Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

[Clement Verna]

.. snip ...

>
> Based on the feedback received, I will update the change proposal to
> exclude shadow-utils from the packages proposed to be removed. That way we
> should be able to move on and at least remove sssd-client and util-linux ;-)
>


I have updated https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SmallerContainerBase
to remove shadow-utils.


>
>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-34-20210408.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp

Failed openQA tests: 6/127 (aarch64), 9/189 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210407.n.0):

ID: 849702  Test: aarch64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849702
ID: 849714  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849714
ID: 849716  Test: aarch64 universal 
install_kickstart_firewall_configured@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849716
ID: 849726  Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849726
ID: 849762  Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849762

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210407.n.0):

ID: 848993  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848993
ID: 849257  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849257
ID: 849269  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849269
ID: 849270  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849270
ID: 849271  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849271
ID: 849272  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849272
ID: 849273  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849273
ID: 849274  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849274
ID: 849275  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849275
ID: 849703  Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849703

Soft failed openQA tests: 4/189 (x86_64), 6/127 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-34-20210407.n.0):

ID: 849042  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849042
ID: 849732  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849732

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210407.n.0):

ID: 848804  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848804
ID: 848845  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848845
ID: 848902  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848902
ID: 849620  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849620
ID: 849633  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849633
ID: 849658  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849658
ID: 849673  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849673
ID: 849695  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849695

Passed openQA tests: 176/189 (x86_64), 115/127 (aarch64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-34-20210407.n.0):

ID: 849035  Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849035
ID: 849049  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849049
ID: 849061  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849061
ID: 849064  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849064
ID: 849065  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849065
ID: 849255  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849255
ID: 849635  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849635
ID: 849643  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_freeipa_replication_master@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849643
ID: 849644  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_freeipa_replication_replica@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849644
ID: 849647  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849647
ID: 849652  Test: aarch64 Serve

Fedora-Rawhide-20210408.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 24/189 (x86_64), 9/127 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210407.n.0):

ID: 848298  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848298
ID: 848309  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848309
ID: 848363  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848363
ID: 848536  Test: x86_64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848536
ID: 849579  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849579
ID: 849587  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849587
ID: 849588  Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849588
ID: 849783  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849783

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210407.n.0):

ID: 848288  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848288
ID: 848289  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848289
ID: 848292  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848292
ID: 848301  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848301
ID: 848306  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848306
ID: 848313  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848313
ID: 848319  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848319
ID: 848320  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848320
ID: 848344  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848344
ID: 848345  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848345
ID: 848349  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848349
ID: 848353  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848353
ID: 848466  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848466
ID: 848497  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848497
ID: 848508  Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848508
ID: 848511  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848511
ID: 848518  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848518
ID: 848522  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848522
ID: 848534  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848534
ID: 848538  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848538
ID: 849536  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849536
ID: 849576  Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849576
ID: 849606  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849606
ID: 849608  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849608
ID: 849619  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849619

Soft failed openQA tests: 64/189 (x86_64), 48/127 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210407.n.0):

ID: 848515  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848515
ID: 848537  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848537
ID: 849543  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_nfs_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849543
ID: 84954

Re: Need feedback on ocaml-atd review request

[Jerry James]

I am currently traveling, with only my phone for accessing email, so please
pardon top posting, HTML, etc. I also have the goal of bringing Infer to
Fedora, so I am happy to make common cause with you.

Are you aware of my efforts to build an OCaml spec generator?  See
https://pagure.io/opam2rpm. It isn't finished, but it is useful for getting
started.

I can be more helpful next week when I am home & have my beloved Fedora
desktop in front of me. :-)

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, 4:02 PM Michel Alexandre Salim 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It's been a while since I work on an OCaml spec, so I'm asking the
> ocaml-devel list (and because it seems inactive, cc:ing rjones and
> jjames since they maintain a lot of OCaml packages.
>
> I'm working through the missing dependencies to eventually package
> Infer, Facebook's static analysis tool -- https://fbinfer.com/ -- which
> is written in OCaml.
>
> The first such dependency is atdgen, which is part of atd:
> https://github.com/ahrefs/atd
>
> Review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
>
> This is a single project that ends up generating several related OPAM
> packages. The automatic requires/provides seem to identify the modules
> it provides correctly, so... do I need to split the packaging to
> individual modules, or is it fine to ship only ocaml-atd and ocaml-atd-
> devel?
>
> (My infer package can then depend on ocaml(Atdgen) instead of
> hardcoding the specific RPM name, so if I end up splitting the package
> later it is not affected)
>
> On a related note, the packaging guidelines is rather out of date:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/OCaml/
>
> I have a minor PR for fixing the link back to the main guidelines:
> https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1065
>
> but found the example spec there really obsolete; I ended up basing my
> spec on jjames' ocaml-menhir.
>
> Likewise, the spec generated by `rpmdev-newspec -t ocaml` is out of
> date and roughly corresponds with the spec in the packaging guidelines.
>
> Is there an interest in revamping the documentation and template? Maybe
> ship a separate template for ocaml-dune for projects that use dune as
> as its build system?
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Michel Alexandre Salim
> profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: wlroots 0.13.0 update for rawhide and f34

[Aleksei Bavshin]

The update is on hold until we figure out how to deal with wlroots 
0.13.0 regression on PinePhone[1]. New wlroots drm backend code doesn't 
seem to like lima + sun4i-drm display controller combination :(


The backup plan if we don't have a fix in a next few weeks is to create 
wlroots0.12 compat package and modify `phoc` spec to require it.


[1]: https://github.com/swaywm/wlroots/issues/2795

On 4/7/21 1:54 PM, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:

Greetings,

wlroots 0.13.0 and sway 1.6 have been released today. As usual, the 
update is API and ABI breaking and all dependent packages must be 
rebuilt. For all the dependents I identified either upstream patches or 
ETA for the new release and have successful copr builds.


I'm planning to create rawhide side-tag later today, rebuild all 
@sway-sig packages and send PRs with instructions to the packages I 
don't have access to. The side-tag will be merged in a week or when all 
the rebuilds are done.


I also plan to prepare a day 0 update for f34 once rawhide rebuilds are 
completed. Let me know if you have any concerns about that.


BCC: maintainer aliases for cage, labwc, phoc and wayfire



--
With best regards,
Aleksei Bavshin



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Documentation on how to install the jupyter stack on Fedora

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

Hi José,

On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 23:41 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Is there any place where we can find a central place for information
> for 
> installing jupyter in Fedora?
> 
This seems to be the intended place, but it could probably be easier to
find (seems to show up if you search for "fedora python" then switch to
the "Scientific Python Stack" option):

https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/python/scipy.html

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Documentation on how to install the jupyter stack on Fedora

[José Abílio Matos]

Is there any place where we can find a central place for information for 
installing jupyter in Fedora?

The best that I could found was an article on Fedora Magazine:
https://fedoramagazine.org/jupyter-and-data-science-in-fedora/

In this case the question come from my wife who installed today a new machine 
with Fedora 34.

My suggestions was to install python3-notebook but unless you know this it is 
not obvious where to search for it.

Best regards,
-- 
José Abílio

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-IoT-35-20210408.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 6/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210407.0):

ID: 849748  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849748
ID: 849752  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849752
ID: 849760  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849760

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210407.0):

ID: 849128  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849128
ID: 849130  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849130
ID: 849749  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849749
ID: 849754  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849754
ID: 849758  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849758

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210407.0):

ID: 849117  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849117

Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64), 9/15 (aarch64)

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used mem changed from 170 MiB to 191 MiB
System load changed from 0.16 to 0.34
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/846681#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849116#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used mem changed from 170 MiB to 189 MiB
System load changed from 0.14 to 0.39
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/846683#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849118#downloads

Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload@uefi: 
Used mem changed from 184 MiB to 206 MiB
System load changed from 0.26 to 0.56
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/846697#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849747#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Need feedback on ocaml-atd review request

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

Hi all,

It's been a while since I work on an OCaml spec, so I'm asking the
ocaml-devel list (and because it seems inactive, cc:ing rjones and
jjames since they maintain a lot of OCaml packages.

