[OSGeo-Discuss] Ubuntu vs. Centos for GIS?

2014-04-02 Thread David Strom
We have a project where people are using R  Grass  GDAL for various 
sorts of Geoprocessing.  The first server we put up is running Ubuntu 
12.0.4, and we installed Grass, Gdal, etc. from repository(ies) - i.e., 
we didn't build it.


2nd server is running Centos, because of EMC SAN storage, thought it 
might be easier because RedHat is supported by EMC, but not Ubuntu. 
Installed Grass, GDAL, etc. from elgis repository.


Centos system can't create BigTiffs, but the Ubuntu system can (GDAL 
page says BigTiff should be supported by default, I think0, so we're 
wondering if we should switch that system over to running Ubuntu.


I wonder if anyone has any experience(s) to share in picking a Linux 
distro, pro or con.  I don't mean to complain about anyone's repository, 
we just don't have that much time to devote to admin efforts, so we 
would rather install FOSS from repositories, rather than having to build 
everything.


Opinions, stories?

TIA
--

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Ubuntu vs. Centos for GIS?

2014-04-02 Thread Alex Mandel
On 04/02/2014 11:13 AM, David Strom wrote:
 We have a project where people are using R  Grass  GDAL for various
 sorts of Geoprocessing.  The first server we put up is running Ubuntu
 12.0.4, and we installed Grass, Gdal, etc. from repository(ies) - i.e.,
 we didn't build it.
 
 2nd server is running Centos, because of EMC SAN storage, thought it
 might be easier because RedHat is supported by EMC, but not Ubuntu.
 Installed Grass, GDAL, etc. from elgis repository.
 
 Centos system can't create BigTiffs, but the Ubuntu system can (GDAL
 page says BigTiff should be supported by default, I think0, so we're
 wondering if we should switch that system over to running Ubuntu.
 
 I wonder if anyone has any experience(s) to share in picking a Linux
 distro, pro or con.  I don't mean to complain about anyone's repository,
 we just don't have that much time to devote to admin efforts, so we
 would rather install FOSS from repositories, rather than having to build
 everything.
 
 Opinions, stories?
 
 TIA
 -- 

In general, the current state of affairs, is the DebianGIS and UbuntuGIS
repositories are more up to date and managed than the ELGis
(Redhat/Centos/Fedora) group. I suspect it's simply a reflection of
people hours available and put into the respective systems.


The other option is the OpenSuse build service which has both Suse and
some Redhat builds (the main person behind this is also on Ubuntugis Team)
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/Application:Geo
OR I think the Postgis/Postgres teams have a somewhat up to date repo of
some stuff
http://yum.postgresql.org/packages.php

I'd assume the build difference in drivers is mostly dependency
libraries and compile time options. GDAL is tricky in that if you need
some formats you can't really avoid compiling it. Of course compiling
GDAL does not mean you have to compile everything else you need.
Or you can bug and bribe the package managers about why they didn't
include a particular format and what it takes to add it (non-free
formats, it's a licensing issue).

Thanks,
Alex

Disclaimer: I'm on the UbuntuGIS/DebianGIS lists and not the ELGis.




___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Ubuntu vs. Centos for GIS?

2014-04-02 Thread Brian H Wilson


A lot of people like RH and CentOS because you can get paid support so 
I understand the need for support. It just seems to lag getting there 
by 6 month to a year in my experience.


-Steve


I am switching my big noisy server from CentOS to Ubuntu Server even as 
we speak.
The ONLY reason I chose CentOS initially was so that I could experiment 
with ArcGIS Server.
Now that I no longer have access to an EDN license, I can't get it 
switched over fast enough.


CentOS is fine if you don't use Ubuntu anywhere else, but it's easier to 
have consistency between my desktops and servers.


Brian

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] NASA Project using QGIS to Address an Oceans Related Issue

2014-04-02 Thread Emma Strong
Hello,

I am a participant in the NASA DEVELOP National Program for college
students and recent graduates.  This term, my team's project focused on
using open source GIS (specifically QGIS) in order to create tools and
tutorials in an effort to aid beach managers in locating Sargassum (a type
of seaweed) using Landsat sensors and environmental monitoring indices so
that landfall predictions can be made.  Please watch our team's video (an
overview of our project) and Like it or leave us a comment or question.
 We were very pleased with the capabilities of the QGIS application, and I
look forward to using it more in the future.

http://www.earthzine.org/2014/03/30/i-seaweed-do-you-using-landsat-and-open-source-gis-to-locate-sargassum/

Thank you very much,
Emma Strong
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss