2.6) are already available in koji. Until now I haven't
heard that a feature page is needed for 3.2.x (or 3.3.x) to be included in
f18. (But how to deprecate HekaFS on f18 once the glusterfs-3.3.0 build is
available.)

See above for feature page details. For deprecate HekaFS you add the
the appropriate obsoletes/provides as necessary to the gluster package
and follow the process for removing/obsoleteing a package in the wiki.


The features that are in HekaFS (in f16 and f17) will get merged into
glusterfs-3.3.1+, as I indicated previously, but I won't promise how many of
them will be there when f18 ships. We certainly hope that all of them will
be, but we aren't making any promises.

So that's something that can be documented in a feature page in the
wiki and updated as things progress through both the gluster devel
process and the fedora release process :)

Okay, as a slightly more detailed version:

You should follow the full feature process, to be put in the
FeatureList for F18.  If you want to see what that process looks like,
you probably want to look at this diagram:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Process

And make your feature page according to the template noted on that
wiki page, and submit it to the feature wrangler (via a wiki category
change) so that they can have it approved by fesco, at which point it
can be added to the actual feature list :)

-robyn



The short version of this is that HekaFS used to be an independent set of 
features on top of glusterfs that are now moving into the core of glusterfs. 
That is a glusterfs community decision, not a fedora project per se.


When we update the gluster code in Fedora, we will get this change and the 
hekafs packages will be obsolete.


Do we really need to create a feature page for that and follow the approval 
process?


Seems too heavy weight to me for effectively rebasing a package...

thanks!

Ric

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: grive open source client for google drive

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote: 
 
 
 Am about to package this:
 grive open source client for google drive
 http://match065.github.com/grive/
 
 
 Just wondering in case if somebody else is working on it
 
http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35570 

fedorarussian :) 


Regards
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi,

On Qua, 2012-06-06 at 14:03 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
 
 In Fedora, you can assume that the default shell (/bin/sh) is bash.
 Thus, all scriptlets can safely assume that if they are running in
 shell
 code, they are running within bash.
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Default_Shell 

Don't understand why you don't change the default shell to bash.
I had problems on export some of my rpm scripts to Debian, because in
one Debian /bin/sh was a dash. 
To workaround changed all /bin/sh to /bin/bash.  

Thanks, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2012-06-06 at 14:03 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd

BTW , 

we don't have an %{_initrddir} for systemd ? 



-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild

[Peter Hutterer]

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:30:57AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
 On 6/4/12 9:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
 We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd
 repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore.
 
 The version of systemd which includes udev has landed in rawhide a
 couple of days ago. Fedora 18 will not have a udev.rpm, no libudev.rpm
 and no libudev-devel.rpm.
 
 I think we can also take this to mean that an explicit:
 
 Requires: udev
 
 is now redundant?  In which case the following (F17) packages can be
 cleaned up:
 
 % repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora --qf=%{sourcerpm}
 --whatrequires udev | sort -u

 xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.6.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
 xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-12.8.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
 xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.14.0-2.fc17.src.rpm

done.
 
Cheers,
  Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: glusterfs rename

[Rahul Sundaram]

On 06/07/2012 05:29 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:

 
 Do we really need to create a feature page for that and follow the
 approval process?
 
 Seems too heavy weight to me for effectively rebasing a package...

It is certainly not required.  Feature process is a marketing and
coordination tool.  Not a bureaucracy to rubber stamp merely a rebase.
Use it only where it makes sense.  In this case, you only need it if you
want to advertise this change heavily.

Rahul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

File Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.1.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

[Petr Pisar]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fedora-Rebuild:

7e3a504fafde3cc77dc3d242157ed4d0  Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Fedora-Rebuild] 0.9.1 bump

[Petr Pisar]

commit 147a59a75f9fb6f378cdd621d1cd48f4f887a5e2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 10:05:26 2012 +0200

0.9.1 bump

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec |7 +--
 sources  |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 202c6af..8a6a58d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
 /Fedora-Rebuild-v0.7.0.tar.gz
 /Fedora-Rebuild-v0.8.0.tar.gz
 /Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.0.tar.gz
+/Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.1.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec b/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec
index 7f31832..17b6333 100644
--- a/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec
+++ b/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # This file is lincensed under the terms of GPLv2+.
 Name:   perl-Fedora-Rebuild
-Version:0.9.0
+Version:0.9.1
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch
 License:GPLv3+
@@ -69,13 +69,16 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null \;
 make test
 
 %files
-%doc COPYING
+%doc Changes COPYING
 %{_bindir}/*
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man1/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.9.1-1
+- 0.9.1 bump
+
 * Tue May 29 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.9.0-1
 - 0.9.0 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 9818818..0518a91 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d2e2a08546d5bae09b9e34a7aa2cf53a  Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.0.tar.gz
+7e3a504fafde3cc77dc3d242157ed4d0  Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Fedora-Rebuild/f17] 0.9.1 bump

[Petr Pisar]

Summary of changes:

  147a59a... 0.9.1 bump (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Fedora-Rebuild/f16] 0.9.1 bump

[Petr Pisar]

commit 486db0bceb02887d80128dbcf750bf6a3a2dad4a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 10:05:26 2012 +0200

0.9.1 bump

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec |7 +--
 sources  |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 202c6af..8a6a58d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
 /Fedora-Rebuild-v0.7.0.tar.gz
 /Fedora-Rebuild-v0.8.0.tar.gz
 /Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.0.tar.gz
+/Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.1.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec b/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec
index 7e4f35b..d600df4 100644
--- a/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec
+++ b/perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # This file is lincensed under the terms of GPLv2+.
 Name:   perl-Fedora-Rebuild
-Version:0.9.0
+Version:0.9.1
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch
 License:GPLv3+
@@ -69,13 +69,16 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null \;
 make test
 
 %files
-%doc COPYING
+%doc Changes COPYING
 %{_bindir}/*
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man1/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.9.1-1
+- 0.9.1 bump
+
 * Tue May 29 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.9.0-1
 - 0.9.0 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 9818818..0518a91 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d2e2a08546d5bae09b9e34a7aa2cf53a  Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.0.tar.gz
+7e3a504fafde3cc77dc3d242157ed4d0  Fedora-Rebuild-v0.9.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Sub-Exporter-0.984.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

[Paul Howarth]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sub-Exporter:

cfa19c5f09bc08f49174856c0bfd7849  Sub-Exporter-0.984.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter] Update to 0.984

[Paul Howarth]

commit 340248ef60883ba20f9bbc362852db58d0e085a3
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Wed Jun 6 09:20:01 2012 +0100

Update to 0.984

- New upstream release 0.984 (documentation fixes)
- Add filters for provides/requires from the test suite
- BR: perl(base) and perl(Exporter) for the test suite

 perl-Sub-Exporter.spec |   21 +++--
 sources|2 +-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sub-Exporter.spec b/perl-Sub-Exporter.spec
index 3a60b62..694801b 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Exporter.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Exporter.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-Sub-Exporter
-Version:   0.982
-Release:   11%{?dist}
+Version:   0.984
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -17,11 +17,17 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Package::Generator)
 BuildRequires: perl(Params::Util) = 0.14
 BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Install) = 0.92
 # Test suite
+BuildRequires: perl(base)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
 # Runtime
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
 Requires:  perl(Package::Generator)
 
+# Don't want doc-file provides or dependencies
+%global __provides_exclude_from ^%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/
+%global __requires_exclude_from ^%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/
+
 %description
 Sub::Exporter provides a sophisticated alternative to Exporter.pm. It allows
 for renaming, currying/sub-generation, and other cool stuff.
@@ -35,6 +41,12 @@ Sub::Exporter::Tutorial first!
 # Fix shellbangs
 find t/ -type f -exec sed -i -e 's|^#!perl|#!/usr/bin/perl|' {} \;
 
+# Filter bogus provides/requires if we don't have rpm ≥ 4.9
+%global provfilt /bin/sh -c %{__perl_provides} | grep -Ev 
'^perl[(]Test::SubExporter.*[)]'
+%define __perl_provides %{provfilt}
+%global reqfilt /bin/sh -c %{__perl_requires} | grep -Ev 
'^perl[(](base|Test::SubExporter.*)[)]'
+%define __perl_requires %{reqfilt}
+
 %build
 perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
@@ -65,6 +77,11 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Sub::Exporter::Util.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Jun  5 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.984-1
+- Update to 0.984 (documentation fixes)
+- Add filters for provides/requires from the test suite
+- BR: perl(base) and perl(Exporter) for the test suite
+
 * Sun Mar 18 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.982-11
 - Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index b6f3b39..4014992 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-db90a0d73a5ca2d185dd6c6d2fc848f0  Sub-Exporter-0.982.tar.gz
+cfa19c5f09bc08f49174856c0bfd7849  Sub-Exporter-0.984.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Sub-Exporter] Created tag perl-Sub-Exporter-0.984-1.fc18

[Paul Howarth]

The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-0.984-1.fc18' was created pointing to:

 340248e... Update to 0.984
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 829260] New: perl-Gtk3-0.006 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829260

Bug ID: 829260
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
  Severity: unspecified
   Version: rawhide
  Priority: unspecified
CC: berra...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Assignee: berra...@redhat.com
   Summary: perl-Gtk3-0.006 is available
Regression: ---
  Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
  Type: ---
 Documentation: ---
  Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Gtk3
   Product: Fedora

Latest upstream release: 0.006
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.004
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk3/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 829262] New: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-71 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829262

Bug ID: 829262
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
  Severity: unspecified
   Version: rawhide
  Priority: unspecified
CC: mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
   Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-71 is available
Regression: ---
  Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
  Type: ---
 Documentation: ---
  Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp
   Product: Fedora

Latest upstream release: 71
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 70
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Critic-Pulp/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 829264] New: perl-SQL-Library-0.0.5 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829264

Bug ID: 829264
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
  Severity: unspecified
   Version: rawhide
  Priority: unspecified
CC: mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, psab...@redhat.com
  Assignee: mmasl...@redhat.com
   Summary: perl-SQL-Library-0.0.5 is available
Regression: ---
  Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
  Type: ---
 Documentation: ---
  Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-SQL-Library
   Product: Fedora

Latest upstream release: 0.0.5
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.0.3
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/SQL-Library/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 829264] perl-SQL-Library-0.0.5 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829264

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |psab...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File SQL-Library-0.0.5.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

[Petr Šabata]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SQL-Library:

cb526a48cd10ca0fa17adb11db588793  SQL-Library-0.0.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-SQL-Library] 0.0.5 bump

[Petr Šabata]

commit 69a852cb7ec27b4c0c4593d4e7655499a60b0aa0
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 14:02:00 2012 +0200

0.0.5 bump

 .gitignore|1 +
 perl-SQL-Library.spec |5 -
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 195972f..bea6141 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 SQL-Library-0.0.3.tar.gz
 /SQL-Library-0.0.4.tar.gz
+/SQL-Library-0.0.5.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-SQL-Library.spec b/perl-SQL-Library.spec
index ea57520..63de58e 100644
--- a/perl-SQL-Library.spec
+++ b/perl-SQL-Library.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-SQL-Library
-Version:0.0.4
+Version:0.0.5
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Manage libraries of SQL easily 
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.0.5-1
+- 0.0.5 bump (documentation and license)
+
 * Tue Jun 05 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.0.4-1
 - 0.0.4 bump
 - Modernize spec (remove buildroot, defattr, and command macros)
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 4019cc6..43968a8 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e77199d4d71eac25cc82b2a86711052c  SQL-Library-0.0.4.tar.gz
+cb526a48cd10ca0fa17adb11db588793  SQL-Library-0.0.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Perl-Critic-Pulp-71.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

[Petr Pisar]

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp:

8b4d68b149d265ad75f8f8484bf3c138  Perl-Critic-Pulp-71.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp] 71 bump

[Petr Pisar]

commit 516b8831f59ace7ae9d481a10c2f984a21d66bf8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 14:19:43 2012 +0200

71 bump

 .gitignore |1 +
 perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec |5 -
 sources|2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 5f2c348..cf551b0 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
 /Perl-Critic-Pulp-68.tar.gz
 /Perl-Critic-Pulp-69.tar.gz
 /Perl-Critic-Pulp-70.tar.gz
+/Perl-Critic-Pulp-71.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec b/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec
index 6504dd4..4e7f1ab 100644
--- a/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec
+++ b/perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp
-Version:70
+Version:71
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Some add-on perlcritic policies
 License:GPLv3+
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 71-1
+- 71 bump
+
 * Fri May 18 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 70-1
 - 70 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 305d237..75b9bb8 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-438f6e216dcc4ed0b68468ddb140dd87  Perl-Critic-Pulp-70.tar.gz
+8b4d68b149d265ad75f8f8484bf3c138  Perl-Critic-Pulp-71.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 829262] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-71 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829262

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-71-1.
   ||fc18
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-06-06 08:28:29

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 829264] perl-SQL-Library-0.0.5 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829264

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-SQL-Library-0.0.5-1.fc
   ||18
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-06-06 09:13:40

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-srpm-macros] Enable perl_bootstrap for perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit d97d288116c7c6e0fea31b57ca426768e7c3d3b3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 15:58:18 2012 +0200

Enable perl_bootstrap for perl 5.16 rebuild

 macros.perl-srpm  |2 +-
 perl-srpm-macros.spec |5 -
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/macros.perl-srpm b/macros.perl-srpm
index 0283cc8..fd86296 100644
--- a/macros.perl-srpm
+++ b/macros.perl-srpm
@@ -13,5 +13,5 @@
 # dependencies, for example: perl-Test-Minimum-Version -
 # perl-Perl-Minimum-Version Defined for bootstraping, undefined otherwise.
 # Usage: %%if !%%{defined perl_bootstrap} ... %%endif
-#perl_bootstrap 1
+%perl_bootstrap 1
 
diff --git a/perl-srpm-macros.spec b/perl-srpm-macros.spec
index 8919f4e..bba8ac2 100644
--- a/perl-srpm-macros.spec
+++ b/perl-srpm-macros.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-srpm-macros
 Version:1
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:RPM macros for building Perl source package from source repository
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPLv3+
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ install -m 644 -D %{SOURCE0} \
 %config %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.perl-srpm
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1-2
+- Enable perl_bootstrap for perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Tue May 15 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1-1
 - Introduce Perl SRPM macros as a standalone package
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-srpm-macros] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 5aef09192842ddbe54948821b2f4f6f1d90bba3e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 16:04:46 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-srpm-macros.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-srpm-macros.spec b/perl-srpm-macros.spec
index bba8ac2..f173073 100644
--- a/perl-srpm-macros.spec
+++ b/perl-srpm-macros.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-srpm-macros
 Version:1
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:RPM macros for building Perl source package from source repository
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPLv3+
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ install -m 644 -D %{SOURCE0} \
 %config %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.perl-srpm
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1-2
 - Enable perl_bootstrap for perl 5.16 rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl/rc/master] perl_bootstrap macro is distributed in perl-srpm-macros now

[Petr Pisar]

commit 746bac5a49b40cdea3918354d9b80cbab38fdab3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 16:35:04 2012 +0200

perl_bootstrap macro is distributed in perl-srpm-macros now

 macros.perl |9 -
 perl.spec   |5 -
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/macros.perl b/macros.perl
index 1094f62..dc10c03 100644
--- a/macros.perl
+++ b/macros.perl
@@ -49,15 +49,6 @@ export PERL_MM_USE_DEFAULT=1
 }
 
 #
-# Perl bootstrap
-# For rebuild of Perl and all related packages is needed switch, which enable
-# only vital build requires. This could help cyclic dependencies, for example:
-# perl-Test-Minimum-Version - perl-Perl-Minimum-Version
-# Defined for bootstraping, undefined otherwise. Usage:
-# %%if !%%{defined perl_bootstrap} ... %%endif
-#perl_bootstrap 1
-
-#
 # Macros to assist with generating a -tests subpackage in a semi-automatic
 # manner.
 #
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index af72de9..135c38b 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 Name:   perl
 Version:%{perl_version}
 # release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be 
broken otherwise
-Release:219%{?dist}
+Release:220%{?dist}
 Epoch:  %{perl_epoch}
 Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
 Group:  Development/Languages
@@ -2459,6 +2459,9 @@ sed \
 
 # Old changelog entries are preserved in CVS.
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 4:5.16.0-220
+- perl_bootstrap macro is distributed in perl-srpm-macros now
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 4:5.16.0-219
 - Own zipdetails and IO::Compress::FAQ by perl-IO-Compress
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl] (15 commits) ...Merge branch 'rc/master' into new-master

[Petr Pisar]

Summary of changes:

  f0b1790... clean patches, not needed with new version (*)
  203f3e9... Remove some problematic requires for time of RC. (*)
  45e115d... regen by podcheck list of failed pods. cn, jp, ko pods fail (*)
  91b534d... iconv failed on README in Chinese? (*)
  9ace17a... Locale::Constants were moved into different directory. Clea (*)
  2d8bd2e... Re-apply perlbug patch for Fedora on the new version. (*)
  13e3016... Remove patches merged into code of 5.16. (*)
  6dcbab6... upload the stable 5.16.0 (*)
  50ee283... Versions of modules changed according to current state. (*)
  0531b28... Shorten perl-Module-Build version to 2 digits to follow ups (*)
  4586ad9... Fix find2perl to translate ? glob properly (BZ#825701) (*)
  7686ee2... Merge branch 'rc/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/pe (*)
  05a53db... Own zipdetails and IO::Compress::FAQ by perl-IO-Compress (*)
  746bac5... perl_bootstrap macro is distributed in perl-srpm-macros now (*)
  2b75993... Merge branch 'rc/master' into new-master

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl: 15/15] Merge branch 'rc/master' into new-master

[Petr Pisar]

commit 2b75993096f86d8964a3d77584a6a5c3b4331426
Merge: 01cb6d0 746bac5
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 17:14:53 2012 +0200

