Calling for the packager of fping
Hey all, I wonder if maintainer of fping is available or not.I took a look at the spec file and see that since f12 rebuild nobody has updated the package. But I can't say nobody is its maintainer,so I want to find that guy. Thanks. -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Calling for the packager of fping
Hi, Meng. If you would like to help, you can go through [1] to take over the package ownership. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers cheers, robin On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote: Hey all, I wonder if maintainer of fping is available or not.I took a look at the spec file and see that since f12 rebuild nobody has updated the package. But I can't say nobody is its maintainer,so I want to find that guy. Thanks. -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: small tip regarding git branch bash prompt in F18/Rawhide
On 2012-08-23 04:34, Todd Zullinger wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: source /usr/share/doc/git-1.7.12/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh because upstream split the prompt stuff out from the bash_completion script. Perhaps the git packagers could consider providing git-prompt.sh in a more permanent location, so we don't have to poke .bashrc every time the git version changes? Thanks! This is definitely planned. I mailed Adam (the other Adam) today to point out that this was broken by the 1.7.12 update. I don't have time to work on a fix though. But certainly, git-prompt.sh should be placed in a more permanent location in the next build. Somewhat unrelated, but I think it'd be better to stop using versioned %doc dirs altogether, just stick with /usr/share/doc/%name and let packages for which it's usual to have multiple versions installed handle doc dir conflicts just as they handle other possibly conflicting files... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: small tip regarding git branch bash prompt in F18/Rawhide
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On 2012-08-23 04:34, Todd Zullinger wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: source /usr/share/doc/git-1.7.12/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh because upstream split the prompt stuff out from the bash_completion script. Perhaps the git packagers could consider providing git-prompt.sh in a more permanent location, so we don't have to poke .bashrc every time the git version changes? Thanks! This is definitely planned. I mailed Adam (the other Adam) today to point out that this was broken by the 1.7.12 update. I don't have time to work on a fix though. But certainly, git-prompt.sh should be placed in a more permanent location in the next build. Somewhat unrelated, but I think it'd be better to stop using versioned %doc dirs altogether, just stick with /usr/share/doc/%name and let packages for which it's usual to have multiple versions installed handle doc dir conflicts just as they handle other possibly conflicting files... Ideally, this shouldn't be an issue, as things in %doc shouldn't be things that affect run-time operation. Ergo, git-prompt.sh shouldn't be in %doc, or if it is, it should also be elsewhere for usage. -J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Calling for the packager of fping
Ok,I'll try -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Calling for the packager of fping
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote: Ok,I'll try https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/fping/ Seems to me that there is some action on the package. I don't know if I miss something here. Especially the Changelog is not so dead as you describe it. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/fping/changelog Johannes -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: small tip regarding git branch bash prompt in F18/Rawhide
On 2012-08-23 15:12, Jon Ciesla wrote: things in %doc shouldn't be things that affect run-time operation True, but there are other considerations in favour of unversioned dirs such as bookmarkability and general referenceability, consistency with other distros, and general cleanliness. But this stuff deserves a discussion of its own. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: small tip regarding git branch bash prompt in F18/Rawhide
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On 2012-08-23 15:12, Jon Ciesla wrote: things in %doc shouldn't be things that affect run-time operation True, but there are other considerations in favour of unversioned dirs such as bookmarkability and general referenceability, consistency with other distros, and general cleanliness. But this stuff deserves a discussion of its own. Absolutely, I didn't mean to imply disagreement with that. -J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Dancer/f18] 1.3099 bump
Summary of changes: c17745c... 1.3099 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Calling for the packager of fping
Hi, why not update to 3.x? Do you think major version upgrade is impossible? -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Calling for the packager of fping
Sorry I forgot that I mean the 'fping' is the package in EPEL, not Fedora, sorry! -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Calling for the packager of fping
Then you may file a bug against the EPEL branch to ask the maintainer to make an upgrade. On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote: Sorry I forgot that I mean the 'fping' is the package in EPEL, not Fedora, sorry! -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Calling for the packager of fping
I know,of course.I've been told many times,now I manage to avoid saying like why not httpd 2.4? or why not collectd5? or blablabla.. Therefore I think there aren't ant conflicts after upgrade. Thanks. -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Calling for the packager of fping
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 21:22 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: I've filed. if there aren't any response, I'll try to take the ownership. You'll have to become a packager before you can take the ownership. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Calling for the packager of fping
I said I'll try, Thanks. -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mate-Desktop
Rave it wrote: For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project for f18 because I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future endeavors. -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: small tip regarding git branch bash prompt in F18/Rawhide
On 08/23/2012 08:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On 2012-08-23 15:12, Jon Ciesla wrote: things in %doc shouldn't be things that affect run-time operation True, but there are other considerations in favour of unversioned dirs such as bookmarkability and general referenceability, consistency with other distros, and general cleanliness. But this stuff deserves a discussion of its own. +1 But an unversioned softlink to the latest would suffice. John -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: TLS definition mismatch error in mrpt
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to rebuild one of my packages (mrpt), and I'm running into a TLS
mismatch error that I am having issues troubleshooting. The offending build
is at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4412122
The problem symbol demangles to
Eigen::internal::manage_caching_sizes(Eigen::Action, int*,
int*)::m_l1CacheSize, which is in
eigen3/Eigen/src/Core/products/GeneralBlockPanelKernel.h:
inline void manage_caching_sizes(Action action, std::ptrdiff_t* l1=0,
std::ptrdiff_t* l2=0)
{
static std::ptrdiff_t m_l1CacheSize = 0;
static std::ptrdiff_t m_l2CacheSize = 0;
#ifdef _OPENMP
#pragma omp threadprivate(m_l1CacheSize,m_l2CacheSize)
#endif
So when building with OpenMP support, those two static variables are
declared to be thread-private (i.e., to use Thread Local Storage, or
TLS). Your problem is that you are trying to link a PCL library built
with OpenMP with mrpt that has not been built with OpenMP, so its
versions of those static variables are non-TLS.
Bottom line: either both PCL and mrpt have to be built with OpenMP
support, or neither of them can be.
You've got a couple of other problems here. One is that you are
building with SSE3 support. Even on x86_64, you can't be sure that
all clients have that. I think you need to add this to your cmake
invocation:
%ifnarch x86_64
-DDISABLE_SSE2=ON \
%endif
-DDISABLE_SSE3=ON \
Also, cmake complains about not being able to find a suitesparse
algorithm, which is remedied by adding a suitesparse-devel BR.
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 847657] perl-Dancer-1.3099 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847657 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-Dancer-1.3099-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-Dancer-1.3099-1.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12575/perl-Dancer-1.3099-1.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Mass changes to packaging
On 08/22/2012 06:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 22.08.12 19:17, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
On Wed, 22.08.12 09:25, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I'll add a me too here.
Any word on if the macros can/will be back-ported to f16/f17?
The preset logic is actually already available in F17, so we could
theoretically backport that, but this would mean we'd also have to
create and maintain a preset policy file for F17, and that's the bit I
am not sure i'd like to do.
Without the preset policy the macros would only turn things off after
installation, never on.
What I would want to see in F16/F17 is macros that exactly duplicate the
previously-standard snippets they are supposed to replace. Nobody is
suggesting that the preset stuff ought to go into the released branches;
only that we don't want to have to maintain different specfile versions
for the different branches. And if these things are macros, we should
not have to.
The thing is that previously we had to different snippets, one for
enabling a service after installation, one for leaving it disabled. With
the macros there is only one which checks the preset policy whether
something should be enabled. Hence we can't really map the old logic to
the new macros, I fear.
I think we can manage this. In the F17 and F16 systemd, provide the same
macros, except:
1) %systemd_post should be redefined as follows:
%systemd_post() \
if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then \
# Initial installation \
/bin/systemctl daemon-reload /dev/null 21 || : \
fi \
%{nil}
2) Create another macro:
%systemd_post_enable() \
if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then \
# Initial installation \
/bin/systemctl enable %{?*} /dev/null 21 || : \
fi \
%{nil}
3) We'll adjust the guidelines like this:
If your service is explicitly enabled by default in Fedora 16 or 17, and
you wish to have a shared spec file, you will need to add a
conditionalized call to the %systemd_post_enable macro, as follows:
%post
%if %{defined fc16} || %{defined fc17}
%systemd_post_enable apache-httpd.service
%else
%systemd_post apache-httpd.service
%endif
Thoughts?
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
self introduction
Hi everyone, my name is Jos de Kloe, I am working for the Dutch Met. Office (KNMI) as a scientist and doing a lot of programming work, mainly in python and fortran. For this reason I am interested in adding some python modules to Fedora that can handle some fileformats commonly used in meteorology, and I would like to volunteer to maintain them. The main fileformats I am interested in are grib, bufr and netcdf. To start I created spec files to build the pygrib module and its dependency pyproj, see these links: pygrib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806037 pyproj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806040 I am looking for a sponsor who would be willing to guide me in getting this software included in Fedora. Best regards, Jos. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass changes to packaging
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com writes:
3) We'll adjust the guidelines like this:
If your service is explicitly enabled by default in Fedora 16 or 17, and
you wish to have a shared spec file, you will need to add a
conditionalized call to the %systemd_post_enable macro, as follows:
%post
%if %{defined fc16} || %{defined fc17}
%systemd_post_enable apache-httpd.service
%else
%systemd_post apache-httpd.service
%endif
Surely F18 could define %systemd_post_enable as a synonym for
%systemd_post. The entire point of this thread is to make things
simpler for packager maintainers, not load them down with cross-branch
differences. (If I wanted to have a version-dependent %if in there,
I could have done that without any help from the macros.)
A larger point here is that I don't think it's an amazingly good idea to
be removing all trace of whether a package thinks it's supposed to be
enabled by default. Having two separate macros is not a bad thing IMO,
even if they happen to have the same expansion today.
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 848997] Missing requirement on perl(Email::Date::Format)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848997 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- (In reply to comment #0) Running repoquery with the --releasever parameter, I can see that the package is missing the requirement in all versions of Fedora (from 16 to 18) and EPEL (5 and 6). In EPEL 5 and 6, the Email::Simple::Creator module is in a separate perl-Email-Simple-Creator package (this was merged into perl-Email-Simple relatively recently), and the perl-Email-Simple-Creator packages *do* have the necessary dependency, so this is not an issue in EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Mass changes to packaging
On 08/23/2012 12:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Surely F18 could define %systemd_post_enable as a synonym for %systemd_post. The entire point of this thread is to make things simpler for packager maintainers, not load them down with cross-branch differences. (If I wanted to have a version-dependent %if in there, I could have done that without any help from the macros.) Unfortunately, it isn't that easy. Please note that I had to redefine %systemd_post for F16 and F17 in order to simplify it to that. The %systemd_post_enable logic doesn't apply in F18+, because there is no longer any explicit enablement at the package level. The two are not synonymous. FWIW, I actually think that doing it as a preset policy makes more sense, because it allows for that decision to be made depending on the usecase, with a set of system-wide defaults provided by Fedora that can be overridden. It also simplifies the scriptlets significantly in the F18+ universe. ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Test-Announce] Fedora Jam test day delayed
Hey, folks - it's probably obvious from the lack of any publicity or a wiki page, but the Fedora Jam test day that's on the schedule for today is delayed, since F18 isn't really in shape for building a test spin. We will come up with a specific date later. See the trac ticket - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/300 - for more details. Sorry for any inconvenience! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: small tip regarding git branch bash prompt in F18/Rawhide
I wrote: This is definitely planned. I mailed Adam (the other Adam) today to point out that this was broken by the 1.7.12 update. I don't have time to work on a fix though. But certainly, git-prompt.sh should be placed in a more permanent location in the next build. I placed git-prompt.sh in /etc/profile.d where it should be sourced for normal login shells. This should make the change transparent to most users. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/git-1.7.12-2.fc18 -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ Life is the art of drawing without an eraser. -- John Gardner pgpZ3kRQLkfYg.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: small tip regarding git branch bash prompt in F18/Rawhide
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:23:48PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 16:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
because upstream split the prompt stuff out from the bash_completion
script. Perhaps the git packagers could consider providing git-prompt.sh
in a more permanent location, so we don't have to poke .bashrc every
time the git version changes? Thanks!
This is actually a packaging violation. %doc files are not allowed to
impact runtime operation. It would be one thing if this was presented as
an example file or template that you were expected to modify and put
into the right location on your own.
Realistically, this belongs in %{_datadir} somewhere, not %{doc}
The subversion package does this too. I suppose you could argue that
some of the files are examples, but sometimes those examples are so
complete that they're usable as is (scripts, xslt files, etc).
--
Scott Schmit
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedpkg build: Could not initiate build: Unknown build target: dist-rawhide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:40:10 -0400 (EDT) Dave Anderson ander...@redhat.com escribió: - Original Message - Is there something I need to change so that a simple fedpkg build will work again? I believe you need a new version of fedpkg and pyrpkg. It should just be using rawhide instead of dist-rawhide. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom is a feature! I did a yum update of fedpkg (although it updated to a crusty 0:0.5.9.2-2.fc14 version), but I don't even see a pyrpkg: # yum update pyrpkg Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Adding en_US to language list Setting up Update Process No Match for argument: pyrpkg No package pyrpkg available. No Packages marked for Update # Should I still be able to exist in an F14 world? Dave If you want to exist in an ancient unsupported world you need to build the latest tools yourself. F14's tooling is too old. you need to use something much newer. we deprectated dist-foo quite awhile ago now. Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlA3FgsACgkQkSxm47BaWfcDJwCfe8E38vFZDDCiiOd4aWuxaV+1 ZzkAnRag5YUp/SwFmVXImNCdHXHRYROM =Repy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 851074] New: perl-Mozilla-CA-20120823 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851074 Bug ID: 851074 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20120823 is available Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: perl-Mozilla-CA Product: Fedora Latest upstream release: 20120823 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 20120309 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mozilla-CA/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Mozilla-CA-20120823.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mozilla-CA: 86c4949fa7c15d24a06af662ee94865c Mozilla-CA-20120823.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Mozilla-CA] 20120823 bump
commit e6aee658d21d4e0662036ecaba6b7c995bae30fd
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 23 12:04:17 2012 +0200
20120823 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...120823-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch | 34 ++-
perl-Mozilla-CA.spec |7 +++-
sources|2 +-
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 552bcd8..cb18d38 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
/Mozilla-CA-20120118.tar.gz
/Mozilla-CA-20120309.tar.gz
/Mozilla-CA-20120822.tar.gz
+/Mozilla-CA-20120823.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Mozilla-CA-20110914-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch
b/Mozilla-CA-20120823-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch
similarity index 67%
rename from perl-Mozilla-CA-20110914-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch
rename to Mozilla-CA-20120823-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch
index d2846ac..c91fc51 100644
--- a/perl-Mozilla-CA-20110914-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch
+++ b/Mozilla-CA-20120823-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-From e6aa17c2d3aa33d164d215b7b4491b31deda73f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 02db836ecf68b7554c7e3f496dbfa9ef1b432d76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:33:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Redirect to ca-certificates bundle
@@ -10,14 +10,13 @@ Mozilla certificate bundle.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738383 for more
details.
---
- MANIFEST |1 -
- Makefile.PL |8
- lib/Mozilla/CA.pm |8 +---
- t/locate-file.t |2 +-
- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
+ MANIFEST | 1 -
+ Makefile.PL | 8
+ lib/Mozilla/CA.pm | 8 +---
+ 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MANIFEST b/MANIFEST
-index a6f0a9c..096dd68 100644
+index a88847b..6577ede 100644
--- a/MANIFEST
+++ b/MANIFEST
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
@@ -43,10 +42,12 @@ index 2b10474..57f2f07 100644
+return $name;
+}
diff --git a/lib/Mozilla/CA.pm b/lib/Mozilla/CA.pm
-index 71e4b8b..71ada3a 100644
+index 95fc86d..71e4f91 100644
--- a/lib/Mozilla/CA.pm
+++ b/lib/Mozilla/CA.pm
-@@ -5,14 +5,8 @@ package Mozilla::CA;
+@@ -3,16 +3,10 @@ package Mozilla::CA;
+ use strict;
+ our $VERSION = '20120823';
-use Cwd ();
use File::Spec ();
@@ -62,19 +63,6 @@ index 71e4b8b..71ada3a 100644
}
1;
-diff --git a/t/locate-file.t b/t/locate-file.t
-index a9acb34..b936059 100644
a/t/locate-file.t
-+++ b/t/locate-file.t
-@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ print # $ca_file\n;
- ok($ca_file);
- ok(open(my $fh, , $ca_file));
- while ($fh) {
--if (/\*\* BEGIN LICENSE BLOCK \*\*/) {
-+if (/-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-/) {
- ok(1);
- last;
- }
--
-1.7.6.2
+1.7.11.4
diff --git a/perl-Mozilla-CA.spec b/perl-Mozilla-CA.spec
index 4388dbd..b0858ca 100644
--- a/perl-Mozilla-CA.spec
+++ b/perl-Mozilla-CA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Name: perl-Mozilla-CA
# You do not need to back-port new version for list of certificates solely.
# They are taken from ca-certificates package instead per bug #738383.
-Version:20120822
+Version:20120823
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Mozilla's CA cert bundle in PEM format
License:MPLv1.1 or LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mozilla-CA/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/A/AB/ABH/Mozilla-CA-%{version}.tar.gz
# Bug #738383
-Patch0: %{name}-20110914-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch
+Patch0: Mozilla-CA-20120823-Redirect-to-ca-certificates-bundle.patch
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
# Tests:
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 23 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 20120823-1
+- 20120823 bump
+
* Wed Aug 22 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 20120822-1
- 20120822 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e01b479..c57e828 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b7bf1b88cbdc5c00d8f168b4875d2c4f Mozilla-CA-20120822.tar.gz
+86c4949fa7c15d24a06af662ee94865c Mozilla-CA-20120823.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 851074] perl-Mozilla-CA-20120823 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851074 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Mozilla-CA-20120823-1. ||fc19 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-08-23 06:15:00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Install] Spec clean-up
commit 3d8ee9c6fbce3d796fb7b024e0920c13b4d5190c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Aug 23 11:06:19 2012 +0100
Spec clean-up
- Be more selective about what to exclude when bootstrapping
- Don't use macros for commands
- Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
- Make %files list more explicit
- Fix typo in %description
.gitignore|3 +-
perl-Sub-Install.spec | 54 ++--
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index c2ebbaf..8486097 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-Sub-Install-0.925.tar.gz
-/Sub-Install-0.926.tar.gz
+/Sub-Install-[0-9.]*.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Sub-Install.spec b/perl-Sub-Install.spec
index ede937e..4dd36c8 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Install.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Install.spec
@@ -1,67 +1,71 @@
Name: perl-Sub-Install
Version:0.926
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:Install subroutines into packages easily
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Install/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RJ/RJBS/Sub-Install-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
BuildArch: noarch
+# = Module Build
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
-
-%if !%{defined perl_bootstrap}
-# Run-time:
+# = Run-time
BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
-# Tests:
+# = Test Suite ==
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+%if !%{defined perl_bootstrap}
+# Test::Output - Sub::Exporter - Sub::Install
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Output)
+# Test::Perl::Critic - Perl::Critic - Exception::Class -
+# Test::EOL - Pod::Coverage::TrustPod - Pod::Eventual -
+# Mixin::Linewise - Sub::Exporter - Sub::Install
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Perl::Critic)
+%endif
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
-%endif
+# = Run-time
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
This module makes it easy to install subroutines into packages without the
-unslightly mess of no strict or typeglobs lying about where just anyone
+unsightly mess of no strict or typeglobs lying about where just anyone
can see them.
%prep
%setup -q -n Sub-Install-%{version}
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
-
make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
-
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
-
-%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
%check
-# you'll note a number of tests are skipped due to Test::Output not being
-# present. However, Test::Output requires Sub::Exporter which requires...
-# Sub::Install. Holy circular loop, Batman! :)
-%if !%{defined perl_bootstrap}
-PERL_TEST_CRITIC=1 make test
-%endif
+make test %{!?perl_bootstrap:PERL_TEST_CRITIC=1}
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc Changes README LICENSE
-%{perl_vendorlib}/*
-%{_mandir}/man3/*
+%doc Changes LICENSE README
+%{perl_vendorlib}/Sub/
+%{_mandir}/man3/Sub::Install.3pm*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 23 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.926-6
+- Be more selective about what to exclude when bootstrapping
+- Don't use macros for commands
+- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
+- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
+- Make %%files list more explicit
+- Fix typo in %%description
+
* Mon Aug 20 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.926-5
- Specify all dependencies
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Bio-SamTools/f18] Update to latest upstream 1.35
Summary of changes: 733226f... Update to latest upstream 1.35 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Sub-Install] Created tag perl-Sub-Install-0.926-6.fc19
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Install-0.926-6.fc19' was created pointing to: 3d8ee9c... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) On i386: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires libsal_textenc.so Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Dancer-1.3099.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dancer: 7b17a35f132cf98fd95f96f6d52d84b1 Dancer-1.3099.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Dancer] 1.3099 bump
commit c17745c3075591be31199b57c356e4b5c7e29114
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Aug 23 14:29:19 2012 +0200
1.3099 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Dancer.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3f9bd58..7bbf456 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
/Dancer-1.3095.tar.gz
/Dancer-1.3097.tar.gz
/Dancer-1.3098.tar.gz
+/Dancer-1.3099.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Dancer.spec b/perl-Dancer.spec
index 2caabb0..f161d44 100644
--- a/perl-Dancer.spec
+++ b/perl-Dancer.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Dancer
-Version:1.3098
+Version:1.3099
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Lightweight yet powerful web application framework
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 23 2012 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.3099-1
+- 1.3099 bump
+
* Mon Jul 30 2012 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com 1.3098-1
- 1.3098 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e7ff45a..1d97382 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-53c441ad64e838af9a47741718c152f5 Dancer-1.3098.tar.gz
+7b17a35f132cf98fd95f96f6d52d84b1 Dancer-1.3099.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 847657] perl-Dancer-1.3099 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847657 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Dancer-1.3099-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3099-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 839744] Review Request: perl-Rose-DateTime - DateTime helper functions and objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839744 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Rose-DateTime-0.537-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 847299] epel6 build request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847299 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Convert-NLS_DATE_FORMAT-0.05-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Template-Toolkit-2.24.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by spot
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Template-Toolkit: c25fdab1beebf8818c2e624bc9f9d212 Template-Toolkit-2.24.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File TT_v224_html_docs.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by spot
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Template-Toolkit: 434a70bb50915e5c2baf5c3fd6ce673e TT_v224_html_docs.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Template-Toolkit] update to 2.24
commit e5dba96b7173d50e787b19444b4abf39216dc4b4
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Aug 23 15:21:11 2012 -0500
update to 2.24
.gitignore |2 ++
perl-Template-Toolkit.spec | 10 +++---
sources|4 ++--
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6682d86..531bbe5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
Template-Toolkit-2.22.tar.gz
TT_v222_html_docs.tar.gz
+/Template-Toolkit-2.24.tar.gz
+/TT_v224_html_docs.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Template-Toolkit.spec b/perl-Template-Toolkit.spec
index fc283ca..753be83 100644
--- a/perl-Template-Toolkit.spec
+++ b/perl-Template-Toolkit.spec
@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
Name: perl-Template-Toolkit
-Version:2.22
-Release:14%{?dist}
+Version:2.24
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Template processing system
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
URL:http://www.template-toolkit.org/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AB/ABW/Template-Toolkit-%{version}.tar.gz
-Source1:http://tt2.org/download/TT_v222_html_docs.tar.gz
+Source1:http://tt2.org/download/TT_v224_html_docs.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+BuildRequires: perl(AppConfig)
BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions)
@@ -101,6 +102,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 23 2012 Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org - 2.24-1
+- update to 2.24
+
* Tue Aug 21 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.22-14
- Correct dependencies
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 9dfe444..c3ea2d0 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-d98277f6420e5da6b93d99a8db2b3934 Template-Toolkit-2.22.tar.gz
-587d909170fd7dcbe8a51485c49fa3e0 TT_v222_html_docs.tar.gz
+c25fdab1beebf8818c2e624bc9f9d212 Template-Toolkit-2.24.tar.gz
+434a70bb50915e5c2baf5c3fd6ce673e TT_v224_html_docs.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Template-Toolkit/f18] update to 2.24
commit 16893710a4237627cede98df3f5c0d1e9bb5ab31
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Aug 23 15:21:38 2012 -0500
update to 2.24
perl-Template-Toolkit.spec | 48 +++
sources|4 +-
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Template-Toolkit.spec b/perl-Template-Toolkit.spec
index 004e0a6..753be83 100644
--- a/perl-Template-Toolkit.spec
+++ b/perl-Template-Toolkit.spec
@@ -1,19 +1,43 @@
Name: perl-Template-Toolkit
-Version:2.22
-Release:13%{?dist}
+Version:2.24
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Template processing system
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
URL:http://www.template-toolkit.org/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AB/ABW/Template-Toolkit-%{version}.tar.gz
-Source1:http://tt2.org/download/TT_v222_html_docs.tar.gz
+Source1:http://tt2.org/download/TT_v224_html_docs.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+BuildRequires: perl(AppConfig)
+BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions)
+BuildRequires: perl(lib)
+# Run-time:
+BuildRequires: perl(base)
+BuildRequires: perl(CGI)
+BuildRequires: perl(constant)
+BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper)
+BuildRequires: perl(Encode)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Path)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
+# Prefer Image::Info over Image::Size
+BuildRequires: perl(Image::Info)
+BuildRequires: perl(Pod::POM)
+BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
+BuildRequires: perl(Text::Wrap)
+# Tests:
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-BuildRequires: perl(AppConfig), perl(Text::Autoformat), perl(GD::Graph3d),
perl(GD::Graph)
-BuildRequires: perl(GD::Text), perl(Image::Info), perl(Image::Size),
perl(Pod::POM)
-BuildRequires: perl(XML::DOM), perl(XML::RSS), perl(XML::XPath)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+Requires: perl(AppConfig)
+Requires: perl(Encode)
+Requires: perl(File::Temp)
+# Prefer Image::Info over Image::Size
+Requires: perl(Image::Info)
Provides: perl-Template-Toolkit-examples = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: perl-Template-Toolkit-examples 2.22-1
@@ -54,8 +78,8 @@ make install \
INSTALLARCHLIB=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_archlib} \
TT_PREFIX=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/tt2
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f \( -name perllocal.pod -o \
- -name .packlist -o -name '*.bs' -size 0 \) -exec rm {} ';'
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -empty -exec rmdir {} ';'
+ -name .packlist -o -name '*.bs' -size 0 \) -exec rm -f {} ';'
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -empty -exec rmdir -f {} ';'
chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
# Nuke buildroot where it hides
sed -i s|$RPM_BUILD_ROOT||g
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_vendorarch}/Template/Config.pm
@@ -78,6 +102,12 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Thu Aug 23 2012 Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org - 2.24-1
+- update to 2.24
+
+* Tue Aug 21 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.22-14
+- Correct dependencies
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 2.22-13
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 9dfe444..c3ea2d0 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-d98277f6420e5da6b93d99a8db2b3934 Template-Toolkit-2.22.tar.gz
-587d909170fd7dcbe8a51485c49fa3e0 TT_v222_html_docs.tar.gz
+c25fdab1beebf8818c2e624bc9f9d212 Template-Toolkit-2.24.tar.gz
+434a70bb50915e5c2baf5c3fd6ce673e TT_v224_html_docs.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 849686] Upgrade perl-Template-Toolkit to 2.24
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849686 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Template-Toolkit-2.24-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Template-Toolkit-2.24-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Razor-Agent] Don't create *.old files that get installed during %install
commit 46c0367ae13129229f6e89b01b9bd8b656f8b9c3
Author: Robert Scheck rob...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Aug 24 00:49:47 2012 +0200
Don't create *.old files that get installed during %install
perl-Razor-Agent.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Razor-Agent.spec b/perl-Razor-Agent.spec
index 1df5eb9..72cabf7 100644
--- a/perl-Razor-Agent.spec
+++ b/perl-Razor-Agent.spec
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Agents on the network.
%prep
%setup -q -n razor-agents-%{version}
-%patch0 -p1 -b .old
+%patch0 -p1
%build
export CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 849686] Upgrade perl-Template-Toolkit to 2.24
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849686 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-Template-Toolkit-2.24-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-Template-Toolkit-2.24-1.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12617/perl-Template-Toolkit-2.24-1.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
