[OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G-CEE 2013 call for papers and workshops opened!
*Dear**colleagues, The moment has come to open up the call for papers and workshops. Thus, we invite you to take a look at our categories and choose the most suited one to bring your contribution to the assembly of a great conference!**This year, we are aiming for 9 hands on of 3 hours course workshops. Keep in mind that these offer the great opportunity for a face to face interaction with users and developers! Once you decide what your contribution to FOSS4G-CEE will be, please *go here [1] and send us your idea.* Be advised that the chance to actively participate at FOSS4G-CEE will expire on the 15th of April. All proposals received after, might not be considered. *For more details, go here [2]. Warm regards, Codrina [1] http://2013.foss4g-cee.org/call/call [2] http://2013.foss4g-cee.org/blog/call-for-papers-and-workshops-now-open * * ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Inspire-data] INSPIRE Conference: finalising the workshop proposal submission
Anyway presentation submitted: http://inspire-forum.jrc.ec.europa.eu/start/www/inspire2013/cgi-bin/scmd.cgi?scmd=confirmSubmit&passcode=262X-P7J7F8C8J3 Thank you all for filling my skeleton with meet, we will see, if the proposal is attractive enough for the conference committee Jachym Dne 15.3.2013 21:22, Jachym Cepicky napsal(a): > I did not submit it yet (I'm filling the submission form), I can add you > there > > I'm going to submit it as "Oral presentation proposal", though option > "Special session proposal (full session 4 presentations)" caught my eye. > > Let's keep it compact and see, how it works for next year(?) > > Jachym > > Dne 15.3.2013 19:22, Stephan Meißl napsal(a): >> Margherita, Jáchym, >> >> a bit late I've reviewed both of your proposals and added myself and >> proposed few minor updates but no problem if I'm too late. Anyway, both >> proposal look quite nice. Many thanks. >> >> cu >> Stephan >> >> >> On 03/15/2013 04:30 PM, Jáchym Čepický wrote: >>> I'm going to submit it little bit later today. Please add your name, who >>> ever is going to contribute. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jáchym >>> >>> Margherita Di Leo napsal(a): >>> Dear all, by *one* hour from now I am going to submit the workshop proposal: "Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE " [1], while I'd leave to Jachym the task to submit the paper proposal [2]. I would like to kindly ask you to make your changes ASAP. Also, I noticed that many persons have added their names in the section below [3], which was meant to gather participants to the hangout that took place yesterday. I won't take the responsibility to put their names within the "authors" of the workshop, even if they indicated they are willing to "contribute" to it. So, please, if you are willing contribute, you are very welcome to add yourselves in the proper section [4]. Thank you! [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Workshop_proposal [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal [3] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#The_hang_out_has_already_taken_place [4] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Ping-Pong_match:_OSGeo_.26_INSPIRE >>> >> > -- Jachym Cepicky Help Service - Remote Sensing s.r.o. jachym.cepi...@gmail.com HS-RS: jac...@hsrs.cz http://bnhelp.cz http://les-ejk.cz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Inspire-data] INSPIRE Conference: finalising the workshop proposal submission
I did not submit it yet (I'm filling the submission form), I can add you there I'm going to submit it as "Oral presentation proposal", though option "Special session proposal (full session 4 presentations)" caught my eye. Let's keep it compact and see, how it works for next year(?) Jachym Dne 15.3.2013 19:22, Stephan Meißl napsal(a): > Margherita, Jáchym, > > a bit late I've reviewed both of your proposals and added myself and > proposed few minor updates but no problem if I'm too late. Anyway, both > proposal look quite nice. Many thanks. > > cu > Stephan > > > On 03/15/2013 04:30 PM, Jáchym Čepický wrote: >> I'm going to submit it little bit later today. Please add your name, who >> ever is going to contribute. >> >> Thanks >> >> Jáchym >> >> Margherita Di Leo napsal(a): >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> by *one* hour from now I am going to submit the workshop proposal: >>> "Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE " [1], while I'd leave to Jachym the >>> task >>> to submit the paper proposal [2]. >>> I would like to kindly ask you to make your changes ASAP. >>> Also, I noticed that many persons have added their names in the section >>> below [3], which was meant to gather participants to the hangout that >>> took >>> place yesterday. I won't take the responsibility to put their names >>> within >>> the "authors" of the workshop, even if they indicated they are willing >>> to >>> "contribute" to it. So, please, if you are willing contribute, you are >>> very >>> welcome to add yourselves in the proper section [4]. >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Workshop_proposal >>> [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal >>> [3] >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#The_hang_out_has_already_taken_place >>> [4] >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Ping-Pong_match:_OSGeo_.26_INSPIRE >> > -- Jachym Cepicky Help Service - Remote Sensing s.r.o. jachym.cepi...@gmail.com HS-RS: jac...@hsrs.cz http://bnhelp.cz http://les-ejk.cz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Inspire-data] INSPIRE Conference: finalising the workshop proposal submission
