Hi,
Yeah, declarative dev is busted. I’ll look into it on Monday. Meanwhile I
support pinning to an older sha1 in qt5.
Simon
> On 28. Apr 2018, at 21:51, Liang Qi wrote:
>
> 5.11.0 is fine. Latest one is successful,
> https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qt5/tasks/1525572833
>
> But looks like there are issues in qt5 dev integration, please check
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/227670/ and
> https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qt5/tasks/1525573813 .
>
> My proposal is switch qtdeclarative back to
> 913dc3f4f2be7c2c23237bcb9bffb3192cb10d60 . The new patch set PS5 is pushed
> there, and have a background build(status check) running, looks good by now.
>
> — Liang
>
>> On 27 Apr 2018, at 12:28, Tuukka Turunen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So we should probably restart https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/227410/
>> and re-run other qt5.git runs to make sure all tests are properly run in
>> those?
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>>Tuukka
>>
>> From: Development
>> on behalf of Sami Nurmenniemi
>> Date: Friday, 27 April 2018 at 13.06
>> To: Simon Hausmann , "development@qt-project.org"
>>
>> Cc: Qt CI
>> Subject: Re: [Development] CI "wave-through"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Increasing the "non-zero change" there a bit, the "wave-through window" was
>> from "25th of April 15:30 CET" to "27th of April 12:00 CET".
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Sami
>>
>> Lähettäjä: Development
>> käyttäjän Simon
>> Hausmann puolesta
>> Lähetetty: 27. huhtikuuta 2018 12:54:11
>> Vastaanottaja: development@qt-project.org
>> Kopio: Qt CI
>> Aihe: [Development] CI "wave-through"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Since yesterday afternoon around 15:30 central european time the CI has
>> experienced a "failure" that resulted in each and all tests being skipped.
>> So if a change broke the build, the CI would reject it. But if the change
>> would normally result in a test failing, then the CI waved the change
>> through regardless as it did not run any tests at all (apart from the BIC
>> tests).
>>
>>
>>
>> The issue has been corrected as of a few minutes ago, but there is a
>> non-zero chance that faulty changes may have slipped through and may result
>> in test failures that are not related to changes you're trying to integrate.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> ___
>> Development mailing list
>> Development@qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development