I'm working through the missing dependencies to eventually package
Infer, Facebook's static analysis tool -- https://fbinfer.com/ -- which
is written in OCaml.

The first such dependency is atdgen, which is part of atd:
https://github.com/ahrefs/atd

Review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685

This is a single project that ends up generating several related OPAM
packages. The automatic requires/provides seem to identify the modules
it provides correctly, so... do I need to split the packaging to
individual modules, or is it fine to ship only ocaml-atd and ocaml-atd-
devel?

(My infer package can then depend on ocaml(Atdgen) instead of
hardcoding the specific RPM name, so if I end up splitting the package
later it is not affected)

On a related note, the packaging guidelines is rather out of date:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/OCaml/

I have a minor PR for fixing the link back to the main guidelines:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1065

but found the example spec there really obsolete; I ended up basing my
spec on jjames' ocaml-menhir.

Likewise, the spec generated by `rpmdev-newspec -t ocaml` is out of
date and roughly corresponds with the spec in the packaging guidelines.

Is there an interest in revamping the documentation and template? Maybe
ship a separate template for ocaml-dune for projects that use dune as
as its build system?

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210408.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64), 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210407.0):

ID: 849487  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849487

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210407.0):

ID: 848256  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848256

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210408.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210407.0):

ID: 847979  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/847979
ID: 849480  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849480

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-34-20210408.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp

Failed openQA tests: 59/127 (aarch64), 9/189 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210407.n.0):

ID: 848908  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848908
ID: 848916  Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848916
ID: 848917  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_fileconflicts@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848917
ID: 848918  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848918
ID: 848919  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_standard_partition_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848919
ID: 848920  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848920
ID: 848922  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848922
ID: 848924  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848924
ID: 848928  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848928
ID: 848929  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848929
ID: 848938  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848938
ID: 848939  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848939
ID: 848961  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848961
ID: 848969  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848969
ID: 848982  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848982
ID: 848983  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848983
ID: 848984  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848984
ID: 848985  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848985
ID: 848986  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848986
ID: 848987  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848987
ID: 848988  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848988
ID: 849066  Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_with_swap@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849066
ID: 849067  Test: aarch64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849067
ID: 849069  Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849069
ID: 849070  Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849070
ID: 849071  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849071
ID: 849072  Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849072
ID: 849073  Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_hdd@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849073
ID: 849074  Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849074
ID: 849075  Test: aarch64 universal install_serial_console@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849075
ID: 849076  Test: aarch64 universal install_shrink_ntfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849076
ID: 849077  Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849077
ID: 849078  Test: aarch64 universal install_anaconda_text@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849078
ID: 849079  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849079
ID: 849081  Test: aarch64 universal 
install_kickstart_firewall_configured@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849081
ID: 849082  Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849082
ID: 849083  Test: aarch64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849083
ID: 849084  Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849084
ID: 8

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Neal Gompa]

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:20 AM Frank Ch. Eigler  wrote:
>
>
> ngompa13 wrote:
>
> > Woohoo! I'm excited for this!
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I got a chance to use debuginfod to do some debugging of DNF on
> > openSUSE last Saturday and the experience was fantastic.
> >
> > I'm looking forward to this being wired up into GDB, ABRT, and
> > everything else
>
> Hey, it already is there in most tools, try it.
>
> % export DEBUGINFOD_URLS=https://debuginfod.stg.fedoraproject.org/
>
> and shortly all F32+ packages/versions/architectures will be debuggable
> that way.  (The staging indexer is processing the l* packages, after a
> few days of churning from 0* through k*.  It has a one or two more days
> to go, but may already be used.)
>
> The purpose of this Change is to configure this environment variable by
> default, pointing to the forthcoming production version of the server
> at https://debuginfod.fedoraproject.org/.
>

We should probably have a halfway decent splash page for
debuginfod.fedoraproject.org, similar to what the openSUSE one has:
https://debuginfod.opensuse.org/



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

ngompa13 wrote:

> Woohoo! I'm excited for this!

Thanks!

> I got a chance to use debuginfod to do some debugging of DNF on
> openSUSE last Saturday and the experience was fantastic.
>
> I'm looking forward to this being wired up into GDB, ABRT, and
> everything else

Hey, it already is there in most tools, try it.

% export DEBUGINFOD_URLS=https://debuginfod.stg.fedoraproject.org/

and shortly all F32+ packages/versions/architectures will be debuggable
that way.  (The staging indexer is processing the l* packages, after a
few days of churning from 0* through k*.  It has a one or two more days
to go, but may already be used.)

The purpose of this Change is to configure this environment variable by
default, pointing to the forthcoming production version of the server
at https://debuginfod.fedoraproject.org/.


- FChE
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20210408.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 24/189 (x86_64), 56/127 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210407.n.0):

ID: 848298  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848298
ID: 848309  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848309
ID: 848363  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848363
ID: 848381  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848381
ID: 848389  Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848389
ID: 848390  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_fileconflicts@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848390
ID: 848391  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848391
ID: 848392  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_standard_partition_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848392
ID: 848393  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848393
ID: 848395  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848395
ID: 848396  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848396
ID: 848397  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848397
ID: 848401  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848401
ID: 848402  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848402
ID: 848411  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848411
ID: 848412  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848412
ID: 848434  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848434
ID: 848442  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848442
ID: 848455  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848455
ID: 848456  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848456
ID: 848457  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848457
ID: 848536  Test: x86_64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848536
ID: 848539  Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_with_swap@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848539
ID: 848540  Test: aarch64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848540
ID: 848542  Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848542
ID: 848543  Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848543
ID: 848544  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848544
ID: 848545  Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848545
ID: 848546  Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_hdd@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848546
ID: 848547  Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848547
ID: 848548  Test: aarch64 universal install_serial_console@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848548
ID: 848549  Test: aarch64 universal install_shrink_ntfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848549
ID: 848550  Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848550
ID: 848551  Test: aarch64 universal install_anaconda_text@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848551
ID: 848552  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848552
ID: 848553  Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848553
ID: 848554  Test: aarch64 universal 
install_kickstart_f

Fedora-IoT-35-20210408.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64

Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210407.0):

ID: 849132  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849132

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210407.0):

ID: 849128  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849128
ID: 849130  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849130
ID: 849134  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849134

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210407.0):

ID: 849117  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849117

Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64)

Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 13 of 31

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used mem changed from 170 MiB to 191 MiB
System load changed from 0.16 to 0.34
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/846681#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849116#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used mem changed from 170 MiB to 189 MiB
System load changed from 0.14 to 0.39
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/846683#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/849118#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora's GPG key in DNS(SEC)

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Friday, 12 February 2021 at 20:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> All Fedora's GPG key - starting with Fedora 27 - are now stored in
> fedoraproject.org DNS record and can be verified using DNSSEC.
> 
> Why? How it can be used? That is long story and you can read about it in my 
> blog entry:
>
> http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2021/02/11/verify_package_gpg_signature_using_dnssec/index.html
> 
> Few last minutes notes here:
>  - there are still some gotchas which should be fixed. But enough code is
> already in production - you can play with it now. Relevant issues are linked
> in the blog post.
>  - the DNF team is migrating their code to libdnf, I do not have any
> guarantee when this piece of code will be migrating - so we are far from
> enabling this by default.
> 
> Comments are welcomed.

systemd-resolved breaks this in F33:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823480

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210408.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-34-20210407.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210408.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  5
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Xfce raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Xfce-34-20210407.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Container_Base docker armhfp
Path: 
Container/armhfp/images/Fedora-Container-Base-34-20210407.n.0.armhfp.tar.xz
Image: Security live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-34-20210407.n.0.iso
Image: Workstation live aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-34-20210407.n.0.iso
Image: SoaS raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-SoaS-34-20210407.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Any interest in Google's recently open sourced Lyra in Fedora?

[Petr Pisar]

V Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 07:05:09AM -0500, Richard Shaw napsal(a):
> https://opensource.googleblog.com/2021/04/lyra-enabling-voice-calls-for-next-billion-users.html
> 
> It would need a new build tool bazel[1] as well, but it's already in
> COPR[2]. It claims to need a specific version/checkout of llvm but it may
> be possible to work around that.

It's not fully open :

Please note that there is a closed-source kernel used for math operations
that is linked via a shared object called libsparse_inference.so. We
provide the libsparse_inference.so library to be linked, but are unable to
provide source for it. This is the reason that a specific
toolchain/compiler is required.

Moreover, I'm curious where an AI data model passed via --model_path argument
is available and what license it has. I worry that this one is also
proprietary.

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Any interest in Google's recently open sourced Lyra in Fedora?

[Richard Shaw]

https://opensource.googleblog.com/2021/04/lyra-enabling-voice-calls-for-next-billion-users.html

It would need a new build tool bazel[1] as well, but it's already in
COPR[2]. It claims to need a specific version/checkout of llvm but it may
be possible to work around that.

Thanks,
Richard

[1] https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel
[2] https://docs.bazel.build/versions/4.0.0/install-redhat.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210408.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210407.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210408.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  10
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   145
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  1.22 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   3.86 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -60.04 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: LXDE live x86_64
Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-LXDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210408.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: golang-github-dop251-scsu-0-0.1.20210407git8fadfb6.fc35
Summary: A Standard Compression Scheme for Unicode implementation in Go
RPMs:golang-github-dop251-scsu-devel
Size:21.35 KiB

Package: golang-github-ncw-swift-2-2.0.0-1.fc35
Summary: Go language interface to Swift
RPMs:golang-github-ncw-swift-2-devel
Size:66.53 KiB

Package: libuev-2.3.2-1.fc35
Summary: Simple event loop for Linux
RPMs:libuev libuev-devel
Size:247.17 KiB

Package: python-interrogate-1.3.2-1.fc35
Summary: Interrogate a codebase for docstring coverage
RPMs:python-interrogate-doc python3-interrogate
Size:232.13 KiB

Package: python-itemadapter-0.2.0-1.fc35
Summary: The ItemAdapter class is a wrapper for data container object
RPMs:python3-itemadapter
Size:21.89 KiB

Package: python-itemloaders-1.0.4-1.fc35
Summary: Library that helps you collect data from HTML and XML sources.
RPMs:python3-itemloaders
Size:24.95 KiB

Package: python-mongoengine-0.23.0-1.fc35
Summary: A Python Document-Object Mapper for working with MongoDB
RPMs:python-mongoengine-doc python3-mongoengine
Size:472.82 KiB

Package: python-protego-0.1.16-1.fc35
Summary: Pure-Python robots.txt parser with support for modern conventions
RPMs:python3-protego
Size:42.82 KiB

Package: rust-qstring-0.7.2-1.fc35
Summary: Query string parser
RPMs:rust-qstring+default-devel rust-qstring-devel
Size:19.71 KiB

Package: uredir-3.3-1.fc35
Summary: UDP port redirector
RPMs:uredir
Size:100.92 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  R-dbplyr-2.1.1-1.fc35
Old package:  R-dbplyr-2.0.0-2.fc34
Summary:  A 'dplyr' Back End for Databases
RPMs: R-dbplyr
Size: 801.26 KiB
Size change:  69.03 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Apr 07 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade  - 
2.1.1-1
  - Update to latest version (#1946640)


Package:  R-pkgload-1.2.1-1.fc35
Old package:  R-pkgload-1.2.0-1.fc35
Summary:  Simulate Package Installation and Attach
RPMs: R-pkgload
Size: 167.87 KiB
Size change:  1.93 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Apr 07 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade  - 
1.2.1-1
  - Update to latest version (#1946725)


