Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
talled > > - python2-tornado-5.0.2-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > > python2-tornado is already in f-o-p. I'll add > python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch. > > > - problem with installed package python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch > > Problem 6: problem with installed package > libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > > - package libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 requires > libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 does not belong > to a distupgrade repository > > - jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > > Problem 7: cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 and > jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 > > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > > - package cmake-3.14.5-4.fc31.x86_64 requires > libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - problem with installed package > python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > > - problem with installed package cmake-3.14.5-1.fc30.x86_64 > > - python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 does not > belong to a distupgrade repository > > - cmake-3.14.5-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > > Problem 8: package openshot-2.4.4-2.fc31.noarch requires > python3-libopenshot >= 0.2.3, but none of the providers can be installed > > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > > - cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 and > jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 > > - package vtk-8.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), > but none of the providers can be installed > > Looks like this needs another rebuild and an update. > > There's more stuff to be fished out from this report ... but I need to run. > > Zbyszek > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Need help with my packages
Hi, I'm interested in the following packages (either primary or co maintainer) python-optcomplete python-pkgconfig python-pyface python-pytest-cache python-pytest-cov python-pytest-flakes python-scp fas: chedi On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 11:07 PM Ian McInerney wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 9:31 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help. If >> you would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or >> becoming the primary maintainer, please let me know. The full list >> follows. Many of these I just made the scitech_sig group co-mainter of >> as described here: >> >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scit...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/76IZTKYWTLQL35FJAWEWBNUIGRAQJQX7/ >> >> so if you are interested in those becoming a member of the scitech_sig, >> if you are not already, would probably be the easiest. >> >> Thanks! >> >> libreoffice-TexMaths > > > I can take this one (either as a co-maintainer or as the primary > maintainer, it is up to you). My fas is imcinerney. > > -Ian > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
pgrade > repository > > - problem with installed package moodbar-0.1.2-19.fc29.x86_64 > > > > Removed moodbar and next try was fine. > > Looked closer - there are six downgrades: > > Instalowanie poprzedniej wersji: > firefox x86_64 72.0.2-3.fc32fedora 98 > M > java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless >x86_64 1:1.8.0.242.b06-0.0.ea.fc32 >fedora 32 > M > kf5-kirigami2 x86_64 5.67.0-1.fc32fedora 248 > k > libarchivex86_64 3.4.0-2.fc32 fedora 388 > k > libarchive-devel x86_64 3.4.0-2.fc32 fedora 124 > k > qqc2-desktop-stylex86_64 5.67.0-1.fc32fedora 100 > k > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Needs help to finalize partio.spec
The error in your build.log ()
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/python/site-packages/partedit.py
/usr/lib64/python/site-packages/partinspect.py
/usr/lib64/python/site-packages/partjson.py
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/python/site-packages/partedit.py
/usr/lib64/python/site-packages/partinspect.py
/usr/lib64/python/site-packages/partjson.py
Indicate that you have installed some files but did not list them in
the %files section, alghouth,
These paths are not the standard install paths for python files.
going by the line
#Remove files from unversioned python directory
rm -f %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch}/*.py
I think you were intending to delete them to but the macro
*%{python3_sitearch}* expands to */usr/lib64/python3.X/site-packages*
on 64bit architectures (e.g. x86_64) and
*/usr/lib/python3.X/site-packages* on 32bit.
so maybe update your install script or replace the deletion line as following
*rm -f %{buildroot}/usr/lib64/python/site-packages/*.py*
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 7:47 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I am about to package partio[1], a component used by openshadinglanguage
> (a new dependency for Blender) but hit an issue relate to an
> non-versioned python files. Will someone show pointer?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Reference:
>
> [1]
>
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luya/openshadinglanguage/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01559509-partio/partio.spec
>
> COPR:
>
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luya/openshadinglanguage/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01559509-partio/
>
> --
> Luya Tshimbalanga
> Fedora Design Team
> Fedora Design Suite maintainer
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
*Chedi Toueiti*
* Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be
responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff.
** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.
*** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me
and brings me back.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Review request/swap: python-subprocess-tee
Hi, This package is a new dependency of python-molecule. Can someone take a look and review it please. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747 Happy to review in exchange. -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Review request/swap python-enrich
Hi, This package is a new dependency of python-molecule. Can someone take a look and review it please. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911296 Happy to review in exchange. -- *Chedi Toueiti* ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
review request
Hi, I have a trivial python package (re-assert) to review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941362 needed for pre-commit tests. Happy to review in exchange. Regards, -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34
Error: Problem: package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_anal.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_asm.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_bin.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_bp.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_config.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_cons.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_core.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_crypto.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_debug.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_egg.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_flag.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_fs.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_hash.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_io.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_parse.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_reg.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_search.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_syscall.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires libr_util.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package cutter-re-1.11.0-2.fc33.x86_64 - radare2-4.5.0-2.fc33.1.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - cutter-re-1.11.0-2.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 1:31 PM Pablo Sebastián Greco < pa...@fliagreco.com.ar> wrote: > > On 20/2/21 09:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:45:58AM -0300, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote: > >> On 20/2/21 06:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >>>sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \ > >>> --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular > \ > >>> distro-sync > >>> > >> Can we add --assumeno to the command line to avoid the prompt? > > That's a good idea. > > > >>> If you have have rdma-core.i686 installed you have to pass > >>> `--allowerasing`. > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919864 > >> Error: > >> Problem: rdma-core-33.0-2.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture > >>- rdma-core-33.0-2.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > >> repository > >>- problem with installed package rdma-core-33.0-2.fc33.i686 > >> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > See the quote above. > Wow, don't know how I missed that :D, thanks > > No more errors after that: > Transaction Summary > > Install 41 Packages > Upgrade2609 Packages > Remove6 Packages > Downgrade51 Packages > > > Zbyszek > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Error: Problem: problem with installed package watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 - watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libfolly.so.2021.04.12.00()(64bit) needed by watchman-2021.04.12.00-1.fc35.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:13 PM wrote: > El mar, 07-09-2021 a las 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý escribió: > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > > > Transaction Summary > > > Install 107 Packages > Upgrade 3805 Packages > Remove 13 Packages > Downgrade 32 Packages > > Total download size: 4.9 G > Is this ok [y/N]: > > > thx dev TEAM for make FEDORA better. as always GOOD WORK > > > -- > Héctor Louzao ->@hhlp > He / His / Him > Fedora Project Contributor > TZ=Europe/Madrid > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Hhlp > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Review swap
Help needed for reviewing this trivial python package python-ansible-pygments: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010045 -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
missing pyproject-rpm-macros component from EPEL (Bugzilla)
I noticed that pyproject-rpm-macros is not listed as a Bugzilla component in the EPEL product. Is there a specific reason for that? If not can someone add it or direct me to the adequate procedure to request it. -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: missing pyproject-rpm-macros component from EPEL (Bugzilla)
fair enough, will this be also the case for EPEL9? On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:47 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 22:24 +0100, chedi toueiti wrote: > > I noticed that pyproject-rpm-macros is not listed as a Bugzilla component > > in the EPEL product. Is there a specific reason for that? If not can > > someone add it or direct me to the adequate procedure to request it. > > It's 'missing' because the package isn't built on EPEL. It's not built > on EPEL because the EL 7 and EL 8 environments are too old for the > macros to work. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA > IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha > https://www.happyassassin.net > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Python package review
Hi, I'm looking for help review the following python packages needed by python-jsonschema+format python-rfc3339-validator: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106174 python-rfc3986-validator: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106171 and let me know if you need something reviewed in exchange. Regards, ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Missing qt6-webengine package
thanks for the insight, I'll try to see if they could use my help. On 10/18/22 21:05, Dan Horák wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 19:54:13 +0100 chedi toueiti wrote: Sorry if this has been asked before (I didn't find any reference in the archives). I noticed that the qt6-webengine package is missing, a bug has been filled since February with no answer ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055135). Is there any hope to have it packaged, and how can I help with that ? see alsohttps://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/issue/127, so some progress has been made Dan ___ devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Missing qt6-webengine package
Sorry if this has been asked before (I didn't find any reference in the archives). I noticed that the qt6-webengine package is missing, a bug has been filled since February with no answer ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055135). Is there any hope to have it packaged, and how can I help with that ? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