Merge branch 'rc/master' into new-master

Resolve conflicts between perl 5.16 and 5.14:
perl.spec

 .gitignore |2 +
 macros.perl|9 -
 ...n-t-leak-memory-when-accessing-named-capt.patch |   52 --
 ...ndlers-must-run-before-sigsuspend-returns.patch |   43 -
 perl-5.14.2-Stop-V-from-leaking.patch  |   54 --
 ...couple-missing-LEAVEs-in-perlio_async_run.patch |   36 
 perl-5.14.2-digest_eval.patch  |   28 ---
 perl-5.14.2-large-repeat-heap-abuse.patch  |   76 
 perl-5.14.2-locale-search-inc.patch|   26 ---
 perl-perlbug-tag.patch |   48 +
 perl.spec  |  189 ++--
 porting-podcheck-regen.patch   |   26 +++
 sources|1 +
 13 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 461 deletions(-)
---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit afdeb15930b05771d492992464f3d1a935b500fd
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 17:27:33 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 135c38b..67fdf07 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 Name:   perl
 Version:%{perl_version}
 # release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be 
broken otherwise
-Release:220%{?dist}
+Release:221%{?dist}
 Epoch:  %{perl_epoch}
 Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
 Group:  Development/Languages
@@ -2459,6 +2459,9 @@ sed \
 
 # Old changelog entries are preserved in CVS.
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 4:5.16.0-221
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 4:5.16.0-220
 - perl_bootstrap macro is distributed in perl-srpm-macros now
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 828222] perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.11 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828222

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.11-1.fc
   ||18
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-06-06 12:00:21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Scalar-List-Utils] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit c6e60bf3d325f7efc34dcc8b181a5da52a36c194
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 19:54:00 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec b/perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec
index b6869ed..60e8553 100644
--- a/perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec
+++ b/perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Scalar-List-Utils
 Version:1.25
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:A selection of general-utility scalar and list subroutines
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.25-2
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Sun Mar 25 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 1.25-1
 - update to latest upstream version
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Filter] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit fda0bd63f49cf231f2c1c23b19f2e0fa7087b9d3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 21:41:07 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Filter.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Filter.spec b/perl-Filter.spec
index 9a156c0..0a33239 100644
--- a/perl-Filter.spec
+++ b/perl-Filter.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Filter
 Version:1.43
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl source filters
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.43-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Thu May 31 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.43-2
 - Skip optional Test::Pod on bootstraping perl
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-threads-shared] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 07435dcb4385e36ce7b02f1aa79c3bd5bfdbe909
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 22:15:52 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-threads-shared.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-threads-shared.spec b/perl-threads-shared.spec
index 2e18d23..d1dcaf3 100644
--- a/perl-threads-shared.spec
+++ b/perl-threads-shared.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-threads-shared
 Version:1.40
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl extension for sharing data structures between threads
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.40-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Sat Jan 14 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.40-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Test-Simple] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 69755b6ec25e27cb17de4c8c95cdb453f4d94faf
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:12:16 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Test-Simple.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Simple.spec b/perl-Test-Simple.spec
index a75f8d0..c61ee0b 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Simple.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Simple.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:   perl-Test-Simple
 Summary:Basic utilities for writing tests
 Version:0.98
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MS/MSCHWERN/Test-Simple-%{version}.tar.gz
 
@@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.98-6
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Thu May 31 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.98-5
 - Specify all dependencies
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-File-Copy-Recursive] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 8d9630fa20ef56f3e1e80d374fd5e780b7af
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:12:16 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-File-Copy-Recursive.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Copy-Recursive.spec b/perl-File-Copy-Recursive.spec
index c690e42..84f7fbc 100644
--- a/perl-File-Copy-Recursive.spec
+++ b/perl-File-Copy-Recursive.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-File-Copy-Recursive
 Version:   0.38
-Release:   10%{?dist}
+Release:   11%{?dist}
 Summary:   Extension for recursively copying files and directories 
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.38-11
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.38-10
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-PathTools] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 0be76c3f6e8301c43d2d19e6772e0292fcd4575a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:12:16 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-PathTools.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PathTools.spec b/perl-PathTools.spec
index 2d2fa91..cb14b91 100644
--- a/perl-PathTools.spec
+++ b/perl-PathTools.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-PathTools
 Version:3.33
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
 Summary:PathTools Perl module (Cwd, File::Spec)
 License:(GPL+ or Artistic) and BSD
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 3.33-6
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 3.33-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Tie-IxHash] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 137a22be64a002aac37b8e2674643cf9ac5bcbf8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:12:16 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Tie-IxHash.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Tie-IxHash.spec b/perl-Tie-IxHash.spec
index c694e37..15e0e1e 100644
--- a/perl-Tie-IxHash.spec
+++ b/perl-Tie-IxHash.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Tie-IxHash
 Version:1.22
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
 Summary:Ordered associative arrays for Perl
 
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.22-8
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.22-7
 - Skip POD tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Digest-SHA] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 125e8ff9aefd18932c1d5f68b9df9288823174ba
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:12:16 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Digest-SHA.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Digest-SHA.spec b/perl-Digest-SHA.spec
index 4a60639..47cc33c 100644
--- a/perl-Digest-SHA.spec
+++ b/perl-Digest-SHA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:   perl-Digest-SHA
 Epoch:  1
 Version:5.71
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl extension for SHA-1/224/256/384/512
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1:5.71-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1:5.71-2
 - Omit optional POD tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Data-Dumper] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit a76a5f46978f06d3c331a1452656bcc4b24412cc
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:12:16 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Data-Dumper.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Data-Dumper.spec b/perl-Data-Dumper.spec
index 70febf5..9b96b95 100644
--- a/perl-Data-Dumper.spec
+++ b/perl-Data-Dumper.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Data-Dumper
 Version:2.131
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:Stringify perl data structures, suitable for printing and eval
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -53,5 +53,8 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.131-2
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Tue Apr 10 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2.131-1
 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Class-Inspector] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit d84d5277c58135043d8b03f623edc79891f2a286
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:12:16 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Class-Inspector.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-Inspector.spec b/perl-Class-Inspector.spec
index bac427c..2968d44 100644
--- a/perl-Class-Inspector.spec
+++ b/perl-Class-Inspector.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-Class-Inspector
 Version:   1.27
-Release:   1%{?dist}
+Release:   2%{?dist}
 Summary:   Get information about a class and its structure
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.27-2
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 27 2012 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.27-1
 - Upstream update.
 - Spec file modernization.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Version-Requirements] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 6c106cc72c1374563e746b6007e4ace54fae23e3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:12:16 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Version-Requirements.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Version-Requirements.spec b/perl-Version-Requirements.spec
index f443f50..b2415b6 100644
--- a/perl-Version-Requirements.spec
+++ b/perl-Version-Requirements.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Version-Requirements
 Version:0.101022
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Set of version requirements for a CPAN dist (DEPRECATED)
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.101022-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.101022-2
 - Update dependencies
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Locale-Codes] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 3fa4fc1aca5363374256df13dfd2424d4baf2e5e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:19:42 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Locale-Codes.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Locale-Codes.spec b/perl-Locale-Codes.spec
index 4cfe92d..0df5ec5 100644
--- a/perl-Locale-Codes.spec
+++ b/perl-Locale-Codes.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Locale-Codes
 Version:3.22
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:Distribution of modules to handle locale codes
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 3.22-2
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Mon Jun 04 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 3.22-1
 - 3.22 bump
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-parent] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit d47d60f1de7eaffec14aa8808dc9afc52eaaa547
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:19:45 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-parent.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-parent.spec b/perl-parent.spec
index 97c51cb..954bd70 100644
--- a/perl-parent.spec
+++ b/perl-parent.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:  perl-parent
 Epoch: 1
 Version:   0.225
-Release:   6%{?dist}
+Release:   7%{?dist}
 Summary:   Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/parent.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1:0.225-7
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Tue Feb  7 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1:0.225-6
 - Reinstate compatibility with old distributions like EL-5
   - Add back buildroot definition and cleaning
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-IO-String] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 5f82acd703487d9891cae3cc139945ed4817d08d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:19:53 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-IO-String.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-String.spec b/perl-IO-String.spec
index 1014f12..d62a94c 100644
--- a/perl-IO-String.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-String.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-IO-String
 Version:1.08
-Release:15%{?dist}
+Release:16%{?dist}
 Summary:Emulate file interface for in-core strings
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ make test
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.08-16
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.08-15
 - Clean spec file
 - Specify all dependencies
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Module-Metadata] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 9ecbeae9ef162636d83534c8c6eaa4091c0328dd
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:20:00 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Module-Metadata.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Metadata.spec b/perl-Module-Metadata.spec
index 88826c3..b70da29 100644
--- a/perl-Module-Metadata.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-Metadata.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-Module-Metadata
 Version:   1.09
-Release:   2%{?dist}
+Release:   3%{?dist}
 Summary:   Gather package and POD information from perl module files
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ make test TEST_FILES=xt/*.t
 %{_mandir}/man3/Module::Metadata.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.09-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.09-2
 - Skip optional POD tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 5e4d3aae682d2af6258ea935f4b29db7f13e68f4
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:20:03 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec b/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec
index fb18c35..d6dac3e 100644
--- a/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec
+++ b/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib
 Version:2.054
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Low-level interface to zlib compression library
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Compress::Raw::Zlib.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.054-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.054-2
 - Omit optional Test::Pod tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-FCGI] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit c103abf0df3bfcb87b5825371792e944d769da40
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:20:03 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-FCGI.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-FCGI.spec b/perl-FCGI.spec
index 4d0433b..c1b06a9 100644
--- a/perl-FCGI.spec
+++ b/perl-FCGI.spec
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Summary:FastCGI Perl bindings
 # needed to properly replace/obsolete fcgi-perl
 Epoch:  1
 Version:0.74
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
 # same as fcgi
 License:OML
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1:0.74-4
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1:0.74-3
 - Specify all dependencies
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 425debb8295fe7bc8c5c0c029054a100ff1bb89b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:20:32 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec b/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec
index 7385b4c..ba2bcc5 100644
--- a/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec
+++ b/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:   perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
 Summary:Low-level interface to bzip2 compression library
 Version:2.052
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Compress-Raw-Bzip2/
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Compress::Raw::Bzip2.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.052-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.052-2