Package:  adcli-0.9.1-4.fc35
Old package:  adcli-0.9.1-3.fc35
Summary:  Active Directory enrollment
RPMs: adcli adcli-doc
Size: 664.14 KiB
Size change:  533 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Apr 07 2021 Sumit Bose  - 0.9.1-4
  - Add macro updates for autoconf-2.71 and downstream gating


Package:  alembic-1.8.0-0.1_beta2.fc35
Old package:  alembic-1.7.16-4.fc34
Summary:  Open framework for storing and sharing scene data
RPMs: alembic alembic-devel alembic-libs
Size: 5.47 MiB
Size change:  -43.69 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Apr 07 2021 Luya Tshimbalanga  - 1.8.0-0.1_beta2
  - Update to 1.8.0_beta2
  - Resolves: #1946083


Package:  ansible-lint-1:5.0.7-1.fc35
Old package:  ansible-lint-1:5.0.6-1.fc35
Summary:  Best practices checker for Ansible
RPMs: python3-ansible-lint
Size: 172.65 KiB
Size change:  749 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Apr 07 2021 Parag Nemade  - 1:5.0.7-1
  - Update to 5.0.7 version (#1947042)


Package:  appres-1.0.5-2.fc35
Old package:  appres-1.0.5-1.fc35
Summary:  X11 utility to print application resources
RPMs: appres
Size: 75.20 KiB
Size change:  506 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Apr 08 2021 Peter Hutterer  - 1.0.5-2
  - Fix Obsoletes line to actually obsolete the -8 resutils


Package:  awscli-1.19.47-1.fc35
Old package:  awscli-1.19.45-1.fc35
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 2.02 MiB
Size change:  2.42 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Apr 07 2021 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.19.46-1
  - 1.19.46

  * Wed Apr 07 2021 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.19.47-1
  - 1.19.47


Package:  bdftopcf-1.1-2.fc35
Old package:  bdftopcf-1.1-1.fc35
Summary:  Font compiler for the X server and font server
RPMs: bdftopcf
Size: 159.64 KiB
Size change:  766 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Apr 08 2021 Peter Hutterer  1.1-2
  - Fix the Conflicts line to properly conflict with the -50 font-utils,
without a {?dist} <= doesn't work as expected.


Package:  blender-1:2.92.0-3.fc35
Old package:  blender-1:2.92.0-2.fc35
Summary:  3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
RPMs: blender 

Fashion

[Sandra Rommel]

The most unique and appealing designs of jackets and coats, worn by all the 
trendsetters, and followed by every fashionista! Grab the masterpieces now and 
become the trendsetter this 
season.[url=https://www.celebjacket.com/product/video-game-mafia-iii-lincoln-clay-jacket/]Mafia
 III Green Jacket[/url] 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Tomas Orsava]

On 4/8/21 10:17 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:

On 4/7/21 4:16 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:

On 4/7/21 2:21 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On the other hand, I understand where you're coming from: we have 
fought battles with unintended use of our tools too (e.g. sudo pip 
breaking dnf). But given the scope of the breakage here, I would 
advocate for postponing this change for now. It seems none of us is 
sure how to square this circle at the moment.


Nod. I'll need to sleep on this all a bit.


There was good feedback and constructive ideas in the PR. I don't have 
the energy or the cycles to deal with all this now so I reverted the 
%exclude-changes upstream, to be revisited at a better time, along 
with some better options for %check.


Thanks everybody for keeping this civil and constructive.


Thank you too, Panu, for taking our feedback into account!

Best of luck to you and our beloved RPM!
Tomas




- Panu -
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210408.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 3/7 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210407.0):

ID: 848262  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848262
ID: 848264  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848264

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210407.0):

ID: 848263  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848263

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210407.0):

ID: 848256  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/848256

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 4/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Panu Matilainen]

On 4/7/21 4:16 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:

On 4/7/21 2:21 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On the other hand, I understand where you're coming from: we have 
fought battles with unintended use of our tools too (e.g. sudo pip 
breaking dnf). But given the scope of the breakage here, I would 
advocate for postponing this change for now. It seems none of us is 
sure how to square this circle at the moment.


Nod. I'll need to sleep on this all a bit.


There was good feedback and constructive ideas in the PR. I don't have 
the energy or the cycles to deal with all this now so I reverted the 
%exclude-changes upstream, to be revisited at a better time, along with 
some better options for %check.


Thanks everybody for keeping this civil and constructive.

- Panu -
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Panu Matilainen]

On 4/7/21 5:14 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:


Dne 07. 04. 21 v 11:05 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):

On 4/7/21 11:45 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:

On 4/6/21 7:40 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:


Dne 06. 04. 21 v 16:02 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):

On 4/6/21 1:36 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
For example, what is common for Python "namepsace" packages, e.g. 
pkg_name.foo.


1) We want to test installed files, not what is in $PWD, so we set 
PYTHONPATH to

%{buildroot}%{python3_sitearch}:%{buildroot}%{python3_sitelib} and we
    (try hard to) exclude $PWD from it. This is crucial to ensure 
the files
    we actually ship are working and the installed file set is 
complete.

    Our macros do this for the packagers.

2) The %{python3_site...}/pkg_name/ directory and
    %{python3_site...}/pkg_name/__init__.py and
    %{python3_site...}/pkg_name/__pycache__/ and
    %{python3_site...}/pkg_name/__pycache__/__init__...pyc
    files must be present in %{buildroot} to successfully run the 
tests.


3) The files from (2) must be excluded from the package because 
*pkg_name* owns

    them, not *pkg_name.foo*.
    We Require the "toplevel" *pkg_name* package from *pkg_name.foo*.
    The files are not bit-by-bit+metadata identical,
    so both packages cannot ship them.


This seems like a fairly exotic case to me - okay, a 
Python-peculiar problem. And a problem of stepping (not saying 
crossing, because I'm not sure it is) on the boundaries of the 
%check use-case I suppose.


%ghost'ing the files might be one option - I don't know about the 
Ruby cache case beyond that there is one.



There is only `%{gem_cache}` (I assume it was mentioned in the 
context of `%exclude`, because that has nothing to do with testing). 
Not shipping this file is enough and we don't ship it just because 
we don't want to ship file which looks like upstream file but it is 
not the original upstream file. Moreover we don't really need it for 
the purposes it is used by upstream, which is restoring the original 
state of the library.


Ah, okay, it's an entirely different case then. Does this file ever 
get created when running the installed software (by root)? If so, 
then %ghost'ing it would seem to be the right thing.



The chances to have this file created are pretty slim end even if it was 
created, it would not be trustworthy.


If they can get created (even if rare) then you'd want it to be removed 
along with the package. Which having them %ghost'ed would achieve.







If it's just something that needs to be scrubbed on each and every 
ruby package ever built, we could always add a buildroot policy for 
it. Just like we could automatically clean .la files rather than 
manually clean them in thousands of packages...




Is it correct assumption that any "random" packages can ship BRP? 
Interesting idea, I have to give it thought. I guess the concern would 
be that the packages for the most recent Fedora/RPM won't be compatible 
with older releases without the BRP. But it should be possible to 
backport it I guess.




Anybody can ship BRP but there's no drop-in mechanism to get then to 
execute atm, you have to override %__os_install_post for that. So in 
practise BRPs need to be enabled via central macros in 
redhat-rpm-config, but there's no reason domain-specific BRPs could not 
be enabled from there (even if the actual BRP lives in another package).


- Panu -


Vít



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210408.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 3/7 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210407.0):

ID: 847985  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/847985
ID: 847986  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/847986
ID: 847987  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/847987

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210407.0):

ID: 847979  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/847979

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 4/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure