Hello Baptiste, Emmanuel I'll let the people more familiar (in cc) with it reply.
On terça-feira, 31 de maio de 2016 16:05:22 BRT Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > Hi Thiago, > basically, we are interested in learning more about it. > And in particular, we were wondering whether it could be a good idea to > present this at the RIOT Summit [1]. > What do you think about this idea? > Best, > Emmanuel > > > [1] summit.riot-os.org > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Baptiste Clenet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > Not really but I saw him answering some post on Iotivity and Soletta > > project for people asking to port Iotivity to constraint object. > > > > Thiago, could you explain Soletta Project and the relation with OIC and > > RIOT please? > > > > 2016-05-30 21:07 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Baptiste, > >> > >> Thanks for the clarification. > >> > >> Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago? > >> > >> It may be interesting if they attend and/or present something on this > >> topic at the upcoming RIOT Summit [1]. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Emmanuel > >> > >> [1] summit.riot-os.org > >> > >> On May 30, 2016 4:19 PM, "Baptiste Clenet" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hi, I correct what I said, Soletta Project is not an implementation of > >>> Iotivity but an implementation of OIC specification (Iotivity too) so > >>> Iotivity and Soletta project can communicate together since they use > >>> same > >>> specification. > >>> > >>> Intel Open Source is in charge of this project and you can ask > >>> [email protected] for more information. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> 2016-05-30 10:41 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm <[email protected]>: > >>>> Hi! > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote: > >>>> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1] imported it > >>>> > for > >>>> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think Riot should > >>>> > >>>> have an > >>>> > >>>> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package) so it will > >>>> > >>>> be > >>>> > >>>> > better maintain. > >>>> > >>>> Very interesting and good to know. I was not aware of this project (and > >>>> I > >>>> think most of the RIOT maintainers weren't either). And yes, for > >>>> maintainability a package in RIOT might make sense. We just need a > >>>> maintainer > >>>> willing to do so. ;-) > >>>> > >>>> Baptiste, do you know the people behind Soletta? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Oleg > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> printk("Entering UltraSMPenguin Mode...\n"); > >>>> > >>>> linux-2.2.16/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> devel mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Baptiste > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> devel mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devel mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > -- > > Baptiste > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
