RE: 11.3.1 development build 26 for XO-1.75

2012-02-01 Thread 林蔚恆
Hi Martin,
We have 13 machines passed the 24 hours runin test with OS26.
10 are 4G SKU and the others are 8G.

Still have 3 8G machines doing the runin test.

We confirmed this version fixed many issues as below:
#11392, #11528, #11576, #11546, #11595, #11536, #10831, #10893, #11496, #11321

Will keep update the test results to you.

Best Regards,
---
WeiHeng Lin 林蔚恆
Notebook Business Unit 2
Software Design Division
E-mail: weiheng@quantatw.com
TEL:886-3-3272345 ext:13313
---

-Original Message-
From: martin.langhoff.o...@gmail.com [mailto:martin.langhoff.o...@gmail.com] On 
Behalf Of Martin Langhoff
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:37 AM
To: OLPC Tech Team; Wei-Heng Lin (林蔚恆); Chia-Hsiu Chang (張嘉修); Eddie Tsai ( 蔡豐吉 
); Mars Chang(張嘉文); Devel List
Subject: 11.3.1 development build 26 for XO-1.75

This build merges kernel 3.0.17 (which reworks the MMC layer), and includes 
fixes in EC communication, audio recording  playback, WLAN during 
suspend/resume and serial port driver. It also downgrades some graphics 
libraries back to OS24 versions.

Notes:

 - Under GNOME we have a new cursor theme that looks much better.

 - Thanks to the suspend/resume WLAN fixes, this build has aggressive suspend 
resume enabled under normal usage. The resume path is still a bit slow, but 
generally works.

 - Wake-on-LAN is not yet working -- WLAN stays associated to an access point 
during SoC sleep, but will not wake to a ping or tcp connection.

Download from:

  http://build.laptop.org/11.3.1/os26/

Fixes (please help us confirm):

#11392 XO-1.75 kernel turns off WLAN during suspend/resume
#11510 Libertas device loses wireless extensions after suspend/resume cycle
#11528 XO-1.75 os18 runin: read-only filesystem mmcblk0: error -110 sending 
SET_BLOCK_COUNT command, response 0x0, card status 0x0
#11576 XO-1.75 C1 os24 RUNIN fail, static progress, mmcblk0: error
-110 sending SET_BLOCK_COUNT command, response 0x0, card status 0x400d00
#11546 Record activity cannot record audio 11.3.1 os19
#11515 XO-1.75 record activity hangs X and keyboard in seconds if rotate key 
pressed
#11595 XO-1.75 camera missing after boot, rarely

--- os25/xo1.75/os25.packages.txt   2012-01-19 08:55:48.0 -0500
+++ os26/xo1.75/os26.packages.txt   2012-01-30 13:11:06.0 -0500
+cursors-adwaita2b-3.0.2.2-1.fc16.noarch
-kernel-3.0.0_xo1.75-20120118.1854.olpc.b2845e6.armv7l
+kernel-3.0.17_xo1.75-20120127.1639.olpc.61e0e9e.armv7l
-libX11-1.4.3-1.olpc.armv5tel
-libX11-common-1.4.3-1.olpc.noarch
+libX11-1.3.4-4.fc14.armv5tel
+libX11-common-1.3.4-4.fc14.noarch
-libxcb-1.7-3.olpc.armv5tel
+libxcb-1.7-1.fc14.armv5tel
-olpc-firmware-q4c12-1.unsigned.noarch
+olpc-firmware-q4d02-1.unsigned.noarch
-olpc-runin-tests-0.17.1-1.armv7l
+olpc-runin-tests-0.17.3-1.armv7l

cheers,



m
--
 mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [IAEP] [x-post] GNU Project renews focus on free software in education

2012-02-01 Thread Sean DALY
http://www.sugarlabs.org/index.php?template=pressarticle=20090918language=english#20090918

This followed uninformed misstatements in the media at the time by
some FSF members.

FSF influence on K-8 education departments is minimal, but I agree
more can always be done. We need to be in touch with Dora.

Most FSF people I know think high school or university when the topic
is educational software; e.g. FSFE edu-eu mailing list
(https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-eu)

Sean



On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
srid...@laptop.org.au wrote:
 Brilliant!

 What can we do to have Sugar more formally recognised by the FSF? I
 think it should be their desktop of choice for primary school
 education.

