Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

2018-12-06 Thread Dusty Mabe 


On 12/6/18 6:20 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:13 PM Dusty Mabe  > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/5/18 5:14 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe    >> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >     On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >
> >     >
> >     > I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where 
> things are going wrong.
> >     >
> >
> >     I think this a a regression is some of the new yaml parsing in 
> pungi. I opened a bug
> >     to see https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/1092
> >
> >     The updates-testing runs are running right after the updates runs 
> and overwriting the ref.
> >     For now we can disable updates-testing composes for silverblue so 
> that it won't overwrite
> >     the updates run.
> >
> >     Here is a PR for that:
> >     
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LGL6LPHSOPNKQUWGYHGZVSDOX466WHFH/
> >
> >     Dusty
> >
> >
> > My issue has been solved and could upgrade
> 
> Yep. We put in a workaround yesterday. We should be good now. Sorry about 
> that.
> 
> 
> Don't be sorry and be proud for your very quick action and for the good work 
> you do with this wonderful distro.

Thanks! It's an incredible team of people that help pull it off. I'm thankful 
for everyone who contributes!

Dusty 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

2018-12-06 Thread arnaud gaboury 
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:13 PM Dusty Mabe  wrote:

>
>
> On 12/5/18 5:14 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe  du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where
> things are going wrong.
> > >
> >
> > I think this a a regression is some of the new yaml parsing in
> pungi. I opened a bug
> > to see https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/1092
> >
> > The updates-testing runs are running right after the updates runs
> and overwriting the ref.
> > For now we can disable updates-testing composes for silverblue so
> that it won't overwrite
> > the updates run.
> >
> > Here is a PR for that:
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LGL6LPHSOPNKQUWGYHGZVSDOX466WHFH/
> >
> > Dusty
> >
> >
> > My issue has been solved and could upgrade
>
> Yep. We put in a workaround yesterday. We should be good now. Sorry about
> that.
>

Don't be sorry and be proud for your very quick action and for the good
work you do with this wonderful distro.



> Dusty
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

2018-12-05 Thread Dusty Mabe 


On 12/5/18 5:14 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe  > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> 
> >
> > I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where things are 
> going wrong.
> >
> 
> I think this a a regression is some of the new yaml parsing in pungi. I 
> opened a bug
> to see https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/1092
> 
> The updates-testing runs are running right after the updates runs and 
> overwriting the ref.
> For now we can disable updates-testing composes for silverblue so that it 
> won't overwrite
> the updates run.
> 
> Here is a PR for that:
> 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LGL6LPHSOPNKQUWGYHGZVSDOX466WHFH/
> 
> Dusty
> 
> 
> My issue has been solved and could upgrade

Yep. We put in a workaround yesterday. We should be good now. Sorry about that.

Dusty 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

2018-12-05 Thread arnaud gaboury 
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe  wrote:

>
>
> On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> >
> > I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where things are
> going wrong.
> >
>
> I think this a a regression is some of the new yaml parsing in pungi. I
> opened a bug
> to see https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/1092
>
> The updates-testing runs are running right after the updates runs and
> overwriting the ref.
> For now we can disable updates-testing composes for silverblue so that it
> won't overwrite
> the updates run.
>
> Here is a PR for that:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LGL6LPHSOPNKQUWGYHGZVSDOX466WHFH/
>
> Dusty
>

My issue has been solved and could upgrade

---
$ rpm-ostree upgrade
1 metadata, 0 content objects fetched; 569 B transferred in 1 seconds
Checking out tree 6b4bc8e... done
Enabled rpm-md repositories: updates fedora yarn rpm-fusion
rpm-md repo 'updates' (cached); generated: 2018-12-05T02:28:43Z
rpm-md repo 'fedora' (cached); generated: 2018-10-24T22:20:15Z
rpm-md repo 'yarn' (cached); generated: 2018-11-07T20:05:15Z
rpm-md repo 'rpm-fusion' (cached); generated: 2018-10-23T11:05:19Z
Importing metadata [=] 100%
Resolving dependencies... done
No upgrade available.
$  rpm-ostree status
State: idle
AutomaticUpdates: disabled
Deployments:
● ostree://fedora-atomic-29:fedora/29/x86_64/silverblue
   Version: 29.20181205.0 (2018-12-05T01:01:39Z)
BaseCommit:
6b4bc8e81acb50897c493154d09afb6f07da3b2d35a1811ab1f121c4447117c1
  GPGSignature: Valid signature by
5A03B4DD8254ECA02FDA1637A20AA56B429476B4
   LayeredPackages: byacc compat-ffmpeg28 dnf
fedora-workstation-repositories ffmpeg ffmpeg-libs flex gcc git
gnome-tweak-tool
gstreamer1-libav gstreamer1-plugins-ugly httpie
hugo kubernetes-client nano nodejs perl-AnyEvent-I3
python2-kobo-rpmlib python3-kobo-rpmlib snapd
vim wmctrl zsh

  ostree://fedora-atomic-29:fedora/29/x86_64/silverblue
   Version: 29.20181205.0 (2018-12-05T01:01:39Z)
BaseCommit:
6b4bc8e81acb50897c493154d09afb6f07da3b2d35a1811ab1f121c4447117c1
  GPGSignature: Valid signature by
5A03B4DD8254ECA02FDA1637A20AA56B429476B4
   LayeredPackages: byacc compat-ffmpeg28 dnf
fedora-workstation-repositories ffmpeg ffmpeg-libs flex gcc git
gnome-tweak-tool
gstreamer1-libav gstreamer1-plugins-ugly httpie
hugo kubernetes-client nano nodejs perl-AnyEvent-I3
python2-kobo-rpmlib python3-kobo-rpmlib snapd
vim wmctrl zsh
-


> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

2018-12-04 Thread Dusty Mabe 


On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:

> 
> I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where things are going 
> wrong.
> 

I think this a a regression is some of the new yaml parsing in pungi. I opened 
a bug
to see https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/1092

The updates-testing runs are running right after the updates runs and 
overwriting the ref.
For now we can disable updates-testing composes for silverblue so that it won't 
overwrite
the updates run.

Here is a PR for that: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LGL6LPHSOPNKQUWGYHGZVSDOX466WHFH/

Dusty 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

2018-12-04 Thread Dusty Mabe 


On 12/4/18 5:11 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> -
> $ cat /etc/os-release
> NAME=Fedora
> VERSION="29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
> ID=fedora
> VERSION_ID=29
> PLATFORM_ID="platform:f29"
> PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
> ---
> 
> now upgrading:
> 
> --
> 
>  # rpm-ostree upgrade 
> 1 metadata, 0 content objects fetched; 569 B transferred in 1 seconds
> Checking out tree 33b20cd... done
> Enabled rpm-md repositories: updates fedora yarn rpm-fusion
> rpm-md repo 'updates' (cached); generated: 2018-12-04T02:37:23Z
> rpm-md repo 'fedora' (cached); generated: 2018-10-24T22:20:15Z
> rpm-md repo 'yarn' (cached); generated: 2018-11-07T20:05:15Z
> rpm-md repo 'rpm-fusion' (cached); generated: 2018-10-23T11:05:19Z
> Importing metadata [=] 100%
> Resolving dependencies... Forbidden base package replacements:
>   libdnf 0.22.3-1.fc29 -> 0.22.0-8.fc29 (updates)
> failed
> error: Some base packages would be replaced



I saw this over the weekend but didn't have a lot of extra time to investigate. 
My theory
here is that one of your layered packages (can you give the output of 
`rpm-ostree status`?)
contains a package that depends on the newer libdnf. This should not happen but 
I suspect
an rpm that depends on the newer libdnf made it into the updates repo before 
the newer libdnf
made it into the updates repo.


On a side note I also found that my local installation of silverblue contains 
podman-0.11.1-1.gita4adfe5.fc29.x86_64, which, according to bodhi, isn't in 
updates:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=podman

So it's possible either there are some issues with our repos or our silverblue 
composes
might be pulling wrong content somehow.

