Re: XO Fedora 22 Beta work
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out: olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja. The olpc-library RPM also was removed from Fedora, perhaps due to lack of changes abandonment. Likely, I didn't even know it existed. totem-mozplugin no longer exists and was intentionally removed. Given Firefox supports various media codecs internally this might not be a problem for it (apart for vmeta?); but I don't know what webkit-based Browse uses for media players. Gstreamer based as well so I don't see any major issue there except if vmeta doesn't support gstreamer 1.0 xorg-x11-drv-keyboard and -mouse have been replaced by xorg-x11-drv-libinput. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg Works fine on SoaS, although I think there might be a need to migrate Control Panel bits, I did send an email about it some time ago to devel@ 14.1.0 has custom F20 systemd binaries, but I am having trouble finding information as to why. If they have relevant changes they need to be ported to F22 if not already present because using the F20 systemd binaries breaks all sorts of library dependencies. The reason is due to changes in firmware loading changes in the kernel and the fact the XO kernels haven't been rebased to something more modern than 3.0+ Patches have been written for the first three that I could submit. We need to come up with a clear direction as to what volunteers and/or OLPC want would actually use for updated XO builds. I only have the time to focus on one set of images. I can help on anything needed that's in Fedora in terms of adding patches there so you don't need to fork but similarly I don't have much time. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: XO Fedora 22 Beta work
James and I looked a bit into the systemd issue last night discovered the same. This was discussed at http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2014-May/048180.html A solution to solve this may be tricky. Currently no one may be available to look into getting newer Linux kernels working on XOs. And if a newer kernel was tweaked for XOs and brought in, extensive testing against multiple XO models variants (wireless cards/cameras/memory chips/etc.) would be required. Bringing in an older systemd with userspace firmware loading support might be easier in the short term, but could break RPMs dependent on newer systemd versions. I don't know what resources OLPC has internally at the moment, but this may be beyond what part-time volunteers can do, especially if support is desired for XO models which OLPC no longer sells. On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: On Saturday, April 25, 2015 10:36:49 PM Peter Robinson wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out: olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja. The olpc-library RPM also was removed from Fedora, perhaps due to lack of changes abandonment. Likely, I didn't even know it existed. totem-mozplugin no longer exists and was intentionally removed. Given Firefox supports various media codecs internally this might not be a problem for it (apart for vmeta?); but I don't know what webkit-based Browse uses for media players. Gstreamer based as well so I don't see any major issue there except if vmeta doesn't support gstreamer 1.0 xorg-x11-drv-keyboard and -mouse have been replaced by xorg-x11-drv-libinput. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg Works fine on SoaS, although I think there might be a need to migrate Control Panel bits, I did send an email about it some time ago to devel@ 14.1.0 has custom F20 systemd binaries, but I am having trouble finding information as to why. If they have relevant changes they need to be ported to F22 if not already present because using the F20 systemd binaries breaks all sorts of library dependencies. The reason is due to changes in firmware loading changes in the kernel and the fact the XO kernels haven't been rebased to something more modern than 3.0+ Patches have been written for the first three that I could submit. We need to come up with a clear direction as to what volunteers and/or OLPC want would actually use for updated XO builds. I only have the time to focus on one set of images. I can help on anything needed that's in Fedora in terms of adding patches there so you don't need to fork but similarly I don't have much time. with Fedora.NEXT we may be able to look at making OLPC builds be an official part of Fedora, tirckiest bit I think would be the kernel. Long term I think it would be good for both OLPC and Fedora for this to happen. Dennis ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] XO Fedora 22 Beta work
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Adam Holt h...@laptop.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out: olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja. The olpc-library RPM also was removed from Fedora, perhaps due to lack of changes abandonment. totem-mozplugin no longer exists and was intentionally removed. Given Firefox supports various media codecs internally this might not be a problem for it (apart for vmeta?); but I don't know what webkit-based Browse uses for media players. xorg-x11-drv-keyboard and -mouse have been replaced by xorg-x11-drv-libinput. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg 14.1.0 has custom F20 systemd binaries, but I am having trouble finding information as to why. If they have relevant changes they need to be ported to F22 if not already present because using the F20 systemd binaries breaks all sorts of library dependencies. Patches have been written for the first three that I could submit. We need to come up with a clear direction as to what volunteers and/or OLPC want would actually use for updated XO builds. I only have the time to focus on one set of images. True. I am not sure what is best option here. We still didn't solved all the issues in F20, but is already a old release. I wonder if we can try make images based in CentOS. George Hunt is having surprisingly rapid success with CentOS 7 for XSCE. Its new release (equivalent to RHEL 7.1) is now out... Wishful Thinking hopes that similar progress might be possible on various XO laptops? Very wishful, most of the server stuff would already be in CentOS/EPEL, to get the the sugar stack and dependencies in would be a reasonable chunk of work. The standard packages in Fedora could easily be branched for EPEL7 and would all be compatible but someone would need to step up to do the work as I certainly don't have the time or really interest. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] XO Fedora 22 Beta work
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out: - olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja. The olpc-library RPM also was removed from Fedora, perhaps due to lack of changes abandonment. - totem-mozplugin no longer exists and was intentionally removed. Given Firefox supports various media codecs internally this might not be a problem for it (apart for vmeta?); but I don't know what webkit-based Browse uses for media players. - xorg-x11-drv-keyboard and -mouse have been replaced by xorg-x11-drv-libinput. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg - 14.1.0 has custom F20 systemd binaries, but I am having trouble finding information as to why. If they have relevant changes they need to be ported to F22 if not already present because using the F20 systemd binaries breaks all sorts of library dependencies. Patches have been written for the first three that I could submit. We need to come up with a clear direction as to what volunteers and/or OLPC want would actually use for updated XO builds. I only have the time to focus on one set of images. True. I am not sure what is best option here. We still didn't solved all the issues in F20, but is already a old release. I wonder if we can try make images based in CentOS. George Hunt is having surprisingly rapid success with CentOS 7 for XSCE. Its new release (equivalent to RHEL 7.1) is now out... Wishful Thinking hopes that similar progress might be possible on various XO laptops? -- Unsung Heroes of OLPC, interviewed live @ http://unleashkids.org ! ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] XO Fedora 22 Beta work
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out: - olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja. The olpc-library RPM also was removed from Fedora, perhaps due to lack of changes abandonment. - totem-mozplugin no longer exists and was intentionally removed. Given Firefox supports various media codecs internally this might not be a problem for it (apart for vmeta?); but I don't know what webkit-based Browse uses for media players. - xorg-x11-drv-keyboard and -mouse have been replaced by xorg-x11-drv-libinput. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg - 14.1.0 has custom F20 systemd binaries, but I am having trouble finding information as to why. If they have relevant changes they need to be ported to F22 if not already present because using the F20 systemd binaries breaks all sorts of library dependencies. Patches have been written for the first three that I could submit. We need to come up with a clear direction as to what volunteers and/or OLPC want would actually use for updated XO builds. I only have the time to focus on one set of images. True. I am not sure what is best option here. We still didn't solved all the issues in F20, but is already a old release. I wonder if we can try make images based in CentOS. Gonzalo ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: XO Fedora 22 Beta work
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 10:36:49 PM Peter Robinson wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out: olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja. The olpc-library RPM also was removed from Fedora, perhaps due to lack of changes abandonment. Likely, I didn't even know it existed. totem-mozplugin no longer exists and was intentionally removed. Given Firefox supports various media codecs internally this might not be a problem for it (apart for vmeta?); but I don't know what webkit-based Browse uses for media players. Gstreamer based as well so I don't see any major issue there except if vmeta doesn't support gstreamer 1.0 xorg-x11-drv-keyboard and -mouse have been replaced by xorg-x11-drv-libinput. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg Works fine on SoaS, although I think there might be a need to migrate Control Panel bits, I did send an email about it some time ago to devel@ 14.1.0 has custom F20 systemd binaries, but I am having trouble finding information as to why. If they have relevant changes they need to be ported to F22 if not already present because using the F20 systemd binaries breaks all sorts of library dependencies. The reason is due to changes in firmware loading changes in the kernel and the fact the XO kernels haven't been rebased to something more modern than 3.0+ Patches have been written for the first three that I could submit. We need to come up with a clear direction as to what volunteers and/or OLPC want would actually use for updated XO builds. I only have the time to focus on one set of images. I can help on anything needed that's in Fedora in terms of adding patches there so you don't need to fork but similarly I don't have much time. with Fedora.NEXT we may be able to look at making OLPC builds be an official part of Fedora, tirckiest bit I think would be the kernel. Long term I think it would be good for both OLPC and Fedora for this to happen. Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Windows xo-1
Is windows on xo-1 real i saw it in a video if so how or where can i get a copy ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] [XSCE] Re: Gutenberg .epubs not viewable from Internet-in-a-Box?
Thanks Braddock, IIAB drive is not mounted; it was copied to the laptop as they were trying to improve response time. I've asked your 5 questions and the response is: It is in a directory off the personal directory called amat. amat@HIIAB ~ $ ls calibre-library Documents Music Videos Calibre Library Downloads Pictures Creole Books IIAB_QuickStart_Sampler_20130809.tgz Public Desktop knowledge Templates I can read books via a web browser I just cannot download. amat@HIIAB /home $ mount /dev/sda1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (rw) none on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw) none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620) tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755) none on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880) none on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) none on /run/user type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=104857600,mode=0755) none on /sys/fs/pstore type pstore (rw) systemd on /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd type cgroup (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,none,name=systemd) gvfsd-fuse on /run/user/1000/gvfs type fuse.gvfsd-fuse (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=amat) amat@HIIAB /home $ pip freeze Babel==1.3 BeautifulSoup==3.2.1 Flask==0.10.1 Flask-AutoIndex==0.5 Flask-Babel==0.9 Flask-SQLAlchemy==2.0 Flask-Silk==0.2 Internet-in-a-Box==0.5.10 Jinja2==2.7.3 Mako==0.9.1 MarkupSafe==0.18 PAM==0.4.2 Pillow==2.3.0 SQLAlchemy==0.9.9 Twisted-Core==13.2.0 Twisted-Names==13.2.0 Twisted-Web==13.2.0 Werkzeug==0.10.4 Whoosh==2.6.0 apt-xapian-index==0.45 apturl==0.4.1ubuntu4 argparse==1.2.1 backports.lzma==0.0.3 ccsm==0.9.11.3 chardet==2.0.1 colorama==0.2.5 command-not-found==0.3 compizconfig-python==0.9.11.3 configglue==1.1.2 configobj==4.7.2 debtagshw==0.1 defer==1.0.6 dirspec==13.10 dnspython==1.11.1 duplicity==0.6.23 feedparser==5.1.3 html5lib==0.999 httplib2==0.8 itsdangerous==0.24 lockfile==0.8 lxml==3.3.3 oauthlib==0.6.1 oneconf==0.3.7 paramiko==1.10.1 pexpect==3.1 piston-mini-client==0.7.5 protobuf==2.5.0 pyOpenSSL==0.13 pycrypto==2.6.1 pycups==1.9.66 pycurl==7.19.3 pygobject==3.12.0 pyinotify==0.9.4 pyserial==2.6 pysmbc==1.0.14.1 python-apt==0.9.3.5ubuntu1 python-debian==0.1.21-nmu2ubuntu2 python-xlib==0.14 pytz==2015.2 pyxdg==0.25 reportlab==3.0 repoze.lru==0.6 requests==2.2.1 sessioninstaller==0.0.0 six==1.5.2 speaklater==1.3 system-service==0.1.6 uTidylib==0.2 urllib3==1.7.1 wsgiref==0.1.2 zope.interface==4.0.5 On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Braddock Gaskill bradd...@gmail.com wrote: I'm looking at this problem but am a bit mystified and cannot reproduce it. Questions and points: 1) Where is the knowledge dataset stored? Is it linked to in /knowledge or is it on a mounted drive? 2) Can I get the output of the 'mount' command? 3) I assume the knowledge dataset is NOT in /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/iiab/knowledge/, and that that path is some sort of error? 4) I doubt this has anything to do with the version of flask the user installed, but would like to know exactly what they installed and whether it was using pip or apt-get. 5) The output from 'pip freeze' would be nice. The code very clearly checks for the existence of the epub file before it attempts to send it. Yet somehow it is trying to send this strange /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/iiab/knowledge/ modules/gutenberg-epub-images/91/pg91.epub path which apparently does not exist. -braddock On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Adam Holt h...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Adam Holt h...@laptop.org wrote: Errors below: one Haiti volunteer is trying to download .epub books from IIAB's Gutenberg, He loaded Flask (Python web framework) thinking that would help but it did not. Are Tony's earlier tips below the best way forward? The default is show html online. In knowledge/modules there is also a directory of epub. I think I patched the code in iiab to default to the epub file. This gets downloaded automatically by the Browse activity to the Journal...The Gutenberg books accessed from Rachel are the text versions...I set it up so that the epub versions are downloaded. Volunteer has given me more details on the error below. He says I had Mint 17.1 running on the laptop and on the box we have IIAB on...these errors are from the laptop. We are using Firefox for the web browser...I added Flask after the fact to the client but I had Flask running on the IIAB box. I will be happy to look closer if you need anything. (And apologies this is not explicitly an XSCE question, but they may use that in future.) IOError IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or
