Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
I also chose Ilya's nanomsg over zeromq, there were some fundamental flaws in ZMQ that it addresses, and it is more flexible. On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:e >> >> Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? >>> >> >> Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See >> http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/ >> > > > Nanomsg is not dead. The maintainer tried to introduce a code of conduct > (about which even he was uncertain of the merits of), felt he didn't have > the effective power to do so, and then resigned in frustration. A few > weeks later he was back and it hit 1.0 recently. > Had an exchange with Pieter on Reddit and after looking at commit > history, he took back his suggestion that Nanomsg was dead. > > It's silly to compare the two communities and make any inferences because > Nanomsg has fewer people and the originator has a job and Google and many > interests. > > There are deimos bindings that Ilya wrote for me and I open-sourced, and > a wrapper that I wrote that is also open sourced. There are some bugs in > the deimos binding - haven't yet had time to push my changes. > > The wrapper isn't super well tested but I use it. Will make it more > polished when I have more time. > > > Laeeth >
Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote: On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:e Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/ Nanomsg is not dead. The maintainer tried to introduce a code of conduct (about which even he was uncertain of the merits of), felt he didn't have the effective power to do so, and then resigned in frustration. A few weeks later he was back and it hit 1.0 recently. Had an exchange with Pieter on Reddit and after looking at commit history, he took back his suggestion that Nanomsg was dead. It's silly to compare the two communities and make any inferences because Nanomsg has fewer people and the originator has a job and Google and many interests. There are deimos bindings that Ilya wrote for me and I open-sourced, and a wrapper that I wrote that is also open sourced. There are some bugs in the deimos binding - haven't yet had time to push my changes. The wrapper isn't super well tested but I use it. Will make it more polished when I have more time. Laeeth
Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote: On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/ That article was in February. There was a 1.0.0 release in June.
Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 04:18 +, Nikolay via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder > wrote: > > > > > Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? > > Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See > http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/ Last person I know who chose Nanomsg over ZeroMQ did so after trying both a few days ago. Nanomsg got chosen because of nicer API and that the project was lively and progressing. It's all about points of view I guess. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote: Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. lol. if one drama queen moved out, that doesn't mean that the project is dead. it only means: "godspeed, drama queen."
Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/
Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:55:15 UTC, JN wrote: On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: Hi, I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways ZeroMQ. Was this manually, or using DStep? Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using DStep. Not sure how they did it, but there are at least three Nanomsg bindings available: http://code.dlang.org/packages/derelict_extras-nanomsg http://code.dlang.org/packages/nanomsg http://code.dlang.org/packages/d-nanomsg do you know if there are some mq-s written in d?
Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: Hi, I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways ZeroMQ. Was this manually, or using DStep? Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using DStep. derelict_extras-nanomsg was converted manually
Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: Hi, I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways ZeroMQ. Was this manually, or using DStep? Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using DStep. http://code.dlang.org/packages/nanomsg was converted manually. --Ilya
Re: D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: Hi, I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways ZeroMQ. Was this manually, or using DStep? Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using DStep. Not sure how they did it, but there are at least three Nanomsg bindings available: http://code.dlang.org/packages/derelict_extras-nanomsg http://code.dlang.org/packages/nanomsg http://code.dlang.org/packages/d-nanomsg
D, ZeroMQ, Nanomsg
Hi, I see that some people have wrapped in various different ways ZeroMQ. Was this manually, or using DStep? Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? If yes, was this manually or using DStep. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
