Re: Heads-up: liboauth 1.0.1 in Rawhide

2013-03-16 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 15/03/13 22:04, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
 On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:37:11 +0700 Michel Alexandre Salim
 sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
 
 Dear all,
 
 I've just updated liboauth to the latest 1.0.1 release in
 Rawhide. The soname is now liboauth.so.0.8.5 (previously
 liboauth.so.0.8.4), and dependent apps should not need a rebuild,
 but maintainers of the affected components should probably
 double-check to be sure.
 
 (Especially for Evolution and GNOME Documents, as ever since I
 enabled two-factor authentication, synchronization with Google
 servers have been a bit problematic anyway).
 
 There's a scratch build for Fedora 18 here:
 
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5125265
 
 Note that upstream now considers all use of oauth_http functions
 to be deprecated:
 
 http://liboauth.sourceforge.net/
 
 Best regards,
 
 Do you intend to land this in f19 branched as well? Or just
 f20/rawhide?
 
If there are no reported problems, ideally F19 as well. There
shouldn't be any problem, but to be safe I'm not pushing this without
the affected components being tested first:

version 1.0.1
  - do not url-escape RSA-key for signature

version 1.0.0
  - fix body-hash example code
  - mark all oauth_http functions a deprecated
  - freeze interface defitions for good
  - enter maintenance/bug-fix only cycle


Best,

- -- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  sali...@fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de   | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRRAfUAAoJEEr1VKujapN6o1kIAJN05wM36Q+fvmwEMlxYf0RD
b1hD1Gbng9MxCyrPdR7jYmc3SfCftfdQYLQQy0WgmMuPueDkQ8PHLFpXf9fjs//r
6rseQHoaLCPnXA4jOi0HrdeZ5Mj0hQLI8ElbpZbAqB5AVZv+C778AOPuKgp11oXQ
tJbHNOMoHyant6WZhFpWLhKlsJRo+KsURzJmeTb0rnzrK6jFPV1YOJLTNbKGPa+K
lILyCL1fIf808PTD1sahjgiTVMmRZpuDz4Dnm9OUoGK3p+RVtkuT7p30t5ZtoLsd
NfAq14muaruEQi59R15z4hnoQDU5O2HQgWe5qOqqLXIdioCGIY7Jh965rNqdOuw=
=6KiY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: dnf installs cron.hourly

2013-03-16 Thread Ralf Corsepius

On 03/16/2013 06:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On 15/03/13 09:48 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

On 03/15/2013 07:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:


In this case it seems perfectly logical. The thing in question is a cron
script.

May-be I am missing something, but the issue is not cron-jobs in
general, it is unwanted, non-user-intended/initiated network access.


You're missing that there are two questions: whether the
network-accessing-thing should be on by default,
Unwanted/non-user-intended network access = Must be disabled by 
default and must explicitly activated by user action.



and what mechanism
should be used for enabling / disabling it.
Plenty of possibilities: editing a config file, adding a GUI, moving the 
cron-stuff into a separate package, removing the cron-stuff and/or 
redesigning the tool.


I for one consider the approach of background updating to be a 
conceptionally broken and flawed design, lacking generality and usability.



I was addressing the second
question, not the first.

OK

Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: using fedup to upgrade to f19

2013-03-16 Thread Harald Hoyer
Am 16.03.2013 01:09 schrieb Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:

 On 15/03/13 04:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:

 When I can expect have an updates.img ? composing is failing to generate
 images ?


 Possibly tomorrow, but it depends on the state of dracut and lorax.

New dracut built with workaround for squashfs module loading
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

2013-03-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Orion Poplawski wrote:

 On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:

 Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide
 ASAP.

 
 Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick
 sonames that doesn't work for Fedora.  Will need to work on a fix...

I've a little experience adding pkg-config hints to cmake, I'll help look 
into it.

-- rex


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

2013-03-16 Thread Orion Poplawski

On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:

Orion Poplawski wrote:


On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:


Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide
ASAP.



Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick
sonames that doesn't work for Fedora.  Will need to work on a fix...


I've a little experience adding pkg-config hints to cmake, I'll help look
into it.


As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue 
with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the 
platforms that cmake supports.  But it is still probably the way to go 
on Linux.


--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: dnf installs cron.hourly

2013-03-16 Thread Nathanael Noblet

On 03/15/2013 05:00 PM, Neal Becker wrote:


Almost makes me wonder if a system like that on my android is needed, where it
tells me when I install that the app may use services that cost me money.



I had an Android phone that did this. However I can't remember if it was 
the HTC Desire Z / G2 or the Galaxy Nexus, and ultimately I'm thinking 
that it was likely something the Play store did, not the phone...


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-03-16

2013-03-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 01:47:24AM +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 libguestfs:
 f19  f20 (1:libguestfs-1.21.20-1.fc19 1:libguestfs-1.21.19-1.fc19)

The error message is a bit confusing, but I guess it means that the
second package is in F20 (despite the *.fc19 name).  In any case, it
should be fixed now.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide report: 20130316 changes

2013-03-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:14:37AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
 [libguestfs]
   1:ruby-libguestfs-1.21.19-1.fc19.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
   1:ruby-libguestfs-1.21.19-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.9()(64bit)

Also should be fixed now or RSN.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages requires /sbin/service.

2013-03-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:

 After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. 

That's not necessarily true.  Do our packaging guidelines actually say that 
anywhere?

-- rex

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: using fedup to upgrade to f19

2013-03-16 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 13:23 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
 
 Am 16.03.2013 01:09 schrieb Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
 
  On 15/03/13 04:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
 
  When I can expect have an updates.img ? composing is failing to
 generate
  images ?
 
 
  Possibly tomorrow, but it depends on the state of dracut and lorax.
 
 New dracut built with workaround for squashfs module loading
 
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/19/x86_64/os/
or
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/x86_64/os/
or ...

we should mirror some images in
fedora/linux/development/19/x86_64/os/images 
I don't understand why f19 is build is new dracut instead a stable one,
especially is not work.
Should this be considerable a critical bug ? 
With pungi of F18 I could build an F19 repo with the images ?  

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Self introduction

2013-03-16 Thread Niyo Raoul
Greetings,

I am a system engineer at ORINUX BURUNDI. I am not experienced in big
development project. But i love programming and design.

However, i have been using fedora for years and building  personal
application in c, c++, java, python and assembly. And also i did some
scripting with shell.

Therefore, i really want to participe in fedora development while learning
and sharing my small experience.

Please any guidelines or mentor are the most welcome to help.

Regards,

Raoul NIYO
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: using fedup to upgrade to f19

2013-03-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:37:54 +
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:

 http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/19/x86_64/os/

yes, this is where the content will be after its done composing. 
(although alt is just a cname for dl, which is all the master mirrors). 

 or
 http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/x86_64/os/
 or ...

This is where the content is when its being mashed/created. You should
not normally ever use this url. Wait until it's synced to the first
link. 

 we should mirror some images in
 fedora/linux/development/19/x86_64/os/images 

Yes, thats where they would be if they composed. ;) 

 I don't understand why f19 is build is new dracut instead a stable
 one, especially is not work.

Well, f19 just branched from rawhide and people were/are trying to get
their features in and testable. 

 Should this be considerable a critical bug ? 

Well, it's a problem, but people are working on it. I'm not sure what
you mean by critical off hand here. ;) F19 just branched and things are
always a bit shaky around branch time. It will get fixed up. 

 With pungi of F18 I could build an F19 repo with the images ?  

I don't know. Possibly. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

2013-03-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Orion Poplawski wrote:

 On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
 Orion Poplawski wrote:

 On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:

 Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide
 ASAP.


 Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of
 ImageMagick
 sonames that doesn't work for Fedora.  Will need to work on a fix...

 I've a little experience adding pkg-config hints to cmake, I'll help look
 into it.
 
 As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue
 with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the
 platforms that cmake supports.  But it is still probably the way to go
 on Linux.

OK, first-draft patch sent upstream and applied to cmake-2.8.11-0.3.rc1.fc20 

As far as I could tell, only one package in fedora is affected, converseen, 
and confirmed it builds ok now.

-- rex 

-- rex


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools

2013-03-16 Thread buildsys


perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires 
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Math-Clipper

2013-03-16 Thread buildsys


perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

2013-03-16 Thread buildsys


perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Math-Clipper

2013-03-16 Thread buildsys


perl-Math-Clipper has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libpolyclipping.so.5()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Math-Clipper-1.17-3.fc19.i686 requires libpolyclipping.so.5
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-SamTools

2013-03-16 Thread buildsys


perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires 
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

2013-03-16 Thread buildsys


perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 922376] New: perl-Data-Dumper-2.145 is available

2013-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922376

Bug ID: 922376
   Summary: perl-Data-Dumper-2.145 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Data-Dumper
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com

Latest upstream release: 2.145
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.143
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Dumper/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9dUemTAOQKa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 922378] New: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-78 is available

2013-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922378

Bug ID: 922378
   Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-78 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com

Latest upstream release: 78
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 77
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Critic-Pulp/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6yXwqrWwlJa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 922443] New: [abrt] perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18: wxTimerBase::Notify: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

2013-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922443

Bug ID: 922443
   Summary: [abrt] perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18: wxTimerBase::Notify:
Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by signal 11
(SIGSEGV)
   Product: Fedora
   Version: 18
 Component: perl-Padre
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
  Assignee: mmasl...@redhat.com
  Reporter: steinach2...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com

Description of problem:
i just closed padre, having multiple files open on various tabs.

Version-Release number of selected component:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18

Additional info:
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:/usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/padre
crash_function: wxTimerBase::Notify
executable: /usr/bin/perl
kernel: 3.8.2-206.fc18.x86_64
uid:1000

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #1 wxTimerBase::Notify at src/common/timercmn.cpp:57
 #2 timeout_callback at src/gtk/timer.cpp:45
 #7 g_main_context_iteration at gmain.c:3351
 #8 gtk_main_iteration at gtkmain.c:1345
 #9 wxWindow::DoPopupMenu at src/gtk/menu.cpp:1730
 #10 PopupMenu at /usr/include/wx-2.8/wx/window.h:926
 #11 XS_Wx__Window_PopupMenuXY at Window.c:2682
 #12 Perl_pp_entersub at /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/libperl.so
 #13 Perl_runops_standard at /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/libperl.so
 #14 Perl_call_sv at /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/libperl.so

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nbN0PR2OB0a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-Authen-Simple

2013-03-16 Thread buildsys


perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData

2013-03-16 Thread buildsys


perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData

2013-03-16 Thread buildsys


perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel