Re: [riot-devel] Distributed Computing (offloading) with RIOT
Hello, > I don't like very much the use-case of face recognition, however I > guess opening up an API to OpenCV is better done in application space. It is not particularly about OpenCV APIs. The face recognition was only an example. It is more about any computation which is heavy to be performed locally. ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] Distributed Computing (offloading) with RIOT
Hi everyone :^) On Tue, 31 May 2016, Arash Shafiei wrote: >I was wondering if anyone has ever worked on this subject and if >the community thinks it is an interesting problem to work on at >all.. If not, would you have any suggestions for the research >challenges in this domain? I don't like very much the use-case of face recognition, however I guess opening up an API to OpenCV is better done in application space. at the OS level it may be easy and beneficial for RiotOS to open an authenticated pipeline to send and perhaps cache and index GPU code, to share rendering computation for instance for lighter VR gear ciao -- Denis Roio aka Jaromil http://Dyne.org think &do tank CTO and co-founder free/open source developers 加密 6113 D89C A825 C5CE DD02 C872 73B3 5DA5 4ACB 7D10 ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] Notification: Hack'n'ACK @ Tue May 31, 2016 5pm - 10pm (RIOT Events)
Hi, we finally managed to set-up here in Berlin. If you like to join via PlaceCam [1] feel free to do so at http://placecam.de/call.php?c=lmakKMrDG8a35aIBNqLBvOnApExkKFntj9xXawGNgTc- Cheers, Martine [1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Instructions-for-remote-participation ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread
Hello Baptiste, Emmanuel
I'll let the people more familiar (in cc) with it reply.
On terça-feira, 31 de maio de 2016 16:05:22 BRT Emmanuel Baccelli wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
> basically, we are interested in learning more about it.
> And in particular, we were wondering whether it could be a good idea to
> present this at the RIOT Summit [1].
> What do you think about this idea?
> Best,
> Emmanuel
>
>
> [1] summit.riot-os.org
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Baptiste Clenet
>
> wrote:
> > Not really but I saw him answering some post on Iotivity and Soletta
> > project for people asking to port Iotivity to constraint object.
> >
> > Thiago, could you explain Soletta Project and the relation with OIC and
> > RIOT please?
> >
> > 2016-05-30 21:07 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli :
> >> Hi Baptiste,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the clarification.
> >>
> >> Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago?
> >>
> >> It may be interesting if they attend and/or present something on this
> >> topic at the upcoming RIOT Summit [1].
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Emmanuel
> >>
> >> [1] summit.riot-os.org
> >>
> >> On May 30, 2016 4:19 PM, "Baptiste Clenet" wrote:
> >>> Hi, I correct what I said, Soletta Project is not an implementation of
> >>> Iotivity but an implementation of OIC specification (Iotivity too) so
> >>> Iotivity and Soletta project can communicate together since they use
> >>> same
> >>> specification.
> >>>
> >>> Intel Open Source is in charge of this project and you can ask
> >>> thiago.macie...@intel.com for more information.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> 2016-05-30 10:41 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm :
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1] imported it
> > for
> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think Riot should
>
> have an
>
> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package) so it will
>
> be
>
> > better maintain.
>
> Very interesting and good to know. I was not aware of this project (and
> I
> think most of the RIOT maintainers weren't either). And yes, for
> maintainability a package in RIOT might make sense. We just need a
> maintainer
> willing to do so. ;-)
>
> Baptiste, do you know the people behind Soletta?
>
> Cheers,
> Oleg
>
> --
> printk("Entering UltraSMPenguin Mode...\n");
>
> linux-2.2.16/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Baptiste
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> devel mailing list
> >>> devel@riot-os.org
> >>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>
> >> ___
> >> devel mailing list
> >> devel@riot-os.org
> >> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> > --
> > Baptiste
> >
> > ___
> > devel mailing list
> > devel@riot-os.org
> > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] Distributed Computing (offloading) with RIOT
Hi Arash, just from the challenges perspective I know that in the working group of Prof. Dr.-Ing. Karl-Ragmar Riemschneider at the Hamburg University of Applied Sciences they do complex signal processing on one powerful processor, based on distributed sensor data from vehicle battery cells. Best Peter Am 31.05.2016 um 16:44 schrieb Arash Shafiei: I have been thinking and reading about the research challenges in IoT-specific operating systems. One idea that I have encountered is to perform the computation outside the device on a more powerful machine. Let's say a face recognition algorithm cannot be performed on a wearable device and the wearable device needs to send (offload) this computation to a nearby machine. This can be done at the application level but also at the OS level. Let's say a remote fork API hides the complexity of creating remote process from the application programmer. I was wondering if anyone has ever worked on this subject and if the community thinks it is an interesting problem to work on at all.. If not, would you have any suggestions for the research challenges in this domain? Thanks. ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Peter Kietzmann Hamburg University of Applied Sciences Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group Berliner Tor 7, 20099 Hamburg, Germany Fon: +49-40-42875-8426 Web: http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[riot-devel] Distributed Computing (offloading) with RIOT
I have been thinking and reading about the research challenges in IoT-specific operating systems. One idea that I have encountered is to perform the computation outside the device on a more powerful machine. Let's say a face recognition algorithm cannot be performed on a wearable device and the wearable device needs to send (offload) this computation to a nearby machine. This can be done at the application level but also at the OS level. Let's say a remote fork API hides the complexity of creating remote process from the application programmer. I was wondering if anyone has ever worked on this subject and if the community thinks it is an interesting problem to work on at all.. If not, would you have any suggestions for the research challenges in this domain? Thanks. ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread
Hi Thiago,
basically, we are interested in learning more about it.
And in particular, we were wondering whether it could be a good idea to
present this at the RIOT Summit [1].
What do you think about this idea?
Best,
Emmanuel
[1] summit.riot-os.org
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Baptiste Clenet
wrote:
> Not really but I saw him answering some post on Iotivity and Soletta
> project for people asking to port Iotivity to constraint object.
>
> Thiago, could you explain Soletta Project and the relation with OIC and
> RIOT please?
>
> 2016-05-30 21:07 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli :
>
>> Hi Baptiste,
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification.
>>
>> Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago?
>>
>> It may be interesting if they attend and/or present something on this
>> topic at the upcoming RIOT Summit [1].
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> [1] summit.riot-os.org
>> On May 30, 2016 4:19 PM, "Baptiste Clenet" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I correct what I said, Soletta Project is not an implementation of
>>> Iotivity but an implementation of OIC specification (Iotivity too) so
>>> Iotivity and Soletta project can communicate together since they use same
>>> specification.
>>>
>>> Intel Open Source is in charge of this project and you can ask
>>> thiago.macie...@intel.com for more information.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> 2016-05-30 10:41 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm :
>>>
Hi!
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
> - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1] imported it for
> RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think Riot should
have an
> implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package) so it will
be
> better maintain.
Very interesting and good to know. I was not aware of this project (and
I
think most of the RIOT maintainers weren't either). And yes, for
maintainability a package in RIOT might make sense. We just need a
maintainer
willing to do so. ;-)
Baptiste, do you know the people behind Soletta?
Cheers,
Oleg
--
printk("Entering UltraSMPenguin Mode...\n");
linux-2.2.16/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Baptiste
>>>
>>> ___
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel@riot-os.org
>>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Baptiste
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread
Not really but I saw him answering some post on Iotivity and Soletta
project for people asking to port Iotivity to constraint object.
Thiago, could you explain Soletta Project and the relation with OIC and
RIOT please?
2016-05-30 21:07 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli :
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago?
>
> It may be interesting if they attend and/or present something on this
> topic at the upcoming RIOT Summit [1].
>
> Cheers,
>
> Emmanuel
>
> [1] summit.riot-os.org
> On May 30, 2016 4:19 PM, "Baptiste Clenet" wrote:
>
>> Hi, I correct what I said, Soletta Project is not an implementation of
>> Iotivity but an implementation of OIC specification (Iotivity too) so
>> Iotivity and Soletta project can communicate together since they use same
>> specification.
>>
>> Intel Open Source is in charge of this project and you can ask
>> thiago.macie...@intel.com for more information.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> 2016-05-30 10:41 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm :
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
>>> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1] imported it for
>>> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think Riot should
>>> have an
>>> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package) so it will be
>>> > better maintain.
>>>
>>> Very interesting and good to know. I was not aware of this project (and I
>>> think most of the RIOT maintainers weren't either). And yes, for
>>> maintainability a package in RIOT might make sense. We just need a
>>> maintainer
>>> willing to do so. ;-)
>>>
>>> Baptiste, do you know the people behind Soletta?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Oleg
>>>
>>> --
>>> printk("Entering UltraSMPenguin Mode...\n");
>>> linux-2.2.16/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c
>>>
>>> ___
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel@riot-os.org
>>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Baptiste
>>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
--
Baptiste
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[riot-devel] Notification: Biweekly virtual meeting @ Wed Jun 1, 2016 2pm - 3pm (RIOT Events)
This is a notification for: Title: Biweekly virtual meeting Developer discussions that will only happen if a proposed agenda exists. Some instructions and a link to the agenda can be found in the RIOT wiki (https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Meetings). Remote participation will be provided. When: Wed Jun 1, 2016 2pm – 3pm Berlin Calendar: RIOT Events Who: * Ludwig Ortmann - creator Event details: https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=Z2tqN2ZyY3NmdnEzOWFkbDdmMXJkb2hrbzhfMjAxNjA2MDFUMTIwMDAwWiBrM3FsOHNldHY3bDQ4b2Zub2wwdGZ1dTZ0c0Bn Invitation from Google Calendar: https://www.google.com/calendar/ You are receiving this email at the account peterschme...@gmail.com because you are subscribed for notifications on calendar RIOT Events. To stop receiving these emails, please log in to https://www.google.com/calendar/ and change your notification settings for this calendar. Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to modify your RSVP response. Learn more at https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