Stephan thank you i'll check if it' s possible to modify the submission in order to include you as author. sent from Android Il giorno 15/mar/2013 19:23, "Stephan Meißl" ha scritto: > Margherita, Jáchym, > > a bit late I've reviewed both of your proposals and added myself and > proposed few minor updates but no problem if I'm too late. Anyway, both > proposal look quite nice. Many thanks. > > cu > Stephan > > > On 03/15/2013 04:30 PM, Jáchym Čepický wrote: > > I'm going to submit it little bit later today. Please add your name, who > ever is going to contribute. > > > > Thanks > > > > Jáchym > > > > Margherita Di Leo napsal(a): > > > >> Dear all, > >> > >> by *one* hour from now I am going to submit the workshop proposal: > >> "Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE " [1], while I'd leave to Jachym the > >> task > >> to submit the paper proposal [2]. > >> I would like to kindly ask you to make your changes ASAP. > >> Also, I noticed that many persons have added their names in the section > >> below [3], which was meant to gather participants to the hangout that > >> took > >> place yesterday. I won't take the responsibility to put their names > >> within > >> the "authors" of the workshop, even if they indicated they are willing > >> to > >> "contribute" to it. So, please, if you are willing contribute, you are > >> very > >> welcome to add yourselves in the proper section [4]. > >> > >> Thank you! > >> > >> > >> [1] > >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Workshop_proposal > >> [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal > >> [3] > >> > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#The_hang_out_has_already_taken_place > >> [4] > >> > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Ping-Pong_match:_OSGeo_.26_INSPIRE > > > > ___ > Inspire-data mailing list > inspire-d...@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/inspire-data > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Inspire-data] INSPIRE Conference: finalising the workshop proposal submission
Margherita, Jáchym, a bit late I've reviewed both of your proposals and added myself and proposed few minor updates but no problem if I'm too late. Anyway, both proposal look quite nice. Many thanks. cu Stephan On 03/15/2013 04:30 PM, Jáchym Čepický wrote: > I'm going to submit it little bit later today. Please add your name, who ever > is going to contribute. > > Thanks > > Jáchym > > Margherita Di Leo napsal(a): > >> Dear all, >> >> by *one* hour from now I am going to submit the workshop proposal: >> "Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE " [1], while I'd leave to Jachym the >> task >> to submit the paper proposal [2]. >> I would like to kindly ask you to make your changes ASAP. >> Also, I noticed that many persons have added their names in the section >> below [3], which was meant to gather participants to the hangout that >> took >> place yesterday. I won't take the responsibility to put their names >> within >> the "authors" of the workshop, even if they indicated they are willing >> to >> "contribute" to it. So, please, if you are willing contribute, you are >> very >> welcome to add yourselves in the proper section [4]. >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> [1] >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Workshop_proposal >> [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal >> [3] >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#The_hang_out_has_already_taken_place >> [4] >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Ping-Pong_match:_OSGeo_.26_INSPIRE > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Inspire-data] INSPIRE Conference: finalising the workshop proposal submission
Dear all, The workshop proposal was further edited on wiki and Margherita submmitted it a few minutes ago. In case there is some major issue, this can be fixed in later stages. Regards, Angelos On 03/15/2013 05:21 PM, Margherita Di Leo wrote: Dear all, by *one* hour from now I am going to submit the workshop proposal: "Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE " [1], while I'd leave to Jachym the task to submit the paper proposal [2]. I would like to kindly ask you to make your changes ASAP. Also, I noticed that many persons have added their names in the section below [3], which was meant to gather participants to the hangout that took place yesterday. I won't take the responsibility to put their names within the "authors" of the workshop, even if they indicated they are willing to "contribute" to it. So, please, if you are willing contribute, you are very welcome to add yourselves in the proper section [4]. Thank you! [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Workshop_proposal [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal [3] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#The_hang_out_has_already_taken_place [4] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Ping-Pong_match:_OSGeo_.26_INSPIRE ___ Inspire-data mailing list inspire-d...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/inspire-data -- Angelos Tzotsos Remote Sensing Laboratory National Technical University of Athens http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?
On 03/15/2013 05:53 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: On 15 March 2013 15:46, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: Hi, OSGeoLive is missing from the list ;) https://www.ohloh.net/p/OSGeo-Live/ Done Thanks :) -- Angelos Tzotsos Remote Sensing Laboratory National Technical University of Athens http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?
On 15 March 2013 15:46, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi, > > OSGeoLive is missing from the list ;) > https://www.ohloh.net/p/OSGeo-Live/ Done -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?
