Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On 06/08/13 03:30, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 20:51 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ? and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated . perl-Qt has test suite failures with Perl 5.18. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 for status of the Perl 5.18 rebuild. Hi, in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 I see po-debconf, it depends on po4a and perl-Qt . po4a-0.44-11 was rebuilt successfully with perl 5.18 , but po-debconf tried to use po4a-0.44-10 The latest po-debconf build I can see (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5743618) used po4a-0.44-11 and didn't appear to use perl-Qt at all. The build failed for what appear to be non-Perl -related reasons. In list is missing (at least) debconf, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13893 I just check now, also needs perl-Qt-devel debconf can't build yet because perl-Qt is still broken. I don't know if Petr will be adding packages to the list on the wiki page if they can't be built simply because their dependencies have issues rather than being directly incompatible with Perl 5.18. Or at least not until the first attempt has been done at building all the Perl packages. and debhelper builds https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16206 are in wrong order ..., ausil rebuild first than ppisar. as ausil build fail , shouldn't be resubmitted by ausil ? I don't expect ausil to resubmit anything. The Perl SIG members will probably do so where possible. However, I don't see much activity upstream for PerlQT so there may not be a fix for that (and its dependencies) any time soon. Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On 05/08/13 00:26, Christopher Meng wrote: All my peel packages are failed because of the magic Requires is for 5.16, not 5.18. Don't know why. The Perl 5.18 rebuild was not complete when merged back into Rawhide prior to the F-20 mass rebuild. Unlike the F-20 mass rebuild, the Perl 5.18 rebuild has ordering requirements, so the packages at the top of the Perl stack (basically those with the deepest dependency chains) are still built for Perl 5.16. Petr Pisar is continuing with the Perl 5.18 rebuild in Rawhide proper to resolve this. Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On Seg, 2013-08-05 at 09:23 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: On 05/08/13 00:26, Christopher Meng wrote: All my peel packages are failed because of the magic Requires is for 5.16, not 5.18. Don't know why. The Perl 5.18 rebuild was not complete when merged back into Rawhide prior to the F-20 mass rebuild. Unlike the F-20 mass rebuild, the Perl 5.18 rebuild has ordering requirements, so the packages at the top of the Perl stack (basically those with the deepest dependency chains) are still built for Perl 5.16. Petr Pisar is continuing with the Perl 5.18 rebuild in Rawhide proper to resolve this. OK , Petr Pisar will rebuild the FTBFS in rawhide ? The 2nd mass rebuild is making a little confusion , now I have some bugs open with FTBFS because some packages still built for perl 5.16 Paul. -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On 05/08/13 15:05, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Seg, 2013-08-05 at 09:23 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: On 05/08/13 00:26, Christopher Meng wrote: All my peel packages are failed because of the magic Requires is for 5.16, not 5.18. Don't know why. The Perl 5.18 rebuild was not complete when merged back into Rawhide prior to the F-20 mass rebuild. Unlike the F-20 mass rebuild, the Perl 5.18 rebuild has ordering requirements, so the packages at the top of the Perl stack (basically those with the deepest dependency chains) are still built for Perl 5.16. Petr Pisar is continuing with the Perl 5.18 rebuild in Rawhide proper to resolve this. OK , Petr Pisar will rebuild the FTBFS in rawhide ? He's rebuilding the packages that have not yet been built for Perl 5.18. Ones that fail to build for other reasons will have to be addressed by their maintainers. The 2nd mass rebuild is making a little confusion , now I have some bugs open with FTBFS because some packages still built for perl 5.16 You'll probably need to close those yourself once the Perl 5.18 builds are done. Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 20:51 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ? and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated . perl-Qt has test suite failures with Perl 5.18. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 for status of the Perl 5.18 rebuild. Hi, in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 I see po-debconf, it depends on po4a and perl-Qt . po4a-0.44-11 was rebuilt successfully with perl 5.18 , but po-debconf tried to use po4a-0.44-10 In list is missing (at least) debconf, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13893 I just check now, also needs perl-Qt-devel and debhelper builds https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16206 are in wrong order ..., ausil rebuild first than ppisar. as ausil build fail , shouldn't be resubmitted by ausil ? Thanks and best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On Ter, 2013-08-06 at 03:30 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 20:51 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ? and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated . perl-Qt has test suite failures with Perl 5.18. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 for status of the Perl 5.18 rebuild. Hi, in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 I see po-debconf, it depends on po4a and perl-Qt . po4a-0.44-11 was rebuilt successfully with perl 5.18 , but po-debconf tried to use po4a-0.44-10 In list is missing (at least) debconf, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13893 I just check now, also needs perl-Qt-devel and debhelper builds https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16206 are in wrong order ..., ausil rebuild first than ppisar. as ausil build fail , shouldn't be resubmitted by ausil ? also dpkg have some wrong order https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=9963 Thanks and best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ? and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated . -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ? and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated . perl-Qt has test suite failures with Perl 5.18. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 for status of the Perl 5.18 rebuild. Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ? and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated . perl-Qt has test suite failures with Perl 5.18. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 for status of the Perl 5.18 rebuild. It doesn't appear to include all the perl packages that have failed in the mass rebuild. http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f20-failed.html Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 21:06:58 +0100 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl (build) debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ? and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated . perl-Qt has test suite failures with Perl 5.18. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 for status of the Perl 5.18 rebuild. It doesn't appear to include all the perl packages that have failed in the mass rebuild. http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f20-failed.html No, Dennis's list is auto-generated, whilst the wiki page is manually updated after some evaluation of why the build failed and addition of bug references. Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20130804 changes
All my peel packages are failed because of the magic Requires is for 5.16, not 5.18. Don't know why. Sent from S3 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