 - Omit optional Test::Pod tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Pod-Perldoc] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit b00937af74ecaf2801cc17237846077aeb0bfd60
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:22:42 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec b/perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec
index 1366246..979b95a 100644
--- a/perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec
+++ b/perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 %global cpan_version 3.17
 Name:   perl-Pod-Perldoc
 Version:%(eval echo '%{cpan_version}' | tr '_' '.')
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
 Summary:Look up Perl documentation in Pod format
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 3.17-5
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 3.17-4
 - Omit optional Tk tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Digest] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 661f3b904463059e1faea36cc9a561a197223bd3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:25:59 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Digest.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Digest.spec b/perl-Digest.spec
index 9361340..810478f 100644
--- a/perl-Digest.spec
+++ b/perl-Digest.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Digest
 Version:1.17
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Modules that calculate message digests
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.17-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.17-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Perl-OSType] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 2a57c404ef6a2c6d8fa5257ec1c9833482befbb0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:26:12 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Perl-OSType.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Perl-OSType.spec b/perl-Perl-OSType.spec
index ada99ab..e9fdd7c 100644
--- a/perl-Perl-OSType.spec
+++ b/perl-Perl-OSType.spec
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 Name:  perl-Perl-OSType
 Version:   1.002
-Release:   10%{?dist}
+Release:   11%{?dist}
 Summary:   Map Perl operating system names to generic types
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Perl::OSType.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.002-11
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.002-10
 - Skip author tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-ExtUtils-Manifest] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit a41c133743afeb09940314e981a6443e79564c4e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:26:47 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec
index b9f378e..13017a1 100644
--- a/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec
+++ b/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-ExtUtils-Manifest
 Version:1.60
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:Utilities to write and check a MANIFEST file
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.60-2
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Mon Nov 28 2011 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 1.60-1
 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
 - Remove defattr and BuildRoot from spec code.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 3b95525c94ba8caebfc48047b14fdd80d8b37677
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:27:03 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spec b/perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spec
index 3c92ad3..961b3c1 100644
--- a/perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spec
+++ b/perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements
 Version:2.122
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Set of version requirements for a CPAN dist
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ make test TEST_FILES=t/*.t xt/*/*.t
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.122-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
 - Skip some tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit c9b0f0b501534edfaf10c0159be6d8f38a83e586
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:44:12 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec
index 6ae0a95..0a05831 100644
--- a/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec
+++ b/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
 Version:6.62
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a module Makefile
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 6.62-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Thu Jan 12 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 6.62-2
 - Do not set RPATH to perl shared-library modules by default (bug #773622)
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Archive-Tar] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 143ed1a7fd6a944a1c0ca39b1d836fbb461aa6ba
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:44:12 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Archive-Tar.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Archive-Tar.spec b/perl-Archive-Tar.spec
index 55888d3..ddff58b 100644
--- a/perl-Archive-Tar.spec
+++ b/perl-Archive-Tar.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Archive-Tar
 Version:1.88
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:A module for Perl manipulation of .tar files
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ make test
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.88-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Mon Jun 04 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.88-2
 - 1.88 bump
 - Drop command macros
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 2309dcdf1f846c34b3babfadfc5608be7fd29505
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:44:12 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec b/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec
index f35b8ca..39a5d8a 100644
--- a/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec
+++ b/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:  perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML
 Version:   0.008
-Release:   4%{?dist}
+Release:   5%{?dist}
 Summary:   Read and write a subset of YAML for CPAN Meta files
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/CPAN::Meta::YAML.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.008-5
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.008-4
 - Disable author tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-File-ShareDir] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 5a9457c30eb5136f07395e7eba0ea340dac69942
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:44:13 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-File-ShareDir.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-ShareDir.spec b/perl-File-ShareDir.spec
index a83ae16..cb95969 100644
--- a/perl-File-ShareDir.spec
+++ b/perl-File-ShareDir.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-File-ShareDir
 Version:1.03
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
 Summary:Locate per-dist and per-module shared files
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.03-5
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.03-4
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-IO-Compress] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit 5664e15776b901e567166163366a8c5ca447fa40
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Wed Jun 6 23:44:13 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-IO-Compress.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-Compress.spec b/perl-IO-Compress.spec
index e2f8c91..43fc54a 100644
--- a/perl-IO-Compress.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-Compress.spec
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:   perl-IO-Compress
 Version:2.052
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Read and write compressed data
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ make test %{?with_long_tests:COMPRESS_ZLIB_RUN_ALL=1}
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::Uncompress::*.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.052-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jun 01 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.052-2
 - Omit optional Test::Pod and Test::NoWarnings tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Module-Build] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit d6bea7f8906bf4e5699c55134d987392a699b831
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Jun 7 01:06:38 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Module-Build.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Build.spec b/perl-Module-Build.spec
index 44d8a0a..b7a2fc1 100644
--- a/perl-Module-Build.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-Build.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:   perl-Module-Build
 Epoch:  2
 Version:0.40
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:Build and install Perl modules
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -102,6 +102,9 @@ LANG=C TEST_SIGNATURE=1 MB_TEST_EXPERIMENTAL=1 ./Build test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2:0.40-3
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Mon Jun 04 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2:0.40-2
 - Do not run PAR tests on bootstrap
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta] Perl 5.16 rebuild

[Petr Pisar]

commit eb6108bd02d1f0c583321aeb7503b25800f78777
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Thu Jun 7 01:06:38 2012 +0200

Perl 5.16 rebuild

 perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta.spec |5 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta.spec b/perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta.spec
index 3015e7b..d3d43a7 100644
--- a/perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta.spec
+++ b/perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name:   perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta
 # dual-lifed module needs to match the epoch in perl.spec
 Epoch:  1
 Version:1.4404
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:Parse META.yml and META.json CPAN metadata files
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 06 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1:1.4404-2
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+
 * Mon Apr 09 2012 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 1:1.4404-1
 - update to latest upstream version
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

[Tom Callaway]

Here is the latest set of changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:

---

In Fedora, you can assume that the default shell (/bin/sh) is bash.
Thus, all scriptlets can safely assume that if they are running in shell
code, they are running within bash.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Default_Shell

---

A bundling exception was granted for calibre to bundle their forked
version of pyPdf.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_granted_exceptions

---

A new set of MinGW guidelines are in place for Fedora 17+. These
guidelines reflect the existence of mingw32 and mingw64.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW

Older guidelines remain in place for older versions of Fedora (and RHEL
6 or older):

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW_Old

---

A section of the Ruby Guidelines concerning the appropriate place to
copy C extensions in the spec file template has been clarified and enhanced:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Building_gems

---

Guidelines for usage of tmpfiles.d have been updated to better reflect
the current stage of Fedora and other Fedora guidelines. In summary:

* Dropped the irrelevant talk of both systemd and upstart
* Prefer talking of /run everywhere instead of /var/run
* Ship the packaged files in %{_prefix}/lib/tmpfiles.d/, not
  %{_sysconfdir}/tmpfiles.d/.
* Do not mark the files as %config and add an explanation why.
* Use the more usual 'd' specifier instead of 'D'.
* Nudge packagers into thinking about the permission mode of their
  directories, rather than copying the 0710 dogmatically.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tmpfiles.d

---
The systemd guidelines have been update to reflect the fact that unit
files should avoid using StandardOutput= or StandardError=. The default
is the right choice for almost all cases, and using the default allows
users to change global defaults in /etc/systemd/system.conf.

Also, all references to After=syslog.target have been dropped, as that
is no longer correct or relevant in current versions of Fedora.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd

---

The packaging guidelines now mention that the %make_install macro (*not*
to be confused with %makeinstall) may be used instead of make
DESTDIR=%{buildroot}.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used

---

A new section was added to the guidelines to indicate that Fedora uses
gcc as the compiler (for all languages that gcc supports). Packages may
only build with an alternative compiler to gcc if upstream does not
support gcc.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler

---

These guidelines (and changes) were approved by the Fedora Packaging
Committee (FPC).

Many thanks to Kevin Fenzi, Hans de Goede, Vít Ondruch, Erik van
Pienbroek, Petr Pisar, Lennart Poettering, Michal Schmidt, Rahul
Sundaram, and all of the members of the FPC, for assisting in drafting,
refining, and passing these guidelines.

As a reminder: The Fedora Packaging Guidelines are living documents! If
you find something missing, incorrect, or in need of revision, you can
suggest a draft change. The procedure for this is documented here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Committee#GuidelineChangeProcedure

Thanks,

~tom
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce