Tom Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> writes:
> 3) We'll adjust the guidelines like this:
> If your service is explicitly enabled by default in Fedora 16 or 17, and
> you wish to have a shared spec file, you will need to add a
> conditionalized call to the "%systemd_post_enable" macro, as follows:
> %post
> %if %{defined fc16} || %{defined fc17}
> %systemd_post_enable apache-httpd.service
> %else
> %systemd_post apache-httpd.service
> %endif
Surely F18 could define %systemd_post_enable as a synonym for
%systemd_post. The entire point of this thread is to make things
simpler for packager maintainers, not load them down with cross-branch
differences. (If I wanted to have a version-dependent %if in there,
I could have done that without any help from the macros.)
A larger point here is that I don't think it's an amazingly good idea to
be removing all trace of whether a package thinks it's supposed to be
enabled by default. Having two separate macros is not a bad thing IMO,
even if they happen to have the same expansion today.
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
