Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
@ Samuel Rakitničan Please re-send your massages and send later massages to below thread, thanks: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RM6SFL22AYOLZEFIO7IYHZPF72NFTWMS/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
Please send massages to below thread, thanks: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RM6SFL22AYOLZEFIO7IYHZPF72NFTWMS/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of 2 march (in local time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mails and others e-mails was visible until 3 march 13:30-14:00. so it is actually 22-23 hours delay. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
On Sat, 2018-03-03 at 18:30 +0100, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: > Hello Farhad, > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/threads.html#241887 > > > > Please do something for this problem, it is really bad situation > > you > > are waiting for e-mails and check the web page several times but > > you > > don't see anything! |: > > > > I don't think that spinics.net is the official archiver of the > Fedora > mailing lists. > > As far as I know, the official mailing list archive for the users > list > is located here: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproje > ct.org/2018/3/ > > and it seems to be uptodate as far as I can see... > Hello Here is a big mis-understanding!!, I know that official archiver is "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/; not "spinics.net" my mean was exactly "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/; which uses HyperKitty and I used it to open some threads, I know that HyperKitty has some advantages over traditional archive software, but it seems there are some problems here, I also mentioned in the original massage that: "I doubt to this situation and *searched internet* with *mentioned titles* and *found mentioned links* " I provided links from "spinics.net" just as reference comparison to "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/; I am sure the problem was not from my web browser (Firefox ESR 52) because I opened archives even with "Private Mode" which does not store and use cache. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of yesterday (in local time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mail and others e-mails was visible until today 13:30-14:00. so it is actually 22-23 hours delay. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of yesterday (in local time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mail and others e-mails was visible until today 13:30-14:00. so it is actually 22-23 hours delay. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
At few days ago I did open two threads: 1: "Fedora 26 & 27 are unable to boot with normal graphic mode on this PC with AMD/ATI RS740 [Radeon 2100] GPU" in "Users" https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/fedora-users/threads.html#481765 2. "Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?" in "devel" https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/threads.html#241887 I did set "Delivery status" to disabled via web page and used official archiver for viewing emails, but until noon today, it doesn't show new e-mails, I doubt to this situation and searched internet with mentioned titles and found mentioned links, so I noticed official archiver of Fedora is not reliable! Please do something for this problem, it is really bad situation you are waiting for e-mails and check the web page several times but you don't see anything! |: It currently shows all new e-mails but not two hours ago. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 14:46 +, chicago wrote: > Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of > it it change infrequently?/Maybe we can diff it? I don't know, I just ran "dnf upgrade" and it took metadata in mentioned size, Fedora developers should answer to these questions. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 14:46 +, chicago wrote: > Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of > it it change infrequently?/Maybe we can diff it? I don't know, I just ran "dnf upgrade" and it took metadata in mentioned size, Fedora developers should answer to these questions. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories metadata is maximum 10MB, while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" for first time after installing Fedora 27 (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-27-1.6) and it took 20+58MB for two official repositories! It is really too high, why there is such difference? why don't optimize it and fix this problem? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: YAST for Fedora?
I believe that everyone comes from MS Windows to Linux will need to YAST, currently it provides many modules that makes system management very easy: * service management, what services are running, what are stopped, and user can change their status. * systemd control * hardware configuration and provide technical info about them * many more modules for doing essential works until Fedora does not provide YAST, it can not claim that is a good alternative for desktop users of MS Windows. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: YAST for Fedora?
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -0000, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote: > > You seem to have missed this in Adam's email No, I don't missed anything. > i) just getting things right so we don't need a giant pile of > configuration tools > ii) tools written at more appropriate layers, mainly desktop > environments "so we don't need" What is his mean about "WE" ?! * professional and long time system administrators? * Fedora developers? * amateur users? special users who come from windows? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: YAST for Fedora?
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +0000, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote: > Because we think it's fundamentally a wrong approach. > > It's not really a question of resources, but of not thinking this is > the correct approach. What is the correct approach?! Wasting lots of time on: * reading bad-structured and complex man pages? * search the internet through search engines and open tens of web pages and reading a bunch of out-dated and non-functional information? * struggle with too many different tools that most of them are unknown for users due to lack of a central management tool like IBM AIX System Management Interface Tool (SMIT)? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
YAST for Fedora?
Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure many aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very interesting, useful and beneficial for all users. * Why Fedora does not have such tool? * How much money is need to develop such tool from scratch or port it from SUSE to Fedora/RHEL? If Fedora provides such tool, it can attract many users from Ubuntu, Debian and others to Fedora. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why Delta RPM is not available for firefox and there is no firefox-esr in the Fedora repository?
Your description was complete and convincing. That link you did provide is only 12.0MB !! it is really acceptable. Thank you Fedora, Red Hat and RPM are really great! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why Delta RPM is not available for firefox and there is no firefox-esr in the Fedora repository?
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25 Does Delta RPM is available only for the last installed version of software? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Why Delta RPM is not available for firefox and there is no firefox-esr in the Fedora repository?
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25 Does Delta RPM is available only for the installed recent version? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
