Re: fedpkg new-sources errors
V Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 02:35:51PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > Il 07/10/22 13:50, Petr Pisar ha scritto: > > V Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 08:17:15PM -0500, Richard Shaw napsal(a): > >> I'm still getting this on occasion and have no idea what the issue is: > >> > >> $ fedpkg new-sources OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz > >> Uploading: OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz > >> # > >> 52.0%Could not execute new_sources: (56, 'OpenSSL SSL_read: > >> error:0A0003FC:SSL routines::sslv3 alert bad record mac, errno 0') > >> > > It can be caused by anything. From a currupted IP packet to a TLS > > implementation (either server or client) wich does not understand or > > misimplements some TLS extensions. Example at > > <https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/1866>. > > > > -- Petr > > Possibly related (?), today I've noticed that opening a .fedorapeople > website in a browser I get an error about expired certificate... > I think that's an independent bug. The certificate was successfully renewed in the meant time: Serial Number: 04:e8:a4:9d:11:95:f8:01:7d:ea:f8:37:05:ba:c6:45:16:9c Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption Issuer: C = US, O = Let's Encrypt, CN = R3 Validity Not Before: Oct 7 14:19:33 2022 GMT Not After : Jan 5 14:19:32 2023 GMT Subject: CN = *.fedorapeople.org -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: fedpkg new-sources errors - fedorapeople certificate expiry
-- Petr Possibly related (?), today I've noticed that opening a .fedorapeople website in a browser I get an error about expired certificate... Also prevents downloading spec and srpm files. Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: fedpkg new-sources errors
Il 07/10/22 13:50, Petr Pisar ha scritto: > V Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 08:17:15PM -0500, Richard Shaw napsal(a): >> I'm still getting this on occasion and have no idea what the issue is: >> >> $ fedpkg new-sources OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz >> Uploading: OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz >> # >> 52.0%Could not execute new_sources: (56, 'OpenSSL SSL_read: >> error:0A0003FC:SSL routines::sslv3 alert bad record mac, errno 0') >> > It can be caused by anything. From a currupted IP packet to a TLS > implementation (either server or client) wich does not understand or > misimplements some TLS extensions. Example at > <https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/1866>. > > -- Petr Possibly related (?), today I've noticed that opening a .fedorapeople website in a browser I get an error about expired certificate... Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: fedpkg new-sources errors
V Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 08:17:15PM -0500, Richard Shaw napsal(a): > I'm still getting this on occasion and have no idea what the issue is: > > $ fedpkg new-sources OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz > Uploading: OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz > # > 52.0%Could not execute new_sources: (56, 'OpenSSL SSL_read: > error:0A0003FC:SSL routines::sslv3 alert bad record mac, errno 0') > It can be caused by anything. From a currupted IP packet to a TLS implementation (either server or client) wich does not understand or misimplements some TLS extensions. Example at <https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/1866>. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
fedpkg new-sources errors
I'm still getting this on occasion and have no idea what the issue is: $ fedpkg new-sources OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz Uploading: OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz # 52.0%Could not execute new_sources: (56, 'OpenSSL SSL_read: error:0A0003FC:SSL routines::sslv3 alert bad record mac, errno 0') Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 2:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:45 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker > wrote: > > > > > >> I believe it is failing on the line: > > >> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line > 298, > > >> in upload > > >> if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash): > > >> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line > 259, > > >> in remote_file_exists > > >> self.raise_upload_error(status) > > >> > > >> So maybe the file already exists in the cache? But then, sources has > not > > >> been updated, and if I try > > >> fedpkg local it will attempt to build the old version 1.8.1, not the > new > > >> 1.9.0. > > >> > > >> > > > > > OK, so unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz already exists in the cache. So I had to > > > manually update sources by running > > > md5sum unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz, which luckily I just guessed. Now > everything > > > seems to be working fine. > > > > > > > Ooops, spoke too soon. > > fedpkg local > > Downloading unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz > > > > 100.0% > > Remove downloaded invalid file > > /home/nbecker/fedora.git/unuran/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz > > Could not execute local: Server returned status code 404 > > > > No idea what's going on here. > > You seem to have gotten a kerberos ticket for: > > nbec...@fedoraproject.org > > which I guess ipa is fine with giving you. > However, our upload script checking your username sees "NBECKER" and not > 'nbecker' and denys you. > > Can you do: > > kdestroy -A > > then > > kinit nbec...@fedoraproject.org > > and see if it works? > > kevin > Yes, that was the problem and the solution. The error messages I saw were not very helpful. Thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:45:52PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker <[1]ndbeck...@gmail.com> >wrote: > > I believe it is failing on the line: > File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line > 298, in upload > if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash): > File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line > 259, in remote_file_exists > self.raise_upload_error(status) > So maybe the file already exists in the cache? But then, sources has > not been updated, and if I try > fedpkg local it will attempt to build the old version 1.8.1, not the new > 1.9.0. > >OK, so unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz already exists in the cache. So I had to >manually update sources by running >md5sum unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz, which luckily I just guessed. Now everything >seems to be working fine. Also, we no longer use md5sum in our lookaside cache by default, but sha512, so you may have more chances using that algorithm :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:45 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > >> I believe it is failing on the line: > >> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298, > >> in upload > >> if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash): > >> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 259, > >> in remote_file_exists > >> self.raise_upload_error(status) > >> > >> So maybe the file already exists in the cache? But then, sources has not > >> been updated, and if I try > >> fedpkg local it will attempt to build the old version 1.8.1, not the new > >> 1.9.0. > >> > >> > > > OK, so unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz already exists in the cache. So I had to > > manually update sources by running > > md5sum unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz, which luckily I just guessed. Now everything > > seems to be working fine. > > > > Ooops, spoke too soon. > fedpkg local > Downloading unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz > > 100.0% > Remove downloaded invalid file > /home/nbecker/fedora.git/unuran/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz > Could not execute local: Server returned status code 404 > > No idea what's going on here. You seem to have gotten a kerberos ticket for: nbec...@fedoraproject.org which I guess ipa is fine with giving you. However, our upload script checking your username sees "NBECKER" and not 'nbecker' and denys you. Can you do: kdestroy -A then kinit nbec...@fedoraproject.org and see if it works? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:45 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker wrote: > >> I believe it is failing on the line: >> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298, >> in upload >> if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash): >> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 259, >> in remote_file_exists >> self.raise_upload_error(status) >> >> So maybe the file already exists in the cache? But then, sources has not >> been updated, and if I try >> fedpkg local it will attempt to build the old version 1.8.1, not the new >> 1.9.0. >> >> > OK, so unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz already exists in the cache. So I had to > manually update sources by running > md5sum unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz, which luckily I just guessed. Now everything > seems to be working fine. > Ooops, spoke too soon. fedpkg local Downloading unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz 100.0% Remove downloaded invalid file /home/nbecker/fedora.git/unuran/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz Could not execute local: Server returned status code 404 No idea what's going on here. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker wrote: > I believe it is failing on the line: > File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298, > in upload > if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash): > File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 259, > in remote_file_exists > self.raise_upload_error(status) > > So maybe the file already exists in the cache? But then, sources has not > been updated, and if I try > fedpkg local it will attempt to build the old version 1.8.1, not the new > 1.9.0. > > >>> OK, so unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz already exists in the cache. So I had to manually update sources by running md5sum unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz, which luckily I just guessed. Now everything seems to be working fine. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
I believe it is failing on the line: File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298, in upload if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash): File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 259, in remote_file_exists self.raise_upload_error(status) So maybe the file already exists in the cache? But then, sources has not been updated, and if I try fedpkg local it will attempt to build the old version 1.8.1, not the new 1.9.0. On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:44 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:28 AM Ankur Sinha > wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 10:46:43 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >> > Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for >> moderation. >> > >> > $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz >> > Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns >> status 403 >> > >> > I haven't been active in packaging for some time, did I miss something? >> >> Another thing to check: did you run the kinit bit before trying the >> `new-sources`? >> >> ``` >> kinit @FEDORAPROJECT.ORG >> ``` >> > > Yes, without running kinit I got "not authorized" > -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:28 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 10:46:43 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for > moderation. > > > > $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz > > Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns > status 403 > > > > I haven't been active in packaging for some time, did I miss something? > > Another thing to check: did you run the kinit bit before trying the > `new-sources`? > > ``` > kinit @FEDORAPROJECT.ORG > ``` > Yes, without running kinit I got "not authorized" ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 10:46:43 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for moderation. > > $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz > Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403 > > I haven't been active in packaging for some time, did I miss something? Another thing to check: did you run the kinit bit before trying the `new-sources`? ``` kinit @FEDORAPROJECT.ORG ``` -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:57 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 3:47 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for > moderation. > > > > $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz > > Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns > status 403 > > > > I haven't been active in packaging for some time, did I miss something? > > Just a guess, but given how new-sources also updates at least .gitignore, > I think it expects maintainers to have the file in the checkout. > Does it fail the same if you place it there and pass a relative filepath? > fedpkg new-sources unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz fedpkg --verbose new-sources unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz Creating repo object from /home/nbecker/fedora.git/unuran Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 33, in sys.exit(load_entry_point('fedpkg==1.42', 'console_scripts', 'fedpkg')()) File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/fedpkg/__main__.py", line 89, in main sys.exit(client.args.command()) File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/cli.py", line 2688, in new_sources self.cmd.upload( File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/__init__.py", line 3078, in upload self.lookasidecache.upload( File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298, in upload if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash): File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 259, in remote_file_exists self.raise_upload_error(status) File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 128, in raise_upload_error raise UploadError(message, http_status=http_status) pyrpkg.errors.UploadError: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403 > > -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 3:47 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for moderation. > > $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz > Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403 > > I haven't been active in packaging for some time, did I miss something? Just a guess, but given how new-sources also updates at least .gitignore, I think it expects maintainers to have the file in the checkout. Does it fail the same if you place it there and pass a relative filepath? fedpkg new-sources unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)
Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for moderation. $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403 I haven't been active in packaging for some time, did I miss something? -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?
On 07/21/2017 11:09 AM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: Hi, I seem to be unable to upload a new tarball for freefem++: $ fedpkg new-sources freefem++-3.56.tar.gz /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48: DeprecationWarning: fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated. Please use bodhi.client.bindings instead. DeprecationWarning) Uploading: freefem++-3.56.tar.gz 100.0% Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 502 Any ideas about what is going on here? We were testing a fix for the double-upload. Could you let us know what versions you have of: fedora-packager fedpkg curl python2-pycurl libcurl. This should be F26 with all "released updates" applied. # rpm -q fedora-packager fedpkg curl python2-pycurl libcurl fedora-packager-0.6.0.1-2.fc26.noarch fedpkg-1.28-1.fc26.noarch curl-7.53.1-7.fc26.x86_64 python2-pycurl-7.43.0-8.fc26.x86_64 libcurl-7.53.1-7.fc26.x86_64 Also, please retry now, as we have reverted the server-side change that likely made you hit this. OK, I see. The double-uploads now seem to be back, however "fedpkg new-sources" appears to be functional, now ;) Ralf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?
> Hi, > > > I seem to be unable to upload a new tarball for freefem++: > > $ fedpkg new-sources freefem++-3.56.tar.gz > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48: > DeprecationWarning: fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated. Please use > bodhi.client.bindings instead. >DeprecationWarning) > Uploading: freefem++-3.56.tar.gz > > 100.0% > Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns > status 502 > > > Any ideas about what is going on here? We were testing a fix for the double-upload. Could you let us know what versions you have of: fedora-packager fedpkg curl python2-pycurl libcurl. Also, please retry now, as we have reverted the server-side change that likely made you hit this. > > Ralf Patrick ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
fedpkg new-sources broken?
Hi, I seem to be unable to upload a new tarball for freefem++: $ fedpkg new-sources freefem++-3.56.tar.gz /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48: DeprecationWarning: fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated. Please use bodhi.client.bindings instead. DeprecationWarning) Uploading: freefem++-3.56.tar.gz 100.0% Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 502 Any ideas about what is going on here? Ralf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 2017-07-14, Mamoru TASAKA <mtas...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> Fabio Valentini wrote on 07/14/2017 06:04 PM: >>> Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg >>> new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error >>> message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do >>> anything until I kill it ... >>> >>> I can't pin down the exact date it stopped working (since I don't use it >>> every day), but I first noticed it yesterday after installing updates from >>> f26-updates-testing (although those updates probably didn't cause the bug, >>> because downgrading to f26 stable packages didn't help). >>> >>> Am I the only one affected by this bug or has nobody else been building >>> packages? ;) >> >> Yes, I am seeing the same issue on F-26. >> Looks like some of nss-* 3.31.0-1.0.fc26 packages are the culprits. >> I downgraded to nss-* 3.30.2-1.1.fc26 and it seems to be working. >> > I have experienced this issue now with nss-3.31.0-1.0.fc25.x86_64 on > F25. The fedpkg client gets stucked after reading expired > ~/.fedora.cert. After removing the old certificate-key file, it works > again with the new nss. Good catch! After removing ~/.fedora.cert, it works for me again, too :) > -- Petr > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?
On 2017-07-14, Mamoru TASAKA <mtas...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Fabio Valentini wrote on 07/14/2017 06:04 PM: >> Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg >> new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error >> message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do >> anything until I kill it ... >> >> I can't pin down the exact date it stopped working (since I don't use it >> every day), but I first noticed it yesterday after installing updates from >> f26-updates-testing (although those updates probably didn't cause the bug, >> because downgrading to f26 stable packages didn't help). >> >> Am I the only one affected by this bug or has nobody else been building >> packages? ;) > > Yes, I am seeing the same issue on F-26. > Looks like some of nss-* 3.31.0-1.0.fc26 packages are the culprits. > I downgraded to nss-* 3.30.2-1.1.fc26 and it seems to be working. > I have experienced this issue now with nss-3.31.0-1.0.fc25.x86_64 on F25. The fedpkg client gets stucked after reading expired ~/.fedora.cert. After removing the old certificate-key file, it works again with the new nss. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?
Hello: Fabio Valentini wrote on 07/14/2017 06:04 PM: Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do anything until I kill it ... I can't pin down the exact date it stopped working (since I don't use it every day), but I first noticed it yesterday after installing updates from f26-updates-testing (although those updates probably didn't cause the bug, because downgrading to f26 stable packages didn't help). Am I the only one affected by this bug or has nobody else been building packages? ;) Fabio Yes, I am seeing the same issue on F-26. Looks like some of nss-* 3.31.0-1.0.fc26 packages are the culprits. I downgraded to nss-* 3.30.2-1.1.fc26 and it seems to be working. Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:04:23AM +, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg > new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error > message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do > anything until I kill it ... > > I can't pin down the exact date it stopped working (since I don't use it > every day), but I first noticed it yesterday after installing updates from > f26-updates-testing (although those updates probably didn't cause the bug, > because downgrading to f26 stable packages didn't help). > > Am I the only one affected by this bug or has nobody else been building > packages? ;) It worked for me about 2 hours ago when I was uploading a new version of american-fuzzy-lop. Might it be a network problem, either at your side or on the server side? Proxy settings might also affect curl. fedpkg has ‘--verbose’ and ‘--debug’ options which might help. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?
Hello, I was able to successfully use 'fedpkg new-sources' (still from f25) right now. clime On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg > new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error > message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do > anything until I kill it ... > > I can't pin down the exact date it stopped working (since I don't use it > every day), but I first noticed it yesterday after installing updates from > f26-updates-testing (although those updates probably didn't cause the bug, > because downgrading to f26 stable packages didn't help). > > Am I the only one affected by this bug or has nobody else been building > packages? ;) > > Fabio > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
fedpkg new-sources broken?
Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do anything until I kill it ... I can't pin down the exact date it stopped working (since I don't use it every day), but I first noticed it yesterday after installing updates from f26-updates-testing (although those updates probably didn't cause the bug, because downgrading to f26 stable packages didn't help). Am I the only one affected by this bug or has nobody else been building packages? ;) Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources still uploading twice?
Il 02/05/2017 15:13, Richard Shaw ha scritto: I know this was reported as far back as December... Am I the only one still seeing sources getting uploaded twice? Thanks, Richard No news since February. Look at https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/103 Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources still uploading twice?
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esserwrote: Still uploading twice for me too… Me three ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources still uploading twice?
Am 02.05.2017 um 15:13 schrieb Richard Shaw: I know this was reported as far back as December... Am I the only one still seeing sources getting uploaded twice? Thanks, Richard Still uploading twice for me too… ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
fedpkg new-sources still uploading twice?
I know this was reported as far back as December... Am I the only one still seeing sources getting uploaded twice? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources:
thanks for your quick response. after updating the mentioned program version and running kinit @FEDORAPROJECT.ORG the fedpkg new-sources ... works again. :-) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources:
On 15/12/16 12:20, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi I'm getting this: [martin@fc25 vdr-epg-daemon]$ fedpkg new-sources vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.70.tar.bz2 Could not execute new_sources: 302 Found Found The document has moved https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi;>here. You need to update your tools. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FlagDay2016#What_do_I_have_to_do Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources:
more informations: [martin@fc25 vdr-epg-daemon]$ koji -d hello 2016-12-15 15:28:53,365 [DEBUG] koji: Opening new requests session 2016-12-15 15:28:53,366 [DEBUG] koji: Opening new requests session 2016-12-15 15:28:54,011 [DEBUG] koji: Opening new requests session Kerberos authentication failed: No credentials cache found (-1765328189) [martin@fc25 vdr-epg-daemon]$ fedora-cert -v Verifying Certificate cert expires: 2017-03-08 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/fedora-cert", line 85, in main(opts) File "/usr/bin/fedora-cert", line 63, in main fedora_cert.verify_cert() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora_cert/__init__.py", line 69, in verify_cert revoked = crl.get_revoked() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/OpenSSL/crypto.py", line 1921, in get_revoked revoked_stack = self._crl.crl.revoked AttributeError: '_cffi_backend.CData' object has no attribute 'crl' ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources:
Hi I'm getting this: [martin@fc25 vdr-epg-daemon]$ fedpkg new-sources vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.70.tar.bz2 Could not execute new_sources: 302 Found Found The document has moved https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi;>here. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: buildSRPMFromSCM: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: //qt-creator (Was: Re: fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources: Error checking for [...])
Rex Dieter wrote: > Sandro Mani wrote: >> The upload worked, but now I'm getting a failure during buildSRPMFromSCM: >> >> $ git clone -n git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org//qt-creator >> /var/lib/mock/f25-build-5222806-591862/root/tmp/scmroot/qt-creator >> Cloning into >> '/var/lib/mock/f25-build-5222806-591862/root/tmp/scmroot/qt-creator'... >> fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: >> //qt-creator >> >> Any ideas? > > The fedpkg/rpkg in -testing repo is apparently to blame. I'll file a bug > shortly. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319433 -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: buildSRPMFromSCM: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: //qt-creator (Was: Re: fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources: Error checking for [...])
Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > On 17.03.2016 23:22, Sandro Mani wrote: >> >> >> On 17.03.2016 17:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> >>> Neither. :) It's likely a fedpkg/pyrpkg bug. ;) >>> >>> What versions of those do you have installed? >>> >>> I think: >>> >>> pyrpkg-1.42-1.fc25.noarch >>> fedpkg-1.22-2.fc25.noarch >>> >>> should work, but pyrpkg versions 1.41* were broken in this way. >> Correct, works after updating the packages. Thanks > > The upload worked, but now I'm getting a failure during buildSRPMFromSCM: > > $ git clone -n git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org//qt-creator > /var/lib/mock/f25-build-5222806-591862/root/tmp/scmroot/qt-creator Cloning > into > '/var/lib/mock/f25-build-5222806-591862/root/tmp/scmroot/qt-creator'... > fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: > //qt-creator > > Any ideas? The fedpkg/rpkg in -testing repo is apparently to blame. I'll file a bug shortly. -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
buildSRPMFromSCM: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: //qt-creator (Was: Re: fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources: Error checking for [...])
On 17.03.2016 23:22, Sandro Mani wrote: On 17.03.2016 17:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Neither. :) It's likely a fedpkg/pyrpkg bug. ;) What versions of those do you have installed? I think: pyrpkg-1.42-1.fc25.noarch fedpkg-1.22-2.fc25.noarch should work, but pyrpkg versions 1.41* were broken in this way. Correct, works after updating the packages. Thanks The upload worked, but now I'm getting a failure during buildSRPMFromSCM: $ git clone -n git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org//qt-creator /var/lib/mock/f25-build-5222806-591862/root/tmp/scmroot/qt-creator Cloning into '/var/lib/mock/f25-build-5222806-591862/root/tmp/scmroot/qt-creator'... fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: //qt-creator Any ideas? Thanks -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources: Error checking for [...]
Hi I'm getting $ fedpkg new-sources qt-creator-opensource-src-3.6.1.tar.gz Could not execute new_sources: Error checking for qt-creator-opensource-src-3.6.1.tar.gz at https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi and same for another source tarball I've tried. When I open https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi in a browser, Firefox gives me the "Your connection is not secure" error. Is this an issue with my system or with the Fedora infrastructure? Thanks Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources: Error checking for [...]
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:26:40 +0100 Sandro Mani <manisan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I'm getting > > $ fedpkg new-sources qt-creator-opensource-src-3.6.1.tar.gz > Could not execute new_sources: Error checking for > qt-creator-opensource-src-3.6.1.tar.gz at > https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi > > and same for another source tarball I've tried. When I open > https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi in a browser, > Firefox gives me the "Your connection is not secure" error. > > Is this an issue with my system or with the Fedora infrastructure? Neither. :) It's likely a fedpkg/pyrpkg bug. ;) What versions of those do you have installed? I think: pyrpkg-1.42-1.fc25.noarch fedpkg-1.22-2.fc25.noarch should work, but pyrpkg versions 1.41* were broken in this way. kevin pgpKSETs9QAP1.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedpkg new-sources: Could not execute new_sources: Error checking for [...]
On 17.03.2016 17:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Neither. :) It's likely a fedpkg/pyrpkg bug. ;) What versions of those do you have installed? I think: pyrpkg-1.42-1.fc25.noarch fedpkg-1.22-2.fc25.noarch should work, but pyrpkg versions 1.41* were broken in this way. Correct, works after updating the packages. Thanks Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
fedpkg new-sources not working
Something seems to be wrong with 'fedpkg new-sources' here. :-( % fedpkg new-sources libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz Uploading: 329a61fa3c30acf46efef1a9221b2054 libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure: (60, Peer's certificate issuer has been marked as not trusted by the user.) I tried running 'fedora-cert -n' to get a new cert and even 'rm -rf ~/.fedora* fedora-packager-setup' to make sure nothing local was messed up but it still failed. % rpm -q fedpkg fedpkg-1.15-1.fc20.noarch Thanks! -T.C. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: fedpkg new-sources not working
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:35:22 -0700 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: Something seems to be wrong with 'fedpkg new-sources' here. :-( % fedpkg new-sources libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz Uploading: 329a61fa3c30acf46efef1a9221b2054 libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure: (60, Peer's certificate issuer has been marked as not trusted by the user.) I tried running 'fedora-cert -n' to get a new cert and even 'rm -rf ~/.fedora* fedora-packager-setup' to make sure nothing local was messed up but it still failed. % rpm -q fedpkg fedpkg-1.15-1.fc20.noarch I've seen this a few times and it was something wacky in ~/.pki/ can you try a 'mv ~/.pki ~/.pki.sav' and see if it works? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: fedpkg new-sources not working
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: I've seen this a few times and it was something wacky in ~/.pki/ can you try a 'mv ~/.pki ~/.pki.sav' and see if it works? That did the trick. Thanks for the _very_ quick help. :-) -T.C. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Any issue with fedpkg new-sources?
On 11/03/2012 08:27 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:41:05 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:29:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Hans and I have been having a problem uploading the source for the new version of hegdewars to the lookaside cache. There is some initial network traffic, but then things hang. Has anybody successfully uploaded a new file to the lookaside cache in about the last 12 hours? It looks like there was an issue with a bad version of nss that got into updates-testing and probably rawhide. I've been advised to try an older version. With a downgraded version of nss it now works with rawhide. For f18 the bad version has been pulled from updates-testing. With nss-3.14-8.f19 and nss-3.14-5.f18 just made it into updates-testing I was the verify that 'fedkg new-sources' and 'fedpkg update' stopped hanging. It was a double-locking issue that Bob Relyea fixed. Elio smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Any issue with fedpkg new-sources?
Hans and I have been having a problem uploading the source for the new version of hegdewars to the lookaside cache. There is some initial network traffic, but then things hang. Has anybody successfully uploaded a new file to the lookaside cache in about the last 12 hours? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Any issue with fedpkg new-sources?
* Bruno Wolff III [03/11/2012 15:30] : Has anybody successfully uploaded a new file to the lookaside cache in about the last 12 hours? Uploaded Queue-DBI-2.5.0.tar.gz just now. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Any issue with fedpkg new-sources?
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:29:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Hans and I have been having a problem uploading the source for the new version of hegdewars to the lookaside cache. There is some initial network traffic, but then things hang. Has anybody successfully uploaded a new file to the lookaside cache in about the last 12 hours? It looks like there was an issue with a bad version of nss that got into updates-testing and probably rawhide. I've been advised to try an older version. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Any issue with fedpkg new-sources?
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:41:05 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:29:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Hans and I have been having a problem uploading the source for the new version of hegdewars to the lookaside cache. There is some initial network traffic, but then things hang. Has anybody successfully uploaded a new file to the lookaside cache in about the last 12 hours? It looks like there was an issue with a bad version of nss that got into updates-testing and probably rawhide. I've been advised to try an older version. With a downgraded version of nss it now works with rawhide. For f18 the bad version has been pulled from updates-testing. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
fedpkg new-sources
Kevin: Thanks for you message about the new sources. Unfortunately, I do not have a copy of the mail message to reply directly to, so I am including its web address below: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/147704.html I uploaded a new version of the upstream source and checked that it was correct. This time the sources file [bradbell@localhost cppad]$ cat sources c3481a2b39c1a1744386afd0d6a99633 cppad-20110101.2.gpl.tgz agrees with the output of md5sum on the upstream source tarball. [bradbell@localhost cppad]$ md5sum cppad-20110101.2.gpl.tgz c3481a2b39c1a1744386afd0d6a99633 cppad-20110101.2.gpl.tgz The resulting build of cppad was successfully; see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2726774 Is there some way I should remove or correct the old tarball cppad-20110101.0.gpl.tgz which appears to be corrupted ? Perhaps it does not matter because no build using it was successful ? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedpkg new-sources
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:46:04 -0800 Brad Bell bradb...@seanet.com wrote: ...snip... Is there some way I should remove or correct the old tarball cppad-20110101.0.gpl.tgz which appears to be corrupted ? Perhaps it does not matter because no build using it was successful ? Shouldn't matter. I'd just leave it and move on. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedpkg new-sources
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 16:52:00 -0800 (PST) bradb...@seanet.com wrote: ...snip... When I execute md5sum cppad-20110101.0.gpl.tgz, I get ba57ee45b1a950004c33003e929c7ec1 cppad-20110101.0.gpl.tgz If you look in your sources file you will see: d25559c1adb7bbdbb254206b7464dc78 cppad-20110101.0.gpl.tgz So, the file in the lookaside cache doesn't match up. ;( Try fedpkg new-sources again on the file to re-upload it, check in the new sources file and see if that gets it working. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedpkg new-sources
On 01/09/2011 05:52 PM, bradb...@seanet.com wrote: I am trying to update the cppad package using a new version of the upstream source following the instructions on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo I used the command fedpkg new-sources cppad-20110101.0.gpl.tgz Don't you also have to commit the 'sources' file ? Not sure if you did that as well or not. Just a thought. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel