Re: dmd 2.064.2
Can you clarify exactly which version of Visual Studio 2013 you are using? Can you also confirm that you can compile and link a C++ console app using your current installation of vs2013?
Re: DirectX bindings
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:27:24 UTC, evilrat wrote: please be careful though, as it is only in alpha stage and missing some stuff. current version is June 2010 SDK, but i update it(to win8 sdk version) once i had win8 machine(i'm still don't have a PC at home). Hi evilrat, I've been thinking about this for a while, maybe you know about SharpDX. https://github.com/sharpdx/SharpDX It parses DirectX SDK headers and provide C# DirectX bindings + marshalling code (based on gccxml C++ parser). I wonder how involved would it be to modify its generation tool (https://github.com/sharpdx/SharpDX/tree/master/Source/Tools/SharpGen) to output D bindings instead.
Re: DirectX bindings
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:27:24 UTC, evilrat wrote: Greetings, many of you may notice lack of (up-to-date and working) DirectX bindings, one may also seen my activity on d.learn sub forum. so let me announce yet another bindings for DirectX which one may fork right now from github! https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d please be careful though, as it is only in alpha stage and missing some stuff. current version is June 2010 SDK, but i update it(to win8 sdk version) once i had win8 machine(i'm still don't have a PC at home). also, there is no d3d9 and d3d10 stuff as i consider it outdated now, but i would appreciate pull requests for them anyway :) great, however it seems has a little problem, the arg of ID3D11DeviceContext.Unmap should be ID3D11Resource not ID3D11Resource*, arg of IASetIndexBuffer should be ID3D11Buffer not ID3D11Buffer*
Re: DirectX bindings
On Friday, 8 November 2013 at 11:37:38 UTC, liyu wrote: On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:27:24 UTC, evilrat wrote: Greetings, many of you may notice lack of (up-to-date and working) DirectX bindings, one may also seen my activity on d.learn sub forum. so let me announce yet another bindings for DirectX which one may fork right now from github! https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d please be careful though, as it is only in alpha stage and missing some stuff. current version is June 2010 SDK, but i update it(to win8 sdk version) once i had win8 machine(i'm still don't have a PC at home). also, there is no d3d9 and d3d10 stuff as i consider it outdated now, but i would appreciate pull requests for them anyway :) great, however it seems has a little problem, the arg of ID3D11DeviceContext.Unmap should be ID3D11Resource not ID3D11Resource*, arg of IASetIndexBuffer should be ID3D11Buffer not ID3D11Buffer* uh, yes, it has some problems, this is semi-automatic coversion bindings, and i have missed some stuff. thanks for pointing out.
Re: dmd 2.064.2
BTW, I have noticed that this version was compiled without -D=PULL93 so transition switch list again only has `tls`. Is there any specific reason to remove this switch after actual deprecation? It still can be very useful for porting D1 to D2 :)
Re: dmd 2.064.2
On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 17:12:07 UTC, tester wrote: nothing worked.. after a reboot i reinstalled with the installer and used the (bug) appended sc.ini. didn't work. i then replaced all occurences of %VCINSTALLDIR% and %WindowsSdkDir% with the actual path such as C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\VC and it wouldn't work. i worked with these modifications when i started as administrator. It works under administrator? You probably got something virtualized. Can you find the dmd folder in VirtualStore in your profile?
Re: DirectX bindings
On 11/8/13, ponce cont...@gam3sfrommars.fr wrote: I've been thinking about this for a while, maybe you know about SharpDX. https://github.com/sharpdx/SharpDX It parses DirectX SDK headers and provide C# DirectX bindings + marshalling code (based on gccxml C++ parser). If you need a gccxml XML loader you could grab this code: https://github.com/AndrejMitrovic/dgen/blob/master/src/dgen/parser/gccxml.d It's not exactly a self-hosting module, there's a few dependencies. I also have a fork of gccxml that exports some additional attributes (and documents some things as well): https://github.com/AndrejMitrovic/gccxml Don't even ask about that project though, it's something I /might/ get back to at one point, but I'm way too busy with other stuff.
Re: dmd 2.064.2
On 11/7/13, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote: The changelog is missing issue 10700. I though that part was automatically generated. The list of issues fixed were generated on October 20th, and that bug was not marked as fixed in bugzilla at the time. There's likely a set of additional bugs which are not listed in the changelog, but it's hard to both autogenerate these and then have to manually track which bugs were merged into the 2.064 branch. Everything is done ad-hoc, so you'll end up with this sort of problem.
Re: dmd 2.064.2
On 11/05/2013 11:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote: Ok, this is it: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_i386.deb http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2.exe http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.2.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.2.dmg http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-64_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-64_2.064.2-0_i386.deb Would you mind to update the rpms with a fixed build? http://forum.dlang.org/post/527c3ed0.8030...@dawg.eu
Re: dmd 2.064.2
On 2013-11-08 19:37, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: The list of issues fixed were generated on October 20th, and that bug was not marked as fixed in bugzilla at the time. There's likely a set of additional bugs which are not listed in the changelog, but it's hard to both autogenerate these and then have to manually track which bugs were merged into the 2.064 branch. Everything is done ad-hoc, so you'll end up with this sort of problem. Aha, I see. The documentation wasn't merged on October 20th so the issue hadn't got closed. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: dmd 2.064.2
On 2013-11-08 14:17, Dicebot wrote: BTW, I have noticed that this version was compiled without -D=PULL93 so transition switch list again only has `tls`. Is there any specific reason to remove this switch after actual deprecation? It still can be very useful for porting D1 to D2 :) Yeah, I still have DWT Mac OS X left to port. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: D programing language specifications v2.064.2
On 11/08/2013 11:36 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote: New D programing language specifications v2.064.2 in several formats: http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/ Cool, thanks!