And... After a little investigation I can see there is some different content 
between
the atomic host updates compose and the silverblue compose:


```
[dustymabe@media fedora-ostree-repo-mirror]$ ostree log 
onerepo:fedora/29/x86_64/silverblue  | head -n 5
commit 33b20cd7f31286861c7f7cdd78fe6211d76f2a1683141ed78290bc990ce64a52
ContentChecksum:  
cd3e6a7624f4638a8627032e3c9e7cb21cfb898456e1e7efad698eb194b2db8d
Date:  2018-12-04 03:43:35 +
Version: 29.20181204.0 
(no subject)
[dustymabe@media fedora-ostree-repo-mirror]$ ostree log 
onerepo:fedora/29/x86_64/updates/atomic-host  | head -n 5
commit f6086b9fff20af1f4b1a9c172191026a56dd36342933da9344b38004fe4dd758
ContentChecksum:  
db363011cbbe8a5e3796cdaecb0ff47f64f5ac931fca7d4fcf92027c25a262a6
Date:  2018-12-04 00:57:30 +  
Version: 29.20181204.0
(no subject)   
[dustymabe@media fedora-ostree-repo-mirror]$
[dustymabe@media fedora-ostree-repo-mirror]$ rpm-ostree --repo=./ db diff 
f6086b9fff20af1f4b1a9c172191026a56dd36342933da9344b38004fe4dd758 
33b20cd7f31286861c7f7cdd78fe6211d76f2a1683141ed78290bc990ce64a52
ostree diff commit old: 
f6086b9fff20af1f4b1a9c172191026a56dd36342933da9344b38004fe4dd758
ostree diff commit new: 
33b20cd7f31286861c7f7cdd78fe6211d76f2a1683141ed78290bc990ce64a52
Upgraded: 
  NetworkManager 1:1.12.4-2.fc29 -> 1:1.12.6-1.fc29
  NetworkManager-libnm 1:1.12.4-2.fc29 -> 1:1.12.6-1.fc29
  cryptsetup 2.0.5-1.fc29 -> 2.0.6-1.fc29   
  cryptsetup-libs 2.0.5-1.fc29 -> 2.0.6-1.fc29
  fedora-release 29-4 -> 29-5 
  fuse-overlayfs 0.1-5.dev.gitd40ac75.fc29 -> 0.1-6.dev.git3d48bf9.fc29
  kernel 4.19.5-300.fc29 -> 4.19.6-300.fc29
  kernel-core 4.19.5-300.fc29 -> 4.19.6-300.fc29
  kernel-modules 4.19.5-300.fc29 -> 4.19.6-300.fc29 
  pam 1.3.1-8.fc29 -> 1.3.1-13.fc29 
  podman 1:0.10.1.3-4.gitdb08685.fc29 -> 1:0.11.1-1.gita4adfe5.fc29
  runc 2:1.0.0-57.dev.git9e5aa74.fc29 -> 2:1.0.0-59.dev.gitccb5efd.fc29
Removed:
```

Looking at the commit timestamps from above and the timestamps from the compose 
logs
it looks like the silverblue ref was written by the updates-testing compose [1] 
rather than the updates compose [2].

I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where things are going 
wrong.

Dusty


[1]  
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-29-updates-testing-20181204.0/logs/x86_64/Everything/ostree-4/
[2] 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-29-updates-20181204.0/logs/x86_64/Everything/ostree-4/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

2018-12-04 Thread arnaud gaboury 
-
$ cat /etc/os-release
NAME=Fedora
VERSION="29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
ID=fedora
VERSION_ID=29
PLATFORM_ID="platform:f29"
PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
---

now upgrading:

--

 # rpm-ostree upgrade
1 metadata, 0 content objects fetched; 569 B transferred in 1 seconds
Checking out tree 33b20cd... done
Enabled rpm-md repositories: updates fedora yarn rpm-fusion
rpm-md repo 'updates' (cached); generated: 2018-12-04T02:37:23Z
rpm-md repo 'fedora' (cached); generated: 2018-10-24T22:20:15Z
rpm-md repo 'yarn' (cached); generated: 2018-11-07T20:05:15Z
rpm-md repo 'rpm-fusion' (cached); generated: 2018-10-23T11:05:19Z
Importing metadata [=] 100%
Resolving dependencies... Forbidden base package replacements:
  libdnf 0.22.3-1.fc29 -> 0.22.0-8.fc29 (updates)
failed
error: Some base packages would be replaced

---
$ dnf list installed | grep libdnf
568:libdnf.x86_64
0.22.0-8.fc29@System

---

I can't upgrade neither install any new package. How can I solve this
libdnf dependency?

TY for  help
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: upgrade failed

2017-09-30 Thread Jerry James 
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Chuck Anderson  wrote:
> PackageKit fills up /var/cache/PackageKit with downloaded packages.
> If you always use dnf and not the graphical updater, it will never get
> deleted and the system will crash when / runs out of space.  The
> upgrade itself also uses space to download everything.

Due to running into the same problem as Howard, I now do the following
whenever I set up a new Fedora system:
- Add a weekly cron job that runs "pkcon refresh force -c -1"
- Edit /etc/systemd/journald.conf to have the entry: "MaxRetentionSec=3month"

Even then, I always aggressively nuke stuff in /var/cache just before
doing a system upgrade, because the upgrade has a distressing tendency
to fail due to lack of space otherwise.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: upgrade failed

2017-09-30 Thread Chuck Anderson 
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 09:08:45AM -0700, Howard Howell wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 02:51 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > 
> > Am 30.09.2017 um 01:53 schrieb Howard Howell:
> > > installing package ncurses-libs-6.0-8.20170212.fc26.i686 needs
> > > 22458368
> > > on the / filesystem
> > > installing package json-c-0.12.1-2.fc26.i686 needs 21594112 on the
> > > /
> > > filesystem
> > 
> > well, don't mess up your system until your disk is full and that is 
> > hardly a "development topic"
> I didn't mess up my system, I don't put stuff in /.  If a set of
> software is putting stuff in /, that needs to be paid attention, and
> corrected in the chain.

PackageKit fills up /var/cache/PackageKit with downloaded packages.
If you always use dnf and not the graphical updater, it will never get
deleted and the system will crash when / runs out of space.  The
upgrade itself also uses space to download everything.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: upgrade failed

2017-09-30 Thread Howard Howell 
On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 02:51 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
> Am 30.09.2017 um 01:53 schrieb Howard Howell:
> > installing package ncurses-libs-6.0-8.20170212.fc26.i686 needs
> > 22458368
> > on the / filesystem
> > installing package json-c-0.12.1-2.fc26.i686 needs 21594112 on the
> > /
> > filesystem
> 
> well, don't mess up your system until your disk is full and that is 
> hardly a "development topic"
I didn't mess up my system, I don't put stuff in /.  If a set of
software is putting stuff in /, that needs to be paid attention, and
corrected in the chain.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: upgrade failed

2017-09-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones 
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 04:53:34PM -0700, Howard Howell wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>   Backed up my system and tried the upgrade by clicking on the
> software>>upgrade button.  It failed.

Please ask these questions on the users mailing list:

us...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: upgrade failed

2017-09-29 Thread William Moreno 
Looks like you get out ot space un your  /  , i hace the same issue un the
f25 -> f26 upgrade, removing unused packages should fix these error messages

Maybe a simple

# dnf clean all && dnf autoremove

Can be enougth

--
Enviado desde mi móvil, disculpe la brevedad
William

El 29/9/2017 5:54 p. m., "Howard Howell"  escribió:

> Hi, guys,
> Backed up my system and tried the upgrade by clicking on the
> software>>upgrade button.  It failed.
>
> Here is the output from the notification box:
>
> Detailed errors from the package manager follow:
>
> Error running transaction: installing package glibc-all-langpacks-2.25-
> 10.fc26.x86_64 needs 61677568 on the / filesystem
> installing package adobe-source-han-sans-cn-fonts-1.004-3.fc26.noarch
> needs 5804032 on the / filesystem
> installing package mrpt-doc-1.4.0-1.fc26.noarch needs 203509760 on the
> / filesystem
> installing package libwebp-0.6.0-2.fc26.i686 needs 167936 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package pixman-0.34.0-3.fc26.i686 needs 958464 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package proj-4.9.3-2.fc26.i686 needs 688128 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-85.fc26.i686 needs 798720 on
> the / filesystem
> installing package gsm-1.0.17-1.fc26.i686 needs 860160 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package libsndfile-1.0.28-6.fc26.i686 needs 1404928 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package nss-softokn-freebl-3.32.0-1.2.fc26.i686 needs
> 1478656 on the / filesystem
> installing package libcrypt-nss-2.25-10.fc26.i686 needs 1183744 on the
> / filesystem
> installing package libdb-5.3.28-24.fc26.i686 needs 3289088 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package libsepol-2.6-2.fc26.i686 needs 2146304 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package libselinux-2.6-7.fc26.i686 needs 1998848 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package libmount-2.30.2-1.fc26.i686 needs 2523136 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package glib2-2.52.3-1.fc26.i686 needs 5894144 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package gstreamer1-1.12.2-1.fc26.i686 needs 8994816 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package harfbuzz-1.4.4-1.fc26.i686 needs 882 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package libglvnd-egl-1:0.2.999-
> 24.20170818git8d4d03f.fc26.i686 needs 8990720 on the / filesystem
> installing package mesa-libEGL-17.1.7-1.fc26.i686 needs 9248768 on the
> / filesystem
> installing package mesa-libglapi-17.1.7-1.fc26.i686 needs 9306112 on
> the / filesystem
> installing package libglvnd-glx-1:0.2.999-
> 24.20170818git8d4d03f.fc26.i686 needs 9646080 on the / filesystem
> installing package mesa-libGL-17.1.7-1.fc26.i686 needs 9801728 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package cairo-1.14.10-1.fc26.i686 needs 10874880 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package pango-1.40.12-1.fc26.i686 needs 11657216 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package lz4-libs-1.8.0-1.fc26.i686 needs 11685888 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package systemd-libs-233-6.fc26.i686 needs 13332480 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package dbus-libs-1:1.11.16-1.fc26.i686 needs 13393920 on
> the / filesystem
> installing package qt-1:4.8.7-28.fc26.i686 needs 28168192 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package qt-x11-1:4.8.7-28.fc26.i686 needs 51011584 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package qt-mobility-common-1.2.2-
> 0.26.20140317git169da60c.fc26.i686 needs 14217216 on the / filesystem
> installing package qt-mobility-location-1.2.2-
> 0.26.20140317git169da60c.fc26.i686 needs 16404480 on the / filesystem
> installing package qt-mobility-sensors-1.2.2-
> 0.26.20140317git169da60c.fc26.i686 needs 14770176 on the / filesystem
> installing package dbusmenu-qt-0.9.3-0.12.20150604.fc26.i686 needs
> 14532608 on the / filesystem
> installing package pulseaudio-libs-10.0-4.fc26.i686 needs 15450112 on
> the / filesystem
> installing package orc-0.4.27-1.fc26.i686 needs 15118336 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package libstdc++-devel-7.2.1-2.fc26.i686 needs 16551936 on
> the / filesystem
> installing package gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.12.2-1.fc26.i686 needs
> 21639168 on the / filesystem
> installing package qtwebkit-2.3.4-16.fc26.i686 needs 97132544 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.1.4-1.fc26.i686 needs
> 19890176 on the / filesystem
> installing package sni-qt-0.2.6-8.fc26.i686 needs 2768 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package pam-1.3.0-2.fc26.i686 needs 21315584 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package krb5-libs-1.15.1-28.fc26.i686 needs 22863872 on the
> / filesystem
> installing package libacl-2.2.52-15.fc26.i686 needs 21073920 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package libXScrnSaver-1.2.2-11.fc26.i686 needs 21094400 on
> the / filesystem
> installing package ncurses-compat-libs-6.0-8.20170212.fc26.i686 needs
> 22257664 on the / filesystem
> installing package libbsd-0.8.3-3.fc26.i686 needs 21385216 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package libidn-1.33-2.fc26.i686 needs 21573632 on the /
> filesystem
> installing package

upgrade failed

2017-09-29 Thread Howard Howell 
Hi, guys,
Backed up my system and tried the upgrade by clicking on the
software>>upgrade button.  It failed.

Here is the output from the notification box:

Detailed errors from the package manager follow:

Error running transaction: installing package glibc-all-langpacks-2.25-
10.fc26.x86_64 needs 61677568 on the / filesystem
installing package adobe-source-han-sans-cn-fonts-1.004-3.fc26.noarch
needs 5804032 on the / filesystem
installing package mrpt-doc-1.4.0-1.fc26.noarch needs 203509760 on the
/ filesystem
installing package libwebp-0.6.0-2.fc26.i686 needs 167936 on the /
filesystem
installing package pixman-0.34.0-3.fc26.i686 needs 958464 on the /
filesystem
installing package proj-4.9.3-2.fc26.i686 needs 688128 on the /
filesystem
installing package tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-85.fc26.i686 needs 798720 on
the / filesystem
installing package gsm-1.0.17-1.fc26.i686 needs 860160 on the /
filesystem
installing package libsndfile-1.0.28-6.fc26.i686 needs 1404928 on the /
filesystem
installing package nss-softokn-freebl-3.32.0-1.2.fc26.i686 needs
1478656 on the / filesystem
installing package libcrypt-nss-2.25-10.fc26.i686 needs 1183744 on the
/ filesystem
installing package libdb-5.3.28-24.fc26.i686 needs 3289088 on the /
filesystem
installing package libsepol-2.6-2.fc26.i686 needs 2146304 on the /
filesystem
installing package libselinux-2.6-7.fc26.i686 needs 1998848 on the /
filesystem
installing package libmount-2.30.2-1.fc26.i686 needs 2523136 on the /
filesystem
installing package glib2-2.52.3-1.fc26.i686 needs 5894144 on the /
filesystem
installing package gstreamer1-1.12.2-1.fc26.i686 needs 8994816 on the /
filesystem
installing package harfbuzz-1.4.4-1.fc26.i686 needs 882 on the /
filesystem
installing package libglvnd-egl-1:0.2.999-
24.20170818git8d4d03f.fc26.i686 needs 8990720 on the / filesystem
installing package mesa-libEGL-17.1.7-1.fc26.i686 needs 9248768 on the
/ filesystem
installing package mesa-libglapi-17.1.7-1.fc26.i686 needs 9306112 on
the / filesystem
installing package libglvnd-glx-1:0.2.999-
24.20170818git8d4d03f.fc26.i686 needs 9646080 on the / filesystem
installing package mesa-libGL-17.1.7-1.fc26.i686 needs 9801728 on the /
filesystem
installing package cairo-1.14.10-1.fc26.i686 needs 10874880 on the /
filesystem
installing package pango-1.40.12-1.fc26.i686 needs 11657216 on the /
filesystem
installing package lz4-libs-1.8.0-1.fc26.i686 needs 11685888 on the /
filesystem
installing package systemd-libs-233-6.fc26.i686 needs 13332480 on the /
filesystem
installing package dbus-libs-1:1.11.16-1.fc26.i686 needs 13393920 on
the / filesystem
installing package qt-1:4.8.7-28.fc26.i686 needs 28168192 on the /
filesystem
installing package qt-x11-1:4.8.7-28.fc26.i686 needs 51011584 on the /
filesystem
installing package qt-mobility-common-1.2.2-
0.26.20140317git169da60c.fc26.i686 needs 14217216 on the / filesystem
installing package qt-mobility-location-1.2.2-
0.26.20140317git169da60c.fc26.i686 needs 16404480 on the / filesystem
installing package qt-mobility-sensors-1.2.2-
0.26.20140317git169da60c.fc26.i686 needs 14770176 on the / filesystem
installing package dbusmenu-qt-0.9.3-0.12.20150604.fc26.i686 needs
14532608 on the / filesystem
installing package pulseaudio-libs-10.0-4.fc26.i686 needs 15450112 on
the / filesystem
installing package orc-0.4.27-1.fc26.i686 needs 15118336 on the /
filesystem
installing package libstdc++-devel-7.2.1-2.fc26.i686 needs 16551936 on
the / filesystem
installing package gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.12.2-1.fc26.i686 needs
21639168 on the / filesystem
installing package qtwebkit-2.3.4-16.fc26.i686 needs 97132544 on the /
filesystem
installing package alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.1.4-1.fc26.i686 needs
19890176 on the / filesystem
installing package sni-qt-0.2.6-8.fc26.i686 needs 2768 on the /
filesystem
installing package pam-1.3.0-2.fc26.i686 needs 21315584 on the /
filesystem
installing package krb5-libs-1.15.1-28.fc26.i686 needs 22863872 on the
/ filesystem
installing package libacl-2.2.52-15.fc26.i686 needs 21073920 on the /
filesystem
installing package libXScrnSaver-1.2.2-11.fc26.i686 needs 21094400 on
the / filesystem
installing package ncurses-compat-libs-6.0-8.20170212.fc26.i686 needs
22257664 on the / filesystem
installing package libbsd-0.8.3-3.fc26.i686 needs 21385216 on the /
filesystem
installing package libidn-1.33-2.fc26.i686 needs 21573632 on the /
filesystem
installing package libseccomp-2.3.2-1.fc26.i686 needs 21544960 on the /
filesystem
installing package ncurses-libs-6.0-8.20170212.fc26.i686 needs 22458368
on the / filesystem
installing package json-c-0.12.1-2.fc26.i686 needs 21594112 on the /
filesystem
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: test dnf system-upgrade (failed?)