Hi, OSGeoLive is missing from the list ;) https://www.ohloh.net/p/OSGeo-Live/ Cheers, Angelos On 03/15/2013 02:52 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote: Mateusz and I have added all OSGeo projects to the organization page on Ohloh: https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/OSGeo Nice to see the total stats, wow! If there are other ohloh users who want to help us manage this please let us know. -mateusz & jeff On 2013-02-28 6:00 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Hi, The Ohloh service launched beta of organizationst: http://www.ohloh.net/orgs Most if not all OSGeo projects are present at Ohloh. Would it be a good idea to add OSGeo there? ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss . -- Angelos Tzotsos Remote Sensing Laboratory National Technical University of Athens http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Inspire-data] INSPIRE Conference: finalising the workshop proposal submission
I'm going to submit it little bit later today. Please add your name, who ever is going to contribute. Thanks Jáchym Margherita Di Leo napsal(a): >Dear all, > >by *one* hour from now I am going to submit the workshop proposal: >"Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE " [1], while I'd leave to Jachym the >task >to submit the paper proposal [2]. >I would like to kindly ask you to make your changes ASAP. >Also, I noticed that many persons have added their names in the section >below [3], which was meant to gather participants to the hangout that >took >place yesterday. I won't take the responsibility to put their names >within >the "authors" of the workshop, even if they indicated they are willing >to >"contribute" to it. So, please, if you are willing contribute, you are >very >welcome to add yourselves in the proper section [4]. > >Thank you! > > >[1] >http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Workshop_proposal >[2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal >[3] >http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#The_hang_out_has_already_taken_place >[4] >http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Ping-Pong_match:_OSGeo_.26_INSPIRE -- Send from cellphone. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] INSPIRE Conference: finalising the workshop proposal submission
Dear all, by *one* hour from now I am going to submit the workshop proposal: "Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE " [1], while I'd leave to Jachym the task to submit the paper proposal [2]. I would like to kindly ask you to make your changes ASAP. Also, I noticed that many persons have added their names in the section below [3], which was meant to gather participants to the hangout that took place yesterday. I won't take the responsibility to put their names within the "authors" of the workshop, even if they indicated they are willing to "contribute" to it. So, please, if you are willing contribute, you are very welcome to add yourselves in the proper section [4]. Thank you! [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Workshop_proposal [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal [3] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#The_hang_out_has_already_taken_place [4] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Ping-Pong_match:_OSGeo_.26_INSPIRE -- Best regards, Margherita DI LEO Postdoctoral Researcher European Commission - DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) Via Fermi, 2749 I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261 Tel. +39 0332 78 3600 margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?
Good work. I don't know if it may be useful but gvSIG comes in two "flavours" in Ohloh, 2.0 and 1.x branch: http://www.ohloh.net/p/gvsig-desktop Have fun. Fran. 2013/3/15 Jeff McKenna > On 2013-03-15 10:01 AM, Milo van der Linden wrote: > > Nice! > > > > I found two projects missing on your stack: > > > > https://www.ohloh.net/p/proj4 > > https://www.ohloh.net/p/udig > > > > I've added all OSGeo projects and those in incubation. I am awaiting > feedback from the MetaCRS community for their project (which includes > proj.4). > > > -jeff > > > > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- Francisco José Peñarrubia Software Colaborativo http://www.scolab.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?
Nice! I found two projects missing on your stack: https://www.ohloh.net/p/proj4 https://www.ohloh.net/p/udig Kind regards, Milo 2013/3/15 Jeff McKenna : > Mateusz and I have added all OSGeo projects to the organization page on > Ohloh: https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/OSGeo > > Nice to see the total stats, wow! > > If there are other ohloh users who want to help us manage this please > let us know. > > -mateusz & jeff > > > > On 2013-02-28 6:00 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The Ohloh service launched beta of organizationst: >> http://www.ohloh.net/orgs >> >> Most if not all OSGeo projects are present at Ohloh. >> >> Would it be a good idea to add OSGeo there? >> > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?
On 2013-03-15 10:01 AM, Milo van der Linden wrote: > Nice! > > I found two projects missing on your stack: > > https://www.ohloh.net/p/proj4 > https://www.ohloh.net/p/udig > I've added all OSGeo projects and those in incubation. I am awaiting feedback from the MetaCRS community for their project (which includes proj.4). -jeff ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] inspire conference 2013: help with presentation proposal
Arnulf, I tend to agree with Margherita that it makes sense to have JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee members for OSGeo developers dialog partners in the Pingpong workshop, as it allows for defining a very practical goal for it: see if and where the Technical Guidelines might be improved. This is not to say I disagree with your thought that implementors should take more ownership of it, but maybe this workshop is not the vehicle for that, as that is a large and unorganized group of people and the workshop dialog might lose practical goal and direction. Kind regards Heikki Doeleman On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:35 PM, heikki wrote: > hi, > > I've added a section to the wiki to clarify that we're talking about two > separate events, a presentation and a workshop : > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Presentation_and_workshop > . > > Kind regards > Heikki Doeleman > > > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Francisco José Peñarrubia > wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> Just a few comments