[digitalradio] Problem with Hoka
Hi everybody, Since a few days,when i wanted to stard Hoka,my computer restart every time!All the other programs work without problems(Wxtrack,MuliPsk,Wxtolmg,LiveNet,JVComm32,etc..).I check the processor,and the memory,look O.K.The other half with Linux work fine.Delete and Reinstall the drivers from Hoka,still the same problem. Any idea what can be? Thanks for help.Have a nice day. Nikos
[digitalradio] Signalink and checkSR
I am totally new to digital radio, have an Icom 746PRO and interfacing for PSK31 with a SignaLink USB. I have a factory lead (computer to signalink) and home brew lead (radio to signalink. This was spreviously on a Yaesu and I rewired. I'm using the 6 pin on the radio and have wired a MiniDIN 6 pin plug accordingly, thanks to assistance from Tigertronics. J-1 jumpers have been set. The setup on Digipan receives OK, but transmit is a problem, although a CQ message from me appears on my screen as transmitted, but does not show on the waterfall??? Using CheckSR at sample rate freq of 11025Hz, the RX is good with a difference of -90Hz but TX difference shows up as 6800Hz. Where should I begin? Thanks, Les VK4VIL.
Re: [digitalradio] Re: A new concept in digital mode band plans- reducing the number of tongues in the tower of Babylon
I agree Jim, ALE400 would make sense. In general, the current failing of standard ALE to take off are , I think, linked to attempts to popularize ALE for emcomm use. While ALE concepts do lend themselves to emergency communication nets, the gist of this thread is related to plain old ham radio, having a normal QSO. Having a standard calling digital mode , and a way to then switch modes to suit conditions . This would eliminate the endless CQ calling in odd-ball modes and increase the chances of actually getting a reply. To regular ALE users my idea is like reinventing the wheel, because what I propose is what ALE can do already. However, getting people to actually deploy ALE and also eliminate unattended operations, is an impossible task. Andy K3Uk On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:41 PM, jhaynesatalumni jhhay...@earthlink.netwrote: I think it's fair to discuss, which is to say question, whether military standard ALE is the best thing to use on amateur frequencies. It's good to make use of existing standards when they fit the situation, but military radio is not amateur radio. With our crowded bands, and with amateur radios that are stingy on the bandwidth, maybe we would be better off using something like Patrick's ALE-400. Jim W6JVE
Re: [digitalradio] Problem with Hoka
What is Hoka? Rick KH2DF Sent from my iPhone On Mar 25, 2010, at 12:15 AM, nikos_katsoulis nikos_katsou...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi everybody, Since a few days,when i wanted to stard Hoka,my computer restart every time!All the other programs work without problems(Wxtrack,MuliPsk,Wxtolmg,LiveNet,JVComm32,etc..).I check the processor,and the memory,look O.K.The other half with Linux work fine.Delete and Reinstall the drivers from Hoka,still the same problem. Any idea what can be? Thanks for help.Have a nice day. Nikos
Re: [digitalradio] Signalink and checkSR
Try SR of 12000. On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:00 AM, vk4vil unw...@bigpond.com wrote: I am totally new to digital radio, have an Icom 746PRO and interfacing for PSK31 with a SignaLink USB. I have a factory lead (computer to signalink) and home brew lead (radio to signalink. This was spreviously on a Yaesu and I rewired. I'm using the 6 pin on the radio and have wired a MiniDIN 6 pin plug accordingly, thanks to assistance from Tigertronics. J-1 jumpers have been set. The setup on Digipan receives OK, but transmit is a problem, although a CQ message from me appears on my screen as transmitted, but does not show on the waterfall??? Using CheckSR at sample rate freq of 11025Hz, the RX is good with a difference of -90Hz but TX difference shows up as 6800Hz. Where should I begin? Thanks, Les VK4VIL. http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [digitalradio] Problem with Hoka
Hi Rick,Hoka is one Data Analyzer and Decoder. Cheers,Nikos --- On Thu, 3/25/10, Rick Westerfield r_lwesterfi...@bellsouth.net wrote: From: Rick Westerfield r_lwesterfi...@bellsouth.net Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Problem with Hoka To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, March 25, 2010, 5:16 AM What is Hoka? Rick KH2DF Sent from my iPhone On Mar 25, 2010, at 12:15 AM, nikos_katsoulis nikos_katsoulis@ yahoo.com wrote: Hi everybody, Since a few days,when i wanted to stard Hoka,my computer restart every time!All the other programs work without problems(Wxtrack, MuliPsk,Wxtolmg, LiveNet,JVComm32 ,etc..).I check the processor,and the memory,look O.K.The other half with Linux work fine.Delete and Reinstall the drivers from Hoka,still the same problem. Any idea what can be? Thanks for help.Have a nice day. Nikos
[digitalradio] Re: A new concept in digital mode band plans- reducing the number of tongues in the tower of Babylon
Hi Andy, Dropped in to see if I needed to reply to anything from yesterday and I see that you really have a number of members on this forum that seem to have a lot of personal gripes and also make a lot of negative comments about BW and what is and is not appropropriate for use on Amateur Radio and I just have to say that it really amuses me a lot. Those forum members that are really interested in the coming wave of Amateur Radio Digital Operating Methods don't just stop at learning about Software Defined Radios, start reading up on Cognitive Defined Radios and don't for a second think that Automatic Link Establishment is not going to be part of the SDR and CDR future of Amateur Radio, it is going to very much be a big part of what is coming into being as I can't think of anything else up to the task. The HF Spectrum will be radpidly scanned to indentify the stations of interest to link with and find the optimal frequency for propagation to establish the automatic link and exchange data at high speeds, you will see the ability to decode and display all the activity on a given chunk of spectrum during RX sweeps, get prepared as its coming sooner than you may think and I gather from comments made here, sooner than some my even want. Anyhow, off my soap box and back to my C++ hole. Sincerely, /s/ Steve, N2CKH www.n2ckh.com/PC_ALE_FORUM/
[digitalradio] Re: Another plug for JT65A ... the spectrum efficient mode
That seems a bit theoretical to me. If you have a mode that is very wide but gets its information across in short bursts, it could be said to be very efficient, but in practise it is efficient only if others are able to make use of the gaps between transmissions. If that mode needs that frequency to itself and cannot exist with other modes then it really makes no difference if it transmits on a 100% duty cycle or a 1% duty cycle it is preventing users of another mode from using the same spectrum. I think this argument is valid for the amateur bands because most digital modes do not have exclusive use of a part of the spectrum. They have to share space with other, different modes. A wide, bursty mode will prevent narrow, continuous ones from having a contact on the frequency (and vice versa) therefore from the point of view of the users of the narrow mode struggling to find somewhere to operate, the wide mode is occupying all of that space. Julian, G4ILO --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rein Couperus r...@... wrote: Hi Andy, well, I don't agree... as soon as you talk efficiency, you have to define what that means. For me bandwidth efficiency is 3-dimensional, it defines how much information can be transferred within a certain time span, within a certain bandwidth.
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Another plug for JT65A ... the spectrum efficient mode
At 01:01 PM 3/25/2010, you wrote: That seems a bit theoretical to me. If you have a mode that is very wide but gets its information across in short bursts, it could be said to be very efficient, but in practise it is efficient only if others are able to make use of the gaps between transmissions. If that mode needs that frequency to itself and cannot exist with other modes then it really makes no difference if it transmits on a 100% duty cycle or a 1% duty cycle it is preventing users of another mode from using the same spectrum. Just * how many * modes would like to put on one frequency at a time? If the frequency is in use then find another.
[digitalradio] Re: Has anyone tried the WINMOR keyboarding?
Thanks Howard, I am hoping to try it soon. Andy K3UK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Howard Z howar...@... wrote: Hi, Has anyone tried the WINMOR keyboarding mode - no ARQ using FEC? How does it compare to Olivia? Howard
[digitalradio] WINMOR good
Another major update came out today. FYI, despite some limitations on noisy HF (like all modes) , my view is the the RMS package is now a complete one. A application that fills the void mentioned frequently, namely the lack on HF on-ramps. With Winmor HF stations now connected to the WINLINK system, hams can easily communicate via Internet and without Internet. Example, today I connected to KN6NB-5 on 30M, just to see if the upgrade was working. I connected and received an email from another ham that was sent a couple of days ago. I had not checked mail for a few days. How I got the email, I have no clue. In other words, I don't know how it found me, I have not kept up on how Winlink works. I assume that I checked in to a WINMOR winlink station, it checks WINLINK for any mail for me by using the Telnet link and then sends me the mail via HF winmor. While many may have issues about the winlink concept, it now does do something effectively, gets messages to a destination via variety of methods ..error free. Andy K3UK On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote: Well, ROS diverted me and I am quite out of date with WINMOR and RMS Express. I finally upgraded tonight and it looks like it has taken a major leap forward with PACTOR now added to the suite, plus may new features. I'll play around some more before registering with the $39.00 fee but it looks very professional and well conceived. VERY nice channel selection and display with time feature and really nifty channel filters that let you set minimum signal quality. Pactor III is still probably the cat's meow, but this package now gives Telnet, Pactor (via hardware modem) and Winmor via soundcard. Winmore P2P or Winmor WL2K. Very well done . I'll try the K7EK station later tonight. See screen shot at http://www.obriensweb.com/wmor.jpg Andy K3UK RMS Express Revision History Revision Date Description/changes 0.5.1 3/13/2010 Minor updates for Pactor and help after version 0.5.0.0 testing. 0.5.0.0 3/10/2010 Major update including New use of WINMOR TNC and addition of Pactor and propagation prediction. 0.4.2.0 1/21/2010 Release of 0.4.1.3 0.4.1.3 1/20/2010 Change logging in KHzToHz to not log exception on empty string. Updated WMLinkProtocol.Process Control for case HFF to not include state disconnecting. Changed sound card restart threshold of dttLastSoundCapture from 3 sec to 7 sec. Moved Reset of dttLastSoundCardCapture in ProcessCapturedData to where Data is decimated by 2. Modified RestartCaptureDevice to clear Capture State and PTT Modified StopRecord to clear capture state and PTT. Fix SetRMSCallListXML and SetRMSFreqListXML in WinmorChannels and Winmor to correct error with multiple intervals of one frequency. Extend intActivityTimeout from 15 to 20 seconds in WMLinkProtocol.DecodeFrames
Re: [digitalradio] WINMOR good
Hi Andy, I guess you could say that the Winlink system is like an ISP like Verizon or Comcast. The CMS servers hold the mail until you connect to a gateway that polls the servers and checks for any mail addressed to you @winlink.org. The RF connection is like a cat5 extension cable. It brings the internet's email capability to a place that doesn't have connectivity like a remote area or a catastrophic area. With Winmor this ability to store and forward email to the internet is available with packet on vhf/uhf and HF using a sound card. It's an effective tool for emergency digital communications. 73, Ron ny3j Andy obrien wrote: Another major update came out today. FYI, despite some limitations on noisy HF (like all modes) , my view is the the RMS package is now a complete one. A application that fills the void mentioned frequently, namely the lack on HF on-ramps. With Winmor HF stations now connected to the WINLINK system, hams can easily communicate via Internet and without Internet. Example, today I connected to KN6NB-5 on 30M, just to see if the upgrade was working. I connected and received an email from another ham that was sent a couple of days ago. I had not checked mail for a few days. How I got the email, I have no clue. In other words, I don't know how it found me, I have not kept up on how Winlink works. I assume that I checked in to a WINMOR winlink station, it checks WINLINK for any mail for me by using the Telnet link and then sends me the mail via HF winmor. While many may have issues about the winlink concept, it now does do something effectively, gets messages to a destination via variety of methods ..error free. Andy K3UK On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com mailto:k3ukandy%40gmail.com wrote: Well, ROS diverted me and I am quite out of date with WINMOR and RMS Express. I finally upgraded tonight and it looks like it has taken a major leap forward with PACTOR now added to the suite, plus may new features. I'll play around some more before registering with the $39.00 fee but it looks very professional and well conceived. VERY nice channel selection and display with time feature and really nifty channel filters that let you set minimum signal quality. Pactor III is still probably the cat's meow, but this package now gives Telnet, Pactor (via hardware modem) and Winmor via soundcard. Winmore P2P or Winmor WL2K. Very well done . I'll try the K7EK station later tonight. See screen shot at http://www.obriensweb.com/wmor.jpg http://www.obriensweb.com/wmor.jpg Andy K3UK RMS Express Revision History Revision Date Description/changes 0.5.1 3/13/2010 Minor updates for Pactor and help after version 0.5.0.0 testing. 0.5.0.0 3/10/2010 Major update including New use of WINMOR TNC and addition of Pactor and propagation prediction. 0.4.2.0 1/21/2010 Release of 0.4.1.3 0.4.1.3 1/20/2010 Change logging in KHzToHz to not log exception on empty string. Updated WMLinkProtocol.Process Control for case HFF to not include state disconnecting. Changed sound card restart threshold of dttLastSoundCapture from 3 sec to 7 sec. Moved Reset of dttLastSoundCardCapture in ProcessCapturedData to where Data is decimated by 2. Modified RestartCaptureDevice to clear Capture State and PTT Modified StopRecord to clear capture state and PTT. Fix SetRMSCallListXML and SetRMSFreqListXML in WinmorChannels and Winmor to correct error with multiple intervals of one frequency. Extend intActivityTimeout from 15 to 20 seconds in WMLinkProtocol.DecodeFrames http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Message via HF (Winmor)
Just a test message to the group vi a Winmor HF station. Andy K3UK
RE: [digitalradio] WINMOR good
Andy, The RMS WINMOR station is always in contact with one of the CMS (Common Mail Servers). When you negotiate a connection, it checks for any mail waiting for your call. You can also send mail through the RMS WINMOR Station. It doesn't have to be to a winlink.org address. There is also a RMS Relay for store and forward, in case the RMS WINMOR station you connect to has loss of internet. In that case, when you disconnect, it will connect to another RMS Station via RF and pass your traffic. I haven't fully implemented RMS Relay in my RMS WINMOR server, as it is only for Pactor 3 at this point. I expect that will also change in the future. I wish I had a better grasp that what I indicate here. It is a nice network; much wider in it's scope than most realize. David KD4NUE -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy obrien Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:29 PM To: digitalradio Subject: [digitalradio] WINMOR good Another major update came out today. FYI, despite some limitations on noisy HF (like all modes) , my view is the the RMS package is now a complete one. A application that fills the void mentioned frequently, namely the lack on HF on-ramps. With Winmor HF stations now connected to the WINLINK system, hams can easily communicate via Internet and without Internet. Example, today I connected to KN6NB-5 on 30M, just to see if the upgrade was working. I connected and received an email from another ham that was sent a couple of days ago. I had not checked mail for a few days. How I got the email, I have no clue. In other words, I don't know how it found me, I have not kept up on how Winlink works. I assume that I checked in to a WINMOR winlink station, it checks WINLINK for any mail for me by using the Telnet link and then sends me the mail via HF winmor. While many may have issues about the winlink concept, it now does do something effectively, gets messages to a destination via variety of methods ..error free. Andy K3UK On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail. mailto:k3ukandy%40gmail.com com wrote: Well, ROS diverted me and I am quite out of date with WINMOR and RMS Express. I finally upgraded tonight and it looks like it has taken a major leap forward with PACTOR now added to the suite, plus may new features. I'll play around some more before registering with the $39.00 fee but it looks very professional and well conceived. VERY nice channel selection and display with time feature and really nifty channel filters that let you set minimum signal quality. Pactor III is still probably the cat's meow, but this package now gives Telnet, Pactor (via hardware modem) and Winmor via soundcard. Winmore P2P or Winmor WL2K. Very well done . I'll try the K7EK station later tonight. See screen shot at http://www.obriensw http://www.obriensweb.com/wmor.jpg eb.com/wmor.jpg Andy K3UK RMS Express Revision History RevisionDateDescription/changes 0.5.1 3/13/2010 Minor updates for Pactor and help after version 0.5.0.0 testing. 0.5.0.0 3/10/2010 Major update including New use of WINMOR TNC and addition of Pactor and propagation prediction. 0.4.2.0 1/21/2010 Release of 0.4.1.3 0.4.1.3 1/20/2010 Change logging in KHzToHz to not log exception on empty string. Updated WMLinkProtocol.Process Control for case HFF to not include state disconnecting. Changed sound card restart threshold of dttLastSoundCapture from 3 sec to 7 sec. Moved Reset of dttLastSoundCardCapture in ProcessCapturedData to where Data is decimated by 2. Modified RestartCaptureDevice to clear Capture State and PTT Modified StopRecord to clear capture state and PTT. Fix SetRMSCallListXML and SetRMSFreqListXML in WinmorChannels and Winmor to correct error with multiple intervals of one frequency. Extend intActivityTimeout from 15 to 20 seconds in WMLinkProtocol.DecodeFrames
[digitalradio] Re: Message via HF (Winmor)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, k...@... wrote: Just a test message to the group vi a Winmor HF station. Andy K3UK It worked ! My thanks to KB1OOQ for the 80M on-ramp. It took 5 minutes to pass the message but hey... Andy K3UK *** Connected to WL2K RMS: KB1OOQ-5 @ 2010/03/26 00:32:38 RMS WINMOR Bedford NH USA (FN42FW) 240 Minutes remaining [WL2K-2.2.1.0-B2FIHM$] Halifax CMS via KB1OOQ-5 [RMS Express-0.5.5.0-B2F] ; KB1OOQ-5 DE K3UK (FN02HK) FC EM EZ10XB1F8FPP 239 204 0 F A5 FS Y *** Sending EZ10XB1F8FPP... FF FQ *** Disconnected from WL2K RMS: KB1OOQ-5 @ 2010/03/26 00:37:33
[digitalradio] Re: Message via HF (Winmor)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, obrienaj k3uka...@... wrote: --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, k3uk@ wrote: Just a test message to the group vi a Winmor HF station. Andy K3UK It worked ! My thanks to KB1OOQ for the 80M on-ramp. It took 5 minutes to pass the message but hey... Andy K3UK *** Connected to WL2K RMS: KB1OOQ-5 @ 2010/03/26 00:32:38 RMS WINMOR Bedford NH USA (FN42FW) 240 Minutes remaining [WL2K-2.2.1.0-B2FIHM$] Halifax CMS via KB1OOQ-5 [RMS Express-0.5.5.0-B2F] ; KB1OOQ-5 DE K3UK (FN02HK) FC EM EZ10XB1F8FPP 239 204 0 F A5 FS Y *** Sending EZ10XB1F8FPP... FF FQ *** Disconnected from WL2K RMS: KB1OOQ-5 @ 2010/03/26 00:37:33 Very cool, Andy, sending a message to the Yahoo Group via Winmor and the Winlink Global HF Email System! Just so everyone doesn't think that Winmor is dog slow, below is a section of my current Winmor RMS (Radio Mail Server) log file from this early evening. If you've got good propagation you are going to go fast. If not, well then I guess you are Andy :-) 2010/03/26 00:32:28 RMS WINMOR Bedford NH USA (FN42FW) 2010/03/26 00:32:29 240 Minutes remaining 2010/03/26 00:32:29 Callsign : 2010/03/26 00:32:29 K3UK 2010/03/26 00:32:29 Password : 2010/03/26 00:32:29 CMSTelnet KB1OOQ-5 3570700 21 2010/03/26 00:32:29 [WL2K-2.2.1.0-B2FIHM$] 2010/03/26 00:32:29 Halifax CMS via KB1OOQ-5 2010/03/26 00:33:47 [RMS Express-0.5.5.0-B2F] 2010/03/26 00:33:47 ; KB1OOQ-5 DE K3UK (FN02HK) 2010/03/26 00:34:46 FC EM EZ10XB1F8FPP 239 204 0 2010/03/26 00:34:46 F A5 2010/03/26 00:34:47 Receiving binary data... 2010/03/26 00:34:47 FS Y 2010/03/26 00:36:46 FF 2010/03/26 00:41:36 RMS WINMOR Bedford NH USA (FN42FW) 2010/03/26 00:41:37 236 Minutes remaining 2010/03/26 00:41:37 Callsign : 2010/03/26 00:41:37 KC1PO 2010/03/26 00:41:37 Password : 2010/03/26 00:41:37 CMSTelnet KB1OOQ-5 3570700 21 2010/03/26 00:41:38 [WL2K-2.2.1.0-B2FIHM$] 2010/03/26 00:41:38 Perth CMS via KB1OOQ-5 2010/03/26 00:42:22 [RMS Express-0.5.5.0-B2F] 2010/03/26 00:42:22 ; KB1OOQ-5 DE KC1PO (FN42IH) 2010/03/26 00:42:22 FF 2010/03/26 00:42:23 FC EM HHJIRMPXSYQZ 4876 4707 0 2010/03/26 00:42:24 F 9C 2010/03/26 00:42:35 Sending binary data... 2010/03/26 00:42:35 FS Y 2010/03/26 00:46:55 FQ The first entry is Andy's traffic. Because of the protocol overhead even connections that pass no traffic take approximately 2 minutes from start to finish. The more you send the less the overhead affects the aggregate data rate. You can see the connect in the log right after Andy moved a message that had 4707 bytes (compressed, uncompressed it was 4876) in about 5 minutes. That's flirting with 1Kbyte/min over a 500Hz bandwidth HF connection INCLUDING overhead, i.e. not bad! That is pretty typical for a 500Hz Winmor connection with good propagation. With very good propagation rates can approach 2Kbytes/min, i.e. VERY not bad for 500Hz bandwidth! Finally, as Dave noted there is no RMS relay yet for Winmor. So there is no true, organic (radio based), mesh network, store and forward YET. For now Winmor is dependent on the internet to move messages between the Winmor CMS mail servers. Nevertheless, if you are in an internet denied area (no wireline or commercial wireless) you can now send and receive internet email over HF and do it WITHOUT a $1000 Pactor modem. 73 k*b*l*0*0*q
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Message via HF (Winmor)
Thanks for the explanation. A few years ago, I expressed concern that hams were drifting towards the Internet and expensive PACTOR modems for emergency messages. Now with RMS Express/Winmor, PSKmail,and NBEMS , we have plenty of good HF options to choose from. The large network of RMS stations on HF has several advantages in North America, in Europe I think PSKMAIL has a wider network. Andy K3UK Very cool, Andy, sending a message to the Yahoo Group via Winmor and the Winlink Global HF Email System! Just so everyone doesn't think that Winmor is dog slow, below is a section of my current Winmor RMS (Radio Mail Server) log file from this early evening. If you've got good propagation you are going to go fast. If not, well then I guess you are Andy :-) The first entry is Andy's traffic. Because of the protocol overhead even connections that pass no traffic take approximately 2 minutes from start to finish. The more you send the less the overhead affects the aggregate data rate. You can see the connect in the log right after Andy moved a message that had 4707 bytes (compressed, uncompressed it was 4876) in about 5 minutes. That's flirting with 1Kbyte/min over a 500Hz bandwidth HF connection INCLUDING overhead, i.e. not bad! That is pretty typical for a 500Hz Winmor connection with good propagation. With very good propagation rates can approach 2Kbytes/min, i.e. VERY not bad for 500Hz bandwidth! Finally, as Dave noted there is no RMS relay yet for Winmor. So there is no true, organic (radio based), mesh network, store and forward YET. For now Winmor is dependent on the internet to move messages between the Winmor CMS mail servers. Nevertheless, if you are in an internet denied area (no wireline or commercial wireless) you can now send and receive internet email over HF and do it WITHOUT a $1000 Pactor modem. 73 k*b*l*0*0*q _
[digitalradio] KB1OOQ off line
FYI Comcast has bit the dust in my neck of the woods. I've taken the station off-line, probably for the rest of the evening. Sorry folks. And just when I got it running well again, too. Nothing I can do about Comcast, though KB1OOQ Andy K3UK via winmor
[digitalradio] Re: KB1OOQ-5 back ON-LINE (Comcast comes through)
Pretty good, those Comcast folks. Expensive as hell, but good. Fixed in an hour and before bedtime, even :-) Very unusual to have an outage, actually, especially with no weather in the area. In 10 years I can count them on the fingers of one hand. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, k...@... wrote: FYI Comcast has bit the dust in my neck of the woods. I've taken the station off-line, probably for the rest of the evening. Sorry folks. And just when I got it running well again, too. Nothing I can do about Comcast, though KB1OOQ Andy K3UK via winmor
