Re: Release D 2.069.0
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 12:28:09 UTC, FreeSlave wrote: I tried to install rpm-package on Fedora 20 with rpm -i, but it gives me error: Failed dependencies: glibc-devel(x86-32) is needed by dmd-2.069.0-0.x86_64 libcurl(x86-32) is needed by dmd-2.069.0-0.x86_64 Why do package depends on 32-bit libraries? Was it always like that? I never installed dmd on Fedora before. Yes, it was always like that. To be able to generate 32-bit binaries, and dmd-64 can do that, these 32-bit packages are required.
Re: 2.069.0 Installation problem with .exe for Windows
On 11/09/2015 09:46 AM, Mike James wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > I've tried the new install with Windows Vista and Windows 7 and the > problem is the same as before. > > Regards, > -=mike=- Can you try again, I updated the installer and tried to revert the other part of the change (though I don't see why that would fix the problem). More details would help a lot at this point, e.g. what windows are open (also look whether the uninstaller hides any window) and what files are left in the install dir (C:\D by default) while the installation hangs. And let's please continue this in Bugzilla. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15284
Re: Release D 2.069.0
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 21:38:13 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On 11/09/2015 07:08 PM, Dicebot wrote: More common practice is to declare such dependencies as optional though. I made a ticket https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15308. Simply changing https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/blob/41fb25ce5e5ff2c14728f490ee4579ac49bb989a/linux/dmd_rpm.sh#L266 doesn't work b/c the rpmtool from debian used to build the rpm packages doesn't support Recommends. Sorry, I don't know a single thing about RPM world thus can't really help meaningfully :(
Re: Release D 2.069.0
On 11/09/2015 07:08 PM, Dicebot wrote: > More common practice is to declare such dependencies as optional though. I made a ticket https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15308. Simply changing https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/blob/41fb25ce5e5ff2c14728f490ee4579ac49bb989a/linux/dmd_rpm.sh#L266 doesn't work b/c the rpmtool from debian used to build the rpm packages doesn't support Recommends.
Re: Release D 2.069.0
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 10:39:21 UTC, Thomas Brix Larsen wrote: Opt-in stats from Arch: https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics go 19.45% rust5.92% gcc-go 5.61% dmd 2.56% ldc 1.72% gdc 1.60% This matches my personal understanding of current "market" share for those.
Re: Release D 2.069.0
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 12:58:39 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote: On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 12:28:09 UTC, FreeSlave wrote: I tried to install rpm-package on Fedora 20 with rpm -i, but it gives me error: Failed dependencies: glibc-devel(x86-32) is needed by dmd-2.069.0-0.x86_64 libcurl(x86-32) is needed by dmd-2.069.0-0.x86_64 Why do package depends on 32-bit libraries? Was it always like that? I never installed dmd on Fedora before. Yes, it was always like that. To be able to generate 32-bit binaries, and dmd-64 can do that, these 32-bit packages are required. More common practice is to declare such dependencies as optional though.
Martin's article on reddit
Discuss away: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3s5f92/writing_a_vibed_app_linking_bugzilla_issues_with/ -- Andrei
Re: Martin's article on reddit
On 11/09/2015 12:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Discuss away: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3s5f92/writing_a_vibed_app_linking_bugzilla_issues_with/ -- Andrei Spread it to other outlets: https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/663764019812036608 https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/1166624980017848 https://news.ycombinator.com/newest "coz you never know" Andrei
Sciter Bootstrap for making HTML based desktop apps in D (e.g: CEF for D)
http://misoftware.rs/Bootstrap Sciter is multiplatform HTML rendering engine for desktop (it also supports scripting and a bunch of CSS3 modules). Sciter Bootstrap let's you download a pre-made IDE project with everything setup for compiling a Sciter-based app, so you just add the HTML code and compile it. There is D package available which generates a Visual Studio project for Visual-D.
Re: Release D 2.069.0
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 09:19:11 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote: Yes, use asModule() for that [1]. Not only does it enable using large grammars, it also saves compilation time for builds after the grammar has stabilised. Thanks. And should the grammar still be too large, it is good to know that Pegged is good at composing a parser from different sub-grammars [2]. So the difficulty is only in finding natural boundaries at which the grammar can be split, making it work should be easy. I knew about composition. I just wanted to keep the same names as per the original spec, instead of nesting.
Re: Release D 2.069.0
On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 14:37:32 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: You mean instead of mixin(grammer(`...`)) I write the output of grammer(`...`) to a file and include that into the final build? Yes, use asModule() for that [1]. Not only does it enable using large grammars, it also saves compilation time for builds after the grammar has stabilised. And should the grammar still be too large, it is good to know that Pegged is good at composing a parser from different sub-grammars [2]. So the difficulty is only in finding natural boundaries at which the grammar can be split, making it work should be easy. [1] https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/wiki/Grammars-as-D-Modules [2] https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/wiki/Grammar-Composition
Re: Release D 2.069.0
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 03:15:29 UTC, rsw0x wrote: On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 02:15:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/8/15 2:58 PM, rsw0x wrote: Interestingly, GDC seems *very* popular - it has a 4:1 install rate of gccgo and only trailing slightly behind the golang-go package(reference compiler?) on Ubuntu's popcon. Link? -- Andrei debian: https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=gdc%2Cgccgo%2Cgolang_installed=on_legend=on_ticks=on_date=_date=_date=_fmt=%25Y-%25m=1 ubuntu: http://ubuntu-popcon.43-1.org/cgi-bin/graph.pl?name=gdc http://ubuntu-popcon.43-1.org/cgi-bin/graph.pl?name=golang-go http://ubuntu-popcon.43-1.org/cgi-bin/graph.pl?name=gccgo note that dmd is not redistributed on most linux distros due to licensing issues Opt-in stats from Arch: https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics go 19.45% rust5.92% gcc-go 5.61% dmd 2.56% ldc 1.72% gdc 1.60%
Re: 2.069.0 Installation problem with .exe for Windows
On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 23:33:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On 11/04/2015 10:05 AM, Mike James wrote: Copied here for extra visibility... Hi. There seems to be an install problem with the .exe version for Windows. The installer removes the old DMD then doesn't install the 2.069.0 version. In the task manager it's still running at 50% CPU time. It fails on Windows Vista and Windows 7. Could some try and verify that this installer fixes the issue. I wasn't able to reproduce the issue myself. https://dlang.dawg.eu/downloads/dmd.2.069.0~fix15824/ Hi Martin, I've tried the new install with Windows Vista and Windows 7 and the problem is the same as before. Regards, -=mike=-
