Re: Tenacity
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 17:46:51 +0100 Alec Leamas wrote: > Using several wxWidgets version is indeed a bit painful, been there, > done that. One quick fix is to configure alternatives to use the new > 3.2 version version of wx-config instead of the default 3.0. I'm not sure what alternatives is, but now that I know about it I can probably find out. The key thing is that I didn't know that wxWindows was configurable for version. > There is no need to actually build, just running "wx-config > --version" reveals the version currently selected by alternatives. > > There are other options including hard-wiring wx-config to an > absolute path. However, it's IMHO more complicated and with some > traps. Thanks. > HTH Yes, that does help. I'll give it another try. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
Hi Stan, On 09/02/2023 16:55, stan via devel wrote: I downloaded the wxWidgets code from their site, and compiled it using their instructions on f37. Compiled easily, with only a warning about missing midi support. I installed it in /usr/local When I tried to get tenacity to use it, though, I hit a dead end. Even though I set the environment variable WX_CONFIG to point to it, cmake find_program kept finding the system version 3.0.4. I assume it looks there first, and once it finds it, it stops. I tried the alternative of building it as a subprogram with the tenacity source (the tenacity build instructions helpfully pointed to this), but it was compiled as 3.0 compatible, and tenacity complained about too old a version of some constructs. I then gave up. Using several wxWidgets version is indeed a bit painful, been there, done that. One quick fix is to configure alternatives to use the new 3.2 version version of wx-config instead of the default 3.0. There is no need to actually build, just running "wx-config --version" reveals the version currently selected by alternatives. There are other options including hard-wiring wx-config to an absolute path. However, it's IMHO more complicated and with some traps. HTH --alec ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:51:37 -0700 stan via devel wrote: > lot of (any?) sound editing anymore. Just for the challenge. Maybe > not. :-) I see lots of other people have taken up the challenge, and reported issues they found, but I thought I would update with my unsuccessful results. I downloaded the wxWidgets code from their site, and compiled it using their instructions on f37. Compiled easily, with only a warning about missing midi support. I installed it in /usr/local When I tried to get tenacity to use it, though, I hit a dead end. Even though I set the environment variable WX_CONFIG to point to it, cmake find_program kept finding the system version 3.0.4. I assume it looks there first, and once it finds it, it stops. I tried the alternative of building it as a subprogram with the tenacity source (the tenacity build instructions helpfully pointed to this), but it was compiled as 3.0 compatible, and tenacity complained about too old a version of some constructs. I then gave up. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote: On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote: > On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: >> wxGTK should have that... > > It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X series > as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason > liblibnyquist.so is missing. F38 / Rawhide has some lisp issue with the > libnyquist stuff. Let me know if you want that bug fixed in F36 wxGTK. Looks like it should be pretty easy to cherry-pick. The entire file dialog customization system was added in 3.1.7 right before the 3.2.0 release, so the header file mentioned doesn't exist in 3.1.5, nor any of the core code it needs to actually work. That change is a change to the API of the file dialog methods, so it is IMO not cherry pickable to F36 because it would require cherry-picking this entire PR: https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/pull/22476. If upstream tenacity wants to use the file dialog customizations, then they need to update their required versions to be 3.2.0+ only and not claim 3.1.5 compatibility. Ooops. What Ian said. :) Upgrading to 3.2.0 in F36 is probably a non-starter as it involves an soname bump. Scott___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote: > > > On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > >> wxGTK should have that... > > > > It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X > series > > as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason > > liblibnyquist.so is missing. F38 / Rawhide has some lisp issue with the > > libnyquist stuff. > > Let me know if you want that bug fixed in F36 wxGTK. Looks like it should > be pretty easy to cherry-pick. > The entire file dialog customization system was added in 3.1.7 right before the 3.2.0 release, so the header file mentioned doesn't exist in 3.1.5, nor any of the core code it needs to actually work. That change is a change to the API of the file dialog methods, so it is IMO not cherry pickable to F36 because it would require cherry-picking this entire PR: https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/pull/22476. If upstream tenacity wants to use the file dialog customizations, then they need to update their required versions to be 3.2.0+ only and not claim 3.1.5 compatibility. > > Scott > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote: On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: wxGTK should have that... It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X series as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason liblibnyquist.so is missing. F38 / Rawhide has some lisp issue with the libnyquist stuff. Let me know if you want that bug fixed in F36 wxGTK. Looks like it should be pretty easy to cherry-pick. Scott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: wxGTK should have that... It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X series as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason liblibnyquist.so is missing. F38 / Rawhide has some lisp issue with the libnyquist stuff. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
wxGTK should have that... ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On 2/8/23 10:59 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: stan via devel writes: As they say in the BUILDING.md file, though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out. That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37 has 3.2.1. - J< Both versions make it through the configure step for me, but a build with 3.1.5 will ultimately fail with "fatal error: wx/filedlgcustomize.h: No such file or directory", (upstream issue 22516[0]). [0] - https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/issues/22516 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
> stan via devel writes: > As they say in the BUILDING.md file, > though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the > configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out. That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37 has 3.2.1. - J< ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:02:47 -0700 stan wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700 > stan wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100 > > Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > > > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going > > > for Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage > > > version . > > > > I knew about the corporate takeover of audacity, but I didn't know > > about this fork. I'm not aware of any effort to package it, but you > > could build it from source, and install it in /usr/local, probably > > the default. > > > > If you have development tools installed, that could be as easy as > > ./configure (not as root) > > make (not as root) > > make install (as root) > > in the directory where you unpack the source code. I used to build > > audacity that way from its git repository. Occasionally there would > > be a glitch with versions, but it worked pretty consistently. You > > will have to have /usr/local/bin in your path (I think that is also > > a default in Fedora). > > > > https://tenacityaudio.org/ > > > > Of course, an rpm would be more convenient, but this *is* an > > alternative. > > PS > I see on the devel list that there are potential patent issues because > of the use of certain codecs. I finessed that by using the ffmpeg > version from rpmfusion, and thus installing the free and nonfree > codecs they are referencing. If you try the above build without > them, it will probably still build, but will have reduced > functionality. Now that mp3 and mpeg are off patent, I think the use > of other codecs would be limited unless you are editing commercial > DVD files using aac, or video files using h264. Videos using webm > probably are using open source video and audio encoders. Disregard my comments. The process to compile tenacity is completely different from the process to compile audacity. A plus is that the BUILDING.md file gives a command to install the dependencies for building tenacity in Fedora. As they say in the BUILDING.md file, though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out. They give a link to the wxWidgets website, so it is possible to compile it and put it in /usr/local, but that seems to be going down the rabbit hole. I might pursue this, even though I don't really do a lot of (any?) sound editing anymore. Just for the challenge. Maybe not. :-) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700 stan wrote: > On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100 > Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going > > for Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage > > version . > > I knew about the corporate takeover of audacity, but I didn't know > about this fork. I'm not aware of any effort to package it, but you > could build it from source, and install it in /usr/local, probably the > default. > > If you have development tools installed, that could be as easy as > ./configure (not as root) > make (not as root) > make install (as root) > in the directory where you unpack the source code. I used to build > audacity that way from its git repository. Occasionally there would > be a glitch with versions, but it worked pretty consistently. You > will have to have /usr/local/bin in your path (I think that is also a > default in Fedora). > > https://tenacityaudio.org/ > > Of course, an rpm would be more convenient, but this *is* an > alternative. PS I see on the devel list that there are potential patent issues because of the use of certain codecs. I finessed that by using the ffmpeg version from rpmfusion, and thus installing the free and nonfree codecs they are referencing. If you try the above build without them, it will probably still build, but will have reduced functionality. Now that mp3 and mpeg are off patent, I think the use of other codecs would be limited unless you are editing commercial DVD files using aac, or video files using h264. Videos using webm probably are using open source video and audio encoders. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:22 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel > wrote: > > > > People, > > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for > > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . . > > > > As I recall, in the beginning, Tenacity (to perform > most meaningful operations) required FFmpeg, > which was not in Fedora, so that was a clear > show stopper. Now that FFmpeg is (or at least > with the codecs without IP encumbrances) > Tenacity might be able to be packaged as long > as it does not include any other libraries that are > IP encumbered. Someone will need to perform > that IP review, as codecs are a minefield. To the best of my knowledge, Tenacity should work fine with Fedora's FFmpeg now. Tenacity's documentation has already been updated accordingly. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100 Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . I knew about the corporate takeover of audacity, but I didn't know about this fork. I'm not aware of any effort to package it, but you could build it from source, and install it in /usr/local, probably the default. If you have development tools installed, that could be as easy as ./configure (not as root) make (not as root) make install (as root) in the directory where you unpack the source code. I used to build audacity that way from its git repository. Occasionally there would be a glitch with versions, but it worked pretty consistently. You will have to have /usr/local/bin in your path (I think that is also a default in Fedora). https://tenacityaudio.org/ Of course, an rpm would be more convenient, but this *is* an alternative. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > > People, > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . . > As I recall, in the beginning, Tenacity (to perform most meaningful operations) required FFmpeg, which was not in Fedora, so that was a clear show stopper. Now that FFmpeg is (or at least with the codecs without IP encumbrances) Tenacity might be able to be packaged as long as it does not include any other libraries that are IP encumbered. Someone will need to perform that IP review, as codecs are a minefield. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On 2/7/23 1:25 PM, Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: People, Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . . Thanks, Phil. I have a copr[0]. It has some issues and the current version is old. I have been working on updating to the latest beta from the new upstream location[1], but $DAY_JOB has been consuming a lot of my time. [0] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nielsenb/tenacity/ [1] - https://codeberg.org/tenacityteam/tenacity ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 21:03 +, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tenacity ? > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue Hi, I believe the original reporter here is speaking of the more privacy centric audacity? Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** Associations: * Debian Maintainer (DM) * Fedora/EPEL Maintainer. * Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation. WWW: https://kathenas.org Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Twitter: @kathenasorg Instagram: @kathenasorg IRC: kathenas GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Tenacity
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tenacity ? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
