Re: having problem with `std.algorithm.each`
DMD 2.069.1 OS Win8.1 Enterprise
Re: having problem with `std.algorithm.each`
On 30.11.2015 11:50, visitor wrote: though i don"t understand why it fails silently ?? ref2491's original code is valid, but doesn't have the intended meaning. `e => {foo(e);}` is the same as `(e) {return () {foo(e);};}`, i.e. a (unary) function that returns a (nullary) delegate. Calling it does not run foo. In contrast, calling this runs foo: `e => foo(e)`.
Re: having problem with `std.algorithm.each`
On Monday, 30 November 2015 at 09:56:08 UTC, ref2401 wrote: DMD 2.069.1 OS Win8.1 Enterprise in a multiline statement, i believe you must use : arr.each!((ref e) { writeln(e); ++e; }) "=>" is for oneliner though i don"t understand why it fails silently ??
Re: having problem with `std.algorithm.each`
On Monday, 30 November 2015 at 12:03:08 UTC, anonymous wrote: On 30.11.2015 11:50, visitor wrote: though i don"t understand why it fails silently ?? ref2491's original code is valid, but doesn't have the intended meaning. `e => {foo(e);}` is the same as `(e) {return () {foo(e);};}`, i.e. a (unary) function that returns a (nullary) delegate. Calling it does not run foo. In contrast, calling this runs foo: `e => foo(e)`. `e => {foo(e);}` is the same as `(e) {return () {foo(e);};}` Ok, Thanks ! :-)
Re: having problem with `std.algorithm.each`
On Monday, 30 November 2015 at 12:03:08 UTC, anonymous wrote: On 30.11.2015 11:50, visitor wrote: though i don"t understand why it fails silently ?? ref2491's original code is valid, but doesn't have the intended meaning. `e => {foo(e);}` is the same as `(e) {return () {foo(e);};}`, i.e. a (unary) function that returns a (nullary) delegate. Calling it does not run foo. In contrast, calling this runs foo: `e => foo(e)`. Got it. Thank you)