Re: Comp groups
* Michal Josef Spacek [15/05/2024 10:34] : > > I am for adding of perl-App-cpanminus . Added. > The question is if perl-web is for development or production? > I am for switch from perl to perl-interpreter if it's for production. When in doubt, assume production. I have replaced perl with perl-interpreter. This led to https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/966 . As one would expect, this failed the CI tests and I filed https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/967 to fix these. Both of these have been merged. Emmanuel -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Comp groups
Hello, all. I've recently learnt that there are two perl-related groups in comps (which allows you to install groups of rpms with the syntax "dnf group install ". These groups are perl and perl-web. They are defined as follows: Group: Perl Development Description: Support for developing programs in the Perl programming language. Mandatory Packages: perl Default Packages: git-cpan-patch perl-CPAN-Uploader perltidy Optional Packages: cpanspec perl-Task-Catalyst vim-perl-support Group: Perl for Web Description: Basic Perl web application support. Mandatory Packages: ImageMagick-perl mod_perl perl perl-App-cpanminus perl-CPAN perl-CPANPLUS perl-DBD-MySQL perl-DBD-SQLite perl-MongoDB Both of these require a pretty significant overhaul, IMHO. Unless someone has any objections, I will file a PR on the fedora-comps repo replacing the contents of the perl group with the following: Mandatory Packages: perl Default Packages: git-cpan-patch perl-CPAN-Uploader perl-Data-Printer perl-Devel-Confess perl-Devel-NYTProf perl-Dist-Zilla perl-Module-Build-Tiny perl-Perl-Critic perl-Pod-Readme perl-Software-License perltidy Optional Packages: cpanspec perl-Code-TidyAll perl-Modern-Perl vim-perl-support Another commit will make perl-web the following group: Mandatory Packages: perl Default Packages: perl-CGI-Formbuilder perl-HTML-FormHandler perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect perl-MIME-Types perl-Plack perl-XML-Atom perl-XML-RSS Optional Packages: perl-Attean perl-Dancer2 perl-Mojolicious perl-Task-Catalyst perl-Template Thoughts? Suggestions? Emmanuel -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unresponsive packagers: suanand and vponcova
* Sundeep Anand [07/05/2024 05:50] : > > (not sure how to update email at bugzilla.redhat.com) Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=account and fill in the 'New email address' field. Emmanuel -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst] PR #1: Stop building for 32-bit x86
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Task-Catalyst` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Stop building for 32-bit x86 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst/pull-request/1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [08/04/2024 09:02] : > > Well, you and Kevin see "salami tactics" (whatever that may be), FTR, I have no idea what "salami tactics" is. > while I see normal engineering practice: some new idea is hatched, > it's implemented and used narrowly, them it's applied by default > and more widely, and possibly at the end previous methods are > deprecated. This sounds acceptable but is not at all how these changes are proposed. An proposal is made, stating explicity that it will be opt-in or target a subset of the target audience and never even suggesting that the scope might one day be expanded. It is accepted based on that premise and, after a while, changes are made to make the change default or opt-out, leaving the people who would not have accepted it had they known they would be forced to use it with no recourse. This is unfriendly (thus violating one of Fedora's core principles) at best and deceitful at worst. > The alternative would be to have "grand plans" where we decide that > some technology will be used by default and mandatory before we deploy > it widely and get feedback. Another alternative would be not lie to the target audience by initially claiming that the change is opt-in. Yet another alternative would be to not go back on this claim. > I think that if you think this through, you'll realize that the > "salami tactic" is quite reasonable. I don't but wish to thank you for the condescending tone nonetheless. Emmanuel -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [07/04/2024 15:56] : > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 05:47:57PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > > This doesn't solve the problem you have so that's a no-go as well. > > In what way doesn't it solve the problem? In your original post, you stated "When working with other packages, I'll forget to update the Relase and/or %changelog." This will not go away if packages are allowed to opt-out. > The opt-out with 'norpmautospec' would solve 1 and 2. I've noticed a trend in proposed changes in the way Fedora works. They start off as as things packagers will not have to use if they do not want to and, over time, become default/forced (Matrix vs IRC, Discourse, ...). Perhaps it's time to discuss imposing financial and/or legal penalties when the opt-in nature of the change goes away. Emmanuel -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [07/04/2024 15:35] : > > OK, so if there was an opt-out, [...] This doesn't solve the problem you have so that's a no-go as well. Emmanuel -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Sys-CPU] PR #3: Add support for riscv64
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Add support for riscv64` that you are following: `` @mspacek Let's keep it simple and just put the patch in the distribution's RT queue. * Other distributions will know to look for it there * The maintainer will know to look for downstream patches there * Future maintainers will know to look there. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-CPU/pull-request/3 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Sys-CPU] PR #3: Add support for riscv64
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Sys-CPU` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Add support for riscv64 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-CPU/pull-request/3 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-IO-Async] PR #1: Fix provided files
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-Async` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Fix provided files `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Async/pull-request/1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Sys-CPU] PR #3: Add support for riscv64
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Add support for riscv64` that you are following: `` While the upstream repo hasn't seen activity in a while, it is labelled "Maintenance Only" and the maintainer is still active on Github. @davidlt, would you be willing to submit a PR to the upstream repo? Failing that, would it be ok if I do it for you (crediting you for the patch, of course)? `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-CPU/pull-request/3 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [Pierre-Yves Chibon] Unresponsive packagers: nknazeko
* Vit Mojzis [11/02/2024 22:44] : > >Do I understand correctly that she just needs > to create a new BZ account using the email address in FAS? I suspect changing the email linked to her existing BZ account to match the one in FAS will suffice. Emmanuel -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
License change for perl-Net-DHCP
Hello, all. The license tag on perl-Net-DHCP has been corrected from: GPL+ or Artistic to MIT Regards, Emmanuel -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-GnuPG-Interface] PR #1: Add stdin handler to _version sub
eseyman closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-GnuPG-Interface` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Add stdin handler to _version sub `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-GnuPG-Interface/pull-request/1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-GnuPG-Interface] PR #1: Add stdin handler to _version sub
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Add stdin handler to _version sub` that you are following: `` Sadly, this PR escaped my notice. I have merged another PR on this package which contains this fix + other things. @ignatenkobrain, thank you for your contribution. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-GnuPG-Interface/pull-request/1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-GnuPG-Interface] PR #2: Update to 1.04 + add stdin handler to _version sub
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-GnuPG-Interface` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update to 1.04 + add stdin handler to _version sub `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-GnuPG-Interface/pull-request/2 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Network rules to use mock on RHEL8
Hello, all. Wanting to promote RPM packages, I'm trying to use mock on an RHEL8 VM that does not have unrestricted access to the internet. This fails miserably, as you would expect it to. I've already established that I need access to: * registry.access.redhat.com on port 443 * cdn.redhat.com on port 443 Is there anything else I need to ask? Opening ports on internal VMs is a lengthy process and I would really appreciate any help here. Regards, Emmanuel -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: The new Change discussion process is painful
* Vít Ondruch [14/09/2023 10:50] : > > Apart from documentation, where this was announced? On Discourse? Because I > don't remember any email about this change. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z2T5WKUTHNLS2SVCVAWNYYRIBK3NGF32/ Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-HTML-Form] PR #1: Update Source0 URL so it can be downloaded
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Update Source0 URL so it can be downloaded` that you are following: `` Thank you for the PR, Yaroslav. It has been merged and a new package is being built right now. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Form/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-HTML-Form] PR #1: Update Source0 URL so it can be downloaded
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Form` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Update Source0 URL so it can be downloaded `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Form/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: Multimedia SIG
* Philip Wyett [19/06/2023 22:20] : > > Private mailing list? No part of this project should have private anything > IMHO. Bug reports can explain security flaws and lead to exploits. They can also contain confidentiel information. I would suggest a private ml dedicated to bugs and a public one for everything else, IMHO. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/bugzilla] PR #3: remove ifdef's for fedora as they don't make any sense
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `bugzilla` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` remove ifdef's for fedora as they don't make any sense `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bugzilla/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/bugzilla] PR #3: remove ifdef's for fedora as they don't make any sense
The pull-request: `remove ifdef's for fedora as they don't make any sense` of project: `bugzilla` has been assigned to `eseyman` by eseyman. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bugzilla/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Mail-DKIM] PR #3: Adding fmf plan and gating.yaml
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Mail-DKIM` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Adding fmf plan and gating.yaml `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mail-DKIM/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Place to write something up
* Todd Zullinger [03/05/2023 23:33] : > > > Kind of a random thing, but... I would like to write up how to use GRUB2 > > to do BIOS-PXE+UEFI-PXE+UEFI-HTTP boot. I asked for the Fedora packages > > to include the needed PXE bit, and it does now (thanks!), so I feel I > > owe a good explanation on how to use it. :) Note that we have related pages in the Server SIG documentation, some of which hasn't been written yet. https://docs.stg.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/administration/dnsmasq/ https://docs.stg.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/administration/dnsmasq-pxe-boot/ https://docs.stg.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/administration/tftp/ Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Requirements from upstream
Hey, folks. I'm at the Perl Toolkit Summit and have being approched by Salve Nilsen to talk about improvements to the metadata attached to CPAN modules. He wants to improve the PAUSE infrastructure as well as the tooling for CPAN authors and would really appreciate the input of CPAN's downstreams (which we are one of). If you have an opinion, please sound off ASAP. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new
* Kevin P. Fleming [21/04/2023 10:03] : > > lots of people say "I decide > what to read based on what I see in my email client", but when the subject > of the emails doesn't reflect their contents, that's a losing proposition. I agree there's a huge lack of netiquette in Fedora's mailing lists, with wholesale quoting, top-posting, subjects not being updated, etc but changing mediums seems far more expensive than asking people to post emails that are easier to read. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new
* Fulko Hew [20/04/2023 21:18] : > > Can you say the same for Discourse? I've tried using Fedora Discussions and its email notifications (both the text and html versions) leave a lot to be desired. So much so that I never actually go on to read the discussions. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Looking to orphan perl-Net-TELNET
* Stephen Smoogen [14/04/2023 12:20] : > > I would like someone else to take over this package and will either add > someone or orphan this in the coming 2 weeks. I will gladly take it (fas name: eseyman). Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Looking to orphan perl-Net-TELNET
* Stephen Smoogen [14/04/2023 12:20] : > > I would like someone else to take over this package and will either add > someone or orphan this in the coming 2 weeks. I will gladly take it (fas name: eseyman). Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Invitation to the Perl Toolchain Summit 2023 in Lyon
Apologies, I'm sending this way too late... Since 2008, the Perl Toolchain Summit (previousy known as the Perl QA Hackathon) gathers the key developers working on the Perl toolchain every year (with a hiatus in 2020-2022) to discuss and improve the Perl toolchain. https://blogs.perl.org/users/book/2023/01/the-perl-toolchain-summit-is-back-in-2023.html I'm sure that there will be room at the Summit to discuss (and possibly hack on) anything related to Perl's integration to the Fedora ecosystem. So, if you're able to make it to Lyon, France, from Thursday April 27 to Sunday April 30, we'ld love to see you therre. Emmanuel Seyman ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Mo] PR #1: Split Mouse/Moose and Golf parts to separate packages
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Mo` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Split Mouse/Moose and Golf parts to separate packages `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mo/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
* Miro Hrončok [19/12/2022 16:43] : > > perl-Mail-Procmailorphan 0 weeks ago Taken. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
* Miro Hrončok [19/12/2022 16:43] : > > perl-Mail-Procmailorphan 0 weeks ago Taken. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Review Request: ImageMagick7
* Neal Gompa [04/12/2022 22:26] : > > Smooge challenged me earlier in this conversation to provide patches > and effort, and I'm doing just that. Thank you for doing this, btw. Over the weekend, this became a discussion where none of the participants seemed to be listening to the others and it became somewhat painful to read. It's nice to see something constructive come out of it. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
* Chuck Anderson [05/12/2022 13:06] : > > Would you lke to take perl-Term-ShellUI as well? It is a dependency > of kpcli which requires perl-File-KeePass. Otherwise I'm happy to > take it. Taken as well. Co-maintainers are welcome. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
* Miro Hrončok [05/12/2022 12:36] : > > perl-App-PFT orphan 1 weeks ago > perl-File-KeePass cra, echevemaster, orphan, 0 weeks ago > xavierb > perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authenorphan 1 weeks ago > perl-Library-CallNumber-LCorphan 1 weeks ago > perl-PFT orphan 1 weeks ago > perl-Pod-PseudoPodorphan 1 weeks ago > perl-Pod-PseudoPod-LaTeX orphan 1 weeks ago > perl-Proc-PID-Fileorphan 1 weeks ago > perl-WWW-xkcd orphan 0 weeks ago I have taken the above packages. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
* Miro Hrončok [26/09/2022 11:27] : > > perl-PatchReader orphan 1 weeks ago I have taken this since Bugzilla requires it, last time I checked. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
* Miro Hrončok [26/09/2022 11:27] : > > perl-PatchReader orphan 1 weeks ago I have taken this since Bugzilla requires it, last time I checked. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown] PR #1: Remove Perl(HTML::Tidy) after removing from Fedora
eseyman closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Text-MultiMarkdown` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Remove Perl(HTML::Tidy) after removing from Fedora `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown] PR #1: Remove Perl(HTML::Tidy) after removing from Fedora
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Remove Perl(HTML::Tidy) after removing from Fedora` that you are following: `` Thank you for you pull request, Michal. I decided to instead cherry-pick the commit that already existed in the rawhide and f37 branches to make things more consistent. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora
* Lukas Javorsky [22/07/2022 14:24] : > > perl-HTML-Template-Pro I'll build against pcre2 in the coming days (probably this weekend). Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Non Responsive maintainer
* Ivan Chavero [04/07/2022 15:09] : > > I've been trying to contact the current nextcloud package maintainer > because there's a blocker bug [1]. Folks, when you're asking us if anyone knows how to contact the maintainer of a given package, you might want to consider actually giving us his name (both real and FAS). Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Maintainer Change
* Steve Dickson [19/05/2022 14:21] : > > How is this done these days? The package is first orphaned then claimed by the new maintainer. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Orphaning_Process/#claiming_ownership_of_an_orphaned_package Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: The future of FMN (Fedora Messaging Notifications)
* Aurelien Bompard [14/05/2022 09:39] : > > Please check it out if you're interested, it has an analysis of the existing > system and requirements for the next. > And the best time for feedback is now, before the work actually starts :-) One thing I've always wanted is to be able to have a daily/weekly/monthly email summary of all my notifications instead of getting one email for each notification. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Do we have any policy for disabling inactive users
* Stephen Snow [16/02/2022 11:21] : > > Perhaps the automation should do > just that, demote primary packager (from owner to co-maintainer) if > inactive for over a year and promote the main supporter for the year to > be the owner from co-maintainer. Can you define "main supporter"? Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Text-Markdown] PR #1: Improvements to the spec file
eseyman opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Text-Markdown` that you are following: `` Improvements to the spec file `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-Markdown/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
* Jens-Ulrik Petersen [08/02/2022 17:21] : > > Anyone interested in keeping 'ikiwiki' and 'perl-Text-Markdown' around? perl-Text-Markdown has a BR on perl-HTML-Tidy but doesn't do anything with it. I'll submit a PR to remove it (and improve other things in that spec file). Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaning perl-MouseX-App-Cmd and perl-HTML-Tidy
Hello, folks. I've just orphaned two packages, perl-MouseX-App-Cmd and perl-HTML-Tidy. perl-MouseX-App-Cmd has been FTBFS for some time and there is no upstream to speak of. perl-HTML-Tidy's upstream has also stopped work on it. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MouseX-App-Cmd https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Tidy Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaning perl-MouseX-App-Cmd and perl-HTML-Tidy
Hello, folks. I've just orphaned two packages, perl-MouseX-App-Cmd and perl-HTML-Tidy. perl-MouseX-App-Cmd has been FTBFS for some time and there is no upstream to speak of. perl-HTML-Tidy's upstream has also stopped work on it. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MouseX-App-Cmd https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Tidy Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35
* Alain Vigne [02/02/2022 16:07] :
>
> Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1]
> is not building in mock ?
This fails with the following message:
RPM build errors:
error: File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib64/libfungw_mujs.*
error: File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib/puplug/fungw_mujs.*
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib64/libfungw_mujs.*
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib/puplug/fungw_mujs.*
This is because the spec file contains the following stanza:
%files-n %{libmujs}
%{_libdir}/%{name}_mujs.*
%{_usr}/lib/puplug/%{srcname}_mujs.*
but the instructions of the %install part of the spec don't result in
these files being created. So the creation of the rpm fails.
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Text-RecordParser] PR #1: Split tools into a subpackage
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Text-RecordParser` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Split tools into a subpackage `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Text-RecordParser/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: I quit packaging
* Volker Fröhlich [12/12/2021 23:03] : > > All of my packages are up for grabs. For the curious, volter maintains the following packages: * cptutils * dans-gdal-scripts * e00compr * esniper * freexl * gdal * grass * libgeotiff * librasterlite2 * libspatialite * mingw-polyclipping * polyclipping * pyshp * python-OWSLib * python-phyghtmap * python-Rtree * qextserialport * qgis * readosm * routino * saga * snmptt * spatialindex * spatialite-tools * xerces-c * zabbix Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?
* Michel Alexandre Salim [30/11/2021 15:22] : > > At the risk of straying off-topic, an approach I really like (which is > in the spirit of Git being distributed) is to use an open source forge > primarily, with GitHub only as backup. How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting PR and issues to the Github mirror where they cannot be applied/fixed? Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F36 Change: OpenLDAP 2.5 (System-Wide Change proposal)
* Ben Cotton [19/10/2021 12:08] : > > == Benefit to Fedora == > Brings a stable and up-to-date version of OpenLDAP according to > upsteam release. OpenLDAP 2.4 will be out of support as soon as > OpenLDAP 2.6 is released which is planned for this year. Fedora will > be prepared for such a step. Since this was written, the OpenLDAP Project has released OpenLDAP 2.6: https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-annou...@openldap.org/thread/IHS5V46H6NFNFUERMC6AWMPHTWRVNLFA/ Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora Java: The Death of Two SIGs
* Peter Boy [29/09/2021 23:29] : > > Any ideas to get it started to fly? The first step should be to empty the group in FAS and remove its bugzilla account from component ownership in Bugzilla (I happen to think that this is not a good idea in general but it's even worse when the group has no active members). The second step should be to document the current state of affairs in the wiki along with the steps that someone would need to go through to revive the group for another try. We could the point anyone who wants to contribute to that page and get out of their way while they fix things. As an aside, I'm somewhat surprised that the only commit on the Java SIG's main wiki page in nearly 4 years is one that simply fixes a spelling mistake. This doesn't jive with the amount of discussion we've had on this list nor does it match the amount of work that people claim to have done on the stack in recent times. I would encourage people who want to restart the SIG to reach out to other distributions and enquire as to how they handle their Java stack. While I'm as much into Fedora exceptionalism as any other packager, I'm certain that other distributions have the same problems packaging Java that we do. At worst, doing this would give us insight into how the stack can be kept in working condition and, at best, we could gain new contributers. On that topic, I've just read an interview of Nicolas Lécureuil, the president of the Mageia board, in which he says that Mageia's Java stack is based on Fedora's and that he interacts with Fedora's Java team (leading me to wonder who exactly he is interacting with given Fabio's description of the SIG's activity in the opening mail of this thread). Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: perl-Data-Properties License change
* Emmanuel Seyman [25/07/2021 22:42] : > > > Sometime over the coming week, I'm going to update the > perl-Data-Properties package from the current 0.02 to 1.05. > Among other changes, the license changes from ASL 2.0 to the Perl > license (GPL+ or Artistic). Upstream has re-released 0.02 with the version number 1.06 so, in a few days, the changes in the 1.05 version (including the license change) will be reverted. Sorry for the noise, folks. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: perl-Data-Properties License change
* Emmanuel Seyman [25/07/2021 22:42] : > > > Sometime over the coming week, I'm going to update the > perl-Data-Properties package from the current 0.02 to 1.05. > Among other changes, the license changes from ASL 2.0 to the Perl > license (GPL+ or Artistic). Upstream has re-released 0.02 with the version number 1.06 so, in a few days, the changes in the 1.05 version (including the license change) will be reverted. Sorry for the noise, folks. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission (dovecot-fts-xapian)
* Ankur Sinha [20/08/2021 12:27] : > > I totally understand the point of the system we have in place, but I do > see how it doesn't quite address the case of upstream developers or > individuals who'd just like to maintain their few packages. To be fair, the system does address the case of the upstream developers: it is recommended that they co-maintain the packages of their software but leave ownership of the packages to experienced packagers. This has been explained to Joan a number of times. > So, here, I'd rather have Joan, who is the developer and has been > actively engaging with the community to get the package included > (including going through the review), and so who I'd trust to look after > their package, on the team than not. The small issue I have is that, while Joan claims to want to become a packager in the mails he sends to the devel list@, he a) is very secretive about what steps he has taken to seek out a sponsor and b) has said in the review bug that he has no intentions of following the guidelines. Let's hope this dichotomy gets resolved sooner than later. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: The Death of Java (packages)
* Stephen Snow [11/08/2021 12:08] : > > > > Even tried the review route, which is also beset with arbitrary > > > obstacles. > > > Wasn't able to download the build via the link provided. ??? Building a package with mock will create the build in /var/lib/mock/... No download should be required. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: The Death of Java (packages)
* Stephen Snow [11/08/2021 11:37] : > > I feel the frustration you are expressing, and would like to help, nut > apparently I don't meet the Fedora Packaging standards. I'm curious as to what happened... > Even tried the review route, which is also beset with arbitrary obstacles. Again, what happened? Can you point us to those reviews? > I will keep trying because that is in my nature, but making joining the > packaging group(s) a bit more open would go a long way to garnering more > packagers IMO. What changes to the process would you like to see made? Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
perl-Data-Properties License change
Hello, folks. Sometime over the coming week, I'm going to update the perl-Data-Properties package from the current 0.02 to 1.05. Among other changes, the license changes from ASL 2.0 to the Perl license (GPL+ or Artistic). Please holler if this creates a problem for you. Regards, Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
perl-Data-Properties License change
Hello, folks. Sometime over the coming week, I'm going to update the perl-Data-Properties package from the current 0.02 to 1.05. Among other changes, the license changes from ASL 2.0 to the Perl license (GPL+ or Artistic). Please holler if this creates a problem for you. Regards, Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Why so long for EPEL-8?
* Björn Persson [19/07/2021 13:05] : > > but if I could be notified > about updates of certain packages I'm interested in, then I could > choose to test those if I'm not too busy at the time. I don't know a > convenient way to do that, so I end up installing updates when they > show up in the updates repository. There are a number of options that I can see: 1) Bodhi has an RSS feed that you can apply filters to. I'm not sure if you can select packages you want to follow, though. 2) You can sign up as co-maintainer of the package on the EPEL branches. This will give you email notifications on pretty much anything that happens on those branches. 3) Bugzilla generates RSS feeds for virtually any list. You can follow bug activity via those. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
* Joan Moreau via devel [26/06/2021 19:36] : > > What is next ? The answer is the same one you were given two months ago. You need to seek out a sponsor: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Perl 5.34 upgrade
* Jitka Plesnikova [26/05/2021 08:52] : > > I rebuilt all updated packages with new Perl. Thank you for doing this, Jikta. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Plack] PR #1: Move Apache handler ro sub-packages
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Plack` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Move Apache handler ro sub-packages `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: [rpms/perl-Plack] PR #1: Move Apache handler ro sub-packages
* Ralf Corsepius [11/05/2021 07:25] : > > Actually, I am surprized and irritated about not having been informed > beforehand nor having been CC:-ed by any means. Strange, I got an email and I supposed you had too. > I can't deny thinking, Fedoras infrastructure has derailed into an unusable, > bureaucratic mess. > > No idea. Firstly I'd have to have look into this. Unfortunately, I probably > will not have any time available for Fedora throughout the next couple of > weeks.. Given that the release of Perl 5.34 is in a few days, waiting a number of weeks sounds bureaucratic to the extreme. I will merge this later today so the the rebase to 5.34 can happen. We can always revert any number of these commits or improve them further. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Plack] PR #1: Move Apache handler ro sub-packages
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro sub-packages` that you are following: `` Thank you for this PR, Jikta. I've been meaning to work on this since the next version of Bugzilla will require PSGI and having handlers in their own subpackages makes things simpler. Ralf, any input before I merge this? `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-Plack] PR #1: Move Apache handler ro sub-packages
The pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro sub-packages` of project: `perl-Plack` has been assigned to `eseyman` by eseyman. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
* Joan Moreau via devel [01/05/2021 09:21] : > > 1 - Those who have a great piece of software, simply willing to make it > available to the large public. In such case, there should be only quality > barrier of the package + rules of duration (i.e. added packages are not kept > in Fedora if not maintained for instance once a year) I suspect having packages being removed after a year is going to make for a poor user experience. If an upstream author wants his software in Fedora, I would recommend one of two solutions: a) use a COPR repository and publish instructions on enabling the repo b) find an existing maintainer to do the heavy lifting and sign on as a co-maintainer to deal with upstream-related issues. The primary maintainer will then only have to deal with Fedora-related issues. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
* Joan Moreau via devel [30/04/2021 14:16] : > > 1 - How to get to the "packager" group ou forum or else ? We use FAS (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/eseyman/) to manage Fedora developer accounts. FAS has the notion of groups, one of which is the packager group (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/packager/). People can added in this group once they are sponsored in by somebody with "sponsor" status. > 2 - What does it mean to "block the FE-NEEDSPONSOR [1] tracking bug" ? Bugzilla bugs can block and depend on other bugs. To block on the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug means to block on bug #177841 (which has the alias FE-NEEDSPONSOR) > So far, I have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340 This bug blocks FE-NEEDSPONSOR so there is noting more to do on this front. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
* Joan Moreau [27/04/2021 20:51] :
>
> Hi Emmanuel
>
> I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere
>
> Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session")
That looks like a recurring kerberos issue.
https://pagure.io/koji/issue/2063
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7522
You probably want to contact releng to help solve this.
> I tried "fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian" -> Lead some
> error ("fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian")
Why is this package exempt from the review process?
> I filed a "bug" on redhat :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
>
> And now, how to get things moving ?
You need to seek out a sponsor:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
> Isnt' there just a repo where to push the RPM ? (similar to Arch)
There is COPR but I suspect this is reserved to Fedora packagers so you
will still need to be sponsored.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Copr
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: The Death of Java (packages)
* Fabio Valentini [26/04/2021 21:19] : > > I am not using any of > them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and > don't get me started on the horrid Java ecosystem. Thank you for all the work you've done, Fabio. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
* Joan Moreau via devel [24/04/2021 18:49] : > > It looks overwhelmingly complicated. Out of curiosity, which part of the process looks complicated. Perhaps we can simplify it. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: WARNING: The script foo is installed $HOME/.local/bin which is not on PATH
* Sérgio Basto [18/04/2021 12:57] : > > Hi, > > $HOME/.local/bin which is not on PATH , $HOME/bin is in PATH, am I > missing something ? /etc/skel/.bashrc has contained the following: # User specific environment if ! [[ "$PATH" =~ "$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin:" ]] then PATH="$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin:$PATH" fi export PATH for years and years now. If $HOME/.local/bin is not in your path, something is wrong with your configuration. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Retiring from Perl maintenance
* Petr Pisar [09/04/2021 18:04] : > > Nevertheless, if you are interested to any of them, don't hesitate and contact > me and I will reassign them to you. I will gladly take ownership of the following: * perl-CGI-FastTemplate * perl-CGI-FormBuilder * perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie * perl-HTML-Escape * perl-HTML-FormatExternal * perl-HTML-FormFu-Element-reCAPTCHA * perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm * perl-HTML-HTML5-Entities * perl-HTML-HTML5-Parser * perl-HTML-HTML5-Sanity * perl-HTML-HTML5-Writer * perl-MooseX-ArrayRef * perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts * perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute * perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods * perl-MooseX-Meta-TypeConstraint-Mooish * perl-MooseX-TraitFor-Meta-Class-BetterAnonClassNames * perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions * perl-MooseX-Util * perl-MooX-Struct * perl-MouseX-Foreign Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaning perl-re-engine-RE2
Hello, folks. I've just orphaned the perl-re-engine-RE2 package. If someone wishes to take it up, it's yours. Be warned that the package has an open bug in Bugzilla: Bug #1922811 (perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available) Regards, Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Orphaning perl-re-engine-RE2
Hello, folks. I've just orphaned the perl-re-engine-RE2 package. If someone wishes to take it up, it's yours. Be warned that the package has an open bug in Bugzilla: Bug #1922811 (perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available) Regards, Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
RIP Kent Fredric (KENTNL)
Hello, all. I've been informed that Kent Fredric (KENTNL on CPAN) has passed away. If you maintain the package of one of his module, be advised that, unless the module has co-maintainers, it no longer has an upstream. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-11-11)
* Matthew Miller [19/11/2020 17:13] : > > Some packagers in Fedora do not have time to maintain the build dependencies > for the packages that they are actually interested in and have time to > build. I suspect that these packages are maintained only to the point where they can build (and thus be used as buildreqs) but their maintainer also doesn't want them to be updated without making sure that the update will not break the package they are really interested in. > However, I'm not stuck on that one and it's probably not useful to stay > stuck on it if there's not enough support to do it. So, let's find a > different solution. What exactly do you want to do with this list of lightly-maintained packages? Is this something you want to present to end-users? Is this a list we should show to people tempted to become packagers? Do we want to generate auto-replies to bugs filed in Bugzilla? Should SIGs keep a lookout for security fixes to apply? I suspect we'll only be able to determine the best approach if we know what problem you're trying to solve. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-11-11)
* Kevin Kofler via devel [13/11/2020 00:52] : > > The one that keeps getting brought up is Tomcat, but I can tell you from my > personal experience that the Fedora Tomcat package has always been working > just fine (not only as a build dependency, but for its intended use as a web > application server: I use it to locally test Java web applications). I suspect this isn't sufficient a test to determine if a package is well maintained or not. At a minimum, you also need to look at CVEs for which fixes have not being pushed. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lightly-maintained packages (was: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-11-11))
* Miroslav Suchý [11/11/2020 18:05] : > > We already have "lightly-maintained packages" - it is called Copr projects. > Do we need something in between? The issue here is discoverabilty. If $PACKAGE is in a separate repository, be it a 'lightly-maintained' repo or a copr, how do we go about communicating to users wanting to install it that they need to activate that repository and that the software they download from it may or may not work? Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[rpms/perl-EV] PR #1: Add better provides with perl-generators
eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-EV` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Add better provides with perl-generators `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-EV/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID
Hello, all. Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and Jitka Plesnikova collaborator rights in bug #1870755 . Their FAS usernames are pghmcfc and jplesnik respectively. Is there someone on the list who can do this? Regards, Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Unicode-MapUTF8 license change: GPL+ or Artistic -> MIT
Hello, all. With version 1.12, the author of the Perl Unicode::MapUTF8 module has relicensed it under the MIT license. In pratice, the first package to contain the relicensed module is perl-Unicode-MapUTF8-1.14-1.fc34 with the license field only being updated in perl-Unicode-MapUTF8-1.14-2.fc34 . Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Unicode-MapUTF8 license change: GPL+ or Artistic -> MIT
Hello, all. With version 1.12, the author of the Perl Unicode::MapUTF8 module has relicensed it under the MIT license. In pratice, the first package to contain the relicensed module is perl-Unicode-MapUTF8-1.14-1.fc34 with the license field only being updated in perl-Unicode-MapUTF8-1.14-2.fc34 . Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)
* Fabio Valentini [09/09/2020 00:19] : > > Can we please increase the bus / lottery > factor (= 1) for Java package maintenance in fedora? I know that at least one distribution bases its Java stack on Fedora's. Perhaps someonce could contact their maintainers and encourage them to contribute to their upstream? Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lua 5.4.0
* Tom Callaway [30/06/2020 18:00] : > > lua-event seems to be broken because of broken deps unrelated to Lua > 5.4: nothing provides perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1) needed by > perl-Monotone-1.1-34.fc32.x86_64, so I left it alone. FTR, We've moved on to Perl 5.32.x so monotone needs to be rebuild against that so that we get a new perl-Monotone package. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Regarding behaviour of Gnome and Fedora members
* Ty Young [12/06/2020 07:13] : > > > Some of the comments mentioned in my article took place on this mailing > list. Would it not be appropriate to post it here as a result? No, I don't think so. >Where on > Fedora's mailing lists should I post it to? I don't think this would be considered on topic for any of Fedora's lists that I know of thus I would refrain from posting to any of them. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Regarding behaviour of Gnome and Fedora members
* Ty Young [12/06/2020 05:50] : > > So, could anything be done about any of this? I would propose that we keep discussions not related to the development of Fedora off the devel@ mailing-list. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed
* Artur Iwicki [27/05/2020 06:25] : > > While I understand the mechanism, I think that this needs to be communicated > more clearly. I've been a packager for close to 3 years now and I admit until > I read this e-mail I wasn't quite sure whether "no updates after EOL" meant > "you can't submit stuff to bodhi", or whether it meant "the updates repo is > frozen solid, whatever didn't make it in, well shucks". (As we can see, it's > the latter.) The Fedora 29 EOL message[1] was a bit more explicit: "At that time, all open Bugzilla bugs will be closed and no more package updates will be published." Emmanuel [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VUK3CJ5LO4ROUH3JTCDVHYAVVYAOCU62/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Non-responsive maintainer check for avesh
Hello, Anybody knows how to contact Avesh Agarwal (fas:avesh) ? I have a bug filed in Bugzilla that has not seen any action for 6+ months now. BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748553 Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group
* Paul Howarth [20/04/2020 10:09] : > > I'll be a member. Added. I've also taken the liberty of subscribing you to the perl-ma...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group
* Petr Pisar [22/04/2020 16:20] : > > Thanks. I approved the subscription and added you to the list owners. I'm not > sure if you received any confirmation by e-mail. The new Mailman is a huge > regress in a user interface. No confirmation but I can manage the list once I login on the web interface. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group
* Petr Pisar [20/04/2020 10:12] : > > Please add me (ppisar). Done. > Could you please subscribe yourself to the list > ? I could do it myself, but I'd like to Done. Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group
* Emmanuel Seyman [12/03/2020 21:03] : > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8743 Okay, this was done a few weeks ago (sorry for the lag, the world's been kind of crazy, these last few weeks). Does anybody want to be an admin of the group (I'ld rather not be alone to do this)? Who wants to be a member of the group? Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: CPE Git Forge Decision
* Clement Verna [01/04/2020 15:04] : > > What does NIH stands for ? Not invented here (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here for the gory details) Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
* Scott Talbert [30/03/2020 14:38] : > > Because the maintainer (normunds) was non-responsive. I don't see any > commits from you?? Sorry, I was looking at perl-Data-Validate-Type, not at perl-Data-Validate-Domain. I've taken the package. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
* Miro Hrončok [30/03/2020 20:24] : > > perl-Data-Validate-Domain orphan 1 weeks ago I've maintained this package for years now. Why is it considered it orphaned? Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
