Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group
You need to open ticket here https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/new_issue/ As soon as you get your 'packager' group back i can transfer package to you. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: wlroots 0.16 update announcement
Thanks! labwc and wayfire updated for Rawhide [1]. Please ping when you consider new wlroots 0.16 mature enough and start updating it for f37. [1]: - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9bac007398 - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1bbf74fbb8 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
JFYI: Some of new Bottles >2022.7.14 modules depends on Rust packages. Also Bottles package which requires intensive testing every new version due regression. I can't dedicate at this moment enough time and resources for this but glad if you found this package useful and keep maintain it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Call for testing: rpmautospec 0.2.6 in staging
> do you mean if you can use rpmautospec features on packages with epel8/9 > branches, or if you can use the command line tool? > You can definitely use %autorelease/%autochangelog in whatever package you > build in Fedora Koji I had to clarify this, yes i mean can i build packages with rpmautospec features for such branches. So even building for EPEL-7 in Koji possible. Great. Thanks for answer! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Call for testing: rpmautospec 0.2.6 in staging
Does rpmautospec compatible with EPEL-9, EPEL-8 branches? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Call for testing: rpmautospec 0.2.6 in staging
It works for me and really like this new approach. Switched couple of my packages and no issue so far with rpmautospec itself. But some 3rd-party tools requires some work and adaption. For example if you already switched to rpmautospec format and try to: $ fedpkg import foo.fc36.src.rpm then your changlog file will be removed: Removing no longer used file: changelog ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Non-responsive maintainer check for icon
Hello. Anyone know how to contact with Konstantin Ryabitsev, FAS: icon? - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078516 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742343 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyotp/pull-request/2 cc: mri...@gmail.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [Test-Announce] [Test Day] Kernel 5.16 closing notes
Eh, i missed this time due Nvidia lag with 510 driver update. But rpm fusion folks already built [1] it so i hope it will appears in repos very soon. [1]: https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21262 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [Test-Announce] [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.16 2022-01-23 through 2022-01-29
Asking here due: Your message to the test mailing-list was rejected for the following reasons: The message is not from a list member. 5.16 will contain full preemption enabled? https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/228#comment-767601 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Does anybody still use `starship'?
Updated few packages which requires by new Starship. There some new modules required as well. Need help with RR: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039465 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (in Winter)
Updated 'rust-process_control' and 'rust-versions'. New module required for 'rust-shadow-rs'. Please help with RR: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039429 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F36 Change: Default To Noto Fonts (System-Wide Change proposal)
Cantarell current default UI font in GNOME (Workstation) will be replaced by Noto font as well or remain? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora
> Yes, bundling is allowed only for sources. You can package all dependencies > in source form into a single vendored tarball. OP never talked about bundling blobs, only you. Also OP never talked about vscode. > Flathub != Fedora. All Fedora packages must be built from sources (except > firmware). Indeed, and they are built from sources on Flathub and that exactly the point. We can do the same for Fedora. Keep mislead people and twisting things if this helps you with packaging electron apps on Fedora. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package FFMPEG with royalty free codes (AV1, THEORA, VPX, OGG, OPUS, SPEEX, ...) for Fedora
> All of them must be compiled from source on Fedora's infra. No, they don't. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault#Detailed_Description > Have you tested the build without network access? Because even Flatpaks > download everything from npm. "Flatpaks" using flatpak-node-generator for downloading modules but doesn't requires network access during build. Builds also reproducible. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: bodhi updates skipping updates-testing entirely
Understood. Filed a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013168#c1. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: bodhi updates skipping updates-testing entirely
Noticed this a long time ago when in freeze stage and this could a serious issue sometimes. BTW please push flatpak 1.12.1 update to Stable manually since people still complain and stuck with 1.12.0. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc
Should i disabled myself this arches for Goverlay or you add them into
`ExclusiveArch: %{fpc_arches}` and rebuild affected packages yourself? Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: wlroots 0.14.0 is coming to rawhide
