Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Ville Skyttä]

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Umar Parooq  wrote:
> i can take zopfli

Thanks, but I'm unable to guess/locate your username in FAS. Could you
let me know what it is?

(Does a thing exist where I could search FAS users by real name, BTW?)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Ville Skyttä]

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Francisco J. Tsao Santin  wrote:
> I review the list again, and I think I also can take reptyr.

Transferred, thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Ville Skyttä]

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Antonio Trande  wrote:
> I can take libmodplug and rpmdevtools.

libmodplug transferred, thanks! rpmdevtools was already transferred to
ngompa, I suggest contacting the current maintainers if you still want
to help out.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Ville Skyttä]

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Sandro Bonazzola  wrote:
> I can take pyflakes

Transferred, thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Ville Skyttä]

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Jan Pokorný  wrote:
> On 23/10/17 22:24 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> [...]
>> - jing-trang
>
> still somewhat interested in that package, would help to keep it in
> Fedora if that's not awfully a lot of work.

Nah, it's been a very low maintenance package, and is in a good shape
I think. Transferred, thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Umar Parooq]

i can take zopfli
On Oct 23, 2017 8:26 PM, "Ville Skyttä"  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if
> you're able to help out.
>
> 1) No co-maintainers at the moment:
>
> - git-bz
> - isrcsubmit
> - jing-trang
> - kid3
> - mbox2eml
> - modplugtools
> - netmask
> - portecle
> - python-flake8-import-order
> - vdr-epgfixer
> - vdr-ttxtsubs
>
> 2) Needs new main admin, co-maintainers pinged some time ago but no
> reply received/noticed:
>
> - ccache
> - libmodplug
> - pyflakes
> - python-libdiscid
> - reptyr
> - rpmdevtools
> - zopfli
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171025.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171024.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171025.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  1
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages:   7
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  475.69 KiB
Size of dropped packages:2.19 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   202.32 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   869.93 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: xorg-x11-xinit-1.3.4-16.module_8f1d8a6f
Summary: X.Org X11 X Window System xinit startup scripts
RPMs:xorg-x11-xinit xorg-x11-xinit-session
Size:487104 bytes


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: libtalloc-2.1.10-4.module_97fb54be
Summary: The talloc library
RPMs:libtalloc libtalloc-devel python2-talloc python2-talloc-devel 
python3-talloc python3-talloc-devel
Size:1288364 bytes

Package: libtevent-0.9.33-3.module_97fb54be
Summary: The tevent library
RPMs:libtevent libtevent-devel python2-tevent python3-tevent
Size:1012480 bytes


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  avahi-0.7-5.module_8789fd86
Old package:  avahi-0.7-3.module_97fb54be
Summary:  Local network service discovery
RPMs: avahi avahi-autoipd avahi-compat-howl avahi-compat-howl-devel 
avahi-compat-libdns_sd avahi-compat-libdns_sd-devel avahi-devel avahi-dnsconfd 
avahi-glib avahi-glib-devel avahi-gobject avahi-gobject-devel avahi-libs 
avahi-qt3 avahi-qt3-devel avahi-qt4 avahi-qt4-devel avahi-sharp avahi-tools 
avahi-ui avahi-ui-devel avahi-ui-gtk3 avahi-ui-sharp avahi-ui-sharp-devel 
avahi-ui-tools python2-avahi python3-avahi
Size: 5948972 bytes
Size change:  29908 bytes
Changelog:
  * Mon Oct 02 2017 Troy Dawson <tdaw...@redhat.com> - 0.7-4
  - Cleanup spec file conditionals

  * Sat Oct 07 2017 Rex Dieter <rdie...@fedoraproject.org> - 0.7-5
  - consistently use %{_unitdir} macro


Package:  cups-1:2.2.5-1.module_8789fd86
Old package:  cups-1:2.2.4-3.module_97fb54be
Summary:  CUPS printing system
RPMs: cups cups-client cups-devel cups-filesystem cups-ipptool 
cups-libs cups-lpd
Size: 59161968 bytes
Size change:  390392 bytes
Changelog:
  * Fri Sep 22 2017 Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> - 1:2.2.4-4
  - 1494558 - CUPS may fail to start if NIS groups are used

  * Mon Oct 02 2017 Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> - 1:2.2.4-5
  - 1484916 - Can not get destinations from CUPS server

  * Wed Oct 04 2017 Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> - 1:2.2.4-6
  - 1498091 - Cannot browse CUPS servers in GNOME Control Panel Printers

  * Mon Oct 09 2017 Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> - 1:2.2.4-7
  - removing ghostscript-cups dependency - cups-filters ships it

  * Tue Oct 17 2017 Zdenek Dohnal <zdoh...@redhat.com> - 1:2.2.5-1
  - rebase to 2.2.5


Package:  libldb-1.3.0-2.module_8789fd86
Old package:  libldb-1.2.1-3.module_97fb54be
Summary:  A schema-less, ldap like, API and database
RPMs: ldb-tools libldb libldb-devel python-ldb-devel-common python2-ldb 
python2-ldb-devel python3-ldb python3-ldb-devel
Size: 3171620 bytes
Size change:  68840 bytes
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 11 2017 Lukas Slebodnik <lsleb...@redhat.com> - 1.2.2
  - New upstream release 1.2.2
  - Resolves: rhbz#1489418  - libldb-1.2.2 is available

  * Fri Oct 20 2017 Lukas Slebodnik <lsleb...@redhat.com> - 1.3.0
  - New upstream release 1.3.0
  - Resolves: rhbz#1504361 - libldb-1.3.0 is available

  * Sat Oct 21 2017 Lukas Slebodnik <lsleb...@fedoraproject.org> - 1.3.0-2
  - Fix memory leak introduced in 1.3.0


Package:  libtdb-1.3.15-1.module_8789fd86
Old package:  libtdb-1.3.15-1.module_97fb54be
Summary:  The tdb library
RPMs: libtdb libtdb-devel python2-tdb python3-tdb tdb-tools
Size: 1203740 bytes
Size change:  2928 bytes

Package:  libtomcrypt-1.18-2.20170915git0ceb1c1.module_8789fd86
Old package:  libtomcrypt-1.17-36.20170720gitab8c5b8.module_97fb54be
Summary:  A comprehensive, portable cryptographic toolkit
RPMs: libtomcrypt libtomcrypt-devel libtomcrypt-doc
Size: 3814044 bytes
Size change:  -163272 bytes
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 11 2017 Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com> - 
1.18-1.20170910git32d60ac
  - Update to latest snapshot (post rc3).
  - Version is now at 1.18.

  * Sun Sep 17 2017 Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com> - 
1.18-2.20170915git0ceb1c1
  - Update to latest snapshot post rc3.
  - Remove RHEL 6 support.
  - Clean up SPEC file.
  - Trim changelog.


Package:  libtommath-1.0.1-1.module_8789fd86
Old package:  libtommath-1.0-10.module_97fb54be
Summary:  A portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library
RPMs: libtommath libtommath-devel libtommath-doc
Size: 1893204 bytes
Size change:  -305440 bytes
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 11 2017 Simone Caronni <negativ...

[389-devel] LDAPCon 2017 trip

[William Brown]

Hi all,

Ludwig and I have just returned from our trip to LDAPCon 2017. It was a
great experience where we were finally able to meet Ilias (The 2017
GSoC student). 

This conference was a great experience, and Ludwig and I both really
enjoyed presenting our ideas and subjects to the conference. Both talks
were really well received, and our material can be found:

https://ldapcon.org/2017/managing-replication-conflicts/
https://ldapcon.org/2017/speed-parallelism-safety-choose-all-three-high
-performance-data-structures-for-multithread-applications/

Another really important outcome was our meeting of the openldap team.
Conferences really help to improve relations, and meeting these people
I think has given us some friendly competition. We are all made
stronger for communities like this that bring our diverse range of
talents and experiences together.

LDAPCon 2019 will be an event to look forward too, and I hope to see
you all there,


-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: lib389 17 ds remove

[William Brown]

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/17

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/30e70a79a5917ed85ed03fec518275
9138245f3a0be53f7e1767c9d2262dcde3-0001-Ticket-17-lib389-dsremove-
support.patch



-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] LDAP Ext mailing list

[William Brown]

Hi all,

During LDAPCon an attempt is being made to revive the LDAP standards
working group,

I would encourage all interested technical members of the community to
join:

https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

As we attempt to rebuild this community,

Thanks! 

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Francisco J. Tsao Santin]

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Ville Skyttä wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Francisco J. Tsao Santin
>  wrote:
> > I can take netmask :-)
> 
> Transferred, thanks.
> 

Hi, 
I review the list again, and I think I also can take reptyr.


-- 
Francisco Javier Tsao Santín
http://gattaca.es
1024D/71CF4D62  42 F1 53 35 EF 98 98 8A FC 6C 56 B3 4C A7 7D FB___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] revised: Ticket 48393 - Improve replication configuration validation

[Mark Reynolds]

Forgot to check repl agreement port:

new patch:

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/0d57b7a929a7b10606c5a77e00830b3a0216c5c3eee146df86e35b7557a7233b-0001-Ticket-48393-Improve-replication-config-validation.patch

On 10/24/2017 03:45 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48393
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/c8e2c41df8b62afd501fa7acc40f796051ba37b93be411828b959396eafae578-0001-Ticket-48393-Improve-replication-config-validation.patch
>
>
>
> ___
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Antonio Trande]

On 10/23/2017 09:24 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if
> you're able to help out.
> 
> 1) No co-maintainers at the moment:
> 
> - git-bz
> - isrcsubmit
> - jing-trang
> - kid3
> - mbox2eml
> - modplugtools
> - netmask
> - portecle
> - python-flake8-import-order
> - vdr-epgfixer
> - vdr-ttxtsubs
> 
> 2) Needs new main admin, co-maintainers pinged some time ago but no
> reply received/noticed:
> 
> - ccache
> - libmodplug
> - pyflakes
> - python-libdiscid
> - reptyr
> - rpmdevtools
> - zopfli
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 

I can take libmodplug and rpmdevtools.

-- 
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 48393 - Improve replication configuration validation

[Mark Reynolds]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48393

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/c8e2c41df8b62afd501fa7acc40f796051ba37b93be411828b959396eafae578-0001-Ticket-48393-Improve-replication-config-validation.patch

___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171024.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171024.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  11
Added packages:  119
Dropped packages:31
Upgraded packages:   51
Downgraded packages: 26

Size of added packages:  1.27 GiB
Size of dropped packages:141.87 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   606.57 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 477.43 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   82.04 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 7.56 MiB

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Server boot x86_64
Path: 
Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-netinst-x86_64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server raw-xz x86_64
Path: 
Server/x86_64/images/Fedora-Modular-Server-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.x86_64.raw.xz
Image: Server raw-xz aarch64
Path: 
Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Modular-Server-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Server qcow2 x86_64
Path: 
Server/x86_64/images/Fedora-Modular-Server-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.x86_64.qcow2
Image: Server boot i386
Path: 
Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-netinst-i386-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server qcow2 aarch64
Path: 
Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Modular-Server-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.aarch64.qcow2
Image: Server boot aarch64
Path: 
Server/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-netinst-aarch64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server dvd i386
Path: Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-dvd-i386-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server dvd aarch64
Path: 
Server/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-dvd-aarch64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server dvd x86_64
Path: 
Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-dvd-x86_64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso
Image: Server boot ppc64
Path: 
Server/ppc64/iso/Fedora-Modular-Server-netinst-ppc64-Bikeshed-20171023.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: GConf2-3.2.6-19.module_48144c2d
Summary: A process-transparent configuration system
RPMs:GConf2 GConf2-devel
Size:8206956 bytes

Package: adwaita-icon-theme-3.25.91-1.module_48144c2d
Summary: Adwaita icon theme
RPMs:adwaita-cursor-theme adwaita-icon-theme adwaita-icon-theme-devel
Size:13400128 bytes

Package: anaconda-user-help-26.1-5.module_48144c2d
Summary: Content for the Anaconda built-in help system
RPMs:anaconda-user-help
Size:302808 bytes

Package: at-spi2-atk-2.25.3-3.module_48144c2d
Summary: A GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi
RPMs:at-spi2-atk at-spi2-atk-devel
Size:752876 bytes

Package: at-spi2-core-2.25.91-1.module_48144c2d
Summary: Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi
RPMs:at-spi2-core at-spi2-core-devel
Size:2235844 bytes

Package: atk-2.25.90-1.module_48144c2d
Summary: Interfaces for accessibility support
RPMs:atk atk-devel
Size:3294296 bytes

Package: bison-3.0.4-8.module_add0e20c
Summary: A GNU general-purpose parser generator
RPMs:bison bison-devel bison-runtime
Size:5370400 bytes

Package: blivet-gui-2.1.6-1.module_48144c2d
Summary: Tool for data storage configuration
RPMs:blivet-gui blivet-gui-runtime
Size:368080 bytes

Package: cairo-1.14.10-4.module_48144c2d
Summary: A 2D graphics library
RPMs:cairo cairo-devel cairo-gobject cairo-gobject-devel cairo-tools
Size:8485520 bytes

Package: cdparanoia-10.2-24.module_48144c2d
Summary: Compact Disc Digital Audio (CDDA) extraction tool (or ripper)
RPMs:cdparanoia cdparanoia-devel cdparanoia-libs cdparanoia-static
Size:1326736 bytes

Package: colord-1.4.1-1.module_48144c2d
Summary: Color daemon
RPMs:colord colord-devel colord-devel-docs colord-extra-profiles colord-libs
Size:5593024 bytes

Package: enchant-1:1.6.0-18.module_48144c2d
Summary: An Enchanting Spell Checking Library
RPMs:enchant enchant-aspell enchant-devel enchant-voikko
Size:811156 bytes

Package: fedora-productimg-server-27-1.module_48144c2d
Summary: Installer branding and configuration for Fedora Server
RPMs:fedora-productimg-server
Size:12468928 bytes

Package: flac-1.3.2-4.module_48144c2d
Summary: An encoder/decoder for the Free Lossless Audio Codec
RPMs:flac flac-devel flac-libs xmms-flac
Size:6399812 bytes

Package: fros-1.1-13.module_48144c2d
Summary: Universal screencasting frontend with pluggable support for various 
backends
RPMs:fros fros-gnome fros-recordmydesktop
Size:55004 bytes

Package: gcr-3.20.0-6.module_48144c2d
Summary: A library for bits of crypto UI and parsing
RPMs:gcr gcr-devel
Size:6901228 bytes

Package: gdk-pixbuf2-2.36.9-1.module_48144c2d
Summary: An image loading library
RPMs:gdk-pixbuf2 gdk-pixbuf2-devel gdk-pixbuf2-modules gdk-pixbuf2-tests 
gdk-pixbuf2-xlib gdk-pixbuf2-xlib-devel
Size:37305428 bytes

Package: geoclue2-2.4.5-6.module_48144c2d
Summary: Geolocation service
RPMs:geoclue2 geoclue2-demos geoclue2-devel geoclue2-libs
Size:1550568 bytes

Package: gettext-0.19.8.1-11.module_48144c2d
Summary: GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages
RPMs:emacs-gettext gettext

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Sandro Bonazzola]

Il 23 Ott 2017 21:26, "Ville Skyttä"  ha scritto:

Hello,

The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if
you're able to help out.

1) No co-maintainers at the moment:

- git-bz
- isrcsubmit
- jing-trang
- kid3
- mbox2eml
- modplugtools
- netmask
- portecle
- python-flake8-import-order
- vdr-epgfixer
- vdr-ttxtsubs

2) Needs new main admin, co-maintainers pinged some time ago but no
reply received/noticed:

- ccache
- libmodplug
- pyflakes


I can take pyflakes


- python-libdiscid
- reptyr
- rpmdevtools
- zopfli
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Jan Pokorný]

Hello Ville,

On 23/10/17 22:24 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if
> you're able to help out.
> 
> 1) No co-maintainers at the moment:
> 
> [...]
> - jing-trang

still somewhat interested in that package, would help to keep it in
Fedora if that's not awfully a lot of work.

-- 
Jan (Poki), jpokorny in FAS


pgpD57CSk2Ze9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

[smooge]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   EPEL Steering Committee on 2017-10-25 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
   At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:
There is a weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting to go over events, ideas, and 
tickets about EPEL.

More information available at:
[https://pagure.io/epel/blob/master/f/docs/source/EPEL-meeting-process.rst](https://pagure.io/epel/blob/master/f/docs/source/EPEL-meeting-process.rst)


Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/6592/

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

BuildError: src.fedoraproject.org:/git/rpms/mingw-gdal is not in the list of allowed SCMs

[Sandro Mani]

Hi

Any ideas about this one?

$ fedpkg build
Building mingw-gdal-2.2.2-3.fc28 for rawhide
Created task: 22673795
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22673795
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
22673795 build (rawhide, 
/git/rpms/mingw-gdal:41a1d0cf030714b5728c02968c6309260ee935ce): open 
(buildvm-armv7-13.arm.fedoraproject.org)
  22673796 buildSRPMFromSCM 
(/git/rpms/mingw-gdal:41a1d0cf030714b5728c02968c6309260ee935ce): free
22673795 build (rawhide, 
/git/rpms/mingw-gdal:41a1d0cf030714b5728c02968c6309260ee935ce): open 
(buildvm-armv7-13.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: 
src.fedoraproject.org:/git/rpms/mingw-gdal is not in the list of allowed 
SCMs

  1 free  0 open  0 done  1 failed
  22673796 buildSRPMFromSCM 
(/git/rpms/mingw-gdal:41a1d0cf030714b5728c02968c6309260ee935ce): free -> 
FAILED: BuildError: src.fedoraproject.org:/git/rpms/mingw-gdal is not in 
the list of allowed SCMs

  0 free  0 open  0 done  2 failed

Also happens if a do a fresh fedpkg clone of mingw-gdal.

Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20171024.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386

Failed openQA tests: 25/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171023.n.0):

ID: 161254  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_system_logging
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161254
ID: 161283  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161283
ID: 161286  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161286
ID: 161294  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_system_logging
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161294
ID: 161298  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161298
ID: 161304  Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161304
ID: 161310  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161310
ID: 161311  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161311
ID: 161335  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161335
ID: 161368  Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161368

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171023.n.0):

ID: 161251  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161251
ID: 161258  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161258
ID: 161269  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161269
ID: 161272  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161272
ID: 161274  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161274
ID: 161280  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161280
ID: 161291  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161291
ID: 161297  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161297
ID: 161299  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161299
ID: 161300  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161300
ID: 161305  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161305
ID: 161306  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161306
ID: 161318  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161318
ID: 161333  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161333
ID: 161341  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161341
ID: 161346  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161346

Soft failed openQA tests: 5/128 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20171023.n.0):

ID: 161349  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161349

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20171023.n.0):

ID: 161308  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161308
ID: 161328  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161328
ID: 161350  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161350
ID: 161351  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161351

Passed openQA tests: 94/128 (x86_64)

New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20171023.n.0):

ID: 161288  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161288
ID: 161289  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161289
ID: 161322  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161322

Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 130

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.33 to 0.10
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160737#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/161246#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: 
2 packages(s) added since 

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171024.n.1 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171024.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171024.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  9.82 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: plymouth-0.9.3-0.9.20160620git0e65b86c.module_1a38245a
Summary: Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
RPMs:plymouth plymouth-core-libs plymouth-devel plymouth-graphics-libs 
plymouth-plugin-fade-throbber plymouth-plugin-label plymouth-plugin-script 
plymouth-plugin-space-flares plymouth-plugin-throbgress 
plymouth-plugin-two-step plymouth-scripts plymouth-system-theme 
plymouth-theme-charge plymouth-theme-fade-in plymouth-theme-script 
plymouth-theme-solar plymouth-theme-spinfinity plymouth-theme-spinner
Size:10301084 bytes


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Heads Up - openssl makefile and scripts for creating self signed certificates

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:33 AM Tomas Mraz  wrote:

> On 10/24/2017 04:23 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > I was asked here to merge pull request that moves the openssl makefile
> > and scripts for creating self signed certificates to /usr/share/doc.
> >
> > I am not sure this is the right thing to do as these are definitely
> > still used currently.
> >
> > Although it is much easier now to set up proper certificates for your
> > servers with Let's Encrypt, it is still not fully automatable process
> > (it needs at least some set up at the beginning for the first issued
> > certificate). Thus it cannot be included for example in rpm packages
> > %post scripts, etc.
> >
> > At least I would like to know from maintainers of packages  that depend
> > on openssl whether they currently use the makefile or the scripts to
> > create self signed certificate for the service.
>
> One more thing to add - the pull request is here:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl/pull-request/1
>
>
I'd like to recommend that we start encouraging people to use SSCG for
generating "self-signed"[1] certificates when their packages need them.

Also, just a reminder: if you are using any of these tools to generate
self-signed certificates as part of an RPM scriptlet, please stop doing
that and read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Initial_Service_Setup
which
will teach you how to move that into a systemd unit that runs prior to
service startup rather than when the package is installed. This has
multiple advantages; the entropy pool is likely to be more full during
system start-up and it allows tools like virt-sysprep to safely wipe out
the certificates when making a Gold Master VM, since the system will
automatically generate fresh ones.

[1] SSCG actually generates a one-time-use CA, signs the certificates and
then destroys the private key of the CA. See
https://sgallagh.wordpress.com/2016/05/02/self-signed-ssltls-certificates-why-they-are-terrible-and-a-better-alternative/
for
a complete explanation.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Heads Up - openssl makefile and scripts for creating self signed certificates

[Tomas Mraz]

On 10/24/2017 04:23 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> I was asked here to merge pull request that moves the openssl makefile
> and scripts for creating self signed certificates to /usr/share/doc.
> 
> I am not sure this is the right thing to do as these are definitely
> still used currently.
> 
> Although it is much easier now to set up proper certificates for your
> servers with Let's Encrypt, it is still not fully automatable process
> (it needs at least some set up at the beginning for the first issued
> certificate). Thus it cannot be included for example in rpm packages
> %post scripts, etc.
> 
> At least I would like to know from maintainers of packages  that depend
> on openssl whether they currently use the makefile or the scripts to
> create self signed certificate for the service.

One more thing to add - the pull request is here:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl/pull-request/1

Tomas Mraz
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Heads Up - openssl makefile and scripts for creating self signed certificates

[Tomas Mraz]

I was asked here to merge pull request that moves the openssl makefile
and scripts for creating self signed certificates to /usr/share/doc.

I am not sure this is the right thing to do as these are definitely
still used currently.

Although it is much easier now to set up proper certificates for your
servers with Let's Encrypt, it is still not fully automatable process
(it needs at least some set up at the beginning for the first issued
certificate). Thus it cannot be included for example in rpm packages
%post scripts, etc.

At least I would like to know from maintainers of packages  that depend
on openssl whether they currently use the makefile or the scripts to
create self signed certificate for the service.

Tomas Mraz
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

[Fran Tsao Santín]

Ok, thanks!

2017-10-23 21:48 GMT+02:00 Ville Skyttä :

> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Francisco J. Tsao Santin
>  wrote:
> > I can take netmask :-)
>
> Transferred, thanks.
>



-- 
Francisco J. Tsao Santín
http://gattaca.es
Twitter: @FranTsao 
1024D/71CF4D62  42 F1 53 35 EF 98 98 8A FC 6C 56 B3 4C A7 7D FB
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

[Petr Lautrbach]

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:25:14PM +0200, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 09:10:32AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 
> wrote:
> > Hello, Lukas.
> > Thanks for this thread.
> > 
> > On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 17:50, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
> > > On 10/21/2017 08:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Also, perhaps it would make sense to move to a more normal looking
> > > > release flow instead of a massive patch? I think that might make it
> > > > easier to see whats going on and how to contribute.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This "massive" patch is here because, we diverted from Upsteam policy.
> > > Because Upstream policy is much more strict, you cannot even boot F26+
> > > just with upstream policy. We confine more services then upstream and
> > > we're more benevolent.
> > 
> > The usual way of doing such things is to create a fork from which
> > patches can be merged to the original tree. Surely merging one massive
> > patch is much more difficult than single commits or even series of
> > commits. I assume you do have a fork of the original SELinux policy
> > source tree somewhere, so why don't you simply ship a tarball of your
> > fork instead of upstream+massive patch?
> 
> From selinux-policy.spec:
> 
>26 # Use the following command to create patch from 
> https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy
>27 # git diff eb4512f6eb13792c76ff8d3e6f2df3a7155db577 rawhide > 
> policy-rawhide-base.patch
>28 # Use the following command to create patch from 
> https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib
>29 # git diff 64302b790bf2b39d93610e1452c8361d56966ae0 rawhide > 
> policy-rawhide-contrib.patch
> 
> So the fork is at https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy and 
> https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib
> 
> There's a document
> https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/wiki/HowToContribute
> which is as recent as it could be but it gives insight how

which is NOT as recent as it could be

> does it work. This document should be probably linked directly in spec
> file.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > > This should change, and we're trying to focus on technical solution
> > > which should decrease amount of maintenance of selinux-policy. We'll
> > > inform you about this project.
> > 
> > If you shared more details about this effort now, you would be more
> > likely to receive help from the community earlier.
> > 
> > > > > Note: If you are interested in writing custom SELinux policy for your
> > > > > package, you can follow the
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/IndependentPolicy documentation
> > > > > on wiki.
> > > > 
> > > > Perhaps you could submit this to the FPC and get it reviewed and moved
> > > > under the normal packaging space?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Will do.
> > 
> > Excellent, thank you!
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Dominik
> > -- 
> > Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPMFusion   http://rpmfusion.org
> > There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
> > oppression to develop psychic muscles.
> > -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

[Petr Lautrbach]

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 09:10:32AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, Lukas.
> Thanks for this thread.
> 
> On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 17:50, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
> > On 10/21/2017 08:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> [...]
> > > Also, perhaps it would make sense to move to a more normal looking
> > > release flow instead of a massive patch? I think that might make it
> > > easier to see whats going on and how to contribute.
> > > 
> > 
> > This "massive" patch is here because, we diverted from Upsteam policy.
> > Because Upstream policy is much more strict, you cannot even boot F26+
> > just with upstream policy. We confine more services then upstream and
> > we're more benevolent.
> 
> The usual way of doing such things is to create a fork from which
> patches can be merged to the original tree. Surely merging one massive
> patch is much more difficult than single commits or even series of
> commits. I assume you do have a fork of the original SELinux policy
> source tree somewhere, so why don't you simply ship a tarball of your
> fork instead of upstream+massive patch?

From selinux-policy.spec:

   26 # Use the following command to create patch from 
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy
   27 # git diff eb4512f6eb13792c76ff8d3e6f2df3a7155db577 rawhide > 
policy-rawhide-base.patch
   28 # Use the following command to create patch from 
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib
   29 # git diff 64302b790bf2b39d93610e1452c8361d56966ae0 rawhide > 
policy-rawhide-contrib.patch

So the fork is at https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy and 
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib

There's a document
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/wiki/HowToContribute
which is as recent as it could be but it gives insight how
does it work. This document should be probably linked directly in spec
file.





> > This should change, and we're trying to focus on technical solution
> > which should decrease amount of maintenance of selinux-policy. We'll
> > inform you about this project.
> 
> If you shared more details about this effort now, you would be more
> likely to receive help from the community earlier.
> 
> > > > Note: If you are interested in writing custom SELinux policy for your
> > > > package, you can follow the
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/IndependentPolicy documentation
> > > > on wiki.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps you could submit this to the FPC and get it reviewed and moved
> > > under the normal packaging space?
> > > 
> > 
> > Will do.
> 
> Excellent, thank you!
> 
> Regards,
> Dominik
> -- 
> Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPMFusion   http://rpmfusion.org
> There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
> oppression to develop psychic muscles.
> -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 27 Final Release Readiness Meeting on Thursday, October 26 @ 19:00 UTC

[Jan Kurik]

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 27
Final Release Readiness Meeting meeting.

The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, Oct 26, 2017 at 19:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.

We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Final
release of Fedora 27. Please note that this meeting is going to be
held even if the release is delayed at the Go/No-Go meeting on the
same day two hours earlier.

You may received this message several times, but it is by purpose to
open this meeting to the teams and to raise awareness, so hopefully
more team representatives will come to this meeting. This meeting
works best when we have representatives from all of the teams.

For more information please check the [2] link.

[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/7385/
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness_Meetings

Thank you for your support,
Regards, Jan
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 27 Final Release Readiness Meeting on Thursday, October 26 @ 19:00 UTC

[Jan Kurik]

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 27
Final Release Readiness Meeting meeting.

The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, Oct 26, 2017 at 19:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.

We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Final
release of Fedora 27. Please note that this meeting is going to be
held even if the release is delayed at the Go/No-Go meeting on the
same day two hours earlier.

You may received this message several times, but it is by purpose to
open this meeting to the teams and to raise awareness, so hopefully
more team representatives will come to this meeting. This meeting
works best when we have representatives from all of the teams.

For more information please check the [2] link.

[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/7385/
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness_Meetings

Thank you for your support,
Regards, Jan
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass rebuilds update

[Michael Cullen]

A few I've just tried to build chosen pretty much at random from the
above list:

> boinc-client
builds fine - there was a FTBFS months ago (#1251482) referring to
openssl but it's fine now

> activemq-cpp
Already tracked by  #1423204 - upstream have, slightly strangely,
included the fix in a comment but not their source repo
I've attached a working patch to the ticket. (I forked in Pagure but it
seems it won't let me push right now - I guess it needs longer to sync
than I expected or can be bothered to wait!)

> dvb-apps
Was about to say this was fine until I built for rawhide and saw the
problem.
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/43705/ removed the IOCTL it uses
with the comment that nothing uses it! not sure quite what to say about
this one. It's old and seems to have a few bugs reported against it -
https://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git contains replacements for some of
them, using the dvbv5 API rather than the dvbv3 API these apps use.
Easiest thing might be to remove the function the IOCTL is for from
dst-utils.
In future we should probably consider encouraging users to move to newer
utils though.

Michael


On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, at 10:24 AM, Michael Cullen wrote:
> A few I've just tried to build chosen pretty much at random from the
> above list:
> 
> > boinc-client
> builds fine - there was a FTBFS months ago (#1251482) referring to
> openssl but it's fine now
> 
> > activemq-cpp
> Already tracked by  #1423204 - upstream have, slightly strangely,
> included the fix in a comment but not their source repo
> I've attached a working patch to the ticket. (I forked in Pagure but it
> seems it won't let me push right now - I guess it needs longer to sync
> than I expected or can be bothered to wait!)
> 
> > dvb-apps
> Was about to say this was fine until I built for rawhide and saw the
> problem.
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/43705/ removed the IOCTL it uses
> with the comment that nothing uses it! not sure quite what to say about
> this one. It's old and seems to have a few bugs reported against it -
> https://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git contains replacements for some of
> them, using the dvbv5 API rather than the dvbv3 API these apps use.
> Easiest thing might be to remove the function the IOCTL is for from
> dst-utils.
> In future we should probably consider encouraging users to move to newer
> utils though.
> 
> Michael
> 
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, at 12:53 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez
> >  wrote:
> > > On 10/22/2017 04:08 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > >> Mat Booth wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore  wrote:
> > >>>
> >  [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
> > 
> > >>>
> > >>> This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there
> > >>> were "0 failed builds" :-)
> > >> Current status?
> > >
> > > Digging a bit deeper, there are ~880 packages with building problems.
> > > Some of them since fedora 20/21:
> > >
> > 
> > > quasselc-0-3.20170111gita0a1e6b | fc26
> > > quassel-irssi-0-4.20170119git7b034e3 | fc26
> > 
> > Where is this list sourced from? I maintain both of these packages,
> > and to my knowledge, they're building fine. (And no FTBFS bugs have
> > been filed against them).
> > 
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23320
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23342
> > 
> > This makes me slightly dubious about the rest of the list.
> > 
> > Ben Rosser
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

F27 Server Beta & F27 Final Go/No-Go Meeting on Thursday, October 26th @ 17:00 UTC

[Jan Kurik]

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 27
Server Beta [1] as well as Fedora 27 Final [2] releases.

The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, October 26th, 2017 at
17:00 UTC. Please check the links [1] and [2] for your time zone.

[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/7520/
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/7386/
[3] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/27/server-beta/buglist
[4] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/27/final/buglist

Thank you in advance for your support.
Regards, Jan
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505680] Upgrade perl-Class-Accessor to 0.51

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505680

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Class-Accessor-0.51-1.
   ||fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Assignee|tcall...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org
Last Closed||2017-10-24 05:10:34



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
Build done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22663374

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505413] Upgrade perl-File-LibMagic to 1.16

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505413

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-File-LibMagic-1.16-1.f
   ||c28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-24 04:41:38



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
Build done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22662787

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505673] perl-SNMP-Info-3.38 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505673



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-SNMP-Info-3.38-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9192b80890

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505673] perl-SNMP-Info-3.38 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505673

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-SNMP-Info-3.38-1.fc28
   Assignee|w...@gouldfamily.org|jples...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505675] Upgrade perl-SNMP-Info to 3.38

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505675

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2017-10-24 03:56:01



--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1505673 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505673] perl-SNMP-Info-3.38 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505673

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jples...@redhat.com



--- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
*** Bug 1505675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505679] Upgrade perl-Digest-SHA3 to 1.01

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505679

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Digest-SHA3-1.01-1.fc2
   ||8
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Assignee|dd...@cpan.org  |jples...@redhat.com
Last Closed||2017-10-24 03:53:09



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505672] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505672



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-936074f4cc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505672] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505672

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-
   ||0.007-1.fc28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1500438] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.69 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500438
Bug 1500438 depends on bug 1500691, which changed state.

Bug 1500691 Summary: Review Request: perl-lib-relative - Add paths relative to 
the current file to @INC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500691

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

Hello, Lukas.
Thanks for this thread.

On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 17:50, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
> On 10/21/2017 08:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[...]
> > Also, perhaps it would make sense to move to a more normal looking
> > release flow instead of a massive patch? I think that might make it
> > easier to see whats going on and how to contribute.
> > 
> 
> This "massive" patch is here because, we diverted from Upsteam policy.
> Because Upstream policy is much more strict, you cannot even boot F26+
> just with upstream policy. We confine more services then upstream and
> we're more benevolent.

The usual way of doing such things is to create a fork from which
patches can be merged to the original tree. Surely merging one massive
patch is much more difficult than single commits or even series of
commits. I assume you do have a fork of the original SELinux policy
source tree somewhere, so why don't you simply ship a tarball of your
fork instead of upstream+massive patch?

> This should change, and we're trying to focus on technical solution
> which should decrease amount of maintenance of selinux-policy. We'll
> inform you about this project.

If you shared more details about this effort now, you would be more
likely to receive help from the community earlier.

> > > Note: If you are interested in writing custom SELinux policy for your
> > > package, you can follow the
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/IndependentPolicy documentation
> > > on wiki.
> > 
> > Perhaps you could submit this to the FPC and get it reviewed and moved
> > under the normal packaging space?
> > 
> 
> Will do.

Excellent, thank you!

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPMFusion   http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505680] New: Upgrade perl-Class-Accessor to 0.51

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505680

Bug ID: 1505680
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Class-Accessor to 0.51
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Class-Accessor
  Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcall...@redhat.com, trem...@tremble.org.uk



Latest Fedora delivers 0.34 version. Upstream released 0.51. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505679] New: Upgrade perl-Digest-SHA3 to 1.01

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505679

Bug ID: 1505679
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Digest-SHA3 to 1.01
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Digest-SHA3
  Assignee: dd...@cpan.org
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: dd...@cpan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest Fedora delivers 1.00 version. Upstream released 1.01. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505675] New: Upgrade perl-SNMP-Info to 3.38

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505675

Bug ID: 1505675
   Summary: Upgrade perl-SNMP-Info to 3.38
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-SNMP-Info
  Assignee: w...@gouldfamily.org
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: ktdre...@ktdreyer.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
w...@gouldfamily.org



Latest Fedora delivers 3.37 version. Upstream released 3.38. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505673] perl-SNMP-Info-3.38 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505673



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
hotness's scratch build of perl-SNMP-Info-3.38-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22661011

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505673] perl-SNMP-Info-3.38 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505673



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1342516
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1342516=edit
[patch] Update to 3.38 (#1505673)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505672] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505672



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
hotness's scratch build of perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007-1.el7.src.rpm for
rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22661009

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505673] New: perl-SNMP-Info-3.38 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505673

Bug ID: 1505673
   Summary: perl-SNMP-Info-3.38 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-SNMP-Info
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: w...@gouldfamily.org
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: ktdre...@ktdreyer.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
w...@gouldfamily.org



Latest upstream release: 3.38
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.37-1.fc27
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/SNMP-Info/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3318/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505672] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505672



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1342515
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1342515=edit
[patch] Update to 0.007 (#1505672)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1505672] New: perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505672

Bug ID: 1505672
   Summary: perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.007
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.006-2.fc27
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-OlsonTZ-Download/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/15759/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org