about the document. >> >> In "Keywords", there are Open Source projects that are not related with >> OSGeo. As far as I know, NASA Worldwind is not in OSGeo, and gvSIG CE is a >> fork of the official gvSIG, which is in incubation. >> >> About Notes and Goals, I would add something related to How JRC or >> Inspire can support OSGeo projects (using them, contributing to the >> communities, or even making some recommendations). >> >> My 2 cents. >> >> Best regards. >> >> Fran. >> >> 2013/3/15 Seven (aka Arnulf) >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Madi, >>> I am pretty sure that "Members of the JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee" >>> is also sort of "wrong". The JRC is only the "facilitator" for the >>> "INSPIRE process". They are (and definitely don't *feel*) >>> "responsible" for INSPIRE. In the end it is the member states who are >>> responsible for everything and you can't get a hold of them either >>> because they send people to do something about INSPIRE. Then there are >>> the SIGs and some companies are also involved in defining the rules, >>> some get paid, some don't, some want to influence the process so that >>> they can sell their software and so on. Slippery slopes all over the >>> place. >>> >>> - From all the quotes in this you can easily tell that definition-wise >>> this is a big mess. And it got me into trouble every single time in >>> the past ten years that I tried to interact with anybody "responsible" >>> for INSPIRE. >>> >>> My suggestion was and is that those people who have to implement >>> INSPIRE finally take ownership of it. That is broadly said "INSPIRE >>> users". But feel free to go ahead as you think fits best. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Arnulf >>> >>> >>> On 15.03.2013 12:08, Margherita Di Leo wrote: >>> > Hi Arnulf, >>> > >>> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) >>> > mailto:se...@arnulf.us>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Folks, I really like the idea of the round table but changed some >>> > wording to amend the expectations for it. This was mainly to the >>> > effect of avoiding up front misunderstanding which invariably over >>> > the past years lead to unnecessary friction. >>> > >>> > >>> >> Thank you for that, it sounds way better now. We don't aim to >>> >> create any friction but to improve the dialog, so smoothing the >>> >> tone was a good thing IMHO. >>> > >>> > >>> > The whole point of INSPIRE is that there is nobody singly >>> > responsible. It has evolved over time and through the contribution >>> > of the broadest set of different people from different backgrounds >>> > and many are not even involved any more. Therefore we cannot really >>> > talk to "the people responsible for INSPIRE" - there simply are >>> > none. To avoid having one side of the table empty I changed >>> > "members of the INSPIRE Technical Committee" to "users involved >>> > with INSPIRE". Maybe that is too broad, if so please change to >>> > something else. >>> > >>> > >>> >> Here maybe there was a misunderstanding. With "Members of the >>> >> INSPIRE Technical Committee" I meant people from JRC working on >>> >> the implementation of the technical rules, so if you agree I'd >>> >> change this in: "Members of the JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee". >>> >> Users involved with INSPIRE are of course welcome as well.. >>> >>> >>> >>> > To the same effect I changed "discussion" (which always results in >>> > one winner and one loser) to "dialog" (which means that people >>> > listen to each other and learn from each other). >>> > >>> > >>> >> very good. >>> > >>> > >>> > Hope this sits well with you, otherwise feel free to revert to an >>> > earlier version. >>> > >>> > Please note that the Wiki had a hickup when saving two conflicting >>> > edits, so one intermediate version is raw HTML. I tried to save >>> > the earlier changes, mainly adding Paolo to the list of >>> > contributors. Please recheck, if you edited in the past hour or >>> > so. >>> > >>> > Looking forward to seeing so
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?
Mateusz and I have added all OSGeo projects to the organization page on Ohloh: https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/OSGeo Nice to see the total stats, wow! If there are other ohloh users who want to help us manage this please let us know. -mateusz & jeff On 2013-02-28 6:00 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > Hi, > > The Ohloh service launched beta of organizationst: > http://www.ohloh.net/orgs > > Most if not all OSGeo projects are present at Ohloh. > > Would it be a good idea to add OSGeo there? > ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] inspire conference 2013: help with presentation proposal
hi, I've added a section to the wiki to clarify that we're talking about two separate events, a presentation and a workshop : http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Presentation_and_workshop . Kind regards Heikki Doeleman On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Francisco José Peñarrubia wrote: > Hi. > > Just a few comments about the document. > > In "Keywords", there are Open Source projects that are not related with > OSGeo. As far as I know, NASA Worldwind is not in OSGeo, and gvSIG CE is a > fork of the official gvSIG, which is in incubation. > > About Notes and Goals, I would add something related to How JRC or Inspire > can support OSGeo projects (using them, contributing to the communities, or > even making some recommendations). > > My 2 cents. > > Best regards. > > Fran. > > 2013/3/15 Seven (aka Arnulf) > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Madi, >> I am pretty sure that "Members of the JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee" >> is also sort of "wrong". The JRC is only the "facilitator" for the >> "INSPIRE process". They are (and definitely don't *feel*) >> "responsible" for INSPIRE. In the end it is the member states who are >> responsible for everything and you can't get a hold of them either >> because they send people to do something about INSPIRE. Then there are >> the SIGs and some companies are also involved in defining the rules, >> some get paid, some don't, some want to influence the process so that >> they can sell their software and so on. Slippery slopes all over the >> place. >> >> - From all the quotes in this you can easily tell that definition-wise >> this is a big mess. And it got me into trouble every single time in >> the past ten years that I tried to interact with anybody "responsible" >> for INSPIRE. >> >> My suggestion was and is that those people who have to implement >> INSPIRE finally take ownership of it. That is broadly said "INSPIRE >> users". But feel free to go ahead as you think fits best. >> >> Cheers, >> Arnulf >> >> >> On 15.03.2013 12:08, Margherita Di Leo wrote: >> > Hi Arnulf, >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) >> > mailto:se...