Re: OLPC config in salut in F9?
Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:23 -0400, Michael Stone a écrit : On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 05:01:04PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: I asked Dennis about branching salut, and he recommended we try keep everything in F-9 if possible. Is it feasible to put the rainbow specific patches in such that they are enabled with a runtime option, if built with --enable-olpc? Could you put up a link to the OLPC-specific patches? Gabble patches: https://dev.laptop.org/git?p=sugar-jhbuild;a=blob_plain;f=config/modulesets/patches/telepathy-gabble-chmod-unix-socket.patch;hb=HEAD https://dev.laptop.org/git?p=sugar-jhbuild;a=blob_plain;f=config/modulesets/patches/telepathy-gabble-olpc-no-dbus-uid-check.patch;hb=HEAD And the same patches for Salut: https://dev.laptop.org/git?p=sugar-jhbuild;a=blob;f=config/modulesets/patches/telepathy-salut-olpc-no-dbus-uid-check.patch;h=d876cd80c1251e5d5abdc27709a4df132387181c;hb=HEAD https://dev.laptop.org/git?p=sugar-jhbuild;a=blob;f=config/modulesets/patches/telepathy-salut-chmod-unix-socket.patch;h=5d36941d1faf84015fc4357f03926995fae1626c;hb=HEAD G. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC config in salut in F9?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit : On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work in the F-9 branch and not need to fork. Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches. If it makes sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem with you doing enabling it. Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO security model (Rainbow). Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does). I asked Dennis about branching salut, and he recommended we try keep everything in F-9 if possible. Is it feasible to put the rainbow specific patches in such that they are enabled with a runtime option, if built with --enable-olpc? Morgan ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC config in salut in F9?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 17:03, Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:01 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit : On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit : On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work in the F-9 branch and not need to fork. Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches. If it makes sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem with you doing enabling it. Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO security model (Rainbow). Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does). I asked Dennis about branching salut, and he recommended we try keep everything in F-9 if possible. Is it feasible to put the rainbow specific patches in such that they are enabled with a runtime option, if built with --enable-olpc? Then it would be build time option and F9 users will have the patch applied anyway (which is not really a good idea). Can we make it a runtime option? Morgan ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC config in salut in F9?
Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:23 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit : On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 17:03, Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:01 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit : On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit : On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work in the F-9 branch and not need to fork. Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches. If it makes sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem with you doing enabling it. Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO security model (Rainbow). Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does). I asked Dennis about branching salut, and he recommended we try keep everything in F-9 if possible. Is it feasible to put the rainbow specific patches in such that they are enabled with a runtime option, if built with --enable-olpc? Then it would be build time option and F9 users will have the patch applied anyway (which is not really a good idea). Can we make it a runtime option? We certainly don't want to add a CM parameter for this. We could eventually check an env variable but I'm not convince that's a so good idea as these workarounds are very very hackish. Sjoerd, Daf: Thoughts? G. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC config in salut in F9?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 05:01:04PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: I asked Dennis about branching salut, and he recommended we try keep everything in F-9 if possible. Is it feasible to put the rainbow specific patches in such that they are enabled with a runtime option, if built with --enable-olpc? Could you put up a link to the OLPC-specific patches? Thanks, Michael ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC config in salut in F9?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit : On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work in the F-9 branch and not need to fork. Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches. If it makes sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem with you doing enabling it. Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO security model (Rainbow). Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does). OK, then we want to make an OLPC-3 branch and build salut there with the patches. Morgan ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC config in salut in F9?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Morgan Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit : On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work in the F-9 branch and not need to fork. Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches. If it makes sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem with you doing enabling it. Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO security model (Rainbow). Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does). OK, then we want to make an OLPC-3 branch and build salut there with the patches. It would still be good if we could --enable-olpc on the F9 packages, so that Sugar can work right in Fedora 9. Morgan could you take care of that? I agree that the ugly rainbow workarounds should be kept in OLPC-3. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC config in salut in F9?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 18:27, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Morgan Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit : On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work in the F-9 branch and not need to fork. Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches. If it makes sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem with you doing enabling it. Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO security model (Rainbow). Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does). OK, then we want to make an OLPC-3 branch and build salut there with the patches. It would still be good if we could --enable-olpc on the F9 packages, so that Sugar can work right in Fedora 9. Morgan could you take care of that? Yes, I'll do that. I agree that the ugly rainbow workarounds should be kept in OLPC-3. I've done a scratch build of telepathy-salut for dist-f9 with the patches: http://dev.laptop.org/~morgan/telepathy-salut/ I'll request the branch. Morgan ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC config in salut in F9?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 18:35, Morgan Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 18:27, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would still be good if we could --enable-olpc on the F9 packages, so that Sugar can work right in Fedora 9. Morgan could you take care of that? Yes, I'll do that. Done. Morgan ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