2016-11-20 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 14:05 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> I tried to test upgrade f24->f25:
> 
> sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=25 --
> allowerasing
> 
> but it wanted to downgrade a large number of packages, particularly
> texlive:
> [hundreds of downgrades...]
>  texlive-zlmtt  noarch  
> 5:svn34485.1.01-
> 17.fc25.1   fedora   
> 35 k
> 
> Just checking that last one:
>  rpm -q texlive-zlmtt
> texlive-zlmtt-svn34485.1.01-24.fc24.1.noarch
> 
> Yup, the f24 version seems to be newer.
> 
> I suppose this is not the correct procedure?

Well, no. There really isn't any bug here. The current F25 package is
older than the current F24 package, so if you upgrade from F24 to F25,
the package will indeed be downgraded. This is all basically as it
should be, nothing is wrong, and if you went ahead with the upgrade, it
ought to work correctly.

This is not uncommon around this point in the cycle, because updates
can be pushed stable for 23 and 24 while 25 is in its Final freeze and
only blocker / FE fixes can be pushed stable. So it does happen that 25
'stable' gets behind 23/24 'stable' for some packages. This usually
gets sorted out when we start doing the post-freeze stable pushes, but
it's usually not actually a *problem* anyway.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: test dnf system-upgrade (failed?)

2016-11-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 02:05:37PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> I tried to test upgrade f24->f25:
> 
> sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=25 --allowerasing
> 
> but it wanted to downgrade a large number of packages, particularly texlive:
> [hundreds of downgrades...]
>  texlive-zlmtt  noarch  
> 5:svn34485.1.01-17.fc25.1   fedora
>
> 35 k
> 
> Just checking that last one:
>  rpm -q texlive-zlmtt
> texlive-zlmtt-svn34485.1.01-24.fc24.1.noarch

Yes, it's a (temporary) bug in the texlive package set. F24 has
5:svn34485.1.01-24.fc24.1, while F25 updates-testing has
5:svn34485.1.01-17.fc25.1. I assume spot is aware.
What's strange is that the F24 build with higher number is rather old:
texlive-2015-24.20150728_r37987.fc24  spot   2016-02-17 02:35:46

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

test dnf system-upgrade (failed?)

2016-11-20 Thread Neal Becker 
I tried to test upgrade f24->f25:

sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=25 --allowerasing

but it wanted to downgrade a large number of packages, particularly texlive:
[hundreds of downgrades...]
 texlive-zlmtt  noarch  
5:svn34485.1.01-17.fc25.1   fedora  
 
35 k

Just checking that last one:
 rpm -q texlive-zlmtt
texlive-zlmtt-svn34485.1.01-24.fc24.1.noarch

Yup, the f24 version seems to be newer.

I suppose this is not the correct procedure?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org