Re: F38 proposal: Modernize Live Media (System-Wide Change proposal)
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, at 4:35 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModernizeLiveMedia Just for reference, today Fedora CoreOS uses a different implementation of this: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/tree/testing-devel/overlay.d/05core/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/35coreos-live See specifically https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/blob/testing-devel/overlay.d/05core/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/35coreos-live/live-generator ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Modernize Live Media (System-Wide Change proposal)
> With
> {{package|livesys-scripts}}, those scripts have been simplified and
> turned into systemd services that activate only in live environments.
Just to confirm, will live-media-only these systemd services all be contained
within a package (either livesys-scripts, or some other RPM), and will that
package be kept dependent-less so it can be uninstalled at any point if it's
not needed?
I'm just picturing all of these new "systemd services that activate only in
live environments" possibly ending up on _installed_ systems. (Particularly
since the supported desktop installation method is to install from the live
media.)
Not a problem if they can just be `dnf remove`-d, but less great if they
clutter up `systemctl list-unit-files` with a bunch of useless, perma-disabled
units that can't (easily) be removed because some core package either contains
or Requires: them. systemd _already_ comes with a **large** default collection
of unit files.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Modernize Live Media (System-Wide Change proposal)
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:43 PM Ben Cotton > > Neal, Matt, what is the rationale for enabling persistence for the default > boot option? I have mixed opinions about this. One of the benefits of a > Live image, as we use it today, is that it's always the same/fresh. If I > use it and then hand it over to a friend/colleague, I don't need to worry > that some personal files (like a browser history) were left behind. I also > don't need to worry that I (or the previous user) made some changes which > would negatively impact the installation process or my user environment > (like configuring a different keymap, or installing some updates). It's > always as the creators intended. With the proposed Change, suddenly I need > to care and need to worry. Yes, default should be the pristine image, at least as long no persistent overlay exists. > My impression is that currently persistence use is basically non-existent. > Our well-advertised tools like Fedora Media Writer don't support it. Even And that is exactly why. I used to use it quite a alot - and be it just selecting the right keyboard layout for trying out an RC or such on various boxes which all happened to have the same keyboard layout, being in the same country. Another use case is as a handy rescue option, where - again - I might want to set up my environment (home overlay), or even trying out selective updates between RCs, say for QA purposes (system overlay). ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Modernize Live Media (System-Wide Change proposal)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 09:22:23AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > I don't think that persistence by default is a good idea, because > modern USB-flash drives are very unreliable and don't have a > wear-cell balancer, so it will wear out very quickly for some > frequently modified files. Yeah — lots of very-low-quality flash drives out there. Ran into this just trying to get decent ones for give-away swag. I expect this to get worse and worse, as more and more people just use dropbox and other cloud storage for file transfer and random storage. Once again we're increasingly a niche case. (It is, on the other hand, easier and easier to get really good MicroSD cards for relatively cheap. SanDisk High Endurance for ten bucks. But not quite cheap enough for giveways. Maybe the giveway item should be a branded card reader...) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Modernize Live Media (System-Wide Change proposal)
On 18/10/2022 22:35, Ben Cotton wrote: There should be new options for resetting the persistent overlay and booting with no persistence. The default options should boot with persistence and setup of persistence should work. I don't think that persistence by default is a good idea, because modern USB-flash drives are very unreliable and don't have a wear-cell balancer, so it will wear out very quickly for some frequently modified files. Persistence is a good option, but should only be enabled at the user's choice. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Modernize Live Media (System-Wide Change proposal)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 2:57 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:43 PM Ben Cotton wrote: >> >> There should be new options for resetting the persistent overlay and >> booting with no persistence. The default options should boot with >> persistence and setup of persistence should work. > > > Neal, Matt, what is the rationale for enabling persistence for the default > boot option? I have mixed opinions about this. One of the benefits of a Live > image, as we use it today, is that it's always the same/fresh. If I use it > and then hand it over to a friend/colleague, I don't need to worry that some > personal files (like a browser history) were left behind. I also don't need > to worry that I (or the previous user) made some changes which would > negatively impact the installation process or my user environment (like > configuring a different keymap, or installing some updates). It's always as > the creators intended. With the proposed Change, suddenly I need to care and > need to worry. > Hmm, that makes sense. The main reason I was thinking of it was to make the live media useful in portable and rescue environments. Maybe it would make sense to make the default boot option activate persistence if it exists, but use a temporary overlay if it doesn't (which is what we technically do today) and create menu options to trigger overlay creation. That said, SoaS would probably benefit from default persistence, since I believe it's supposed to work from a USB stick. > My impression is that currently persistence use is basically non-existent. > Our well-advertised tools like Fedora Media Writer don't support it. Even if > we flip this to make it easily available (which is probably a good thing), > how many users do you estimate would actually want to make use of it? Who > would want to work from a Live image regularly? I'm sure there are some use > cases, but they seem so niche to me, that making it a non-default boot option > wouldn't be a problem at all. > > I wonder if you've thought about this and why you decided to propose making > it enabled by default. Thanks. > I know that a big part of why persistence use is non-existent is that support for integrating it into FMW has been deferred for years. Over that time, the script has see-sawed from working to not working. Having persistence means people can have Fedora environments they can carry around, and if we advertised the capability, I think people *would* use it. Enabling persistence is pretty much a matter of adding a boot option to the grub menu item. If we could modify the grub menu configuration from FMW, then we could probably have a checkbox there to turn on/off the capability. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Modernize Live Media (System-Wide Change proposal)
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:43 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > There should be new options for resetting the persistent overlay and > booting with no persistence. The default options should boot with > persistence and setup of persistence should work. > Neal, Matt, what is the rationale for enabling persistence for the default boot option? I have mixed opinions about this. One of the benefits of a Live image, as we use it today, is that it's always the same/fresh. If I use it and then hand it over to a friend/colleague, I don't need to worry that some personal files (like a browser history) were left behind. I also don't need to worry that I (or the previous user) made some changes which would negatively impact the installation process or my user environment (like configuring a different keymap, or installing some updates). It's always as the creators intended. With the proposed Change, suddenly I need to care and need to worry. My impression is that currently persistence use is basically non-existent. Our well-advertised tools like Fedora Media Writer don't support it. Even if we flip this to make it easily available (which is probably a good thing), how many users do you estimate would actually want to make use of it? Who would want to work from a Live image regularly? I'm sure there are some use cases, but they seem so niche to me, that making it a non-default boot option wouldn't be a problem at all. I wonder if you've thought about this and why you decided to propose making it enabled by default. Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
