Re: Review request: sfsexp - Small Fast S-Expression Library
Michael J Gruber wrote: > It turns out that bodhi applies the same boundary conditions to > "newpackage" updates (no karma for your own update, 7 days minimum to > stable by time). I don't think a new leave package can disturb current > systems much ... A library, in particular, will not receive any testing > while in testing. I also question the usefulness of these restrictions for new packages (and have done so for years), because a new package does not upgrade any existing package and so cannot really break anything that worked before. But the rationale that was given (by the majority of FESCo and by QA) when this was discussed years ago was that new packages can have broken Obsoletes, Provides, and/or Supplements (or Enhances, but that is mostly ignored by the current package dependency solvers) that can break existing systems merely by having the package in the repository. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Review request: sfsexp - Small Fast S-Expression Library
So, thanks to the good and fast review sfsexp is in rawhide now. Hooray! It turns out that bodhi applies the same boundary conditions to "newpackage" updates (no karma for your own update, 7 days minimum to stable by time). I don't think a new leave package can disturb current systems much ... A library, in particular, will not receive any testing while in testing. So, since the new package certainly resolves the "new package" bug, and if someone thinks this is enough I'd be happy to receive +1 karma for the following updates: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8e53be2fb9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-57dfeeb304 Once they are in stable, I'll rebuild notmuch against sfsexp for the real test (which was successful in copr already). I could have built the new sfsexp and an update for notmuch in a side-tag, of course, but that would have lead to a "mixed update" (new package/enhancement) which didn't seem optimal either. Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Review request: sfsexp - Small Fast S-Expression Library
I'll take it and review it. I don't have any ones to swap currently. -Ian On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:09 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717 > > This is an optional dependency of notmuch, the mail indexer. sfsexp > enhances notmuch's capabilities considerably. > > Feel free to suggest a review swap within my capabilities (say C/Python). > > Cheers > Michael > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Review request: sfsexp - Small Fast S-Expression Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717 This is an optional dependency of notmuch, the mail indexer. sfsexp enhances notmuch's capabilities considerably. Feel free to suggest a review swap within my capabilities (say C/Python). Cheers Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