> I'd prefer to wait for 0.14.1 Totally agree with this approach. > we normally don't push breaking wlroots changes into stable branches. Yep. But few users already asking me about 'labwc' update. I personally interesting in testing it too but i can build locally or in COPR and test it which is not always preferable way for other users. Anyway since it far from version 1.0 i don't insist and think it's OK to update it just for Rawhide at this point. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: wlroots 0.14.0 is coming to rawhide
Done for labwc and wayfire: * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71258443 * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71258789 Thanks for updating it. What's a plan for f34? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Gnome Fractal and veloren/airshipper needs maintainer
Veloren and Veloren Airshipper bot using rust-nightly. you can forget about packaging it for official repos in Fedora. Fractal - good luck to package it Fedora. But both packaged for a long time and available in COPR: - Fractal: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/fractal/ - Veloren: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/veloren/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel
Good to know. I am crossing fingers 爛 and hope you could improve current defaults and this will be upstreamed. So at least users who want PREEMPT could enable it in runtime and not need to rebuild custom kernel every time for this. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel
Hello. Upcoming 5.12 allow building with dynamic preemption support which allows changing mode at boot/run-time so finally no need to rebuild or make alternative kernel build anymore[1]. Responsive system is a must have for gaming and good desktop experience overall, not only for professional audio. For example difference in input mouse lag is like day and night with PREEMPT mode. Maybe on cheap mouse this is hard to notice but on 500-1000Hz mouse really easy. You can test this yourself with experimental kernel build on COPR[2]. Some Linux distros[3] already using PREEMPT mode by default for a decent period of time. Fedora kernel build with CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY but this is not enough for desktop use case. Please provide full PREEMPT mode by default in 5.12 kernel for desktop variants. With 5.12 it is possible for user to change it without efforts if they need this. RT kernel FAQ: https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions [1]: http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2102.2/01311.html [2]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/kernel-futex/ [3]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Professional_audio#Realtime_kernel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: wlroots 0.13.0 update for rawhide and f34
Thank you for update. 'labwc' built https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=66343993 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packaging new Compiz 0.9 version
Good to know, thanks for answer. Can we package then separate compat version with 0.9 version? Still WIP build [1] but fully working. And already filed some bugs [2] upstream. [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/compiz0.9/ [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1923481 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Packaging new Compiz 0.9 version
Hello. I'd like to package new Compiz 0.9. New version required for GNOME
Flashback [1] and also have some other nice improvements like CCSM ported on
GTK3. Currently Compiz 0.8 packaged in Fedora. The question is: should i send
PR with update current Compiz 0.8 -> 0.9 or should i made compat package and
open new RR for it ('compiz0.9')?
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-flashback/blob/rawhide/f/gnome-flashback.spec#_2
cc: jskar...@redhat.com, fed...@raveit.de
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34
❯ sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync --allowerasing All fine, but few packages wants to downgrade: conmon x86_64 2:2.0.22-0.9.dev.git2fbeb9f.fc34 fedora48 k fuse-overlayfs x86_64 1.4+dev-2.dev.gitee8ce2e.fc34 fedora76 k httpd x86_64 2.4.46-8.fc34 fedora 1.4 M httpd-filesystemnoarch 2.4.46-8.fc34 fedora13 k httpd-tools x86_64 2.4.46-8.fc34 fedora82 k libusbx i686 1.0.23-3.fc34 fedora75 k libusbx x86_64 1.0.23-3.fc34 fedora71 k mod_lua x86_64 2.4.46-8.fc34 fedora62 k ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Ars claims: Fedora 32 is sluggish
I did my own various tests on Ryzen (Zen 2) 4 month ago or so on Fedora 32/33 vs Clear Linux which known to be "fastest" distro and in almost all benchmarks Fedora was equal or even faster a little bit then Clear Linux. In rare cases Clear Linux was faster within the margin of error. Have no idea what they mean by "sluggish". ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 34 Change: Scale ZRAM to Full Memory Size (Self-Contained Change proposal)
Some tests: https://youtu.be/d4Sc80TMEtA webkit2gtk3 compilation with zram-fraction=1, max-zram-size=8192 Physical RAM: 8GB. Kernel 5.10.6 Fedora 33, with such deviations from default: - zram-fraction=1, max-zram-size=8192 (this is default for f34) - le9 patch - https://github.com/hakavlad/le9-patch GPU heavily loaded for all time in test at 100% and almost all VRAM utilized. Software which run in background during test: - Firefox with many open tabs - OBS - virt-manager and guest Fedora 33 - Steam - Telegram No hangs, no heavily freezes, system was responsive for all time during webkit2gtk3 compilation. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)
My experience is pretty OK with PipeWire in f33. Gaming also OK and seems like even fixed long standing issues in some games. Overall is better in terms of CPU utilization and quality (subjectively). But one noticeable issue - no volume control in GNOME Shell, but it available in System Settings. There is also report about this in GNOME Flashback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912062 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Bodhi down?
Yep. Works for me now. Both, src.fedoraproject and Bodhi. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable btrfs transparent zstd compression by default (System-Wide Change proposal)
It's faster. Here is some benchmark with different zstd compression ratios https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/28/1930. Could be outdated a little bit though. But for HDD it makes sense to increase it probably. And IIRC Chris wrote about such plans. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What is the most time consuming task for you as packager?
Rust packaging automation. People shouldn't do work which could be done by machine in 2020. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VirtualBox pkgs for F33?
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VirtualBox pkgs for F33?
Vbox also available in RPM Fusion repo https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/VirtualBox/ Works OK in f33. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make
How to quickly retest packages which listed here https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/needs_br_make_packages.txt? I've tested few locally and in Koji Rawhide scratch, but they are compiled fine. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Packages looking for new maintainers
Hi everyone,
I've decided to orphan packages which i am not using myself and those which
flatpak'ed to date. I'll still try to update them in time for a while until
they found new home.
Email me, comment on Google docs [1] or post here your FAS name and packages
which you want to take.
Package which looking new maintainers:
## GTK apps:
- apostrophe
- drawing
- dynamic-wallpaper-editor
- foliate
- gedit-color-schemes
- gedit-control-your-tabs
- gnome-feeds
- gydl
- howl
- hydrapaper ('kalev' taking care of Fedora flatpak package but still could -
use some help)
- komikku ('lyessaadi' taking care of it as well but still could use some -
help)
- srain
- video-downloader
- gnome-passwordsafe
- gnome-radio
## Qt apps:
- qownnotes
- stacer
## Vala apps:
- cawbird
- coin
- elementary-planner
- ephemeral
- fondo
- meteo
- minder
- notes-up
- nutty
- peek
- quilter
- remotely
- taigo
- taxi
- vgrive
## C:
- xde-menu
## C++:
- polybar
- springlobby
## Python:
- python-argon2-cffi
- python-aspy.yaml
- python-cfgv
- python-cloudscraper
- python-identify
- python-injector
- python-listparser
- python-pure-protobuf
- python-py3nvml
- python-pycryptodome
- python-pykeepass
- python-readability
- python-readability-lxml
- python-rustcfg
- python-rx
- python-siphash
## Golang
- golang-github-anaskhan96-soup
- golang-github-gizak-termui
- golang-github-hajimehoshi-mp3
- golang-github-hajimehoshi-oto
- golang-github-jroimartin-gocui
- golang-github-lithammer-fuzzysearch
- golang-github-lunixbochs-vtclean
- golang-github-mbndr-figlet4go
- golang-github-sqshq-sampler
- golang-github-tomnomnom-xtermcolor
- golang-github-zyedidia-highlight
## Vim plugins:
- awesome-vim-colorschemes
- boxes
- vim-airline
- vim-devicons
- vim-gitgutter
- vim-gv
- vim-nerdtree-git-plugin
- vim-pathogen
- vim-trailing-whitespace
[1] An up-to-date list here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KHaH_DmsaLUGoBFSAagy0PXrUDHgPVKhlimjFIJPe_o/edit?usp=sharing
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
Ah, it all makes sense now.. Mail chatting lagging a little bit, so my previous questions not actual anymore then. :) Thanks for clearing that up. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
Also, if upstream against about packaging, why they added packaging status badge then on their project page? Availability in distros: https://gitlab.com/BuildStream/buildstream They against only Fedora? I don't understand at all then. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
> Also note the buildstream package is mostly useless without bst-external, > which is unfortunately not packaged in Fedora because upstream requested it > not be packaged Michael, this is super weird. I pushed to repos bst-external already. And i never seen before that upstream against it. Quite the opposite, upstream emailed me about this issue and buildstream update in Fedora. The original bug report itself is reported by Javier btw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821245 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