@arnulf.us>> wrote: >> > >> > Folks, I really like the idea of the round table but changed some >> > wording to amend the expectations for it. This was mainly to the >> > effect of avoiding up front misunderstanding which invariably over >> > the past years lead to unnecessary friction. >> > >> > >> >> Thank you for that, it sounds way better now. We don't aim to >> >> create any friction but to improve the dialog, so smoothing the >> >> tone was a good thing IMHO. >> > >> > >> > The whole point of INSPIRE is that there is nobody singly >> > responsible. It has evolved over time and through the contribution >> > of the broadest set of different people from different backgrounds >> > and many are not even involved any more. Therefore we cannot really >> > talk to "the people responsible for INSPIRE" - there simply are >> > none. To avoid having one side of the table empty I changed >> > "members of the INSPIRE Technical Committee" to "users involved >> > with INSPIRE". Maybe that is too broad, if so please change to >> > something else. >> > >> > >> >> Here maybe there was a misunderstanding. With "Members of the >> >> INSPIRE Technical Committee" I meant people from JRC working on >> >> the implementation of the technical rules, so if you agree I'd >> >> change this in: "Members of the JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee". >> >> Users involved with INSPIRE are of course welcome as well.. >> >> >> >> > To the same effect I changed "discussion" (which always results in >> > one winner and one loser) to "dialog" (which means that people >> > listen to each other and learn from each other). >> > >> > >> >> very good. >> > >> > >> > Hope this sits well with you, otherwise feel free to revert to an >> > earlier version. >> > >> > Please note that the Wiki had a hickup when saving two conflicting >> > edits, so one intermediate version is raw HTML. I tried to save >> > the earlier changes, mainly adding Paolo to the list of >> > contributors. Please recheck, if you edited in the past hour or >> > so. >> > >> > Looking forward to seeing some of you at the conference. >> > >> > >> >> Thanks! m >> > >> > >> > Cheers, Arnulf >> > >> > On 14.03.2013 22:14, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: >> >> Hi Margherita, Jachym. >> > >> >> Margherita, thanks for the workshop proposal draft. I will >> >> review this too. >> > >> >> Jachym, the abstract review is done on my side. Please have a >> >> look. >> > >> >> Regards, Angelos >> > >> >> On 03/14/2013 10:41 PM, Margherita Di Leo wrote: >> >>> Thank you Jachym. I also prepared the workshop proposal here >> >>> >> > >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Tennis_table_match:_OSGeo_vs_INSPIRE >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> > >> if you guys could also review this. And, of course, add your names and >> >>> affiliations. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> >> >>> On
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] inspire conference 2013: help with presentation proposal
Hi. Just a few comments about the document. In "Keywords", there are Open Source projects that are not related with OSGeo. As far as I know, NASA Worldwind is not in OSGeo, and gvSIG CE is a fork of the official gvSIG, which is in incubation. About Notes and Goals, I would add something related to How JRC or Inspire can support OSGeo projects (using them, contributing to the communities, or even making some recommendations). My 2 cents. Best regards. Fran. 2013/3/15 Seven (aka Arnulf) > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Madi, > I am pretty sure that "Members of the JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee" > is also sort of "wrong". The JRC is only the "facilitator" for the > "INSPIRE process". They are (and definitely don't *feel*) > "responsible" for INSPIRE. In the end it is the member states who are > responsible for everything and you can't get a hold of them either > because they send people to do something about INSPIRE. Then there are > the SIGs and some companies are also involved in defining the rules, > some get paid, some don't, some want to influence the process so that > they can sell their software and so on. Slippery slopes all over the > place. > > - From all the quotes in this you can easily tell that definition-wise > this is a big mess. And it got me into trouble every single time in > the past ten years that I tried to interact with anybody "responsible" > for INSPIRE. > > My suggestion was and is that those people who have to implement > INSPIRE finally take ownership of it. That is broadly said "INSPIRE > users". But feel free to go ahead as you think fits best. > > Cheers, > Arnulf > > > On 15.03.2013 12:08, Margherita Di Leo wrote: > > Hi Arnulf, > > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) > > mailto:se...@arnulf.us>> wrote: > > > > Folks, I really like the idea of the round table but changed some > > wording to amend the expectations for it. This was mainly to the > > effect of avoiding up front misunderstanding which invariably over > > the past years lead to unnecessary friction. > > > > > >> Thank you for that, it sounds way better now. We don't aim to > >> create any friction but to improve the dialog, so smoothing the > >> tone was a good thing IMHO. > > > > > > The whole point of INSPIRE is that there is nobody singly > > responsible. It has evolved over time and through the contribution > > of the broadest set of different people from different backgrounds > > and many are not even involved any more. Therefore we cannot really > > talk to "the people responsible for INSPIRE" - there simply are > > none. To avoid having one side of the table empty I changed > > "members of the INSPIRE Technical Committee" to "users involved > > with INSPIRE". Maybe that is too broad, if so please change to > > something else. > > > > > >> Here maybe there was a misunderstanding. With "Members of the > >> INSPIRE Technical Committee" I meant people from JRC working on > >> the implementation of the technical rules, so if you agree I'd > >> change this in: "Members of the JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee". > >> Users involved with INSPIRE are of course welcome as well.. > > > > > To the same effect I changed "discussion" (which always results in > > one winner and one