Re: [SailfishDevel] Packaging with icons in 86x86 folder
Hi, thank you for your replies. Andrey, I tried what you proposed but unfortunately it didn't work for me. I will try again just to be sure and then I will try Artem's solution. If it works for someone it must work for me also. Best regards. Unai. On Tue Nov 26 14:50:14 2013 Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote: > you should clean project and restart qmake to generate new Makefiles ;) > > On 26.11.2013 19:48, Artem Marchenko wrote: > > Or if you fail to correct this file (I failed whatever changes I do > > and run qmake, Makefile generated still uses 90x90), you can ignore > > CONFIG += sailfishapp and use that stuff manually - you can see how > > it's done at > > https://github.com/amarchen/Wikipedia/blob/master/src/src.pro > > > > /Artem. > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andrey Kozhevnikov > > mailto:coderusin...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Sure, you can edit file > > SailfishOS/mersdk/targets/SailfishOS-armv7hl/usr/share/qt5/mkspecs/features/sailfishapp.prf > > > > > > > > On 26.11.2013 19:33, Unai IRIGOYEN wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I submitted my app before naming policy change but it got > > > rejected according to new naming policy. > > > > > > I fixed all naming to comply with new policy but I cannot change > > > the intermediate install folder from > > > "/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/icons/hicolor/90x90/apps" to > > > "/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/icons/hicolor/86x86/apps". > > > > > > I made a search in SDK files and replaced "90x90" occurrences by > > > "86x86" but my makefile still has "90x90" even after deleting and > > > running qmake. > > > > > > Does somebody have a workaround to package according to new > > > policy so I can submit my app again or do I absolutely need to > > > wait for SDK update? > > > > > > Best regards. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Unai IRIGOYEN > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > > > > > > ___ > > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Artem Marchenko > > http://agilesoftwaredevelopment.com > > http://twitter.com/AgileArtem > > > > > > ___ > > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > -- Unai IRIGOYEN ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
Re: [SailfishDevel] Packaging with icons in 86x86 folder
you should clean project and restart qmake to generate new Makefiles ;) On 26.11.2013 19:48, Artem Marchenko wrote: Or if you fail to correct this file (I failed whatever changes I do and run qmake, Makefile generated still uses 90x90), you can ignore CONFIG += sailfishapp and use that stuff manually - you can see how it's done at https://github.com/amarchen/Wikipedia/blob/master/src/src.pro /Artem. On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andrey Kozhevnikov mailto:coderusin...@gmail.com>> wrote: Sure, you can edit file SailfishOS/mersdk/targets/SailfishOS-armv7hl/usr/share/qt5/mkspecs/features/sailfishapp.prf On 26.11.2013 19:33, Unai IRIGOYEN wrote: Hi, I submitted my app before naming policy change but it got rejected according to new naming policy. I fixed all naming to comply with new policy but I cannot change the intermediate install folder from "/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/icons/hicolor/90x90/apps" to "/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/icons/hicolor/86x86/apps". I made a search in SDK files and replaced "90x90" occurrences by "86x86" but my makefile still has "90x90" even after deleting and running qmake. Does somebody have a workaround to package according to new policy so I can submit my app again or do I absolutely need to wait for SDK update? Best regards. -- Unai IRIGOYEN ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list -- Artem Marchenko http://agilesoftwaredevelopment.com http://twitter.com/AgileArtem ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
Re: [SailfishDevel] Packaging with icons in 86x86 folder
Or if you fail to correct this file (I failed whatever changes I do and run qmake, Makefile generated still uses 90x90), you can ignore CONFIG += sailfishapp and use that stuff manually - you can see how it's done at https://github.com/amarchen/Wikipedia/blob/master/src/src.pro /Artem. On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote: > Sure, you can edit file > SailfishOS/mersdk/targets/SailfishOS-armv7hl/usr/share/qt5/mkspecs/features/sailfishapp.prf > > > On 26.11.2013 19:33, Unai IRIGOYEN wrote: > > Hi, > > I submitted my app before naming policy change but it got rejected > according to new naming policy. > > > > I fixed all naming to comply with new policy but I cannot change the > intermediate install folder from > "/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/icons/hicolor/90x90/apps" > to "/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/icons/hicolor/86x86/apps". > > I made a search in SDK files and replaced "90x90" occurrences by "86x86" > but my makefile still has "90x90" even after deleting and running qmake. > > Does somebody have a workaround to package according to new policy so I > can submit my app again or do I absolutely need to wait for SDK update? > > > > Best regards. > > -- > > > > > > Unai IRIGOYEN > > > ___ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > > > > ___ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > -- Artem Marchenko http://agilesoftwaredevelopment.com http://twitter.com/AgileArtem ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
Re: [SailfishDevel] Packaging with icons in 86x86 folder
Sure, you can edit file SailfishOS/mersdk/targets/SailfishOS-armv7hl/usr/share/qt5/mkspecs/features/sailfishapp.prf On 26.11.2013 19:33, Unai IRIGOYEN wrote: Hi, I submitted my app before naming policy change but it got rejected according to new naming policy. I fixed all naming to comply with new policy but I cannot change the intermediate install folder from "/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/icons/hicolor/90x90/apps" to "/home/deploy/installroot/usr/share/icons/hicolor/86x86/apps". I made a search in SDK files and replaced "90x90" occurrences by "86x86" but my makefile still has "90x90" even after deleting and running qmake. Does somebody have a workaround to package according to new policy so I can submit my app again or do I absolutely need to wait for SDK update? Best regards. -- Unai IRIGOYEN ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