Hi. Anyone know how to contact Mathieu Bridon [FAS name: bochecha]? 'buildstream' package need urgent update. Related bug reports: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868983 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821245 - PR with fix: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/buildstream/pull-request/1 cc: boche...@daitauha.fr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Btrfs by default, the compression option
@Chris, thanks, i did some tests and now we have some numbers. tl;rd the results is pretty satisfying me, even if there no speedup in my case, but there is a lot disk space could be saved and reduce writes. Probably not worth file a bug, but a little bit weird that with zstd:1 still a little bit slower on HDD and on SSD speed equal. --- ! Note: please use monospace font to save formatting. CPU:Quad Core AMD Athlon X4 845 Kernel: 5.7.11-200.fc32.x86_64 (non-debug) btrfs-progs:5.7-4 Scheduler: mq-deadline Mount options: - HDD: rw,relatime,seclabel,space_cache=v2,autodefrag - SSD: rw,relatime,seclabel,compress=lzo,ssd,space_cache=v2 To produce more precise results do some things before: - Disable ZRAM: sudo systemctl stop zram-swap.service - Download all necessary packages before build to exclude time required for downloading package from internet. After that you can run mock with '--offline' option. - Before every benchmark clean-up mock: mock --isolation=simple clean -r fedora-32-x86_64 ## How to reproduce? 1. git clone https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-flashback.git 2. cd gnome-flashback/ 3. spectool -g gnome-flashback.spec 4. mock --isolation=simple -r fedora-32-(uname -m) --rebuild --sources . --spec gnome-flashback.spec --offline ## Results (HDD) ### Compression:lzo Took: 6m53s Processed 42492 files, 24340 regular extents (26282 refs), 24114 inline. Type Perc Disk Usage Uncompressed Referenced TOTAL 63% 992M 1.5G 1.7G none 100% 389M 389M 442M lzo 50% 603M 1.1G 1.3G ### Compression:zstd:1 Took: 7m5s Processed 42492 files, 24232 regular extents (26219 refs), 24861 inline. Type Perc Disk Usage Uncompressed Referenced TOTAL 46% 738M 1.5G 1.7G none 100% 280M 280M 317M zstd35% 458M 1.2G 1.4G ### Compression:zstd:3 Took: 7m8s Processed 42492 files, 24104 regular extents (26059 refs), 24940 inline. Type Perc Disk Usage Uncompressed Referenced TOTAL 45% 707M 1.5G 1.7G none 100% 270M 270M 306M zstd33% 437M 1.2G 1.4G ### Compression:none Took: 7m18s ## Various combinations with aditional tweaks: ### Compression:zstd:1 Addtional mount options:noautodefrag Took: 7m3s ### Compression:zstd:1 Addtional mount options:noatime Took: 7m1s --- ## Results (SSD) ### Compression:lzo Took: 2m26s ### Compression:zstd:1 Took: 2m26s ### Compression:zstd:3 Took: 2m28s ### Compression:zstd:14 Took: 4m9s Processed 42495 files, 25883 regular extents (27868 refs), 25013 inline. Type Perc Disk Usage Uncompressed Referenced TOTAL 42% 673M 1.5G 1.7G none 100% 272M 272M 310M zstd30% 401M 1.2G 1.4G ### Compression:none Took: 2m24s ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Btrfs by default, the compression option
I am experimenting now with various compression in Fedora and noticed slowdowns with compression only for mock at this moment. On 4-core CPU building in mock with zstd:1 on HDD is slower. Also 'autodefrag' and 'space_cache=v2' options enabled on HDD. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The case of LTO when produced enlarged binaries
Hi. In rare cases building packages with LTO producing binaries or libraries which have bigger size then if they have built without LTO. For example 'kitty' package: * with LTO: - koji task https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47762998 1.79 MB glfw-wayland.so 1.99 MB glfw-x11.so 4.78 MB fast_data_types.so 8.56 MB total * no LTO - koji https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47769854 1.65 MB glfw-wayland.so 1.84 MB glfw-x11.so 4.51 MB fast_data_types.so 8.00 MB total Difference is 7%. What we should do in such case? Should we disable LTO for such packages? Or there is still could be gains from faster code execution speed? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants
BTRFS WA is ~8 times higher than ext4. Average profit from compression about 50% max. Not that hard arithmetic. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing
Yay, thanks a lot! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard available for testing
It's awesome, but for some reason my profile not showing here. Just gray background. :( https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/atim ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: games group in comps
> Does anyone know why they are all optional there? Don't know why they are optional but most packages from this list will not run or retired already. I want to suggest add game launchers here which already packaged in Fedora: - minigalaxy - gamehub - legendary - lutris ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
You need @fmuellner i suppose. :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Candidate RC-1.5 Available Now!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_32_RC_1.5_Summary#Downloads ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning package procedure. (icewm, spring, springlobby)
LGTM. Thank you! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning package procedure. (icewm, spring, springlobby)
Hello. Gilboa, i would like to continue maintaining IceWM. And i interesting in 'springlobby' package. Please add me as co-maintainer. FAS: atim. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32: System hangs when using mock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754807 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Koji is failing on s390x
> But it might be my fault. No, i have the same issue with different packages at this time as well. But now it's fine. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Non-responsive maintainer gilboa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818461 CC: gilb...@gmail.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Need help from Provenpackager
Thank you! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Need help from Provenpackager
Hello! Lutris broken completely on F32 and many users asking what happens with package. Lutris always up to day in Fedora and i personally doesn't have any issues with it or all this time until this, but seems like this time ' bunnyapocalypse' just busy [1] to fix it and merge my PR [2]. Can we merge PR and build it for F32? It's already tested and it works. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lutris/pull-request/1#comment-36580 [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lutris/pull-request/2 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
Have many dupes which was already reported there, so selectively: Problem 4: problem with installed package minetest-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64 - package minetest-5.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - minetest-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 6: package python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 requires python3-libs(x86-64) = 3.7.6-2.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - package ulauncher-5.6.1-4.fc31.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-libs-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package ulauncher-5.6.1-4.fc31.noarch Problem 7: package cheese-2:3.34.0-3.fc32.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-3.35.91-1.fc32.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64 - problem with installed package cheese-2:3.34.0-1.fc31.x86_64 - package gnome-panel-3.34.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.18()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cheese-2:3.34.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-panel-3.34.1-3.fc31.x86_64 Problem 8: cannot install both gnome-desktop3-3.35.91-1.fc32.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64 - package evince-3.35.92-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-panel-3.34.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.18()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package evince-3.34.2-1.fc31.x86_64 - package gnome-applets-1:3.34.0-2.fc31.x86_64 requires gnome-panel >= 3.24.1, but none of the providers can be installed - evince-3.34.2-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-applets-1:3.34.0-2.fc31.x86_64 Problem 9: cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.2-2.fc32.x86_64 and jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 - package vtk-8.2.0-12.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package minetest-server-5.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package vtk-8.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64 - problem with installed package minetest-server-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64 - vtk-8.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - minetest-server-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Filed a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811103 BTW already upgraded successfully form F31 to F32. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to add i686 package availabe for download on x86_64 system?
Filed a bug. @Kamil, many thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
How to add i686 package availabe for download on x86_64 system?
Hello everyone. Previously, IIRC when we add new package for F31 the i686 version of package available for download on x86_64 systems but now there is no 'mangohud-0.2.0-11.fc31.i686` [1] if you try to install it. We need to manually specify somewhere that some app/lib should available in multilib? [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mangohud ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: infrastructure problem: koji and bodhi responding very slow / dl with 80kb/s
Same here. I am waiting several minutes for every my action. This is very unproductive. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [security] only latest Qt 5.14.1 has all fixes
Request 768036 (accepted) Qt 5.14.1 - untested, as usual https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/768036 That is all we need to know about how packages updating in openSUSE or something else? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Copr Build System - review of 2019 and vote for features in 2020
This is awesome. Also I've been dreaming for a long time to simplified and integrated this chain: Playing with package in Copr → Review Request package from Copr and import it to RHBZ in one click. This could save a lot of time and make easier maintainers life. SUSE already did something like that in OBS. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
vokoscreenNG packaged now. Nice to have such app available in official repos. F31: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a489a2436a F30: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-aa27dbce21 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal (late): Enable EarlyOOM
Seems like this bug: **Kills multiple processes at once** https://github.com/rfjakob/earlyoom/issues/121 but according to github it's fixed now. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (incl. wine, dosbox, nextcloud, owncloud)
WINE worries me a lot. Why previous maintainer dropped it? I never have issues with WINE package and it was always up to day. Hope someone will save package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
I did draft package of vokoscreenNG if someone interesting RR: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787578 Works without ffmpeg. Thanks for tip @Neal. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Status of bodhi
Seems like this issue https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8477 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
No prob. :) But i didn't received any notification so this could be upsetting a little bit if package was retired. Community barely fixed crash dump recently [1] and Fedora users before often write me on email with various questions, so this makes me believe that app is not useless and users interesting in it. And as for Recommends in spec file yes, this my bad and this not allowed but i believed that soon this will be legal [2]. > Indeed, a more descriptive error > would be nice (and, maybe, viewable in a window message, not only from CLI). Adding 'gnome-shell' as hard dependency could be easiest way to fix but i believe we don't want this because this install many gnome packages so let's try move in this direction [3] until we come up with something better. [1] https://github.com/phw/peek/issues/419 [2] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/914#comment-607823 [3] https://github.com/phw/peek/issues/539 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
Perhaps OP should not sneaky asking for retiring functional package? Maybe he should instead file a bug and ask maintainer first about this and discuss with it? I might have miss this thread and didn't even notice it. TBH all this just demotivating from packaging something at all. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
> You started the drama by picking on cinnamon! Me started drama? Cinnamon mentioned by original poster and he even post a link on github issue where title is: 'Peek fails to start in Cinnamon on Fedora 30' https://github.com/phw/peek/issues/485 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
> Please prevent your useless app from displaying in cinnamon menu, I'm sure > Mate, XFCE > and LXDE would also like it removed from their menus as well. What is alternative to Peek? OBS Studio is totally different beast. OBS more advanced, using Qt framework, available only in RPM Fusion repo. Users asked many time about this Peek and why it is not available in repo and they really like it because of their simplicity and ease to use. Also this whole issue is more suitable for regular bug report, not for such drama in mailing list and salt. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
> Then OnlyShowIN=Gnome in the desktop file seems like a possible > solution. @Kevin, i'll do shortly. Also i filed a bug in upstream https://github.com/phw/peek/issues/539 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
> "All package dependencies (build-time or runtime, regular, weak or otherwise) > MUST ALWAYS be satisfiable within the official Fedora repositories." > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/WeakDependencies/ > "As with regular dependencies, weak dependencies MUST be satisfiable > within the official Fedora repositories." > Also, the gstreamer1-plugins-ugly Recommends needs removed along with > ffmpeg. Removed 'gstreamer1-plugins-ugly' and 'ffpmeg' as weak deps, just commented them as tip. > Failing that perhaps adjust the desktop file to add a > But does it work only in Wayland sessions? Works on both Xorg and Wayland session. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
> The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it > doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not > distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion): Why we should drop such useful app just because it doesn't work on Cinnamon? It works on GNOME without ffpmeg and rpm fusion repo, see screenshot [1]. > The peek specfile contains a `Recommends: ffmpeg >= 3`, which is rather > confusing... I think this package should never have passed the review > process! It should really stay in rpmfusion repository. OK, this should been fixed. There was a proposal for this but it not passed https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/914 > Is this something allowed? Should I file a ticket against the package or > against fedora-infra to suggest its retirement? App works on GNOME. I can add hard dependency: gnome-shell in this case if you think this is better rather then installing ffmpeg. [1] https://i.imgur.com/V5rSBiP.png ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall
For this who can't change their default zone in firewall after installing Fedora Workstation completely block all ports may result in worse things, like completely turn off firewall, because they can't run their online video games for example and some one always advised them to do this. We remember well this with SELinux and we still can find such advised to disable it in internet. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall
Great point. Maybe in perfect world such services as VNC should have default port <1024. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall
> completely disabled by default (opened all ports 1025-65535) on Fedora > Workstation? Not completely. Completely when from 1 to 65535. :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations
BFQ scheduler help a lot with this issue. Using it on Fedora since 4.19 kernel. Also there was previous discussion about make it default for Workstation https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ker...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I2OZWDD4QCDYUXJ5NHYTMGNAB4KLJN2K/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RANT: compton-ng…
> Review processes exist for a reason. Review processes is one of the best thing in Fedora and i believe this helps with packaging quality overall. The problem is no one literally wanted to do this in Fedora since 99% of packages reviewing one person which i mentioned already before there. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RANT: compton-ng…
> I see plenty of names in Bugzilla doing package reviews. If you’ve > waited a long time, this list is one place to ask for them (review > swaps for extra points). This guy probably didn't know about that since he still trying to push it since 2014 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161834 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517451 And this is original dev of this app. GJ. > Have you even attempted getting in touch with the original author? Have > you attempted proposing switching the upstream of the existing package? > Lots of things to do beforehand, but I can’t see any communication to > have happened. No, and not even because i have previous experience with non-responsive maintainer and lesson learned of some other people who struggle with this process. And not even because maintainer of old compton doesn't exist anymore and this is obvious - https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/axeld (see Activity) and his second packages already maintained by Till Maas for a long time. Because i didn't wanted overwrite old compton, i mistakenly put 'obsoletes' instead of 'conflicts'. Also that's why non responsive maintainer process **finally** changed now and now we need only 1 week to wait https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-docs/pull-request/15 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RANT: compton-ng…
Fixed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compton-ng/blob/master/f/compton-ng.spec > How did it pass review? Because no one reviewing packages in Fedora. Only one person reviewing and help witch packaging - eclipseo. Many thanks to him. Also no one want to wait for month+ and pinging non existent maintainer. Keep more like that and more people will continue switch to SUSE, Arch, whatever where no such bureaucracy and where no terrible tooling from 1990s like RHBZ for reviewing process. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Unresponsive maintainer - springlobby package
Hi. Bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725520 No activity for years https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/gilboa Package is completely broken and wont even install. PR with fix https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/springlobby/pull-request/2 If there is no maintainer i wish to take this orphaned package if this possible. --- Also this package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726441 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