 Sridhar


 Sridhar Dhanapalan
 Engineering Manager
 One Laptop per Child Australia



 On 31 January 2012 23:28, Anish Mangal an...@activitycentral.com wrote:
 Hi,

 Just received a message on the fsf-info list about FSF relaunching the
 GNU education project:

 Links:
 [1] http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/gnu-education-website-relaunch
 [blog post]
 [2] http://www.gnu.org/education/ [GNU Education website]

 --
 Anish


 * * *


 BOSTON, Massachusetts, USA -- Monday, January 30, 2012 -- The GNU
 Project today announced the relaunch of its worldwide volunteer-led
 effort to bring free software to educational institutions of all
 levels. The new effort is based at http://www.gnu.org/education.

 The newly formed GNU Education Team is being led by Dora Scilipoti, an
 Italian free software activist and teacher. Under her leadership, the
 Team has developed a list of specific goals to guide their work:


 Present cases of educational institutions around the world who are
 successfully using and teaching free software.

 Show examples of how free programs are being used by educational
 institutions to improve the learning and teaching processes.

 Publish articles on the various aspects involved in the use of free
 software by educational institutions.

 Maintain a dialogue with teachers, students and administrators of
 educational institutions to listen to their difficulties and provide
 support.

 Keep in contact with other groups around the world committed to the
 promotion of free software in education.

 GNU and its host organization, the Free Software Foundation (FSF),
 emphasize that free software principles are a prerequisite for any
 educational environment that uses computers:

 Educational institutions of all levels should use and teach free
 software because it is the only software that allows them to
 accomplish their essential missions: to disseminate human knowledge
 and to prepare students to be good members of their community. The
 source code and the methods of free software are part of human
 knowledge. On the contrary, proprietary software is secret, restricted
 knowledge, which is the opposite of the mission of educational
 institutions. Free software supports education, proprietary software
 forbids education.

 In an article at
 http://fsf.org/blogs/community/gnu-education-website-relaunch,
 Scilipoti adds insights about the project's organizing philosophy,
 current contributors, and progress so far. Of her basic motivation for
 being involved, she says, As a free software advocate and a teacher,
 I always felt that the GNU Project needed to address the subject
 specifically and in depth, for it is in the education field that its
 ethical principles find the most fertile ground for achieving the goal
 of building a better society.

 In her article, Scilipoti also highlights some of the free software
 success stories from around the world, especially Kerala, India, where
 the government has migrated over 2,600 of its public schools to free
 software.

 While the Education Team has already compiled a collection of useful
 materials, they are also looking for more volunteer contributors.
 People who want to help, or who have information about instructive
 examples of existing use of free software in schools, should contact
 educat...@gnu.org.

 Education really is one of the most fundamental areas we need to
 focus on to achieve real social change, said Free Software Foundation
 executive director John Sullivan. We need to be acknowledging and
 assisting schools that are doing the right thing, and helping those
 who aren't yet on board understand why those giveaway Microsoft
 Office, iPad, and Kindle deals aren't so great for classrooms after
 all. We're very thankful to all of the Team members for stepping up to
 meet this challenge. I hope others will be inspired by their work and
 join the effort.

 The Education Team has also been working closely with GNU's
 Translation Team to make the new materials available in as many
 languages as possible. People interested in helping with the
 translation component of the project should see the information at
 http://www.gnu.org/server/standards/README.translations.html.

 About the Free Software Foundation

 The Free Software 

Re: Impacts of disabling Automatic Power Management

2012-02-01 Thread Richard A. Smith

On 01/31/2012 11:43 PM, Paul Fox wrote:

sridhar wrote:
We are considering disabling Automatic Power Management because of its
impact on collaboration and 3G connectivity.
  
What kind of battery life can we expect from an XO-1.5 with Automatic
Power Management disabled as opposed to enabled? I understand that
this can vary wildly with usage, but is there an average estimate?

he's on a very long plane flight, but i'll try and channel richard:

 it depends.

how did i do?  :-)


You have learned well.

Sirdhar:  Unfortunately theres no way we can answer your question ( or 
even make a SWAG) without known how much idleness is in your normal 
workload.  Automatic Power Management only makes a big difference if 
there is a lot of time spent idle.  If you are running Tam-Tam the 
entire time then turning off aggressive suspend/resume will make zero 
difference.


powerd tracks this though so if you can collect some powerd logs from 
some of your users then we can make a guess at figuring out what your 
impact will be.


powerd logs are located in the ~olcp/power-logs directory.  Copy all the 
files in there off of several machines that have been used in the 
classroom and send them to me and we can take a look at what sort of 
profile you have.


What build are you basing your images off of?

--
Richard A. Smith  rich...@laptop.org
One Laptop per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Impacts of disabling Automatic Power Management

2012-02-01 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 1 February 2012 16:09, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 1 Feb 2012, at 04:43, Paul Fox wrote:
 would it help to disable automatic power management only when specific
 Activities are running?  only when certain kinds of collaboration are
 in effect?  only when certain drivers are active?

 Thanks Paul, yes excellent point. With my Activity Team hat on, Sridhar if 
 you could please expand a little on the test cases you are hitting Activity 
 collaboration issues with, so that we can try and resolve or minimise issue 
 from Automatic Power Management kicking in. There are already a number of 
 Activities that programatically keep the machine awake – a simple example is 
 Clock, who wants the clock display to continuously keep stopping as if 
 there's sand stuck in the gears ;)

We've found it really difficult to diagnose and replicate reliably -
the problems can be random. I made an OLPC bug report [1], which is
also in our tracker [2]. The workaround for us (and several other
deployments, I hear) is to disable automatic power management.

I didn't realise that activities could suspend power management. How
does this work, and which activities use it? We see problems with just
about any activity that engages in collaboration. Maybe it should be
standard to suspend power management for any collaboration session?
That would be smarter than turning it off entirely.

Sridhar


[1] http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10878
[2] https://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/636
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Impacts of disabling Automatic Power Management

2012-02-01 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
srid...@laptop.org.au wrote:
 Maybe it should be
 standard to suspend power management for any collaboration session?
 That would be smarter than turning it off entirely.

I'd be supportive of a patch that does that.

Simon, given the collaboration API in 11.2.x, would it be possible to
keep a file in existence all the while that a collaboration session
exists?

cheers,


m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


openhatch

2012-02-01 Thread Sameer Verma
I was wondering how many of you have looked at http://openhatch.org as
a way to bring in new volunteers, and provide mentorship. We had
Asheesh Laroia of OpenHatch on campus today, talking about the
project, its approach and how they pull from various bug trackers
including Sugarlabs.

cheers,
Sameer
-- 
Sameer Verma, Ph.D.
Professor, Information Systems
San Francisco State University
http://verma.sfsu.edu/
http://commons.sfsu.edu/
http://olpcsf.org/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Impacts of disabling Automatic Power Management

2012-02-01 Thread Richard A. Smith

On 02/01/2012 08:32 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
srid...@laptop.org.au  wrote:

Maybe it should be
standard to suspend power management for any collaboration session?
That would be smarter than turning it off entirely.


I'd be supportive of a patch that does that.

Simon, given the collaboration API in 11.2.x, would it be possible to
keep a file in existence all the while that a collaboration session
exists?



While I understand the frustration, this is going to wrong direction. 
We need to hunt down the problems and fix them.


Its a good short term fix to be  enabled on a per-deployment basis but 
if this becomes the default then I worry  all our work on making 
aggressive suspend/resume work will begin to fade away because its never 
active.


--
Richard A. Smith  rich...@laptop.org
One Laptop per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Impacts of disabling Automatic Power Management

2012-02-01 Thread Ed McNierney
Sridhar -

I agree with Richard's concern about finding the problem.  Have you tried to 
differentiate between problems with collaboration and problems with networking 
in general?  Have you tried different 3G modems and seen different results?  
I'm just a little skeptical about assuming we know where the problems lie when 
we haven't actually identified them yet.

- Ed


On Feb 1, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:

 On 1 February 2012 16:09, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 1 Feb 2012, at 04:43, Paul Fox wrote:
 would it help to disable automatic power management only when specific
 Activities are running?  only when certain kinds of collaboration are
 in effect?  only when certain drivers are active?
 
 Thanks Paul, yes excellent point. With my Activity Team hat on, Sridhar if 
 you could please expand a little on the test cases you are hitting Activity 
 collaboration issues with, so that we can try and resolve or minimise issue 
 from Automatic Power Management kicking in. There are already a number of 
 Activities that programatically keep the machine awake – a simple example is 
 Clock, who wants the clock display to continuously keep stopping as if 
 there's sand stuck in the gears ;)
 
 We've found it really difficult to diagnose and replicate reliably -
 the problems can be random. I made an OLPC bug report [1], which is
 also in our tracker [2]. The workaround for us (and several other
 deployments, I hear) is to disable automatic power management.
 
 I didn't realise that activities could suspend power management. How
 does this work, and which activities use it? We see problems with just
 about any activity that engages in collaboration. Maybe it should be
 standard to suspend power management for any collaboration session?
 That would be smarter than turning it off entirely.
 
 Sridhar
 
 
 [1] http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10878
 [2] https://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/636
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: openhatch

2012-02-01 Thread Walter Bender
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
 I was wondering how many of you have looked at http://openhatch.org as
 a way to bring in new volunteers, and provide mentorship. We had
 Asheesh Laroia of OpenHatch on campus today, talking about the
 project, its approach and how they pull from various bug trackers
 including Sugarlabs.

There is a Sugar project in there somewhere...

-walter


 cheers,
 Sameer
 --
 Sameer Verma, Ph.D.
 Professor, Information Systems
 San Francisco State University
 http://verma.sfsu.edu/
 http://commons.sfsu.edu/
 http://olpcsf.org/
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel



-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Impacts of disabling Automatic Power Management

2012-02-01 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
 While I understand the frustration, this is going to wrong direction. We
 need to hunt down the problems and fix them.

I think we have the root problem well isolated -- dsd has done a good
job of that. Getting it fixed is taking longer than we thought, and it
got better, but not fixed, in the 11.x.y cycle.

Our next stab at fixed is in the 12.1.0 timeframe, mid-2012.

A workaround of this kind _is_ the right thing now for the 11.x.y platform.

Let's _not_ include it in the development builds, so developers and
testers suffer (and fix).

end users need not suffer.


m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Impacts of disabling Automatic Power Management

2012-02-01 Thread Jerry Vonau
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 22:42 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
  While I understand the frustration, this is going to wrong direction. We
  need to hunt down the problems and fix them.
 
 I think we have the root problem well isolated -- dsd has done a good
 job of that. Getting it fixed is taking longer than we thought, and it
 got better, but not fixed, in the 11.x.y cycle.
 
 Our next stab at fixed is in the 12.1.0 timeframe, mid-2012.
 
 A workaround of this kind _is_ the right thing now for the 11.x.y platform.
 

I like to keep OOB as close to upstream as possible, having
customizations contained in separate files within OOB. I take it the
correct way to disable this is to add a powered stanza to the OOB's ini
file to override what is in powerd/defaults.ini? Or do I have to toggle
the defaults.ini file? 

Jerry

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


RE: 11.3.1 development build 26 for XO-1.75

2012-02-01 Thread 林蔚恆
Dear Martin,
We need your confirmation that will use OS26 for RAMP.
Could you please reply the mail to us, thanks?

Best Regards,
---
WeiHeng Lin 林蔚恆 
Notebook Business Unit 2
Software Design Division
E-mail: weiheng@quantatw.com
TEL:886-3-3272345 ext:13313 

---

-Original Message-
From: Wei-Heng Lin (林蔚恆) 
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 7:07 PM
To: 'Martin Langhoff'; OLPC Tech Team; Chia-Hsiu Chang (張嘉修); Eddie Tsai ( 蔡豐吉 
); Mars Chang(張嘉文); Devel List; Gary Su (蘇泓仁)
Cc: Keith Tzeng (鄭期鴻)
Subject: RE: 11.3.1 development build 26 for XO-1.75

Hi Martin,
We have 13 machines passed the 24 hours runin test with OS26.
10 are 4G SKU and the others are 8G.

Still have 3 8G machines doing the runin test.

We confirmed this version fixed many issues as below:
#11392, #11528, #11576, #11546, #11595, #11536, #10831, #10893, #11496, #11321

Will keep update the test results to you.

