Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
All, Just resurrecting this thread. It's been 6 months. I've done a couple of little projects with the N900 which are detailed here: http://pwultra5.ci.stpaul.mn.us/OPERA/ Question to Chris S., do you have any other insights into the directions that the N900 device (or others like it) might be taking in the future (that you can mention? :c) I'm setting up some netbooks next for the two projects listed above, using essentially the same software stack as used for the N900, which it is somewhat amazing when you think about it. I would still like to revisit the Mobile controls issues for OpenLayers and GeoMoose at some point, but focusing on flexibility with software stack at the moment. Thanks bobb Christopher Schmidt crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Bob Basques wrote: Milo, You mentioned MEEGO in your post, I just ordered a N900 to do some testing for GIS related stuff on the N900. What types of functionalities are you focusing your efforts on for MEEGO? Note that the current development platform for the N900 (and likely for the next 6 months at least) is still Maemo. The two platforms will likely not differ greatly; a lot of the UI functionality is already SDK-level in Maemo, and apps themselves likely won't change much other than packaging. In either case, it's mostly just a Very Small Linux Box. -- Chris, proud owner of an N900 bobb miblon mob...@dogodigi.net wrote: I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin and will try to get it running on meego. If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your feature list, let me know. Kind regards, Milo van der Linden Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 08:56:14AM -0600, Bob Basques wrote: All, Just resurrecting this thread. It's been 6 months. I've done a couple of little projects with the N900 which are detailed here: http://pwultra5.ci.stpaul.mn.us/OPERA/ Question to Chris S., do you have any other insights into the directions that the N900 device (or others like it) might be taking in the future (that you can mention? :c) The N900 platform is dead. MeeGo will continue to exist as an open source development platform, but you're not going to see it on any mass-produced phones in the near future, based on public statements from Nokia. (I'd expect numbers similar to the N900; you may see them, but it'll be a toy, not a commonplace.) I'm setting up some netbooks next for the two projects listed above, using essentially the same software stack as used for the N900, which it is somewhat amazing when you think about it. Maemo and MeeGo are definitely interesting platforms, though I don't know if they're more exciting than other Netbook distros, since I haven't used many of them. I would still like to revisit the Mobile controls issues for OpenLayers and GeoMoose at some point, but focusing on flexibility with software stack at the moment. There's an OpenLayers sprint for Mobile taking place next week in Lausanne. If you have things you've thought of, you should share them on the mailing lists to help support the effort. -- Chris Thanks bobb Christopher Schmidt crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Bob Basques wrote: Milo, You mentioned MEEGO in your post, I just ordered a N900 to do some testing for GIS related stuff on the N900. What types of functionalities are you focusing your efforts on for MEEGO? Note that the current development platform for the N900 (and likely for the next 6 months at least) is still Maemo. The two platforms will likely not differ greatly; a lot of the UI functionality is already SDK-level in Maemo, and apps themselves likely won't change much other than packaging. In either case, it's mostly just a Very Small Linux Box. -- Chris, proud owner of an N900 bobb miblon mob...@dogodigi.net wrote: I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin and will try to get it running on meego. If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your feature list, let me know. Kind regards, Milo van der Linden Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
Chris, Thanks for the info. I kinda figured the Meego thing was stalling on my own. A couple of manufacturers I've seen so far, but no big numbers yet. I did send in some notes for the Mobile sprint a couple of weeks ago., never heard any comments though, so don't know where they went. I think my real question for the long term, is do I stick with Linux and bend it to my will :c) , or go Andriod and/or Mac OS. bobb Christopher Schmidt crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 08:56:14AM -0600, Bob Basques wrote: All, Just resurrecting this thread. It's been 6 months. I've done a couple of little projects with the N900 which are detailed here: http://pwultra5.ci.stpaul.mn.us/OPERA/ Question to Chris S., do you have any other insights into the directions that the N900 device (or others like it) might be taking in the future (that you can mention? :c) The N900 platform is dead. MeeGo will continue to exist as an open source development platform, but you're not going to see it on any mass-produced phones in the near future, based on public statements from Nokia. (I'd expect numbers similar to the N900; you may see them, but it'll be a toy, not a commonplace.) I'm setting up some netbooks next for the two projects listed above, using essentially the same software stack as used for the N900, which it is somewhat amazing when you think about it. Maemo and MeeGo are definitely interesting platforms, though I don't know if they're more exciting than other Netbook distros, since I haven't used many of them. I would still like to revisit the Mobile controls issues for OpenLayers and GeoMoose at some point, but focusing on flexibility with software stack at the moment. There's an OpenLayers sprint for Mobile taking place next week in Lausanne. If you have things you've thought of, you should share them on the mailing lists to help support the effort. -- Chris Thanks bobb Christopher Schmidt crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Bob Basques wrote: Milo, You mentioned MEEGO in your post, I just ordered a N900 to do some testing for GIS related stuff on the N900. What types of functionalities are you focusing your efforts on for MEEGO? Note that the current development platform for the N900 (and likely for the next 6 months at least) is still Maemo. The two platforms will likely not differ greatly; a lot of the UI functionality is already SDK-level in Maemo, and apps themselves likely won't change much other than packaging. In either case, it's mostly just a Very Small Linux Box. -- Chris, proud owner of an N900 bobb miblon mob...@dogodigi.net wrote: I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin and will try to get it running on meego. If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your feature list, let me know. Kind regards, Milo van der Linden Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
Hello Miguel, I have done some mobile GIS applications on Windows Mobile platform based on SQLite and SpatiaLite. I'm interested to share my experience and contribute my findings in your compilation for your coming presentation such as GIS feature list and performance. At the moment I have built a set of DLLs called libMobileGIS to be used on Windows Mobile device. This set of DLLs was mentioned sometime ago in the following Google discussion group [1] and the binary can be downloaded at [2]. I need sometime to tidy up before publishing the modified/edited sources with Microsoft VS solution and projects. [1] http://groups.google.com/group/spatialite-users/browse_thread/thread/fdc0dd434b8d5248# [2] http://myweb.polyu.edu.hk/~lsykshea/public/spatialite-related/ Regards, Geoffrey ---BeginMessage--- Miguel, I'm excited to hear your presentation was selected. I think there is a lot of interest in mobile GIS and seeing an overview of technologies will be of great interest to the general community, so I expect you will have a large audience to present to. I saw an interesting presentation from Geoffrey Shea and Professor Jiannong Cao at the FIG conference [1]. They have built a mobile application based upon open source on a Windows Mobile. I understand they have already, or are going to publish their source code as an Open Source project. Geoffrey, Professor Cao, I wonder whether you would be interested in joining Miguel's comparison of GIS Mobile applications? Also, could you please point us to the location of the code for your project. Is it on Google Code or similar? [1] http://www.google.com/search?q=libmobilegis+fig On 02/06/10 22:35, Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Cameron Shorter Geospatial Director Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050 Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254 Think Globally, Fix Locally Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source http://www.lisasoft.com ---End Message--- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
Hi Miguel, I like very much Enebro-2.0 because it work with data base SQLite. Enebro have too EnebroPC, a desktop interface to convert formats and migrate data form PC to PDA and viceversa It's only available for windows and windows mobile. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/repositorio/usuario/listado/fichacompleta.jsf?idProyecto=490 Regards, Valenty On 2 June 2010 08:05, Miguel Montesinos mmontesi...@prodevelop.es wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin and will try to get it running on meego. If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your feature list, let me know. Kind regards, Milo van der Linden Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
Miguel, I'm excited to hear your presentation was selected. I think there is a lot of interest in mobile GIS and seeing an overview of technologies will be of great interest to the general community, so I expect you will have a large audience to present to. I saw an interesting presentation from Geoffrey Shea and Professor Jiannong Cao at the FIG conference [1]. They have built a mobile application based upon open source on a Windows Mobile. I understand they have already, or are going to publish their source code as an Open Source project. Geoffrey, Professor Cao, I wonder whether you would be interested in joining Miguel's comparison of GIS Mobile applications? Also, could you please point us to the location of the code for your project. Is it on Google Code or similar? [1] http://www.google.com/search?q=libmobilegis+fig On 02/06/10 22:35, Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Cameron Shorter Geospatial Director Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050 Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254 Think Globally, Fix Locally Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source http://www.lisasoft.com ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
Milo, You mentioned MEEGO in your post, I just ordered a N900 to do some testing for GIS related stuff on the N900. What types of functionalities are you focusing your efforts on for MEEGO? bobb miblon mob...@dogodigi.net wrote: I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin and will try to get it running on meego. If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your feature list, let me know. Kind regards, Milo van der Linden Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
Hello Bob! I started out using moblin as my en route OS of choice. On my asus 1005HA eee pc, it turned out to be the fastest, easiest to use (even on bumpy rides) and flexible enough. I managed to connect moblin via bluetooth to my gps and to my mobile phone. I use my mobile phone as 3G modem. Then I started using it for openstreetmap work by getting osm2go up. My goal is to get meego up to the same task: an excelent mobile solution for communication and (lightweight) geodata collection. Besides that I am waiting for the nokia device that will follow up on the N900, rumours has it will be called the N9, but those rumours haven't been confirmed by nokia. Why meego and not android? Because I am always looking at alternative products that will prevent single parties to become dominant. This has nothing to do with reason, it is purely out of ideology ;-) I am now running the 1.0 release and believe it or not, it is a small step down from moblin 2.1. Although it boots faster, the interface looks like a candystore and not all components have a synced look and feel. Chromium for instance is not integrated in the panels as much as the moblin browser was, and some apps suddenly have gray window decoration while others have black. With moblin I would have people ooh and aah when I did a business presentation with it, meego with its OS for kids look has to stay in the box a little while longer. For me meego == choice. I don't intend my eee pc it to be a desktop replacer, I cannot imagine myself programming on 1024x600 resolution. But it is my companion on the road and since I travel by train a lot, the best companion I had so far with almost 8h of battery power. And even for business meetings, I don't need to bring a heavy 15 or more anymore. The eee will do perfect and run like a charm Bob Basques wrote: Milo, You mentioned MEEGO in your post, I just ordered a N900 to do some testing for GIS related stuff on the N900. What types of functionalities are you focusing your efforts on for MEEGO? bobb miblon mob...@dogodigi.net wrote: I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin and will try to get it running on meego. If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your feature list, let me know. Kind regards, Milo van der Linden Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Bob Basques wrote: Milo, You mentioned MEEGO in your post, I just ordered a N900 to do some testing for GIS related stuff on the N900. What types of functionalities are you focusing your efforts on for MEEGO? Note that the current development platform for the N900 (and likely for the next 6 months at least) is still Maemo. The two platforms will likely not differ greatly; a lot of the UI functionality is already SDK-level in Maemo, and apps themselves likely won't change much other than packaging. In either case, it's mostly just a Very Small Linux Box. -- Chris, proud owner of an N900 bobb miblon mob...@dogodigi.net wrote: I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin and will try to get it running on meego. If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your feature list, let me know. Kind regards, Milo van der Linden Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
Christopher, Understood, I went the Linux route on purpose. Maemo is fine for the time being. Everything I need looks be in there already, the Meego stuff just looked interesting, and the fact that someone else was talking about it made it even more interesting. C:) bobb Christopher Schmidt crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Bob Basques wrote: Milo, You mentioned MEEGO in your post, I just ordered a N900 to do some testing for GIS related stuff on the N900. What types of functionalities are you focusing your efforts on for MEEGO? Note that the current development platform for the N900 (and likely for the next 6 months at least) is still Maemo. The two platforms will likely not differ greatly; a lot of the UI functionality is already SDK-level in Maemo, and apps themselves likely won't change much other than packaging. In either case, it's mostly just a Very Small Linux Box. -- Chris, proud owner of an N900 bobb miblon mob...@dogodigi.net wrote: I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin and will try to get it running on meego. If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your feature list, let me know. Kind regards, Milo van der Linden Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Christopher Schmidt Web Developer ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Mobile GIS applications
Milo, You don't need to convince me on the Open side of things, it's why I chose to try out the Nokia. I'm actually going to buy 3 more of them, if all goes as planned, mostly for prototyping and such to build support for follow on work. bobb miblon mob...@dogodigi.net wrote: Hello Bob! I started out using moblin as my en route OS of choice. On my asus 1005HA eee pc, it turned out to be the fastest, easiest to use (even on bumpy rides) and flexible enough. I managed to connect moblin via bluetooth to my gps and to my mobile phone. I use my mobile phone as 3G modem. Then I started using it for openstreetmap work by getting osm2go up. My goal is to get meego up to the same task: an excelent mobile solution for communication and (lightweight) geodata collection. Besides that I am waiting for the nokia device that will follow up on the N900, rumours has it will be called the N9, but those rumours haven't been confirmed by nokia. Why meego and not android? Because I am always looking at alternative products that will prevent single parties to become dominant. This has nothing to do with reason, it is purely out of ideology ;-) I am now running the 1.0 release and believe it or not, it is a small step down from moblin 2.1. Although it boots faster, the interface looks like a candystore and not all components have a synced look and feel. Chromium for instance is not integrated in the panels as much as the moblin browser was, and some apps suddenly have gray window decoration while others have black. With moblin I would have people ooh and aah when I did a business presentation with it, meego with its OS for kids look has to stay in the box a little while longer. For me meego == choice. I don't intend my eee pc it to be a desktop replacer, I cannot imagine myself programming on 1024x600 resolution. But it is my companion on the road and since I travel by train a lot, the best companion I had so far with almost 8h of battery power. And even for business meetings, I don't need to bring a heavy 15 or more anymore. The eee will do perfect and run like a charm Bob Basques wrote: Milo, You mentioned MEEGO in your post, I just ordered a N900 to do some testing for GIS related stuff on the N900. What types of functionalities are you focusing your efforts on for MEEGO? bobb miblon mob...@dogodigi.net wrote: I have been using navit and osm2go on moblin. There is a debian build for osm2go which is targeted at maemo, I managed to get it up on moblin and will try to get it running on meego. If you are interested in me filling the blanks for these 2 apps on your feature list, let me know. Kind regards, Milo van der Linden Miguel Montesinos wrote: Hello to all, I'm preparing a presentation for the FOSS4G, with title Comparison of Mobile GIS applications. I know some, but I think that the best way to make an objective analysis is to offer the chance for anyone to collaborate, in order to define common feature lists as well as perfomance or usability check lists. Is anyone developing or using a mobile geospatial application interested? Regards, - Miguel Montesinos CTO PRODEVELOP, S.L. mmontesinos [at] prodevelop [dot] es www.prodevelop.es ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
can compare the current versions of the two leading web map servers. I think making the evaluation yourself not only viewing the scores, could be profitable not only for us - to know you opinion and improve the method, but for you as well - to maybe find missing elements in your software project or gaps in its documentation. (-: Best regards: Raf Dr. Rafal Wawer K.U.Leuven RD Division SADL (Spatial Application Division) Celestijnenlaan 200e bus 2224 BE-3001 Leuven-Heverlee Belgium tel. 0032 16 329731 -Original Message- From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot Sent: 18 February 2010 21:31 To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison Stefan Steiniger wrote: same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email. Stefan, Please try to understand what Rafal says. It was intentional and it was part of the idea of the evaluation made in frame of the CASCADOSS project. There is no point in making outraged debate if this idea was right or not, as it would be a never-ending story. It would be better to consider it as a software benchmark. It is not possible to create a benchmark that is completely and fully objective and makes happiness and peace in every corner of all geeky mindship. Every study makes particular assumptions, so CASCADOSS study does. The point is to review current status and make it better. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Daniel wrote: Or we go the other way: you tell us what you're trying to achieve and we tell you which one seems to be the best fit based on our experience. Thank you very much for the interest. 1)Here is the scenario: I work with enviromental services. I use GRASS+QGIS on windows. Small amount of data. Over high resolution sat images I draw vectors for some planning, the vectors have a lot of atributes. Those vectors have dayli updates. 2)What I want: Make my work easily avaliable for my teanmates over the internet, so they can visualise and query the vectors for the atributes. I look for a server that is easy to configure and that have some tools like zoom, pan and query. And the server must show always the latest updates made in the vectors (should I put the vectors in postgis?). Thanks again. Pablo. _ Quer compartilhar fotos com seus amigos? Conheça agora o Windows Live Fotos. http://www.eutenhomaisnowindowslive.com.br/?utm_source=MSN_Hotmailutm_medium=Taglineutm_campaign=InfuseSocial___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Hello, I am very new to geoservers and am currently studying GIS info system. I am wondering whether you could help me getting an overview and comparison of some of the Servers such as MapServer, GeoServer and Deegree. I've gone through the documentation of these Servers and the presentation of FOSS4G conferences. What I've got is that these servers are similar to each other, regarding the functionality and features. (I am probably wrong about this). And I still don't help a clear picture of these projects. For example, what's the strength and weakness of each server in some particular scenario? Or why would people choose MapServer over GeoServer? I guess I could never answer these questions without ever using them, right? Could anyone of you give me some help or tips on this? Thank you very much. Cheers, Jovi ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Hi Jovi, For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too. http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and compare FOSS4G software projects. Best regards: RAf Dr. Rafal Wawer K.U.Leuven RD Division SADL (Spatial Application Division) Celestijnenlaan 200e bus 2224 BE-3001 Leuven-Heverlee Belgium tel. 0032 16 329731 From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of JOvi Sent: 18 February 2010 14:39 To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison Hello, I am very new to geoservers and am currently studying GIS info system. I am wondering whether you could help me getting an overview and comparison of some of the Servers such as MapServer, GeoServer and Deegree. I've gone through the documentation of these Servers and the presentation of FOSS4G conferences. What I've got is that these servers are similar to each other, regarding the functionality and features. (I am probably wrong about this). And I still don't help a clear picture of these projects. For example, what's the strength and weakness of each server in some particular scenario? Or why would people choose MapServer over GeoServer? I guess I could never answer these questions without ever using them, right? Could anyone of you give me some help or tips on this? Thank you very much. Cheers, Jovi ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Rafal Wawer ha scritto: Hi Jovi, For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too. http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and compare FOSS4G software projects. I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report (even for beginning 2008). For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:28 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: Rafal Wawer ha scritto: Hi Jovi, For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too. http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and compare FOSS4G software projects. I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report (even for beginning 2008). For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on. Cheers Andrea Andrea, I also noticed some inconsistencies and omissions in that document. This is the general problem with canned information that has not been passed by the relevant communities. It would be much easier to have this type of documents available in an editable format like a Wiki. I wonder why OSGeo has not got around to producing something similar? It is obviously a hard task but if we (OSGeo folks) do not manage to get it done well, who will? Best regards, Arnulf. -- http://arnulf.us Exploring Space, Time and Mind ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Hi Andrea, None of the reports were submitted to any of the communities. We aimed at completely independent evaluations and the method itself was designed to enable users to perform their own evaluation. We cannot expect users to contact communities each time an evaluaiton is performed. (-; Although in few cases - e.g. Degree we contacted the developers/communities to get information we needed for documentation. In many cases the documentation of the FOSSG projects was ... Let's say it was very often quite challanging to get information we needed. The lacking information was gained through hands-on experience. I would love to discuss the details, but I think the list in not a right place for it. Please feel free to send you remarks on my e-mail address: rafal.wa...@sadl.kuleuven.be. Best regards: Raf Dr. Rafal Wawer K.U.Leuven RD Division SADL (Spatial Application Division) Celestijnenlaan 200e bus 2224 BE-3001 Leuven-Heverlee Belgium tel. 0032 16 329731 -Original Message- From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Aime Sent: 18 February 2010 15:29 To: OSGeo Discussions Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison Rafal Wawer ha scritto: Hi Jovi, For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too. http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1 6Itemid=16 http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid= 16Itemid=16 The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and compare FOSS4G software projects. I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report (even for beginning 2008). For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email. Arnulf Christl (aka Seven) wrote: On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:28 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: Rafal Wawer ha scritto: Hi Jovi, For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too. http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and compare FOSS4G software projects. I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report (even for beginning 2008). For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on. Cheers Andrea Andrea, I also noticed some inconsistencies and omissions in that document. This is the general problem with canned information that has not been passed by the relevant communities. It would be much easier to have this type of documents available in an editable format like a Wiki. I wonder why OSGeo has not got around to producing something similar? It is obviously a hard task but if we (OSGeo folks) do not manage to get it done well, who will? Best regards, Arnulf. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Jovi Wrote (...) help me getting an overview and comparison of some of the Servers such as MapServer, GeoServer and Deegree. what's the strength and weakness of each server in some particular scenario I could never answer these questions without ever using them, right? I have exactly the same doubts, but for me, a beginer in webmaping, the report does not help much. So, I kindly ask the comunity members for their personal opinion, to point in a single line what is the strong and the week point of each of the servers. For example: - ServerX. good:Nice results in little time. Bad:Limited resources. Regards, Pablo. Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:23:30 -0700 From: sst...@geo.uzh.ch To: se...@arnulf.us; discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison CC: same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email. Arnulf Christl (aka Seven) wrote: On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:28 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: Rafal Wawer ha scritto: Hi Jovi, For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too. http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and compare FOSS4G software projects. I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report (even for beginning 2008). For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on. Cheers Andrea Andrea, I also noticed some inconsistencies and omissions in that document. This is the general problem with canned information that has not been passed by the relevant communities. It would be much easier to have this type of documents available in an editable format like a Wiki. I wonder why OSGeo has not got around to producing something similar? It is obviously a hard task but if we (OSGeo folks) do not manage to get it done well, who will? Best regards, Arnulf. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _ No Messenger você pode tranformar sua imagem de exibição num vídeo. Veja aqui! http://www.windowslive.com.br/public/tip.aspx/view/97?product=2ocid=Windows Live:Dicas - Imagem Dinamica:Hotmail:Tagline:1x1:Mexa-se___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Pablo Carreira wrote: So, I kindly ask the comunity members for their personal opinion, to point in a single line what is the strong and the week point of each of the servers. Or we go the other way: you tell us what you're trying to achieve and we tell you which one seems to be the best fit based on our experience. Things we need to know include type and volume of data (raster, vector, which formats), server environment (are you restricted by corporate IT to something like Windows/IIS or are all options open?), type of app (ranging from simple map browsing with push-pins to advanced transactional editing and analysis over the Web), expected traffic, ... the more details you provide the better advice you will get... help us help you. -- Daniel Morissette http://www.mapgears.com/ ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Stefan Steiniger wrote: same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email. Stefan, Please try to understand what Rafal says. It was intentional and it was part of the idea of the evaluation made in frame of the CASCADOSS project. There is no point in making outraged debate if this idea was right or not, as it would be a never-ending story. It would be better to consider it as a software benchmark. It is not possible to create a benchmark that is completely and fully objective and makes happiness and peace in every corner of all geeky mindship. Every study makes particular assumptions, so CASCADOSS study does. The point is to review current status and make it better. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: Stefan Steiniger wrote: same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email. Stefan, Please try to understand what Rafal says. It was intentional and it was part of the idea of the evaluation made in frame of the CASCADOSS project. There is no point in making outraged debate if this idea was right or not, as it would be a never-ending story. It would be better to consider it as a software benchmark. It is not possible to create a benchmark that is completely and fully objective and makes happiness and peace in every corner of all geeky mindship. Every study makes particular assumptions, so CASCADOSS study does. The point is to review current status and make it better. Checking open source software against its documentation is like evaluating commercial software against the help you can get on community driven forums (if there are any). Anyways, I agree this discussion would not take us anywhere and I won't comment any further. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Andrea, Why don't just let him get access to the MapServer vs Geoserver comparative you and Jeff presented at the last FOSS4G conference? I mean... if he wants to know what is the best option.. that should be a very very useful material. He doesn't need a discussion, he needs help. On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 21:46 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: Stefan Steiniger wrote: same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email. Stefan, Please try to understand what Rafal says. It was intentional and it was part of the idea of the evaluation made in frame of the CASCADOSS project. There is no point in making outraged debate if this idea was right or not, as it would be a never-ending story. It would be better to consider it as a software benchmark. It is not possible to create a benchmark that is completely and fully objective and makes happiness and peace in every corner of all geeky mindship. Every study makes particular assumptions, so CASCADOSS study does. The point is to review current status and make it better. Checking open source software against its documentation is like evaluating commercial software against the help you can get on community driven forums (if there are any). Anyways, I agree this discussion would not take us anywhere and I won't comment any further. Cheers Andrea -- Mauricio Miranda Software Engineering Manager www.xoomcode.com ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Mauricio Miranda wrote: Why don't just let him get access to the MapServer vs Geoserver comparative you and Jeff presented at the last FOSS4G conference? I mean... if he wants to know what is the best option.. that should be a very very useful material. He doesn't need a discussion, he needs help. And he denotes...? Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
2010/2/18 Andrea Aime aa...@opengeo.org: ... Checking open source software against its documentation ... depends on the project... also remember this: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Library#GFOSS_Books Plenty of books :) Markus is like evaluating commercial software against the help you can get on community driven forums (if there are any). Anyways, I agree this discussion would not take us anywhere and I won't comment any further. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
The guy who started the discussion. Or is she a female? I don't know, it's the same anyway... On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 22:42 +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Mauricio Miranda wrote: Why don't just let him get access to the MapServer vs Geoserver comparative you and Jeff presented at the last FOSS4G conference? I mean... if he wants to know what is the best option.. that should be a very very useful material. He doesn't need a discussion, he needs help. And he denotes...? Best regards, -- Mauricio Miranda Software Engineering Manager www.xoomcode.com ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Mauricio Miranda wrote: The guy who started the discussion. Or is she a female? I don't know, it's the same anyway... I mean, you replied under subnode where nobody was referred to, but evaluation procedures. So, your reference to some person was confusing. Let's keep the discussion threaded, please. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Open Source Desktop GIS Software
Hi, For those who do not monitor the Slashgeo, a very detailed and interesting comparison of FOSS GIS for desktop has been compiled by Stefan Steiniger: http://www.spatialserver.net/osgis/ References: http://technology.slashgeo.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/19/1529252 http://freegeographytools.com/2008/feature-comparison-table-for-open-source-gis Greetings -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Open Source Desktop GIS Software
On 3/19/08, Mateusz Loskot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, For those who do not monitor the Slashgeo, a very detailed and interesting comparison of FOSS GIS for desktop has been compiled by Stefan Steiniger: http://www.spatialserver.net/osgis/ Indeed, a commendable compilation. Sure to become a great reference tool. References: http://technology.slashgeo.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/19/1529252 http://freegeographytools.com/2008/feature-comparison-table-for-open-source-gis Greetings -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Puneet Kishor http://punkish.eidesis.org/ Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/ Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) http://www.osgeo.org/ ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison of Open Source Desktop GIS Software
Very useful information. I'm gonna share this link with my classmates and colleagues. Thanks a lot. On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Mateusz Loskot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, For those who do not monitor the Slashgeo, a very detailed and interesting comparison of FOSS GIS for desktop has been compiled by Stefan Steiniger: http://www.spatialserver.net/osgis/ References: http://technology.slashgeo.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/19/1529252 http://freegeographytools.com/2008/feature-comparison-table-for-open-source-gis Greetings -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