loser) to "dialog" (which means that people > > listen to each other and learn from each other). > > > > > >> very good. > > > > > > Hope this sits well with you, otherwise feel free to revert to an > > earlier version. > > > > Please note that the Wiki had a hickup when saving two conflicting > > edits, so one intermediate version is raw HTML. I tried to save > > the earlier changes, mainly adding Paolo to the list of > > contributors. Please recheck, if you edited in the past hour or > > so. > > > > Looking forward to seeing some of you at the conference. > > > > > >> Thanks! m > > > > > > Cheers, Arnulf > > > > On 14.03.2013 22:14, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > >> Hi Margherita, Jachym. > > > >> Margherita, thanks for the workshop proposal draft. I will > >> review this too. > > > >> Jachym, the abstract review is done on my side. Please have a > >> look. > > > >> Regards, Angelos > > > >> On 03/14/2013 10:41 PM, Margherita Di Leo wrote: > >>> Thank you Jachym. I also prepared the workshop proposal here > >>> > > > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Tennis_table_match:_OSGeo_vs_INSPIRE > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > if you guys could also review this. And, of course, add your names and > >>> affiliations. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Angelos Tzotsos > >>> mailto:gcpp.kal...@gmail.com>>wrote: > >>> > Hi Jachym, > > I will review the proposal and make additions/corrections. > > Regards, Angelos > > > On 03/14/2013 07:46 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote: > > Hi, > > can anybody please have a look at the proposal of > presentation of INSPIRE conference, I've prepared at [1]? > > I'm not na
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] inspire conference 2013: help with presentation proposal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Madi, I am pretty sure that "Members of the JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee" is also sort of "wrong". The JRC is only the "facilitator" for the "INSPIRE process". They are (and definitely don't *feel*) "responsible" for INSPIRE. In the end it is the member states who are responsible for everything and you can't get a hold of them either because they send people to do something about INSPIRE. Then there are the SIGs and some companies are also involved in defining the rules, some get paid, some don't, some want to influence the process so that they can sell their software and so on. Slippery slopes all over the place. - From all the quotes in this you can easily tell that definition-wise this is a big mess. And it got me into trouble every single time in the past ten years that I tried to interact with anybody "responsible" for INSPIRE. My suggestion was and is that those people who have to implement INSPIRE finally take ownership of it. That is broadly said "INSPIRE users". But feel free to go ahead as you think fits best. Cheers, Arnulf On 15.03.2013 12:08, Margherita Di Leo wrote: > Hi Arnulf, > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) > mailto:se...@arnulf.us>> wrote: > > Folks, I really like the idea of the round table but changed some > wording to amend the expectations for it. This was mainly to the > effect of avoiding up front misunderstanding which invariably over > the past years lead to unnecessary friction. > > >> Thank you for that, it sounds way better now. We don't aim to >> create any friction but to improve the dialog, so smoothing the >> tone was a good thing IMHO. > > > The whole point of INSPIRE is that there is nobody singly > responsible. It has evolved over time and through the contribution > of the broadest set of different people from different backgrounds > and many are not even involved any more. Therefore we cannot really > talk to "the people responsible for INSPIRE" - there simply are > none. To avoid having one side of the table empty I changed > "members of the INSPIRE Technical Committee" to "users involved > with INSPIRE". Maybe that is too broad, if so please change to > something else. > > >> Here maybe there was a misunderstanding. With "Members of the >> INSPIRE Technical Committee" I meant people from JRC working on >> the implementation of the technical rules, so if you agree I'd >> change this in: "Members of the JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee". >> Users involved with INSPIRE are of course welcome as well.. > To the same effect I changed "discussion" (which always results in > one winner and one loser) to "dialog" (which means that people > listen to each other and learn from each other). > > >> very good. > > > Hope this sits well with you, otherwise feel free to revert to an > earlier version. > > Please note that the Wiki had a hickup when saving two conflicting > edits, so one intermediate version is raw HTML. I tried to save > the earlier changes, mainly adding Paolo to the list of > contributors. Please recheck, if you edited in the past hour or > so. > > Looking forward to seeing some of you at the conference. > > >> Thanks! m > > > Cheers, Arnulf > > On 14.03.2013 22:14, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: >> Hi Margherita, Jachym. > >> Margherita, thanks for the workshop proposal draft. I will >> review this too. > >> Jachym, the abstract review is done on my side. Please have a >> look. > >> Regards, Angelos > >> On 03/14/2013 10:41 PM, Margherita Di Leo wrote: >>> Thank you Jachym. I also prepared the workshop proposal here >>> > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Tennis_table_match:_OSGeo_vs_INSPIRE >>> >>> >>> > > if you guys could also review this. And, of course, add your names and >>> affiliations. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Angelos Tzotsos >>> mailto:gcpp.kal...@gmail.com>>wrote: >>> Hi Jachym, I will review the proposal and make additions/corrections. Regards, Angelos On 03/14/2013 07:46 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote: Hi, can anybody please have a look at the proposal of presentation of INSPIRE conference, I've prepared at [1]? I'm not native speaker, nor do I use the language (English) very fluently, so any help mostly welcomed. I would also like to ask, if someone has the capacity and inspiration, that he/she could extend or rewrite completely the proposal I've prepared (and add his/her name at the top). Thanks for help, more work will come if the proposal will be accepted Jachym [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal > ___ Discuss mailing > listDiscuss@lists.osgeo.orghttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] inspire conference 2013
Hi everyone, really appreciate your efforts. I am happy to join :-) Just added my information to the wiki page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013 Best regards, Markus -- Markus Schneider CEO Occam Labs UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Godesberger Allee 139 53175 Bonn, Germany +49 228 93798874 http://www.occamlabs.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] inspire conference 2013: help with presentation proposal
Hi all, I've read through the proposal and that looks quite nice! I have put myself to the list of people that would like to take part in the workshop as a speaker. The only thing unclear to me is the section "Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE". Maybe that idea could be moved to another section or be part of another workshop? Or is it a suggestion to have a real ping-pong match somewhere? I don't understand it :-) Anything else I can do for you to be able to submit this Jachym? Cheers, Jeroen On 14 mrt. 2013, at 18:46, Jachym Cepicky wrote: > Hi, > > can anybody please have a look at the proposal of presentation of > INSPIRE conference, I've prepared at [1]? > > I'm not native speaker, nor do I use the language (English) very > fluently, so any help mostly welcomed. > > I would also like to ask, if someone has the capacity and inspiration, > that he/she could extend or rewrite completely the proposal I've > prepared (and add his/her name at the top). > > Thanks for help, more work will come if the proposal will be accepted > > Jachym > > [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal > -- > Jachym Cepicky > Help Service - Remote Sensing s.r.o. > jachym.cepi...@gmail.com > HS-RS: jac...@hsrs.cz http://bnhelp.cz > http://les-ejk.cz > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] inspire conference 2013: help with presentation proposal
Arnulf, I agree with your suggestions. Many thanks! Maria Def. Quota "Seven (aka Arnulf)" : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I really like the idea of the round table but changed some wording to amend the expectations for it. This was mainly to the effect of avoiding up front misunderstanding which invariably over the past years lead to unnecessary friction. The whole point of INSPIRE is that there is nobody singly responsible. It has evolved over time and through the contribution of the broadest set of different people from different backgrounds and many are not even involved any more. Therefore we cannot really talk to "the people responsible for INSPIRE" - there simply are none. To avoid having one side of the table empty I changed "members of the INSPIRE Technical Committee" to "users involved with INSPIRE". Maybe that is too broad, if so please change to something else. To the same effect I changed "discussion" (which always results in one winner and one loser) to "dialog" (which means that people listen to each other and learn from each other). Hope this sits well with you, otherwise feel free to revert to an earlier version. Please note that the Wiki had a hickup when saving two conflicting edits, so one intermediate version is raw HTML. I tried to save the earlier changes, mainly adding Paolo to the list of contributors. Please recheck, if you edited in the past hour or so. Looking forward to seeing some of you at the conference. Cheers, Arnulf On 14.03.2013 22:14, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: Hi Margherita, Jachym. Margherita, thanks for the workshop proposal draft. I will review this too. Jachym, the abstract review is done on my side. Please have a look. Regards, Angelos On 03/14/2013 10:41 PM, Margherita Di Leo wrote: Thank you Jachym. I also prepared the workshop proposal here http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Tennis_table_match:_OSGeo_vs_INSPIRE if you guys could also review this. And, of course, add your names and affiliations. Thanks On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: Hi Jachym, I will review the proposal and make additions/corrections. Regards, Angelos On 03/14/2013 07:46 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote: Hi, can anybody please have a look at the proposal of presentation of INSPIRE conference, I've prepared at [1]? I'm not native speaker, nor do I use the language (English) very fluently, so any help mostly welcomed. I would also like to ask, if someone has the capacity and inspiration, that he/she could extend or rewrite completely the proposal I've prepared (and add his/her name at the top). Thanks for help, more work will come if the proposal will be accepted Jachym [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal ___ Discuss mailing listDiscuss@lists.osgeo.orghttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss - -- Angelos Tzotsos Remote Sensing Laboratory National Technical University of Athenshttp://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss - -- Exploring Space, Time and Mind http://arnulf.us -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFC+HoACgkQXmFKW+BJ1b0CPQCfQ0YSbtLdkVQ9qdaiQ7qwE7+H OgQAnRUtSHpjrpWS2gQvjO0D15ENZuGS =f0j7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] inspire conference 2013: help with presentation proposal
Hi Arnulf, On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Folks, > I really like the idea of the round table but changed some wording to > amend the expectations for it. This was mainly to the effect of > avoiding up front misunderstanding which invariably over the past > years lead to unnecessary friction. > Thank you for that, it sounds way better now. We don't aim to create any friction but to improve the dialog, so smoothing the tone was a good thing IMHO. > > The whole point of INSPIRE is that there is nobody singly responsible. > It has evolved over time and through the contribution of the broadest > set of different people from different backgrounds and many are not > even involved any more. Therefore we cannot really talk to "the people > responsible for INSPIRE" - there simply are none. To avoid having one > side of the table empty I changed "members of the INSPIRE Technical > Committee" to "users involved with INSPIRE". Maybe that is too broad, > if so please change to something else. > Here maybe there was a misunderstanding. With "Members of the INSPIRE Technical Committee" I meant people from JRC working on the implementation of the technical rules, so if you agree I'd change this in: "Members of the JRC INSPIRE Technical Committee". Users involved with INSPIRE are of course welcome as well.. > > To the same effect I changed "discussion" (which always results in one > winner and one loser) to "dialog" (which means that people listen to > each other and learn from each other). > very good. > > Hope this sits well with you, otherwise feel free to revert to an > earlier version. > > Please note that the Wiki had a hickup when saving two conflicting > edits, so one intermediate version is raw HTML. I tried to save the > earlier changes, mainly adding Paolo to the list of contributors. > Please recheck, if you edited in the past hour or so. > > Looking forward to seeing some of you at the conference. > Thanks! m > > Cheers, > Arnulf > > On 14.03.2013 22:14, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > > Hi Margherita, Jachym. > > > > Margherita, thanks for the workshop proposal draft. I will review > > this too. > > > > Jachym, the abstract review is done on my side. Please have a > > look. > > > > Regards, Angelos > > > > On 03/14/2013 10:41 PM, Margherita Di Leo wrote: > >> Thank you Jachym. I also prepared the workshop proposal here > >> > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Tennis_table_match:_OSGeo_vs_INSPIRE > >> > >> > >> > if you guys could also review this. And, of course, add your names and > >> affiliations. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Angelos Tzotsos > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Jachym, > >>> > >>> I will review the proposal and make additions/corrections. > >>> > >>> Regards, Angelos > >>> > >>> > >>> On 03/14/2013 07:46 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> can anybody please have a look at the proposal of presentation > >>> of INSPIRE conference, I've prepared at [1]? > >>> > >>> I'm not native speaker, nor do I use the language (English) > >>> very fluently, so any help mostly welcomed. > >>> > >>> I would also like to ask, if someone has the capacity and > >>> inspiration, that he/she could extend or rewrite completely the > >>> proposal I've prepared (and add his/her name at the top). > >>> > >>> Thanks for help, more work will come if the proposal will be > >>> accepted > >>> > >>> Jachym > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ___ > >>> Discuss mailing > >>> listDiscuss@lists.osgeo.orghttp:// > lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > - -- > >>> Angelos Tzotsos Remote Sensing Laboratory National Technical > >>> University of Athenshttp://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos > >>> > >>> > >>> ___ Discuss mailing > >>> list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > - -- > Exploring Space, Time and Mind > http://arnulf.us > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlFC+HoACgkQXmFKW+BJ1b0CPQCfQ0YSbtLdkVQ9qdaiQ7qwE7+H > OgQAnRUtSHpjrpWS2gQvjO0D15ENZuGS > =f0j7 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- Best regards, Margherita DI LEO Postdoctoral Researcher European Commission - DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) Via Fermi, 2749 I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261 Tel. +39 0332 78 3600 margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstance be regarded as stating an off
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] inspire conference 2013: help with presentation proposal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I really like the idea of the round table but changed some wording to amend the expectations for it. This was mainly to the effect of avoiding up front misunderstanding which invariably over the past years lead to unnecessary friction. The whole point of INSPIRE is that there is nobody singly responsible. It has evolved over time and through the contribution of the broadest set of different people from different backgrounds and many are not even involved any more. Therefore we cannot really talk to "the people responsible for INSPIRE" - there simply are none. To avoid having one side of the table empty I changed "members of the INSPIRE Technical Committee" to "users involved with INSPIRE". Maybe that is too broad, if so please change to something else. To the same effect I changed "discussion" (which always results in one winner and one loser) to "dialog" (which means that people listen to each other and learn from each other). Hope this sits well with you, otherwise feel free to revert to an earlier version. Please note that the Wiki had a hickup when saving two conflicting edits, so one intermediate version is raw HTML. I tried to save the earlier changes, mainly adding Paolo to the list of contributors. Please recheck, if you edited in the past hour or so. Looking forward to seeing some of you at the conference. Cheers, Arnulf On 14.03.2013 22:14, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi Margherita, Jachym. > > Margherita, thanks for the workshop proposal draft. I will review > this too. > > Jachym, the abstract review is done on my side. Please have a > look. > > Regards, Angelos > > On 03/14/2013 10:41 PM, Margherita Di Leo wrote: >> Thank you Jachym. I also prepared the workshop proposal here >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Tennis_table_match:_OSGeo_vs_INSPIRE >> >> >> if you guys could also review this. And, of course, add your names and >> affiliations. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Angelos Tzotsos >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jachym, >>> >>> I will review the proposal and make additions/corrections. >>> >>> Regards, Angelos >>> >>> >>> On 03/14/2013 07:46 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> can anybody please have a look at the proposal of presentation >>> of INSPIRE conference, I've prepared at [1]? >>> >>> I'm not native speaker, nor do I use the language (English) >>> very fluently, so any help mostly welcomed. >>> >>> I would also like to ask, if someone has the capacity and >>> inspiration, that he/she could extend or rewrite completely the >>> proposal I've prepared (and add his/her name at the top). >>> >>> Thanks for help, more work will come if the proposal will be >>> accepted >>> >>> Jachym >>> >>> [1] >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Paper_proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Discuss mailing >>> listDiscuss@lists.osgeo.orghttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - -- >>> Angelos Tzotsos Remote Sensing Laboratory National Technical >>> University of Athenshttp://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos >>> >>> >>> ___ Discuss mailing >>> list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >>> >>> >> > > - -- Exploring Space, Time and Mind http://arnulf.us -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFC+HoACgkQXmFKW+BJ1b0CPQCfQ0YSbtLdkVQ9qdaiQ7qwE7+H OgQAnRUtSHpjrpWS2gQvjO0D15ENZuGS =f0j7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