Best Regards,
---
WeiHeng Lin 林蔚恆
Notebook Business Unit 2
Software Design Division
E-mail: weiheng@quantatw.com
TEL:886-3-3272345 ext:13313
---

-Original Message-
From: martin.langhoff.o...@gmail.com [mailto:martin.langhoff.o...@gmail.com] On 
Behalf Of Martin Langhoff
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:37 AM
To: OLPC Tech Team; Wei-Heng Lin (林蔚恆); Chia-Hsiu Chang (張嘉修); Eddie Tsai ( 蔡豐吉 
); Mars Chang(張嘉文); Devel List
Subject: 11.3.1 development build 26 for XO-1.75

This build merges kernel 3.0.17 (which reworks the MMC layer), and includes 
fixes in EC communication, audio recording  playback, WLAN during 
suspend/resume and serial port driver. It also downgrades some graphics 
libraries back to OS24 versions.

Notes:

 - Under GNOME we have a new cursor theme that looks much better.

 - Thanks to the suspend/resume WLAN fixes, this build has aggressive suspend 
resume enabled under normal usage. The resume path is still a bit slow, but 
generally works.

 - Wake-on-LAN is not yet working -- WLAN stays associated to an access point 
during SoC sleep, but will not wake to a ping or tcp connection.

Download from:

  http://build.laptop.org/11.3.1/os26/

Fixes (please help us confirm):

#11392 XO-1.75 kernel turns off WLAN during suspend/resume
#11510 Libertas device loses wireless extensions after suspend/resume cycle
#11528 XO-1.75 os18 runin: read-only filesystem mmcblk0: error -110 sending 
SET_BLOCK_COUNT command, response 0x0, card status 0x0
#11576 XO-1.75 C1 os24 RUNIN fail, static progress, mmcblk0: error
-110 sending SET_BLOCK_COUNT command, response 0x0, card status 0x400d00
#11546 Record activity cannot record audio 11.3.1 os19
#11515 XO-1.75 record activity hangs X and keyboard in seconds if rotate key 
pressed
#11595 XO-1.75 camera missing after boot, rarely

--- os25/xo1.75/os25.packages.txt   2012-01-19 08:55:48.0 -0500
+++ os26/xo1.75/os26.packages.txt   2012-01-30 13:11:06.0 -0500
+cursors-adwaita2b-3.0.2.2-1.fc16.noarch
-kernel-3.0.0_xo1.75-20120118.1854.olpc.b2845e6.armv7l
+kernel-3.0.17_xo1.75-20120127.1639.olpc.61e0e9e.armv7l
-libX11-1.4.3-1.olpc.armv5tel
-libX11-common-1.4.3-1.olpc.noarch
+libX11-1.3.4-4.fc14.armv5tel
+libX11-common-1.3.4-4.fc14.noarch
-libxcb-1.7-3.olpc.armv5tel
+libxcb-1.7-1.fc14.armv5tel
-olpc-firmware-q4c12-1.unsigned.noarch
+olpc-firmware-q4d02-1.unsigned.noarch
-olpc-runin-tests-0.17.1-1.armv7l
+olpc-runin-tests-0.17.3-1.armv7l

cheers,



m
--
 mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: Impacts of disabling Automatic Power Management

2012-02-01 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
 I like to keep OOB as close to upstream as possible, having

OOB already has a module to do this: powerd. Take a peek at the XO-1
configs provided, which already disable this.

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Notes on touchpad testing @ wiki

2012-02-01 Thread Martin Langhoff
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Touchpad_testing




m
-- 
 mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: [Server-devel] openVPN on the XS

2012-02-01 Thread German Ruiz
Hi Sameer

Here in Nicaragua at Fundación Zamora Terán, we are using openVPN on
XS in client mode, and the openVPN Server is on the main office on a
Centos 5.7 server, because on some school we have a 3G Modem
Connection behind a proxy server at ISP, with the VPN tunnel, we can
access on to XS by ssh and put content, monitoring the XS with Nagios.

And also we redirect the all dns queries on this way:
1. XO(172.18.96.1)
2. XS(172.18.0.1)-(10.8.0.11)
3. openVPNServer(10.8.0.1)
4. openDNS(208.67.222.222)

For now that is the way that we use openVPN with XS.

Regards

--
German R S

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:

 Hello Serverheads!

 We've been using openVPN on the XS in India
 (http://bhagmalpur.wordpress.com) and Jamaica
 (http://olpcjamaica.org.jm). OpenVPN runs in client mode on the XS and
 phones home to public IP server. We have a couple of laptops with
 appropriate keys that also run in the client mode. openVPN runs on the
 server in server mode. This setup allows us to ssh into the XS from
 the two client laptops whenever the servers get online via DSL or
 GPRS/3G. openVPN takes care of the whole NAT business nicely.

 I know that George Hunt was trying to do this in Haiti. Not sure how
 far he got. We also got a suggestion to look into IPv6 tunnels
 (http://www.sixxs.net/tools/ayiya/).

 1) Is anyone else using something like this or similar?
 2) Is there a different approach to doing the same?

 I can put up the instructions on the wiki in a bit.

 cheers,
 Sameer
 --
 Sameer Verma, Ph.D.
 Professor, Information Systems
 San Francisco State University
 http://verma.sfsu.edu/
 http://commons.sfsu.edu/
 http://olpcsf.org/
 ___
 Server-devel mailing list
 Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel




--
German R S
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] CentOS hardware support doubts

2012-02-01 Thread Carlos Daniel Garay Ayala
Hi,


You can try the work done by Alsroot:

http://gitorious.paraguayeduca.org/paraguayeduca-server

is based on Ubuntu server.

Regards,

Carlos

2012/2/1 Abhishek Singh abhishek.si...@olenepal.org:
 On 02/01/2012 01:15 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
 Hi,

 Like others, I'm interested in moving the XS to a newer OS base. My
 key motivation for this is that the Foundation Zamora Teran (OLPC
 Nicaragua) is having difficulty buying servers for new schools being
 added to the project - Fedora 9 is too old to support this hardware.

 For the next XS release, Martin suggests that CentOS 6.2 (or another
 RHEL equivalent) is used as a base. As my contribution here will
 likely be limited to just this rebase, I'm prepared to accept that
 preference.

 However, having installed/run CentOS 6.2 for the first time I now have
 my doubts about this. I installed it on a server where the network
 interface does not appear with F9 (but does work with more recent
 Fedora). With CentOS, the same problem as F9 is presented: no network
 adapter.

 Digging further, I see that support was added to the Linux kernel for
 this particular network adapter (Atheros AR8152) on February 16th,
 2010. However, since CentOS 6.2 uses a kernel from 2009, it does not
 support this hardware. This seems excessively old for a distro that
 was released in December 2011, and I imagine that we will see many
 such problems if we run with this.

 With this in mind, is there still a strong preference to go with
 CentOS, or would a more recent Fedora (e.g. 16/17?) be a better
 choice?

 Thanks,
 Daniel
 ___
 Server-devel mailing list
 Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
 Hi Daniel,
 Moving to CentOS or some enterprise Linux makes sense for rebasing XS on
 but given the limitations with hardware compatibility, this might be a
 blocker. New hardware are being used at deployments so probably we might
 have to stick with newer versions of Fedora.

 --
 Abhishek Singh
 System Engineer
 Open Learning Exchange (OLE) Nepal
 साझा शिक्षा ई-पाटी
 http://www.olenepal.org
 Tel: +977-1-551 ext. 102



 ___
 Server-devel mailing list
 Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel




-- 
Carlos Daniel Garay
Departamento de Tecnología, Paraguay Educa.
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] openVPN on the XS

2012-02-01 Thread George Hunt
Hi Sameer,

Yes, Adam Holt and I worked together to use multiple clients.  I found that
Amazon makes available a free year of a micro installation of OpenVPN
Access Server.  After the first year, it looks to cost on the order of $20
per year.

George

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:

 Hello Serverheads!

 We've been using openVPN on the XS in India
 (http://bhagmalpur.wordpress.com) and Jamaica
 (http://olpcjamaica.org.jm). OpenVPN runs in client mode on the XS and
 phones home to public IP server. We have a couple of laptops with
 appropriate keys that also run in the client mode. openVPN runs on the
 server in server mode. This setup allows us to ssh into the XS from
 the two client laptops whenever the servers get online via DSL or
 GPRS/3G. openVPN takes care of the whole NAT business nicely.

 I know that George Hunt was trying to do this in Haiti. Not sure how
 far he got. We also got a suggestion to look into IPv6 tunnels
 (http://www.sixxs.net/tools/ayiya/).

 1) Is anyone else using something like this or similar?
 2) Is there a different approach to doing the same?

 I can put up the instructions on the wiki in a bit.

 cheers,
 Sameer
 --
 Sameer Verma, Ph.D.
 Professor, Information Systems
 San Francisco State University
 http://verma.sfsu.edu/
 http://commons.sfsu.edu/
 http://olpcsf.org/

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel