Re: %autorelease and arbitrary suffix
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:24:53 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:18 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200
> > Sandro wrote:
> >
> > > On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix
> > > > to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be
> > > > compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim
> > > > builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123456" or similar
> > > > suffices. It looks to me that the current %autorelease doesn't allow
> > > > that per [1]. Did I miss something or should I file a RFE?
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autorelease.html
> > >
> > > I think '%autorelease -e rhbz123456' should do what you want.
> >
> > per the docs it adds the string into the "middle"
> >
> > I would like to achieve NVR like
> > systemd-250.10-2.fc36.rhbz123456
> >
> > which you do with
> > Release: 2%{?dist}.rhbz123456
> >
> > in the classic spec file
>
> I think you should be able to do something like this:
> Release: %{autorelease}.rhbz123456
> (I have not tested this since I'm not at my "work" machine right now).
> (Wrapping the %autorelease macro in {} is probably necessary to ensure
> the .rhbz123456 is not interpreted as an argument to the macro.)
thanks, that does it :-)
Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/systemd-253.5-3.fc38.rhbz123456.s390x.rpm
Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: %autorelease and arbitrary suffix
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:18 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200
> Sandro wrote:
>
> > On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix
> > > to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be
> > > compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim
> > > builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123456" or similar
> > > suffices. It looks to me that the current %autorelease doesn't allow
> > > that per [1]. Did I miss something or should I file a RFE?
> > >
> > > [1] https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autorelease.html
> >
> > I think '%autorelease -e rhbz123456' should do what you want.
>
> per the docs it adds the string into the "middle"
>
> I would like to achieve NVR like
> systemd-250.10-2.fc36.rhbz123456
>
> which you do with
> Release: 2%{?dist}.rhbz123456
>
> in the classic spec file
I think you should be able to do something like this:
Release: %{autorelease}.rhbz123456
(I have not tested this since I'm not at my "work" machine right now).
(Wrapping the %autorelease macro in {} is probably necessary to ensure
the .rhbz123456 is not interpreted as an argument to the macro.)
Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: %autorelease and arbitrary suffix
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200
Sandro wrote:
> On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix
> > to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be
> > compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim
> > builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123456" or similar
> > suffices. It looks to me that the current %autorelease doesn't allow
> > that per [1]. Did I miss something or should I file a RFE?
> >
> > [1] https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autorelease.html
>
> I think '%autorelease -e rhbz123456' should do what you want.
per the docs it adds the string into the "middle"
I would like to achieve NVR like
systemd-250.10-2.fc36.rhbz123456
which you do with
Release: 2%{?dist}.rhbz123456
in the classic spec file
Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: %autorelease and arbitrary suffix
On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote: Hi, I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123456" or similar suffices. It looks to me that the current %autorelease doesn't allow that per [1]. Did I miss something or should I file a RFE? [1] https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autorelease.html I think '%autorelease -e rhbz123456' should do what you want. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
%autorelease and arbitrary suffix
Hi, I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123456" or similar suffices. It looks to me that the current %autorelease doesn't allow that per [1]. Did I miss something or should I file a RFE? [1] https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autorelease.html Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
