Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread o.
Thank you Juergen, you are of course right. 

73

Omar YK1AO

  - Original Message - 
  From: dl8le 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:11 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group


  Per definition the 

  DIGITALRADIO GROUP

  is

  "A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes, 
  applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air 
  activity."

  The ongoing discussion about legal or formal topics since a couple 
  of weeks with constant repeating of all the old arguments without 
  any new ideas or aspects is more than boring and for sure not in 
  line with the original definition. It's just repeating something and 
  no interest in carefully considering the other party's arguments. 
  And, worst of all, only one part of the different subjects of this 
  group, the air activity if this term can be applied at all, is 
  discussed over and over again with absolutely no progress. Please 
  count the posts on FCC regulations, fundamental (and unfortunately 
  non-technical) contributions to emergency communication in 
  particular the spending of 250 KUSD for radio equipment etc (I don't 
  want to waste my time to list all what I have read in the past weeks 
  since I joined this group), and then compare that number to the 
  posts on real topics of this group. The ratio between the two 
  figures is in my opinion completely inadequate.

  I like open discussions but there should be an end sometime, at 
  least that the different parties come to the conclusion that there 
  will be no agreement. That is at least an agreement.

  If the present discussions will continue I will for sure leave this 
  group. The group will survive it, of course, but I wonder if not 
  many others not commenting in public will look for a better 
  alternative to the meeting place the Digitalradio Group is offering 
  at the moment. 

  73

  Juergen, DL8LE



   

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread Jim Dear
Thank you, Juregen. 
Jim
W5LOG
 
dl8le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:   Per definition 
the 
 
 DIGITALRADIO GROUP
 
 is
 
 "A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes, 
 applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air 
 activity."
 
 The ongoing discussion about legal or formal topics since a couple 
 of weeks with constant repeating of all the old arguments without 
 any new ideas or aspects is more than boring and for sure not in 
 line with the original definition. It's just repeating something and 
 no interest in carefully considering the other party's arguments. 
 And, worst of all, only one part of the different subjects of this 
 group, the air activity if this term can be applied at all, is 
 discussed over and over again with absolutely no progress. Please 
 count the posts on FCC regulations, fundamental (and unfortunately 
 non-technical) contributions to emergency communication in 
 particular the spending of 250 KUSD for radio equipment etc (I don't 
 want to waste my time to list all what I have read in the past weeks 
 since I joined this group), and then compare that number to the 
 posts on real topics of this group. The ratio between the two 
 figures is in my opinion completely inadequate.
 
 I like open discussions but there should be an end sometime, at 
 least that the different parties come to the conclusion that there 
 will be no agreement. That is at least an agreement.
 
 If the present discussions will continue I will for sure leave this 
 group. The group will survive it, of course, but I wonder if not 
 many others not commenting in public will look for a better 
 alternative to the meeting place the Digitalradio Group is offering 
 at the moment. 
 
 73
 
 Juergen, DL8LE
 
 
 
   

   
-
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio Group

2008-01-15 Thread dg6ygd

100 % agree

This is no place to discuss failure of fcc or to fight each other.
If you have problems with bandwidth or unattended stations please discuss
with fcc for solutions - not with other hams which everytime have
different opinions. Read and accept the facts given by your authority,
perhaps try to change it by petition. But dont try to persuade...

73
Dirk, DK8EE


15.01.2008, 17:11, schrieb dl8le:
>
> "A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes,
> applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air
> activity."
>
> If the present discussions will continue I will for sure leave this
> group. The group will survive it, of course, but I wonder if not
> many others not commenting in public will look for a better
> alternative to the meeting place the Digitalradio Group is offering
> at the moment.
>
> 73
>
> Juergen, DL8LE