[389-devel] Please review (resent): [389 Project] #48808: Paged results search returns the blank list of entries

[Noriko Hosoi]

On 04/28/2016 12:12 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48808

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48808/0001-Ticket-48808-Paged-results-search-returns-the-blank-.patch 


--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48811: Console window could be hidden after login via consoles on multiple hosts

[Noriko Hosoi]

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48811

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48811/0001-Ticket-48811-Console-window-could-be-hidden-after-lo.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Self Introduction: Michael Cullen

[Michael Cullen]

Hi!

I've just submitted a review request here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344

I'm a software developer from the UK currently living and working in
London on Linux-based set top box middleware. I've been a Linux user for
a long time, but never really offered much back. I've tried many
distros, but always seem to keep coming back to Fedora. Anyway, I've
decided it's probably time I offered something back, and packaging seems
like as good an idea as any. 

Why this package? Well it seemed like a fairly easy one to start with
and I used to work on a Qt-based product so I know it well. Also it
plays into my interest in imaging and media.

My interests outside of software are travel and photography (even if I
do rather more of the latter) and I'm also sometimes found (literally)
hanging around local climbing centres. 

Anyway, let me know if you have any questions about this!

Thanks,
Michael
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 421  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
 183  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
  50  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-785fc9a2ea   
dropbear-2016.72-1.el7
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-56e02a47c7   
ansible-2.0.2.0-1.el7
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-d398cc4c6c   
roundcubemail-1.1.5-1.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-017aadcc97   
php-getid3-1.9.12-1.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-aad55a428b   
w3m-0.5.3-20.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-c731bc5ec0   
cacti-0.8.8g-1.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-af216d3233   
ansible1.9-1.9.6-2.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-2a74e47381   
pgpdump-0.30-1.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-4f1d69369e   
openvas-cli-1.4.4-1.el7 openvas-gsa-6.0.10-3.el7 openvas-libraries-8.0.7-2.el7 
openvas-manager-6.0.8-2.el7 openvas-scanner-5.0.5-3.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-cd0af81454   
botan-1.10.13-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

ReviewBoard-2.5.4-2.el7
owncloud-8.2.3-1.el7
php-Assetic-1.3.2-3.el7
php-myclabs-deep-copy-1.5.1-1.el7
php-natxet-cssmin-3.0.4-1.el7
php-owncloud-tarstreamer-0.1.0-1.el7
php-swiftmailer-5.4.2-1.el7
php-symfony-2.7.12-2.el7
python-assimulo-2.9-1.el7
python-whoosh-2.7.4-1.el7
uget-2.1.3-2.respin2.el7

Details about builds:



 ReviewBoard-2.5.4-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-2bab5ad96d)
 Web-based code review tool

Update Information:

Update to 2.7.4   ReviewBoard: Rebuild for dependency on python-whoosh 2.6+

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1326976 - ReviewBoard-2.5.4 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326976




 owncloud-8.2.3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6ee08a77d2)
 Private file sync and share server

Update Information:

Update owncloud to 8.2.3, along with a couple of new dependencies.  Note that
it's important the owncloud installation is already fully tested at 8.1.6 before
applying this update.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1266491 - php-natxet-cssmin-v3.0.4 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266491
  [ 2 ] Bug #1261011 - owncloud-9.0.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261011




 php-Assetic-1.3.2-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6ee08a77d2)
 Asset Management for PHP

Update Information:

Update owncloud to 8.2.3, along with a couple of new dependencies.  Note that
it's important the owncloud installation is already fully tested at 8.1.6 before
applying this update.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1266491 - php-natxet-cssmin-v3.0.4 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266491
  [ 2 ] Bug #1261011 - owncloud-9.0.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261011




 php-myclabs-deep-copy-1.5.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-2bc326586a)
 Create deep copies (clones) of your objects

Update Information:

**Version 1.5.1**  * fix for exception




 php-natxet-cssmin-3.0.4-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6ee08a77d2)
 Configurable CSS parser and minifier

Update Information:

Update owncloud to 8.2.3, along with a couple of new dependencies.  Note that
it's important the owncloud installation is already fully 

[Bug 1331986] perl-Moose-2.1801 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331986

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-Moose-2.1800 is|perl-Moose-2.1801 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 2.1801
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.1605-1.fc24
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Moose/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6197/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1325888] perl-Mojolicious-6.61 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325888

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-Mojolicious-6.60 is|perl-Mojolicious-6.61 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 6.61
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.57-1.fc25
URL: http://mojolicio.us/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5966/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1332336] perl-Inline-Struct-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332336



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1332336] perl-Inline-Struct-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332336



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1153111
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1153111=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
See for details and report the eventual error to rebase-helper
https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper/issues.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1332336] perl-Inline-Struct-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332336



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Inline-Struct-0.18 failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1332336] New: perl-Inline-Struct-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332336

Bug ID: 1332336
   Summary: perl-Inline-Struct-0.21 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Inline-Struct
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
psab...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.21
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.18-4.fc24
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Inline-Struct/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2988/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1332332] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.72 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332332

Bug ID: 1332332
   Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.72 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, psab...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 2.72
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.70-1.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Perl-Releases/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5881/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1332331] New: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.47 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332331

Bug ID: 1332331
   Summary: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.47 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Code-TidyAll
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 0.47
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.46-1.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Code-TidyAll/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/8650/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 22:36 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> 
> If there is genuine interest of start releasing fedora on time you will 
> not achieve that goal by not doing or blocking mass rebuilds, you either 
> need to stabilize anaconda development earlier in the cycle or find 
> another installer for the distribution that can exist outside the 
> distribution release cycles and does not have to be rewritten like 
> people are getting paid for it every cycle.

Since you haven't been around lately maybe you haven't noticed this,
but here's some interesting numbers for F24. For Alpha there were 35
blocker bugs (approximately - I'm using the BZ tree view which may
include some bugs that got fixed while they were proposed). Of those,
by count, 3 were anaconda-ecosystem bugs.

For Beta, we have ~28 blockers. 4 of those are/were anaconda-ecosystem
bugs.

Also note that most of the anaconda-related bugs were caused not by
changes in anaconda, but by disruptive changes in other components that
anaconda had to adapt to. And that all the anaconda blockers were
resolved very promptly and early.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1296734] perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296734

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.fc |perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.fc
   |23  |23
   |perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.fc |perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.fc
   |22  |22
   ||perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.el
   ||7



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Jóhann B . Guðmundsson]

On 05/02/2016 01:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

There is strong engineering value in having two releases per year: release
early, release often. There are many projects that develop through Fedora that
get thrown into disarray when our cycle gets too far out of whack (prominent
examples being GNOME and glibc)


The distribution is made out of 14k+ components most of which of those 
components completely out of sync with the Gnome and Glibc one which 
means components that make up different products are not synced with 
those two components cycle, which means that you cannot have one 
product's release cycle be synced with another or bound to it's release 
cycle.


Even historically QA did not manage to deal with this release cycle when 
distribution was smaller and when it was just one "generic" release but 
despite all the evidence of this not working through the years you still 
push this one forward which means in other words Red Hat wants the 
distribution cycle to be forcefully synced with Gnome and does what it 
takes to do so which is why it's back on Gnome's release cycle despite 
everything indicating it should not be on that cycle at the cost of the 
community and quality of the distribution.


If there is genuine interest of start releasing fedora on time you will 
not achieve that goal by not doing or blocking mass rebuilds, you either 
need to stabilize anaconda development earlier in the cycle or find 
another installer for the distribution that can exist outside the 
distribution release cycles and does not have to be rewritten like 
people are getting paid for it every cycle.


JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1296734] perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296734



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Net-Whois-IP-1.19-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 19:22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 18:15, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 10:03:51AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > >  wrote:
> > > > On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 15:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >> All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild 
> > > >> (GCC, glibc,
> > > >> etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This 
> > > >> announcement
> > > >> was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed 
> > > >> telling
> > > >> anyone directly.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not so sure about GCC. It's been updated to 6.1 in both F25 and F24
> > > > and it's causing bugs already. For example, anything trying to link
> > > > against boost built with gcc-6.0.0 will fail to link at the moment, see
> > > > bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331983 .
> > > 
> > > It's built in koji for F25 and F24, but it's not been bodhi pushed to
> > > updates-testing for either. I think this is the usual and expected way
> > > things go?
> > 
> > There are no known ABI incompatibilities between gcc-6.1.1 (i.e. snapshot
> > a few hours after the GCC 6.1 release) and recent 6.0.0 snapshots
> > (development snapshots months to weeks before the 6.1 release that happened
> > last week).  So, are you sure it is really in between
> > gcc-6.0.0-0.20.fc{24,25} and gcc-6.1.1-1.fc{24,25}, and not something you
> > just attribute to newer gcc because you see newer version on it?
> 
> All I know is this:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13828182 succeeded
> and https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13872453 failed.
> Rebuilding boost makes it succeed again. In the first case,
> 6.0.0-0.20.fc25 was in the buildroot. 6.1.1-1.fc25 was in the latter.
> Boost was the same in both (1.60.0-5.fc25).

Also, if you read the bug description, you'll see that the linker failure
was caught by koschei when it tried to rebuild mkvtoolnix after updated
gcc hit the repositories:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/mkvtoolnix (scroll down
to the first build attempt after 9.1.0-1.fc25). So yes, it looks to me
that either the newer gcc broke boost or there's a bug in boost exposed by
the gcc update.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Stephen Gallagher]

On 05/02/2016 03:35 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
 The reason for not having mass rebuild during F25 development cycle is
 very tight schedule for F25 and we would like to avoid slips in F25 as
 much as possible. That is the main motivation here.
>>> In other words sacrificing quality for marketing reasons - Utterly poor :(
>>>
>>
>> It's not sacrificing quality. Mass rebuilds require a great deal of 
>> engineering
>> coordination. We're requesting that such coordination happens in the F26
>> development cycle instead, so we don't end up having another long cycle.
>>
>> There is strong engineering value in having two releases per year: release
>> early, release often. There are many projects that develop through Fedora 
>> that
>> get thrown into disarray when our cycle gets too far out of whack (prominent
>> examples being GNOME and glibc). So given that we needed to extend the F24
>> timeframe early on (and also had a couple slips), FESCo agreed to shorten 
>> F25 in
>> response so that we can still deliver the autumn releases of key projects
>> (without having to re-consider the updates policy like we did for GNOME
>> 3.14->3.16 during the "Year Almost Without Fedora").
>>
>> All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild (GCC, 
>> glibc,
>> etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This 
>> announcement
>> was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed 
>> telling
>> anyone directly.
> 
> Really? The email from Florian on this thread 30 mins prior to this
> one conflicts with that from a glibc PoV and given they're part of the
> toolchain team and they didn't know does the rest of the toolchain
> team agree?
> 

I hadn't read Florian's email yet when I replied here (didn't see it in the 
list).

I had another conversation with them on IRC today. They knew, but when the wrong
schedule was put up they thought FESCo had changed plans. There's also been some
kerfluffle with the strlcat() patches that got pushed out, so we're going to
have to see how that plays out.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Peter Robinson]

>>> The reason for not having mass rebuild during F25 development cycle is
>>> very tight schedule for F25 and we would like to avoid slips in F25 as
>>> much as possible. That is the main motivation here.
>> In other words sacrificing quality for marketing reasons - Utterly poor :(
>>
>
> It's not sacrificing quality. Mass rebuilds require a great deal of 
> engineering
> coordination. We're requesting that such coordination happens in the F26
> development cycle instead, so we don't end up having another long cycle.
>
> There is strong engineering value in having two releases per year: release
> early, release often. There are many projects that develop through Fedora that
> get thrown into disarray when our cycle gets too far out of whack (prominent
> examples being GNOME and glibc). So given that we needed to extend the F24
> timeframe early on (and also had a couple slips), FESCo agreed to shorten F25 
> in
> response so that we can still deliver the autumn releases of key projects
> (without having to re-consider the updates policy like we did for GNOME
> 3.14->3.16 during the "Year Almost Without Fedora").
>
> All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild (GCC, glibc,
> etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This 
> announcement
> was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed telling
> anyone directly.

Really? The email from Florian on this thread 30 mins prior to this
one conflicts with that from a glibc PoV and given they're part of the
toolchain team and they didn't know does the rest of the toolchain
team agree?

Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1322442] Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.11

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322442



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-File-Touch-0.11-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[James Hogarth]

On 2 May 2016 17:05, "Chris Murphy"  wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>  wrote:
> > On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 15:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > [...]
> >> All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild
(GCC, glibc,
> >> etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This
announcement
> >> was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed
telling
> >> anyone directly.
> >
> > I'm not so sure about GCC. It's been updated to 6.1 in both F25 and F24
> > and it's causing bugs already. For example, anything trying to link
> > against boost built with gcc-6.0.0 will fail to link at the moment, see
> > bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331983 .
>
> It's built in koji for F25 and F24, but it's not been bodhi pushed to
> updates-testing for either. I think this is the usual and expected way
> things go?
>

There is no updates-testing for rawhide, aka F25 at the moment, so anything
not a scratch build goes straight into it... Which is one of the key
reasons it's seen as quite unstable by many.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 18:15, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 10:03:51AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> >  wrote:
> > > On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 15:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >> All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild (GCC, 
> > >> glibc,
> > >> etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This 
> > >> announcement
> > >> was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed 
> > >> telling
> > >> anyone directly.
> > >
> > > I'm not so sure about GCC. It's been updated to 6.1 in both F25 and F24
> > > and it's causing bugs already. For example, anything trying to link
> > > against boost built with gcc-6.0.0 will fail to link at the moment, see
> > > bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331983 .
> > 
> > It's built in koji for F25 and F24, but it's not been bodhi pushed to
> > updates-testing for either. I think this is the usual and expected way
> > things go?
> 
> There are no known ABI incompatibilities between gcc-6.1.1 (i.e. snapshot
> a few hours after the GCC 6.1 release) and recent 6.0.0 snapshots
> (development snapshots months to weeks before the 6.1 release that happened
> last week).  So, are you sure it is really in between
> gcc-6.0.0-0.20.fc{24,25} and gcc-6.1.1-1.fc{24,25}, and not something you
> just attribute to newer gcc because you see newer version on it?

All I know is this:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13828182 succeeded
and https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13872453 failed.
Rebuilding boost makes it succeed again. In the first case,
6.0.0-0.20.fc25 was in the buildroot. 6.1.1-1.fc25 was in the latter.
Boost was the same in both (1.60.0-5.fc25).

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:52:44 -0500
Adam Miller  wrote:

> Hello all,
> We're wrapping up the first phase of the Fedora Docker Layered
> Image Build Service[0] and the time has come to start thinking about
> what we as a Project need to do to formalize what it means to be
> shipping Docker Layered Images once we are capable of building and
> distributing them.
> 
> These are effectively going to compliment their RPM counterpart
> at least in the beginning since we as a Project have never shipped
> any build artifact other than RPMs as a part of the distribution
> before. We can grow organically from there if we want to extend
> beyond the initial offering for Docker Layered Images but I thought
> following RPM as a guide in the beginning was a reasonable goal to
> achieve. Some areas that seemed pertinant right off the bat are
> below, for each of them I have alread created a Draft document that I
> would appreciate feedback on.

So, at least at first it's assumed there will just be one rpm in each
container? Or can we have a collection of rpms that make sense to be
together?

> Docker Layered Image "packaging" Guidelines [1]

Whats the difference here between version and release? Does version
change any based on the version of the primary rpm in the container?

And any guidelines on naming? Just use common sense? They will have to
be unique. 

I guess the build system has network access and people can put anything
in CMD lines? How can we make reproducible builds? Or should CMD be
restricted to only some network resources.

> Package Review Process with a Docker Containers section [2]

This might be better as a Container review process seperate from the
Package review process, ie a different page?

So it's assumed here that someone is a packager to submit new container
reviews? Or would we want some kind of 'containerger' role for people
who maintainer containers?

> Docker Layered Images Naming Guildelines [3]

I am not sure what to add to make this more concrete, but I think it
needs to be. ;) 
> 
> The Fedora Cloud SIG has done a first-pass review of these (thanks
> Cloud SIG!) so hopefully there's a certainly level of sanity to them
> but I'm absolutely open to new ideas and extending the content with
> more coverage.
> 
> Another point to note is that we need to determine how this should be
> handled in BZ components for bug reporting as well as for filing
> review requests.

I agree with the folks downthread we can make a bugzilla "Container
Review" to compliment Package Review. Unless we think we can spin up a
review application for these (like we are still hopefully planning on
doing for packages someday). 

Also, we will need to make pkgdb create components for each container
as well for people to report bugs against. 

kevin


pgpbgJrhOJZqM.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Modularity] Module build proposal

[Petr Šabata]

Hi all,

as promised on the last Modularity WG meeting [0], here's
a module build proposal we've been pondering for a while.

As always, this is nowhere near final and there are still many
open questions.  The purpose of this mail is to get some early
feedback.  Feel free to comment, especially if you see anything
obviously wrong or have ideas how to make the whole thing better.

Note the last module metadata proposal is a little outdated and
will have to be adapted to make this possible.

Key points:
- building a module means building the components it contains
  and composing a module deliverable (a repository, an image, other)
- the build must be reproducible
- the module's buildroot is defined by "buildrequiring" other,
  already existing modules
- modules should be tracked in a VCS, such as dist-git [1]

Build proposal, step by step:
- we have a module, let's name it foo
- the module definition says it's composed of RPM packages
  bar and baz
- the module definition also says where to find the sources
  for these packages, e.g. a link to a git repository, the
  commit hash and a link to the lookaside cache [2]
- the build service clones bar's and baz's repositories and
  checks out the specified commits [3]
- the build service prepares the buildroot using the modules
  listed as its build dependencies
- the build service builds bar and baz in the prepared buildroot;
  some modules might require buildroot overrides and build their
  packages in a particular order
- for whatever reason, we might not always want all the built
  packages in our module; we can filter some out at this point
- the service optionally includes (well, bundles) dependencies
  present in the buildroot but not present in the module's runtime
  environment in the currently built module
- the service gathers any extra metadata it needs and records
  them in the module -- this could include automatically generated
  lists of component licenses, builder IDs, vendor tags, timestamps,
  module life cycle data and more
- the build service composes the deliverable(s)

Challenges:
- we need to ensure the module sources will be available for the
  entire lifetime of the module (e.g. SPEC files, tarballs)
- plenty more, point them out

Most of this can be done with the tools we already have or
with minimal changes to them.  This proposal doesn't address
parallel installations of conflicting modules but that's a
somewhat different topic and may be solved on a different level.

Again, share your comments and feel free to ask any questions.

Cheers,
P

[0] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/modularity-wg/modularity-wg.2016-04-28-15.01.html
[1] Working on that; our staging dist-git and pkgdb already
include support for this.
[2] Obviously some of these couldn't be set by the module author
when building official Fedora modules; our build service should
always use our dist-git and our cache.  It is still useful for
development, testing and third-party module vendors.
[3] We've considered using git tags but it's more trouble than it's
worth.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 10:03:51AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>  wrote:
> > On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 15:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > [...]
> >> All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild (GCC, 
> >> glibc,
> >> etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This 
> >> announcement
> >> was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed 
> >> telling
> >> anyone directly.
> >
> > I'm not so sure about GCC. It's been updated to 6.1 in both F25 and F24
> > and it's causing bugs already. For example, anything trying to link
> > against boost built with gcc-6.0.0 will fail to link at the moment, see
> > bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331983 .
> 
> It's built in koji for F25 and F24, but it's not been bodhi pushed to
> updates-testing for either. I think this is the usual and expected way
> things go?

There are no known ABI incompatibilities between gcc-6.1.1 (i.e. snapshot
a few hours after the GCC 6.1 release) and recent 6.0.0 snapshots
(development snapshots months to weeks before the 6.1 release that happened
last week).  So, are you sure it is really in between
gcc-6.0.0-0.20.fc{24,25} and gcc-6.1.1-1.fc{24,25}, and not something you
just attribute to newer gcc because you see newer version on it?

Jakub
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Chris Murphy]

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
 wrote:
> On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 15:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> [...]
>> All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild (GCC, 
>> glibc,
>> etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This 
>> announcement
>> was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed 
>> telling
>> anyone directly.
>
> I'm not so sure about GCC. It's been updated to 6.1 in both F25 and F24
> and it's causing bugs already. For example, anything trying to link
> against boost built with gcc-6.0.0 will fail to link at the moment, see
> bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331983 .

It's built in koji for F25 and F24, but it's not been bodhi pushed to
updates-testing for either. I think this is the usual and expected way
things go?

-- 
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 24-20160501.n.0 compose check report

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 14:51 +0200, Jan Sedlak wrote:
> > 
> > ID: 15492   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
> > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15492
> 
> 
> Not sure what is causing this and I can't reproduce it locally.

I'll rebuild the base disk image this afternoon when nothing's running,
it's possible that it's bad.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: 7Server or 6Server in baseurl or mirror_list

[Gerald Sim]

Hi Kevin

Yes, I know the version specific gpg keys are available, not being a pain
but they won't exactly match $releasever , since

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-7

will also need to link to

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6Server
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-7Server

and vice versa


Happy to hear your thoughts

Cheers



Regards,
Gerald Sim

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On Sun, 1 May 2016 10:11:29 +0930
> Gerald Sim  wrote:
>
> > Hi Kevin
> >
> > Awesome I can see this now
> > http://fedora.mirror.serversaustralia.com.au/epel//
> >
> > So much m ore balanced.
> >
> > Now with GPG keys, unless there is a "master" public key to be shared
> > for all repos, or unless the GPG key rests in the relevant nested
> > directory which isn't, would you be able to add something like
> >
> http://fedora.mirror.serversaustralia.com.au/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-$releasever
> > too ?
>
> We already have:
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6
> and
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-7
>
> I don't think we want to make nests of symlinks for all the various
> versions of those.
>
> kevin
>
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list
> epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Self Introduction: Tomohiro Ichikawa

[Tomohiro Ichikawa]

2016-05-02 23:55 GMT+09:00 Kevin Fenzi :

> Welcome!
>
> I'll try and take a look at your package later in the week, but not
> sure when I will find time for it. ;( If someone else wishes to do so
> before then, please do.
>

Thank you for your reply.
OK. I will wait for a review until that day.
thanks!

tomohiro
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: 7Server or 6Server in baseurl or mirror_list

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sun, 1 May 2016 10:11:29 +0930
Gerald Sim  wrote:

> Hi Kevin
> 
> Awesome I can see this now
> http://fedora.mirror.serversaustralia.com.au/epel//
> 
> So much m ore balanced.
> 
> Now with GPG keys, unless there is a "master" public key to be shared
> for all repos, or unless the GPG key rests in the relevant nested
> directory which isn't, would you be able to add something like
> http://fedora.mirror.serversaustralia.com.au/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-$releasever
> too ?

We already have: 

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6
and
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-7

I don't think we want to make nests of symlinks for all the various
versions of those. 

kevin


pgpn2sW0Lq4Nb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Self Introduction: Tomohiro Ichikawa

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 2 May 2016 09:34:24 +0900
toromoti  wrote:

> Nice to meet you, all!
> 
> My name is Tomohiro Ichikawa.
> I am a DevOps engineer in Japan.
> 
> I have posted a review request of python-jinja2-27 for EPEL6.
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331923)
> 
> Jinja2 is used by "Ansible". and Jinja-2.7 have many useful function
> to write Ansible Playbooks. e.g. map filter, select filter and more.
> Now, in EL7, Jinja2 version is 2.7, but it is 2.6 in
> EL6(python-jinja2-26 in EPEL6).
> This mean that runnable playbooks on EL7 may not be able to run on
> EL6. Therefore, I thought that I want to provide Jinja-2.7 via EPEL6.
> and I have built python-jinja2-27.
> If it is realized, many ansible users can write runnable playbooks on
> both EL6 and EL7.
> 
> I'm waiting for my sponsor.

Welcome!

I'll try and take a look at your package later in the week, but not
sure when I will find time for it. ;( If someone else wishes to do so
before then, please do. 

kevin


pgp0Rh0iuDqEG.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

2016-05-02 Fedora QA Devel Meeting Minutes

[Tim Flink]

=
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora-qadevel
=

Minutes: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-05-02/fedora-qadevel.2016-05-02-14.01.html
Minutes (text): 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-05-02/fedora-qadevel.2016-05-02-14.01.txt
Log: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-05-02/fedora-qadevel.2016-05-02-14.01.log.html



Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call  (tflink, 14:01:50)
  * LINK:

https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/w/meetings/20160502-fedoraqadevel/
(tflink, 14:02:56)

* Announcements and Information  (tflink, 14:05:31)
  * new blockerbugs deployed to stg - tflink  (tflink, 14:05:39)
  * imagefactory builds F23/24, F25 builds fail, but that is not a
problem in imgfac - jskladan  (tflink, 14:05:40)

* Docker Testing  (tflink, 14:08:30)
  * ACTION: tflink to follow up on resultsdb_api packaging status and
infra team to be sure of what all needs to be done before we can
build libtaskotron in koji  (tflink, 14:44:00)

* ABI Checking Task  (tflink, 14:44:39)
  * ACTION: kparal to continue coordinating abi check work with the
authors and mkrizek  (tflink, 14:53:54)

* Tasks  (tflink, 14:54:10)

* Open Floor  (tflink, 14:54:42)

Meeting ended at 14:58:07 UTC.




Action Items

* tflink to follow up on resultsdb_api packaging status and infra team
  to be sure of what all needs to be done before we can build
  libtaskotron in koji
* kparal to continue coordinating abi check work with the authors and
  mkrizek




Action Items, by person
---
* kparal
  * kparal to continue coordinating abi check work with the authors and
mkrizek
* mkrizek
  * kparal to continue coordinating abi check work with the authors and
mkrizek
* tflink
  * tflink to follow up on resultsdb_api packaging status and infra team
to be sure of what all needs to be done before we can build
libtaskotron in koji
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---
* tflink (104)
* jskladan (29)
* kparal (15)
* linuxmodder (8)
* zodbot (7)
* garretraziel (4)
* mkrizek (3)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot


pgpVahLjJSud4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 15:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
[...]
> All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild (GCC, glibc,
> etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This 
> announcement
> was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed telling
> anyone directly.

I'm not so sure about GCC. It's been updated to 6.1 in both F25 and F24
and it's causing bugs already. For example, anything trying to link
against boost built with gcc-6.0.0 will fail to link at the moment, see
bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331983 .

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 24-20160502.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Workstation live x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 5/63 (x86_64), 3/16 (i386)

ID: 15617   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15617
ID: 15622   Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15622
ID: 15642   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15642
ID: 15643   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15643
ID: 15645   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15645
ID: 15646   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15646
ID: 15686   Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15686
ID: 15688   Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15688

Passed openQA tests: 58/63 (x86_64), 13/16 (i386)

-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII (master). "Fix expanding undefined el6 macro (..more)"

[notifications]

From 29b17200884de40c4ee7259987cd739812ad3017 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 15:55:46 +0200
Subject: Fix expanding undefined el6 macro

The spec file could not been processed on Fedora:

$ fedpkg local
error: parse error in expression
error: /home/test/fedora/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec:19: 
bad %if condition
error: query of specfile 
/home/test/fedora/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec failed, 
can't parse

This fixes it by expanding the macro only if it is defined.
---
 perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec b/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec
index cd3779f..27abb1a 100644
--- a/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec
+++ b/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.spec
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(XSLoader)
 BuildRequires:  perl(base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Encode::CJKConstants)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Encode::JP::JIS7)
-%if 0%{el6}
+%if 0%{?el6}
 BuildRequires:  perl-devel
 %else
 BuildRequires:  perl-Encode-devel
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII.git/commit/?h=master=29b17200884de40c4ee7259987cd739812ad3017
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ttorling pushed to perl-Unix-Statgrab (f24). "0.111 bump (..more)"

[notifications]

From bda4f46bd0b665a1872aad272481fd562f13ff2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Orling 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 06:32:40 -0700
Subject: 0.111 bump

- Drop patch, renenabling user_data tests, upstream has fixed (rt#107241)
---
 .gitignore |  3 +-
 ...atgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch | 32 --
 perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec| 11 
 sources|  2 +-
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index fd472b2..72ec8a5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-Unix-Statgrab-0.04.tar.gz
-/Unix-Statgrab-0.109.tar.gz
+/Unix-Statgrab-0.111.tar.gz
diff --git a/Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch 
b/Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a5c9331..000
--- a/Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-diff --git a/t/01-methods.t b/t/01-methods.t
-index af1a48a..773f6e3 100644
 a/t/01-methods.t
-+++ b/t/01-methods.t
-@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ my %funcs = (
-   voluntary_context_switches involuntary_context_switches proc_size
-   proc_resident start_time time_spent cpu_percent nice state systime/
- ],
--get_user_stats => [qw/login_name record_id device hostname pid login_time 
systime/],
- );
- 
- my %errs = ( get_error => [qw/error error_name error_value error_arg 
strperror/], );
-@@ -111,6 +110,7 @@ foreach my $func ( sort 
@{$Unix::Statgrab::EXPORT_TAGS{stats}} )
- {
-   SKIP:
- {
-+skip("get_user_stats is broken :(") if $func eq "get_user_stats";
- my $sub = Unix::Statgrab->can($func);
- ok( $sub, "Unix::Statgrab->can('$func')" ) or skip("Can't invoke 
unknow stats-call $func");
- my $o = &{$sub}();
-diff --git a/t/03-leak.t b/t/03-leak.t
-index 84b46f4..75b3d55 100644
 a/t/03-leak.t
-+++ b/t/03-leak.t
-@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ my %funcs = (
- get_network_iface_stats => [],
- get_page_stats  => [qw/get_page_stats_diff/],
- get_process_stats   => [],
--get_user_stats  => [],
- );
- 
- my %errs = (
diff --git a/perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec b/perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec
index efb5726..bd92bad 100644
--- a/perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec
+++ b/perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec
@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
 Name:   perl-Unix-Statgrab
-Version:0.109
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.111
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl extension for collecting information about the machine
 License:LGPLv2+
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Unix-Statgrab/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RE/REHSACK/Unix-Statgrab-%{version}.tar.gz
-# rt#107241
-Patch0: Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch
 # Build
 BuildRequires:  coreutils
 BuildRequires:  findutils
@@ -48,7 +46,6 @@ operating system, CPU, memory usage, network interfaces, 
hard-disks etc.
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n Unix-Statgrab-%{version}
-%patch0 -p1
 
 %build
 perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" NO_PACKLIST=1
@@ -69,6 +66,10 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Tim Orling  - 0.111-1
+- Drop patch, renenabling user_data tests, upstream has fixed rt#10721
+- Upgrade to version 0.111
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.109-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 4438f9b..a3e121c 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e1a084a220d7c7cb46cb1e06957fab3f  Unix-Statgrab-0.109.tar.gz
+5e9734ef1f90ae3c085e88426d145e7a  Unix-Statgrab-0.111.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Unix-Statgrab.git/commit/?h=f24=bda4f46bd0b665a1872aad272481fd562f13ff2e
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20160502.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 9/58 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386)

ID: 15539   Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15539
ID: 15550   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15550
ID: 15552   Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15552
ID: 15561   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15561
ID: 15563   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15563
ID: 15565   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15565
ID: 15566   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15566
ID: 15567   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15567
ID: 15571   Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15571
ID: 15593   Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15593
ID: 15607   Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15607
ID: 15608   Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15608
ID: 15609   Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15609

Passed openQA tests: 49/58 (x86_64), 11/15 (i386)

-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1332062] perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.111 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332062



--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
ttorling's perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.111-1.fc25 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=759476

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ttorling pushed to perl-Unix-Statgrab (master). "0.111 bump (..more)"

[notifications]

From bda4f46bd0b665a1872aad272481fd562f13ff2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Orling 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 06:32:40 -0700
Subject: 0.111 bump

- Drop patch, renenabling user_data tests, upstream has fixed (rt#107241)
---
 .gitignore |  3 +-
 ...atgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch | 32 --
 perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec| 11 
 sources|  2 +-
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index fd472b2..72ec8a5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-Unix-Statgrab-0.04.tar.gz
-/Unix-Statgrab-0.109.tar.gz
+/Unix-Statgrab-0.111.tar.gz
diff --git a/Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch 
b/Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a5c9331..000
--- a/Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-diff --git a/t/01-methods.t b/t/01-methods.t
-index af1a48a..773f6e3 100644
 a/t/01-methods.t
-+++ b/t/01-methods.t
-@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ my %funcs = (
-   voluntary_context_switches involuntary_context_switches proc_size
-   proc_resident start_time time_spent cpu_percent nice state systime/
- ],
--get_user_stats => [qw/login_name record_id device hostname pid login_time 
systime/],
- );
- 
- my %errs = ( get_error => [qw/error error_name error_value error_arg 
strperror/], );
-@@ -111,6 +110,7 @@ foreach my $func ( sort 
@{$Unix::Statgrab::EXPORT_TAGS{stats}} )
- {
-   SKIP:
- {
-+skip("get_user_stats is broken :(") if $func eq "get_user_stats";
- my $sub = Unix::Statgrab->can($func);
- ok( $sub, "Unix::Statgrab->can('$func')" ) or skip("Can't invoke 
unknow stats-call $func");
- my $o = &{$sub}();
-diff --git a/t/03-leak.t b/t/03-leak.t
-index 84b46f4..75b3d55 100644
 a/t/03-leak.t
-+++ b/t/03-leak.t
-@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ my %funcs = (
- get_network_iface_stats => [],
- get_page_stats  => [qw/get_page_stats_diff/],
- get_process_stats   => [],
--get_user_stats  => [],
- );
- 
- my %errs = (
diff --git a/perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec b/perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec
index efb5726..bd92bad 100644
--- a/perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec
+++ b/perl-Unix-Statgrab.spec
@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
 Name:   perl-Unix-Statgrab
-Version:0.109
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.111
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl extension for collecting information about the machine
 License:LGPLv2+
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Unix-Statgrab/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RE/REHSACK/Unix-Statgrab-%{version}.tar.gz
-# rt#107241
-Patch0: Unix-Statgrab-0.109-Disable-get_user_stats-tests.patch
 # Build
 BuildRequires:  coreutils
 BuildRequires:  findutils
@@ -48,7 +46,6 @@ operating system, CPU, memory usage, network interfaces, 
hard-disks etc.
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n Unix-Statgrab-%{version}
-%patch0 -p1
 
 %build
 perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}" NO_PACKLIST=1
@@ -69,6 +66,10 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Tim Orling  - 0.111-1
+- Drop patch, renenabling user_data tests, upstream has fixed rt#10721
+- Upgrade to version 0.111
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.109-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 4438f9b..a3e121c 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e1a084a220d7c7cb46cb1e06957fab3f  Unix-Statgrab-0.109.tar.gz
+5e9734ef1f90ae3c085e88426d145e7a  Unix-Statgrab-0.111.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Unix-Statgrab.git/commit/?h=master=bda4f46bd0b665a1872aad272481fd562f13ff2e
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160502.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-24-20160501.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160502.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  2
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: KDE live i386
Path: Spins/i386/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-i386-24-20160502.n.0.iso
Image: KDE live x86_64
Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-24-20160502.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Workstation live x86_64
Path: Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-20160501.n.0.iso
Image: Workstation live i386
Path: Workstation/i386/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-i386-24-20160501.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[IBSimu]
IBSimu-1.0.5-11.b.fc23.armv7hl requires libgsl.so.0
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.armv7hl requires libOpenMeshCore.so.3.2
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.armv7hl requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.armv7hl requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
[ape]
ape-2.2.0-2.fc22.armv7hl requires libgsl.so.0
[coin-or-Bonmin]
coin-or-Bonmin-1.8.1-8.fc24.armv7hl requires libasl.so.1
coin-or-Bonmin-1.8.1-8.fc24.armv7hl requires libmp.so.1
[coin-or-Couenne]
coin-or-Couenne-0.5.2-6.fc23.armv7hl requires libasl.so.1
coin-or-Couenne-0.5.2-6.fc23.armv7hl requires libmp.so.1
[coin-or-OS]
coin-or-OS-2.9.3-5.fc23.armv7hl requires libasl.so.1
coin-or-OS-2.9.3-5.fc23.armv7hl requires libmp.so.1
[coot]
coot-0.8.2-1.fc24.armv7hl requires libgsl.so.0
[couchdb]
couchdb-1.6.1-10.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_drv_version) = 0:3.2
couchdb-1.6.1-10.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_nif_version) = 0:2.9
[eclipse-jbosstools]
eclipse-jbosstools-as-4.2.2-1.fc22.noarch requires 
osgi(org.eclipse.tm.terminal)
[erlang-basho_metrics]
erlang-basho_metrics-1.0.0-24.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-basho_metrics-1.0.0-24.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-basho_metrics-1.0.0-24.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32)
[erlang-bitcask]
erlang-bitcask-1.6.3-10.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-bitcask-1.6.3-10.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-bitcask-1.6.3-10.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32)
[erlang-cl]
erlang-cl-1.2.1-10.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-cl-1.2.1-10.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-cl-1.2.1-10.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-lfe(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-cl-1.2.1-10.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32)
[erlang-ebloom]
erlang-ebloom-2.0.0-5.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-ebloom-2.0.0-5.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-ebloom-2.0.0-5.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32)
[erlang-eleveldb]
erlang-eleveldb-1.3.2-11.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-eleveldb-1.3.2-11.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-eleveldb-1.3.2-11.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32)
[erlang-emmap]
erlang-emmap-0-0.15.git05ae1bb.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-emmap-0-0.15.git05ae1bb.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-emmap-0-0.15.git05ae1bb.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32)
[erlang-erlsyslog]
erlang-erlsyslog-0.6.2-12.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-erlsyslog-0.6.2-12.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-erlsyslog-0.6.2-12.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32)
[erlang-esasl]
erlang-esasl-0.1-20.20120116git665cc80.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-esasl-0.1-20.20120116git665cc80.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-esasl-0.1-20.20120116git665cc80.fc24.armv7hl requires 
erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32)
[erlang-esdl]
erlang-esdl-1.3.1-11.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-esdl-1.3.1-11.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-esdl-1.3.1-11.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32)
[erlang-js]
erlang-js-1.3.0-6.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-erts(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-js-1.3.0-6.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-kernel(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-js-1.3.0-6.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-mochiweb(armv7hnl-32)
erlang-js-1.3.0-6.fc24.armv7hl requires erlang-stdlib(armv7hnl-32

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Stephen Gallagher]

On 05/02/2016 09:12 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 02:16 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> 
>> The reason for not having mass rebuild during F25 development cycle is
>> very tight schedule for F25 and we would like to avoid slips in F25 as
>> much as possible. That is the main motivation here.
> In other words sacrificing quality for marketing reasons - Utterly poor :(
> 

It's not sacrificing quality. Mass rebuilds require a great deal of engineering
coordination. We're requesting that such coordination happens in the F26
development cycle instead, so we don't end up having another long cycle.

There is strong engineering value in having two releases per year: release
early, release often. There are many projects that develop through Fedora that
get thrown into disarray when our cycle gets too far out of whack (prominent
examples being GNOME and glibc). So given that we needed to extend the F24
timeframe early on (and also had a couple slips), FESCo agreed to shorten F25 in
response so that we can still deliver the autumn releases of key projects
(without having to re-consider the updates policy like we did for GNOME
3.14->3.16 during the "Year Almost Without Fedora").

All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild (GCC, glibc,
etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This announcement
was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed telling
anyone directly.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Jaroslav Reznik]

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Ralf Corsepius  wrote:

> On 05/02/2016 02:16 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>
> The reason for not having mass rebuild during F25 development cycle is
>> very tight schedule for F25 and we would like to avoid slips in F25 as
>> much as possible. That is the main motivation here.
>>
> In other words sacrificing quality for marketing reasons - Utterly poor :(
>

Well, it's not that easy to schedule Fedora release as you have to avoid
real life conflicts - especially autumn release is pretty packed.
Thanksgivings in the US, Christmas holidays etc. and hitting these dates
actually may affect quality more than anything else. You're under pressure
to release but right folks might not available... Releasing right after
Christmas is also pretty hard to achieve and then you put the same pressure
on spring release and you have to cut again... I did it and even I always
tried to be more flexible over strict time based schedules, these were real
red flags what to avoid.

Jaroslav


>
> Ralf
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>



-- 
Jaroslav Řezník 
Engineering Program Manager

Office: +420 532 294 645
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
PIN: REZZABBM
Red Hat, Inc.   http://www.redhat.com/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ttorling uploaded Unix-Statgrab-0.111.tar.gz for perl-Unix-Statgrab

[notifications]

5e9734ef1f90ae3c085e88426d145e7a  Unix-Statgrab-0.111.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Unix-Statgrab/Unix-Statgrab-0.111.tar.gz/md5/5e9734ef1f90ae3c085e88426d145e7a/Unix-Statgrab-0.111.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 05/02/2016 02:16 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:


The reason for not having mass rebuild during F25 development cycle is
very tight schedule for F25 and we would like to avoid slips in F25 as
much as possible. That is the main motivation here.

In other words sacrificing quality for marketing reasons - Utterly poor :(

Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

[nobody]

Change in package status over the last 168 hours


32 packages were orphaned
-
djview4 [epel7] was orphaned by fcami
 DjVu viewer
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/djview4
freeradius-client [master, el6, epel7] was orphaned by nmav
 RADIUS protocol client library
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/freeradius-client
gpsd [epel7] was orphaned by fcami
 Service daemon for mediating access to a GPS
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/gpsd
jabberpy [el5] was orphaned by mzazrive
 Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/jabberpy
js-excanvas [f23, master, f24] was orphaned by mayorga
 Canvas for IE8 and older
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/js-excanvas
ngspice [f23, f22, el6, master, f24] was orphaned by mayorga
 A mixed level/signal circuit simulator
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/ngspice
nodejs-flot [f23, master, f24] was orphaned by mayorga
 Javascript plotting library for jQuery
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-flot
nodejs-handlebars [f23, f22, master, f24, el6, epel7] was orphaned by mayorga
 Mustache extension for Node.js
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-handlebars
nodejs-js-beautify [f23, master, f24] was orphaned by mayorga
 jsbeautifier.org for node
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-js-beautify
nodejs-linify [f23, f22, master, f24, el6, epel7] was orphaned by mayorga
 Transform a file's line endings from `\\r\\n` to `\\n`
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-linify
nodejs-prismjs [f23, master, f24] was orphaned by mayorga
 Lightweight and extensible syntax highlighter
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-prismjs
pdf2djvu [f23, f22, master, epel7, f24] was orphaned by fcami
 PDF to DjVu converter
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/pdf2djvu
pngcrush [f23, f22, el6, master, f24] was orphaned by fcami
 Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/pngcrush
pyliblzma [f23, f22, el6, master, f24] was orphaned by fcami
 Python bindings for lzma
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/pyliblzma
pyproj [el6, epel7] was orphaned by mayorga
 Cython wrapper to provide python interfaces to Proj
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/pyproj
python-ZConfig [f23, f22, master, f24] was orphaned by mayorga
 Structured Configuration Library
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-ZConfig
python-espeak [f23, f22, master, f24, el6, epel7] was orphaned by mayorga
 Python 2 bindings for espeak
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-espeak
python-flask-uwsgi-websocket [f23, f22, master, f24] was orphaned by mayorga
 High-performance WebSockets for your Flask apps powered by uWSGI
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-flask-uwsgi-websocket
python-frappe [f23, master, f24] was orphaned by williamjmorenor
 Meta data driven web framework
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-frappe
python-frappe-bench [f23, master, f24] was orphaned by williamjmorenor
 Command line tool to admin Frappe apps
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-frappe-bench
python-geoip-geolite2 [f23, f22, master, f24, el6, epel7] was orphaned by 
williamjmorenor
 GeoIP database access for Python under a BSD license
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-geoip-geolite2
python-pyo [f23, f22, master, epel7, f24] was orphaned by mayorga
 Python digital signal processing module
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-pyo
python-pyprintr [f23, f22, master, f24, el6, epel7] was orphaned by mayorga
 Module that allows to emulate the print_r() PHP function
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-pyprintr
python-spec [f23, f22, master, f24] was orphaned by mayorga
 Specification-style output for python2-nose
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-spec
sasquatch [f23, f22] was orphaned by cstratak
 Modified unsquashfs utility supporting many SquashFS implementations
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/sasquatch
secstate [f23, f22, master, f24] was orphaned by jokajak
 Security State Configuration Tool
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/secstate
smemstat [f23, f22, master, f24, el6, epel7] was orphaned by mayorga
 Shared memory usage monitoring tool
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/smemstat
stardict-xmllittre [f23, f22, master, f24] was orphaned by fcami
 Authoritative 19th century French dictionary
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/stardict-xmllittre
throttle [f23, f22, master, f24, el6, epel7, el5] was orphaned 

Broken dependencies: perl-Dumbbench

[buildsys]

perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the F-24 tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-SOOT

[buildsys]

perl-SOOT has broken dependencies in the F-24 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libCint.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libCore.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libGpad.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libGraf.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libGraf3d.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libHist.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libMathCore.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libMatrix.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libNet.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libPhysics.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libPostscript.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libRIO.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libRint.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libThread.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libTree.so.5.34()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libCint.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libCore.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libGpad.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libGraf.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libGraf3d.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libHist.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libMathCore.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libMatrix.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libNet.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libPhysics.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libPostscript.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libRIO.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libRint.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libThread.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libTree.so.5.34
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Florian Weimer]

On 05/02/2016 12:15 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:

Hi Fedora developers,

As several people already started to propose their Changes for Fedora
25, I would like to emphasize a decision FESCo made in January [1],
not to do mass rebuild during the Fedora 25 development cycle [2].


This is very unfortunate because some of us were relying on the initial 
Fedora 25 schedule, which did contain a mass rebuild, and which was 
posted *after* the Fesco decision (so we naturally assumed it had been 
superseded).  The resolution of this Fesco ticket goes into the same 
direction:


  

We can try to rebase glibc without a mass rebuild (after all, Debian 
does it all the time).  But I don't feel comfortable delaying 
potentially risky changes upstream (because of symbol clashes, e.g. 
gettid/getrandom/strlcpy) just because Fedora can't do a mass rebuild.


Florian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 24-20160501.n.0 compose check report

[Jan Sedlak]

>
> ID: 15489   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15489

ID: 15493   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit

URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15493


KDE has finally deps solved so I can debug this, working on it right now.


> ID: 15492   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15492


Not sure what is causing this and I can't reproduce it locally.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331953] perl-PDF-Create-1.31 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331953



--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331953] perl-PDF-Create-1.31 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331953



--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Patching or scratch build for perl-PDF-Create-1.29 failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331953] perl-PDF-Create-1.31 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331953



--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1152942
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1152942=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
See for details and report the eventual error to rebase-helper
https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper/issues.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331953] perl-PDF-Create-1.31 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331953

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-PDF-Create-1.30 is |perl-PDF-Create-1.31 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 1.31
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.29-1.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDF-Create/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5987/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Jan Kurik]

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Jiri Vanek  wrote:
> Hello!
>
> this link
>  > [1]
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2016-01-08-17.22.html
> Do not explain more about the missing mass rebuild.  Are there more
> infomration about?

The link points to the minutes from the FESCo meeting, where the
decision has been made. There is no page AFAIK having more
information.
The reason for not having mass rebuild during F25 development cycle is
very tight schedule for F25 and we would like to avoid slips in F25 as
much as possible. That is the main motivation here.

Regards,
Jan

>> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule
>>
>
> Thanx!
>   J.
>



-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1332169] New: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.014 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332169

Bug ID: 1332169
   Summary: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.014 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 0.014
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.013-1.fc25
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-HasCompiler/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/9932/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Jiri Vanek]

Hello!

this link
 > [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2016-01-08-17.22.html
Do not explain more about the missing mass rebuild.  Are there more infomration 
about?


[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule



Thanx!
  J.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331997] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000029 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331997

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test2-Suite-0.29-1
   ||.fc25
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-05-02 08:03:32



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
A bug-fix release suitable for F ≥ 25.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1078438] Templated types are causing "Could not find a typemap for C type"

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078438

Libor Miksik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lmik...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Test2-Suite (master). "0.000029 bump"

[notifications]

From aa30700d264e7d0c745072102fddf5b4317f39ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:55:51 +0200
Subject: 0.29 bump

---
 .gitignore| 1 +
 perl-Test2-Suite.spec | 5 -
 sources   | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 71a60a8..177fa37 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
 /Test2-Suite-0.26.tar.gz
 /Test2-Suite-0.27.tar.gz
 /Test2-Suite-0.28.tar.gz
+/Test2-Suite-0.29.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test2-Suite.spec b/perl-Test2-Suite.spec
index d9c1258..8d18b9a 100644
--- a/perl-Test2-Suite.spec
+++ b/perl-Test2-Suite.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Test2-Suite
-Version:0.28
+Version:0.29
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Set of tools built upon the Test2 framework
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -75,6 +75,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Petr Pisar  - 0.29-1
+- 0.29 bump
+
 * Mon Apr 18 2016 Petr Pisar  - 0.28-1
 - 0.28 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 06f786d..0cddad6 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5fc54d72e7771d8207931cf64913d5f4  Test2-Suite-0.28.tar.gz
+aa2a742a000acc22b8b4605f987bb480  Test2-Suite-0.29.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Test2-Suite.git/commit/?h=master=aa30700d264e7d0c745072102fddf5b4317f39ba
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331996] perl-Test2-0.000044 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331996

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test2-0.44-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-05-02 07:56:14



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
Suitable for F ≥ 25.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar uploaded Test2-Suite-0.000029.tar.gz for perl-Test2-Suite

[notifications]

aa2a742a000acc22b8b4605f987bb480  Test2-Suite-0.29.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test2-Suite/Test2-Suite-0.29.tar.gz/md5/aa2a742a000acc22b8b4605f987bb480/Test2-Suite-0.29.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Test2 (master). "0.000044 bump"

[notifications]

From b6fc290a525f9b7b58281d611c41018aa3b09709 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:46:17 +0200
Subject: 0.44 bump

---
 .gitignore  | 1 +
 perl-Test2.spec | 5 -
 sources | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1f182a4..7d321bc 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -10,3 +10,4 @@
 /Test2-0.40.tar.gz
 /Test2-0.41.tar.gz
 /Test2-0.42.tar.gz
+/Test2-0.44.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test2.spec b/perl-Test2.spec
index f0b9dac..6460e97 100644
--- a/perl-Test2.spec
+++ b/perl-Test2.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Test2
-Version:0.42
+Version:0.44
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Framework for writing test tools that all work together
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Petr Pisar  - 0.44-1
+- 0.44 bump
+
 * Mon Apr 18 2016 Petr Pisar  - 0.42-1
 - 0.42 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 2d59ffc..d93dfc5 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-0d89a36e7ab7dbff99cdd25f9b35a556  Test2-0.42.tar.gz
+45a3e68af975f55dec723786e811537e  Test2-0.44.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Test2.git/commit/?h=master=b6fc290a525f9b7b58281d611c41018aa3b09709
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar uploaded Test2-0.000044.tar.gz for perl-Test2

[notifications]

45a3e68af975f55dec723786e811537e  Test2-0.44.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test2/Test2-0.44.tar.gz/md5/45a3e68af975f55dec723786e811537e/Test2-0.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331991] perl-Thread-Queue-3.09 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331991



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Thread-Queue-3.09-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3aac4ecc07

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331991] perl-Thread-Queue-3.09 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331991



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Thread-Queue-3.09-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-05a5719895

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331991] perl-Thread-Queue-3.09 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331991



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Thread-Queue-3.09-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-986f5d9b83

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-Clownfish-CFC

[buildsys]

perl-Clownfish-CFC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.5.1-1.fc25.x86_64 requires 
libcmark.so.0.24.1()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.5.1-1.fc25.i686 requires libcmark.so.0.24.1
On armhfp:
perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.5.1-1.fc25.armv7hl requires libcmark.so.0.24.1
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-Dumbbench

[buildsys]

perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-SOOT

[buildsys]

perl-SOOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libCint.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libCore.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libGpad.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libGraf.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libGraf3d.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libHist.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libMathCore.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libMatrix.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libNet.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libPhysics.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libPostscript.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libRIO.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libRint.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libThread.so.5.34()(64bit)
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.x86_64 requires libTree.so.5.34()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libCint.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libCore.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libGpad.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libGraf.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libGraf3d.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libHist.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libMathCore.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libMatrix.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libNet.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libPhysics.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libPostscript.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libRIO.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libRint.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libThread.so.5.34
perl-SOOT-0.17-10.fc24.i686 requires libTree.so.5.34
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Thread-Queue (f22). "3.09 bump"

[notifications]

From 209d50324761f8af5d90fd922359bb08029e202e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:16:28 +0200
Subject: 3.09 bump

---
 .gitignore | 1 +
 perl-Thread-Queue.spec | 9 ++---
 sources| 2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 313e1fe..ac124c6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
 /Thread-Queue-3.05.tar.gz
 /Thread-Queue-3.06.tar.gz
 /Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz
+/Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Thread-Queue.spec b/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
index a58af32..c4d36e1 100644
--- a/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
+++ b/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Thread-Queue
-Version:3.07
+Version:3.09
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Thread-safe queues
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Thread-Queue/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JD/JDHEDDEN/Thread-Queue-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
-BuildRequires:  coreutils
 BuildRequires:  findutils
 BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
+BuildRequires:  perl-generators
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -delete
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
 %check
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Petr Pisar  - 3.09-1
+- 3.09 bump
+
 * Mon Oct 26 2015 Petr Pisar  - 3.07-1
 - 3.07 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6e4876f..0bf6b2a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d34f43b3749e4c36327cdecf4ddccaf3  Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz
+d6fd66efd5db95e9d73917871e61689b  Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Thread-Queue.git/commit/?h=f22=209d50324761f8af5d90fd922359bb08029e202e
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Thread-Queue (f23). "3.09 bump"

[notifications]

From f6ae78160d32cd87e279ab3a3842d42b1b1b509c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:16:28 +0200
Subject: 3.09 bump

---
 .gitignore | 1 +
 perl-Thread-Queue.spec | 9 ++---
 sources| 2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 313e1fe..ac124c6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
 /Thread-Queue-3.05.tar.gz
 /Thread-Queue-3.06.tar.gz
 /Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz
+/Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Thread-Queue.spec b/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
index f09e24d..b483763 100644
--- a/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
+++ b/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Thread-Queue
-Version:3.07
+Version:3.09
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Thread-safe queues
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Thread-Queue/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JD/JDHEDDEN/Thread-Queue-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
-BuildRequires:  coreutils
 BuildRequires:  findutils
 BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
+BuildRequires:  perl-generators
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -delete
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
 %check
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Petr Pisar  - 3.09-1
+- 3.09 bump
+
 * Mon Oct 26 2015 Petr Pisar  - 3.07-1
 - 3.07 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6e4876f..0bf6b2a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d34f43b3749e4c36327cdecf4ddccaf3  Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz
+d6fd66efd5db95e9d73917871e61689b  Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Thread-Queue.git/commit/?h=f23=f6ae78160d32cd87e279ab3a3842d42b1b1b509c
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Thread-Queue (f24). "3.09 bump"

[notifications]

From 310c90ae4106b44b87637c69aea65110ebb855db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:16:28 +0200
Subject: 3.09 bump

---
 .gitignore |  1 +
 perl-Thread-Queue.spec | 11 +++
 sources|  2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 313e1fe..ac124c6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
 /Thread-Queue-3.05.tar.gz
 /Thread-Queue-3.06.tar.gz
 /Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz
+/Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Thread-Queue.spec b/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
index 79e8162..60bc171 100644
--- a/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
+++ b/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
 Name:   perl-Thread-Queue
-Version:3.07
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:3.09
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Thread-safe queues
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Thread-Queue/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JD/JDHEDDEN/Thread-Queue-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
-BuildRequires:  coreutils
 BuildRequires:  findutils
 BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
+BuildRequires:  perl-generators
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -delete
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
 %check
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Petr Pisar  - 3.09-1
+- 3.09 bump
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.07-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6e4876f..0bf6b2a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d34f43b3749e4c36327cdecf4ddccaf3  Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz
+d6fd66efd5db95e9d73917871e61689b  Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Thread-Queue.git/commit/?h=f24=310c90ae4106b44b87637c69aea65110ebb855db
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331991] perl-Thread-Queue-3.09 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331991

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Thread-Queue-3.09-1.fc
   ||25



--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  ---
Updates documentation only. Suitable for all Fedoras.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Thread-Queue (master). "3.09 bump"

[notifications]

From 310c90ae4106b44b87637c69aea65110ebb855db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 13:16:28 +0200
Subject: 3.09 bump

---
 .gitignore |  1 +
 perl-Thread-Queue.spec | 11 +++
 sources|  2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 313e1fe..ac124c6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
 /Thread-Queue-3.05.tar.gz
 /Thread-Queue-3.06.tar.gz
 /Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz
+/Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Thread-Queue.spec b/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
index 79e8162..60bc171 100644
--- a/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
+++ b/perl-Thread-Queue.spec
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
 Name:   perl-Thread-Queue
-Version:3.07
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:3.09
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Thread-safe queues
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Thread-Queue/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JD/JDHEDDEN/Thread-Queue-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
-BuildRequires:  coreutils
 BuildRequires:  findutils
 BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
+BuildRequires:  perl-generators
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -delete
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
 %check
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Petr Pisar  - 3.09-1
+- 3.09 bump
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.07-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6e4876f..0bf6b2a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d34f43b3749e4c36327cdecf4ddccaf3  Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz
+d6fd66efd5db95e9d73917871e61689b  Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Thread-Queue.git/commit/?h=master=310c90ae4106b44b87637c69aea65110ebb855db
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar uploaded Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz for perl-Thread-Queue

[notifications]

d6fd66efd5db95e9d73917871e61689b  Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Thread-Queue/Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz/md5/d6fd66efd5db95e9d73917871e61689b/Thread-Queue-3.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331993] perl-threads-shared-1.51 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331993

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-05-02 07:09:38



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

pghmcfc pushed to perl-List-MoreUtils (perl-List-MoreUtils-0.415-1.fc24). "Update to 0.415 (..more)"

[notifications]

From 4ba8c9b98ddb8b45208acfb508595fd50f81c107 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 11:38:41 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.415
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

- New upstream release 0.415
  - Fix CPAN RT#75727: After's XS implementation call XSRETURN(-1) when it
doesn't find an element
  - Fix CPAN RT#113117: XS's minmax() sometimes return undef (perl ≥ 5.20)
  - Explicit test for thesis in CPAN RT#110998: XS implementation of pairwise
fails with memory allocation error when there are more return values than
in original lists - thesis is proven wrong
  - Efficiency improvements
  - Improve some tests to get clearer reports
  - Distinguish between "Makefile.PL finds a .git directory" and
"Makefile.PL runs in maintainer mode"
- Simplify find command using -delete
---
 perl-List-MoreUtils.spec | 25 ++---
 sources  |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec b/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
index aefde60..2a3470b 100644
--- a/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
+++ b/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
 Name:  perl-List-MoreUtils
-Version:   0.413
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Version:   0.415
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Provide the stuff missing in List::Util
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/List-MoreUtils/
 Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RE/REHSACK/List-MoreUtils-%{version}.tar.gz
 Patch0:List-MoreUtils-0.402-provides.patch
 # Module Build
+BuildRequires: coreutils
+BuildRequires: findutils
+BuildRequires: gcc
+BuildRequires: make
 BuildRequires: perl >= 4:5.10.0
+BuildRequires: perl-devel
 BuildRequires: perl(base)
 BuildRequires: perl(Config)
 BuildRequires: perl(constant)
@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -exec rm -f {} ';'
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
 %{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
 
 %check
@@ -86,6 +91,20 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/List::MoreUtils::XS.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May  2 2016 Paul Howarth  - 0.415-1
+- Update to 0.415
+  - Fix CPAN RT#75727: After's XS implementation call XSRETURN(-1) when it
+doesn't find an element
+  - Fix CPAN RT#113117: XS's minmax() sometimes return undef (perl ≥ 5.20)
+  - Explicit test for thesis in CPAN RT#110998: XS implementation of pairwise
+fails with memory allocation error when there are more return values than
+in original lists - thesis is proven wrong
+  - Efficiency improvements
+  - Improve some tests to get clearer reports
+  - Distinguish between "Makefile.PL finds a .git directory" and
+"Makefile.PL runs in maintainer mode"
+- Simplify find command using -delete
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.413-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index b416465..1ea9e47 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bc577c86455e2d1397187bce286a53b9  List-MoreUtils-0.413.tar.gz
+a8e42767dd4f41f51b96749efe5ef31a  List-MoreUtils-0.415.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-List-MoreUtils.git/commit/?h=perl-List-MoreUtils-0.415-1.fc24=4ba8c9b98ddb8b45208acfb508595fd50f81c107
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

pghmcfc pushed to perl-List-MoreUtils (perl-List-MoreUtils-0.415-1.fc25). "Update to 0.415 (..more)"

[notifications]

This commit already existed in another branch.

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-List-MoreUtils.git/commit/?h=perl-List-MoreUtils-0.415-1.fc25=4ba8c9b98ddb8b45208acfb508595fd50f81c107
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-Thread-Queue to nobuild

[notifications]

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-Thread-Queue to nobuild

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331993] perl-threads-shared-1.51 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331993

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-threads-shared-1.51-1.
   ||fc25



--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  ---
It improves documentation but it also removes an XS function and makes many
other functions static. Therefore I push it only into rawhide.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-threads-shared (master). "1.51 bump"

[notifications]

From f44cf150bb53759275e3d28a82040e37375a483a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 12:57:00 +0200
Subject: 1.51 bump

---
 .gitignore|   1 +
 perl-threads-shared.spec  |  23 +--
 sources   |   2 +-
 threads-shared-1.46-Upgrade-to-1.48.patch | 250 --
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 261 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 threads-shared-1.46-Upgrade-to-1.48.patch

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6367d84..f214df0 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -10,3 +10,4 @@
 /threads-shared-1.43.tar.gz
 /threads-shared-1.45.tar.gz
 /threads-shared-1.46.tar.gz
+/threads-shared-1.51.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-threads-shared.spec b/perl-threads-shared.spec
index 750182b..e3e6df5 100644
--- a/perl-threads-shared.spec
+++ b/perl-threads-shared.spec
@@ -1,15 +1,16 @@
-%global base_version 1.46
 Name:   perl-threads-shared
-Version:1.48
-Release:347%{?dist}
+Version:1.51
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl extension for sharing data structures between threads
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/threads-shared/
-Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JD/JDHEDDEN/threads-shared-%{base_version}.tar.gz
-# Unbundled from perl-5.21.11
-Patch0: threads-shared-1.46-Upgrade-to-1.48.patch
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/J/JD/JDHEDDEN/threads-shared-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildRequires:  findutils
+BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
+BuildRequires:  perl-devel
+BuildRequires:  perl-generators
 BuildRequires:  perl(Config)
 # Config_m not needed
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
@@ -43,8 +44,7 @@ you to share variables across different threads (and 
pseudo-forks on
 Win32). It is used together with the threads module.
 
 %prep
-%setup -q -n threads-shared-%{base_version}
-%patch0 -p1
+%setup -q -n threads-shared-%{version}
 
 %build
 perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -delete
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -delete
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
 %check
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Petr Pisar  - 1.51-1
+- 1.51 bump
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.48-347
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 24a618e..e8e2b39 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-b17841a6f1c60f06ebf1a0290530b266  threads-shared-1.46.tar.gz
+fae5d9f9179cd58fb86b9bb62ef9363a  threads-shared-1.51.tar.gz
diff --git a/threads-shared-1.46-Upgrade-to-1.48.patch 
b/threads-shared-1.46-Upgrade-to-1.48.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a31488a..000
--- a/threads-shared-1.46-Upgrade-to-1.48.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,250 +0,0 @@
-From dcf350f9fb1025ac7d5b69b5bf1375a500c381c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
-Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 14:39:38 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] Upgrade to 1.48
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
-The sources are bundled with perl-5.21.11.
-
-Signed-off-by: Petr Písař 

- lib/threads/shared.pm |  4 ++--
- shared.xs | 42 +++---
- t/av_simple.t | 12 +++-
- t/hv_refs.t   |  2 +-
- t/object2.t   | 43 ++-
- 5 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/lib/threads/shared.pm b/lib/threads/shared.pm
-index bad2c41..cdb1990 100644
 a/lib/threads/shared.pm
-+++ b/lib/threads/shared.pm
-@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ use warnings;
- 
- use Scalar::Util qw(reftype refaddr blessed);
- 
--our $VERSION = '1.46'; # Please update the pod, too.
-+our $VERSION = '1.48'; # Please update the pod, too.
- my $XS_VERSION = $VERSION;
- $VERSION = eval $VERSION;
- 
-@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ threads::shared - Perl extension for sharing data 
structures between threads
- 
- =head1 VERSION
- 
--This document describes threads::shared version 1.46
-+This document describes threads::shared version 1.48
- 
- =head1 SYNOPSIS
- 
-diff --git a/shared.xs b/shared.xs
-index f59a82a..ee52fa1 100644
 a/shared.xs
-+++ b/shared.xs
-@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
- /*
-  * The shared things need an interpreter to live in ...
-  */
--PerlInterpreter *PL_sharedsv_space; /* The shared sv space */
-+static PerlInterpreter *PL_sharedsv_space; /* The shared 

pghmcfc pushed to perl-List-MoreUtils (f24). "Update to 0.415 (..more)"

[notifications]

From 4ba8c9b98ddb8b45208acfb508595fd50f81c107 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 11:38:41 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.415
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

- New upstream release 0.415
  - Fix CPAN RT#75727: After's XS implementation call XSRETURN(-1) when it
doesn't find an element
  - Fix CPAN RT#113117: XS's minmax() sometimes return undef (perl ≥ 5.20)
  - Explicit test for thesis in CPAN RT#110998: XS implementation of pairwise
fails with memory allocation error when there are more return values than
in original lists - thesis is proven wrong
  - Efficiency improvements
  - Improve some tests to get clearer reports
  - Distinguish between "Makefile.PL finds a .git directory" and
"Makefile.PL runs in maintainer mode"
- Simplify find command using -delete
---
 perl-List-MoreUtils.spec | 25 ++---
 sources  |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec b/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
index aefde60..2a3470b 100644
--- a/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
+++ b/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
 Name:  perl-List-MoreUtils
-Version:   0.413
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Version:   0.415
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Provide the stuff missing in List::Util
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/List-MoreUtils/
 Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RE/REHSACK/List-MoreUtils-%{version}.tar.gz
 Patch0:List-MoreUtils-0.402-provides.patch
 # Module Build
+BuildRequires: coreutils
+BuildRequires: findutils
+BuildRequires: gcc
+BuildRequires: make
 BuildRequires: perl >= 4:5.10.0
+BuildRequires: perl-devel
 BuildRequires: perl(base)
 BuildRequires: perl(Config)
 BuildRequires: perl(constant)
@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -exec rm -f {} ';'
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
 %{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
 
 %check
@@ -86,6 +91,20 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/List::MoreUtils::XS.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May  2 2016 Paul Howarth  - 0.415-1
+- Update to 0.415
+  - Fix CPAN RT#75727: After's XS implementation call XSRETURN(-1) when it
+doesn't find an element
+  - Fix CPAN RT#113117: XS's minmax() sometimes return undef (perl ≥ 5.20)
+  - Explicit test for thesis in CPAN RT#110998: XS implementation of pairwise
+fails with memory allocation error when there are more return values than
+in original lists - thesis is proven wrong
+  - Efficiency improvements
+  - Improve some tests to get clearer reports
+  - Distinguish between "Makefile.PL finds a .git directory" and
+"Makefile.PL runs in maintainer mode"
+- Simplify find command using -delete
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.413-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index b416465..1ea9e47 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bc577c86455e2d1397187bce286a53b9  List-MoreUtils-0.413.tar.gz
+a8e42767dd4f41f51b96749efe5ef31a  List-MoreUtils-0.415.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-List-MoreUtils.git/commit/?h=f24=4ba8c9b98ddb8b45208acfb508595fd50f81c107
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar uploaded threads-shared-1.51.tar.gz for perl-threads-shared

[notifications]

fae5d9f9179cd58fb86b9bb62ef9363a  threads-shared-1.51.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-threads-shared/threads-shared-1.51.tar.gz/md5/fae5d9f9179cd58fb86b9bb62ef9363a/threads-shared-1.51.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1330787] perl-PerlIO-eol-0.15 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330787

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-PerlIO-eol-0.16-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2ef8b56759

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305061] perl-Encode-2.80 breaks sending email by bugzilla

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305061

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
bugzilla-5.0.2-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3527028bbe

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331894] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.70 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331894

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.70-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e39a17b863

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331902] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160429 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331902

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160429-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4c54e07bdc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331951] perl-PerlIO-eol-0.16 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331951

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-PerlIO-eol-0.16-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2ef8b56759

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

pghmcfc pushed to perl-List-MoreUtils (master). "Update to 0.415 (..more)"

[notifications]

From 4ba8c9b98ddb8b45208acfb508595fd50f81c107 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 11:38:41 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.415
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

- New upstream release 0.415
  - Fix CPAN RT#75727: After's XS implementation call XSRETURN(-1) when it
doesn't find an element
  - Fix CPAN RT#113117: XS's minmax() sometimes return undef (perl ≥ 5.20)
  - Explicit test for thesis in CPAN RT#110998: XS implementation of pairwise
fails with memory allocation error when there are more return values than
in original lists - thesis is proven wrong
  - Efficiency improvements
  - Improve some tests to get clearer reports
  - Distinguish between "Makefile.PL finds a .git directory" and
"Makefile.PL runs in maintainer mode"
- Simplify find command using -delete
---
 perl-List-MoreUtils.spec | 25 ++---
 sources  |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec b/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
index aefde60..2a3470b 100644
--- a/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
+++ b/perl-List-MoreUtils.spec
@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
 Name:  perl-List-MoreUtils
-Version:   0.413
-Release:   3%{?dist}
+Version:   0.415
+Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Provide the stuff missing in List::Util
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/List-MoreUtils/
 Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RE/REHSACK/List-MoreUtils-%{version}.tar.gz
 Patch0:List-MoreUtils-0.402-provides.patch
 # Module Build
+BuildRequires: coreutils
+BuildRequires: findutils
+BuildRequires: gcc
+BuildRequires: make
 BuildRequires: perl >= 4:5.10.0
+BuildRequires: perl-devel
 BuildRequires: perl(base)
 BuildRequires: perl(Config)
 BuildRequires: perl(constant)
@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -exec rm -f {} ';'
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
 %{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
 
 %check
@@ -86,6 +91,20 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/List::MoreUtils::XS.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May  2 2016 Paul Howarth  - 0.415-1
+- Update to 0.415
+  - Fix CPAN RT#75727: After's XS implementation call XSRETURN(-1) when it
+doesn't find an element
+  - Fix CPAN RT#113117: XS's minmax() sometimes return undef (perl ≥ 5.20)
+  - Explicit test for thesis in CPAN RT#110998: XS implementation of pairwise
+fails with memory allocation error when there are more return values than
+in original lists - thesis is proven wrong
+  - Efficiency improvements
+  - Improve some tests to get clearer reports
+  - Distinguish between "Makefile.PL finds a .git directory" and
+"Makefile.PL runs in maintainer mode"
+- Simplify find command using -delete
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.413-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index b416465..1ea9e47 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bc577c86455e2d1397187bce286a53b9  List-MoreUtils-0.413.tar.gz
+a8e42767dd4f41f51b96749efe5ef31a  List-MoreUtils-0.415.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-List-MoreUtils.git/commit/?h=master=4ba8c9b98ddb8b45208acfb508595fd50f81c107
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331992] perl-threads-2.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331992

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-05-02 06:39:21



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331992] perl-threads-2.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331992



--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
ppisar's perl-threads-2.07-1.fc25 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=759365

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

pghmcfc uploaded List-MoreUtils-0.415.tar.gz for perl-List-MoreUtils

[notifications]

a8e42767dd4f41f51b96749efe5ef31a  List-MoreUtils-0.415.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-List-MoreUtils/List-MoreUtils-0.415.tar.gz/md5/a8e42767dd4f41f51b96749efe5ef31a/List-MoreUtils-0.415.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-threads-shared to nobuild

[notifications]

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-threads-shared to nobuild

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331992] perl-threads-2.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331992

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-threads-2.07-1.fc25



--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  ---
Support for perl 5.24, JUMPENV code refactored. I push it only into rawhide. At
least now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-threads (master). "2.07 bump"

[notifications]

From b922e7469d9c2da332f2ecae76f2125170c59c10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= 
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 12:16:19 +0200
Subject: 2.07 bump

---
 .gitignore|  1 +
 perl-threads.spec | 13 +
 sources   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index f4a873a..a4b995a 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
 /threads-1.99.tar.gz
 /threads-2.01.tar.gz
 /threads-2.02.tar.gz
+/threads-2.07.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-threads.spec b/perl-threads.spec
index ce95338..4063748 100644
--- a/perl-threads.spec
+++ b/perl-threads.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:   perl-threads
 Epoch:  1
-Version:2.02
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:2.07
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl interpreter-based threads
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ BuildRequires:  coreutils
 BuildRequires:  findutils
 BuildRequires:  make
 BuildRequires:  perl
+BuildRequires:  perl-devel
+BuildRequires:  perl-generators
 BuildRequires:  perl(Config)
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
@@ -54,8 +56,8 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \;
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -delete
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -delete
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
 %check
@@ -68,6 +70,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 02 2016 Petr Pisar  - 1:2.07-1
+- 2.07 bump
+
 * Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1:2.02-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 780292b..dc44e12 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5acb72e77274eab54aac5aef82c261ef  threads-2.02.tar.gz
+d0ef0ad1bb4304a1ff74af341a2b7373  threads-2.07.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.12



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-threads.git/commit/?h=master=b922e7469d9c2da332f2ecae76f2125170c59c10
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar uploaded threads-2.07.tar.gz for perl-threads

[notifications]

d0ef0ad1bb4304a1ff74af341a2b7373  threads-2.07.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-threads/threads-2.07.tar.gz/md5/d0ef0ad1bb4304a1ff74af341a2b7373/threads-2.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

[Jan Kurik]

Hi Fedora developers,

As several people already started to propose their Changes for Fedora
25, I would like to emphasize a decision FESCo made in January [1],
not to do mass rebuild during the Fedora 25 development cycle [2].

All the Changes requiring mass rebuild should be postponed to Fedora 26.
Changes proposed for Fedora 25 will be reviewed to make sure no mass
rebuild is required.

Please let me know in case you have any questions and thank you for
contributing to Fedora.

[1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2016-01-08-17.22.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

RE: Plans for Node.js 6.x

[Stephen Gallagher]

Sent from my Galaxy Tab® S2 Original message From: drago01 
 Date: 5/1/2016  12:00 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: Development 
discussions related to Fedora  Subject: Re: 
Plans for Node.js 6.x 
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:
> OK folks, it's Bad Decision Time.
>
> Today, Node.js 6.0 was released. This is a significant ABI-breaking release,
> which means there is no guarantee that existing modules will work with it at 
> all.[1]
>
> Better still, Node.js 5.x is only going to be supported until sometime this
> summer, because they're aiming for the 6.x branch to become the new LTS in
> October[2]. This puts us in quite a bind.
>
> Fedora disallows major ABI changes in a stable release, so if Fedora 24 Final
> ships with Node.js 5.x, we will be stuck with maintaining it until Fedora 24 
> EOL

The whole thread is based on this wrong assumption. Quoting from the
update policy [1]:

"If upstream does not provide security fixes for a particular release,
and if backporting the fix would be impractical, then a package may be
rebased onto a version that upstream supports. The definition of
practicality is left to the judgment of FESCO and the packager. "

And from the discussion that seems to be the case here so I'd opt for

4) Leave 5.x in and once it becomes EOL and a security issues comes up
update to 6.x mid release. It would have had been tested in rawhide
(and possible COPR) in the meantime which would minimize the impact.

1: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Security_fixes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org




While true, FESCo recently (last Friday) approved a draft update to that policy 
that explains that backwards-compatibility breakages are almost never 
acceptable in a stable release. Since 6.0 breaks compat, FESCo would probably 
vote against the upgrade mid-release (and I would agree with that).--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1331825] perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331825

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||psab...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
(In reply to Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk from comment #0)
> There really isn't a good reason
> to keep this out, since IPv6 is getting rather common these days

IPv6 support in this package is optional and it's documented.
By requiring it you force it onto users who might not want it, for whatever
reasons.  Note that behavior would also be different from upstream.

The dependency could be expressed with `Recommends', however, I'm not sure
whether this is supported in EPEL7.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1332060] perl-Perlilog-1.0 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332060

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Perlilog-1.0-1.fc25
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-05-02 05:11:59



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org