Re: dtoh
On Tuesday, 7 August 2018 at 12:46:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 8/7/18 6:08 AM, bauss wrote: On Monday, 6 August 2018 at 13:28:05 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Hi Walter. Can dtoh be open-sourced now that dmd is? https://github.com/adamdruppe/dtoh I might be confused, but it seems like it is there. I think he meant htod: https://dlang.org/htod.html Which I believe uses some of the dmc source. -Steve For the record, I think this is the source code for htod: https://github.com/DigitalMars/Compiler/blob/master/dm/src/dmc/htod.d
Re: dtoh
On 2018-08-06 15:28, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Hi Walter. Can dtoh be open-sourced now that dmd is? If you mean htod, I would instead recommend DStep [1] or dpp [2]. Both of them are using libclang for parsing C/C++ code. DStep is cross-platform. [1] http://github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep [2] https://github.com/atilaneves/dpp -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: dtoh
On Tuesday, 7 August 2018 at 12:46:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 8/7/18 6:08 AM, bauss wrote: On Monday, 6 August 2018 at 13:28:05 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Hi Walter. Can dtoh be open-sourced now that dmd is? https://github.com/adamdruppe/dtoh I might be confused, but it seems like it is there. I think he meant htod: https://dlang.org/htod.html Which I believe uses some of the dmc source. -Steve Yes, that makes more sense!
Re: dtoh
On 8/7/18 6:08 AM, bauss wrote: On Monday, 6 August 2018 at 13:28:05 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Hi Walter. Can dtoh be open-sourced now that dmd is? https://github.com/adamdruppe/dtoh I might be confused, but it seems like it is there. I think he meant htod: https://dlang.org/htod.html Which I believe uses some of the dmc source. -Steve
Re: dtoh
On Monday, 6 August 2018 at 13:28:05 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Hi Walter. Can dtoh be open-sourced now that dmd is? Laeeth. https://github.com/adamdruppe/dtoh I might be confused, but it seems like it is there.
Re: dtoh
On Monday, 6 August 2018 at 13:28:05 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: Hi Walter. Can dtoh be open-sourced now that dmd is? Laeeth. Better write Walter a direct mail. He doesn't check the learn NG very often.
dtoh
Hi Walter. Can dtoh be open-sourced now that dmd is? Laeeth.
Re: Any chance of a linux dtoh?
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 16:02:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: I downgraded dmd and now have a different problem with tango at link stage, which is progress of a sort. (I updated the ticket). Do you have to compile it yourself? Arch comes with dstep in their package repository, put there by Dicebot, I just used that. I don't know if any other distros have it packaged though.
Re: Any chance of a linux dtoh?
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:08:30 + Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote: I realize Walter has far better things to work on, but value of having a translation tool is considerable, since it opens up easy access to an enormous range of libraries. It is not much work to do the translation oneself, but in the world as it is small frictions cumulatively have large consequences. Access to libraries is a big advantage of python, and the like. Once you have the wrapper in place, I find D as productive as python, but for now it is still a bit of work first. i bet that the only realistic way to do something like that is to take some existing C/C++ parser and write the tool from scratch. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Any chance of a linux dtoh?
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 14:22:54 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:08:30 + Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote: I realize Walter has far better things to work on, but value of having a translation tool is considerable, since it opens up easy access to an enormous range of libraries. It is not much work to do the translation oneself, but in the world as it is small frictions cumulatively have large consequences. Access to libraries is a big advantage of python, and the like. Once you have the wrapper in place, I find D as productive as python, but for now it is still a bit of work first. i bet that the only realistic way to do something like that is to take some existing C/C++ parser and write the tool from scratch. Which is exactly what dstep is.
Re: Any chance of a linux dtoh?
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 14:14:28 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 14:11:19 UTC, Dicebot wrote: dstep is your only realistic chance currently. htod is completely unmaintained, even on Windows. Please report any issues found with it in relevant issue tracker. I got it the wrong way around - yes, I meant htod. I have reported the issue, and author doesn't know what is wrong. You must be referring to https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep/issues/33 You mention using DMD beta there. Please don't. Use last currently available public release. This specific beta is especially harmful being left-over from unfinished beta cycle.
Any chance of a linux dtoh?
I realize Walter has far better things to work on, but value of having a translation tool is considerable, since it opens up easy access to an enormous range of libraries. It is not much work to do the translation oneself, but in the world as it is small frictions cumulatively have large consequences. Access to libraries is a big advantage of python, and the like. Once you have the wrapper in place, I find D as productive as python, but for now it is still a bit of work first. There is also dstep, but this doesn't seem to compile right now, and I don't have time to figure out why and fix it. (I took a look, and it is not so easy to figure out). Something mambo/tango related. I have raised a bug report. Laeeth
Re: Any chance of a linux dtoh?
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 14:11:19 UTC, Dicebot wrote: dstep is your only realistic chance currently. htod is completely unmaintained, even on Windows. Please report any issues found with it in relevant issue tracker. I got it the wrong way around - yes, I meant htod. I have reported the issue, and author doesn't know what is wrong.
Re: Any chance of a linux dtoh?
dstep is your only realistic chance currently. htod is completely unmaintained, even on Windows. Please report any issues found with it in relevant issue tracker.
Re: Any chance of a linux dtoh?
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 14:25:19 UTC, Dicebot wrote: On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 14:14:28 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote: On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 14:11:19 UTC, Dicebot wrote: dstep is your only realistic chance currently. htod is completely unmaintained, even on Windows. Please report any issues found with it in relevant issue tracker. I got it the wrong way around - yes, I meant htod. I have reported the issue, and author doesn't know what is wrong. You must be referring to https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep/issues/33 You mention using DMD beta there. Please don't. Use last currently available public release. This specific beta is especially harmful being left-over from unfinished beta cycle. Thanks for coming back, Dicebot - I had not seen the update to the ticket. I downgraded dmd and now have a different problem with tango at link stage, which is progress of a sort. (I updated the ticket).
