Re: update.1 breaking wrapped activities?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Paul Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in a description of how non-sugar apps need some help to run properly under sugar, the current front page of OLPC News contains the following quote: ... there is some discussion that Update 1, a forthcoming upgrade to Sugar, will break all existing wrappers, and current Activities will need to be re-coded and re-wrapped. the only breakage that i've heard mentioned on this list is that of the activities moving -- i've seen nothing about the environment changing so as to require wrapper changes (and i've already commented to that effect at olpcnews). can someone confirm that i'm not wrong? You are correct. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: update.1 breaking wrapped activities?
Is this the reason that Bryan Berry in Nepal found that Tux Paint did not work, and is the instruction given here: http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Test_Config_Notesaction=editsection=29 still the correct way to disable isolation? On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in a description of how non-sugar apps need some help to run properly under sugar, the current front page of OLPC News contains the following quote: ... there is some discussion that Update 1, a forthcoming upgrade to Sugar, will break all existing wrappers, and current Activities will need to be re-coded and re-wrapped. I assumed that what's behind this is the introduction of rainbow. [I'm not sure of the date of the transition to rainbow, but perhaps G1G1 participants might be exposed to it when installing Update.1] You are right looks like isolation has been enabled by default only starting from Update.1. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel -- Always do right, said Mark Twain. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: update.1 breaking wrapped activities?
That's the big on/off switch for all isolation. Sugar also independently decides to turn off isolation for a small number of activities listed in its source code. Michael On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 07:33:36PM -0700, Carol Lerche wrote: Is this the reason that Bryan Berry in Nepal found that Tux Paint did not work, and is the instruction given here: http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Test_Config_Notesaction=editsection=29 still the correct way to disable isolation? On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in a description of how non-sugar apps need some help to run properly under sugar, the current front page of OLPC News contains the following quote: ... there is some discussion that Update 1, a forthcoming upgrade to Sugar, will break all existing wrappers, and current Activities will need to be re-coded and re-wrapped. I assumed that what's behind this is the introduction of rainbow. [I'm not sure of the date of the transition to rainbow, but perhaps G1G1 participants might be exposed to it when installing Update.1] You are right looks like isolation has been enabled by default only starting from Update.1. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel -- Always do right, said Mark Twain. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
