Re: [slim] Integrate existing squeezeboxes as chromecast players

2018-01-02 Thread drmatt

There is a project to control a squeeze ecosystem from Alexa, but that
still won't route Cast audio to your squeezebox devices. Another
solution is just buy Bluetooth enabled amplifiers for each end point...


-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-



--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..

drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108497

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Integrate existing squeezeboxes as chromecast players

2018-01-02 Thread philippe_44

ModelCitizen wrote: 
> I've used Chromecast audio and TV devices for a while. The audio devices
> are run by both LMS an Google tech. I've now got a Google home and my
> family are becoming so comfortable with voice control that I've ordered
> a couple of minis. Google Home/Assistant poses the biggest threat to my
> Squeezebox stuff yet, and as it becomes more feature rich and easier to
> use it's possible that pressing buttons might start to seem a bit old
> hat. So I'm very interested in being able to control LMS via voice, but
> Philip affirms my belief that this is probably not possible. However, I
> mentioned Google Home here before and a guy replied stating that he was
> developing some voice functionality for Amazon's Alexa and gave the
> impression he might consider extending it to Google tech in future
> so I still have some small hope it might be possible.

What you're asking here is different. It's likely possible to command
LMS players using Google Home. I think the dev of the Alexa version said
he will work on it

bpa wrote: 
> It''s been a while since I looked at Cast protocols but IIRC Cast player
> acts as single page browser running Javascript which are loaded by
> Google servers. Google server only trust recognised players to act as
> cast players (i.e.trust means content won't be copied/saved by player) .
> So to make cast 2 squeeze work would require an computing intermediary
> device which then has to be recognised by Google which is a complicated
> solution and solution is probably dearer than a Chromecast audio device.

Absolutely - you potentially could mimic a CC for the "default receiver'
w/o that "fake" being approved by Google (in fact you need to
re-implement the cast protocol, which is what I did in squeeze2cast, but
need to do the other side) but that will still be limited to cases where
the app running on Android/iOS wants to use the "default receiver". This
is unlikey the case (I think) for Spotify and any app that wants DRM.

So, at the end, many cases where it would not work and little motivation
from me as I'm not a big Android user (only a few devices) and as you
said @bpa, one must the 1st user of what one does for free



LMS 7.7, 7.8 and 7.9 - 5xRadio, 3xBoom, 4xDuet, 1xTouch, 1 SB2. Sonos
PLAY:3, PLAY:5, Marantz NR1603, JBL OnBeat, XBoxOne, XBMC, Foobar2000,
ShairPortW, JRiver 21, 2xChromecast Audio, Chromecast v1 and v2, , Pi
B3, B2, Pi B+, 2xPi A+, Odroid-C1, Odroid-C2, Cubie2, Yamaha WX-010,
AppleTV 4, Airport Express, GGMM E5

philippe_44's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17261
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108497

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Integrate existing squeezeboxes as chromecast players

2018-01-02 Thread bpa

minscof wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to get the opposite of squeeze2cast : a cast2squeeze, so I
> can reuse my squeezeboxes from my google home. Are there any people
> interested in this ? Do you think it's the same difficulty to do it as
> squeezecast ?

It''s been a while since I looked at Cast protocols but IIRC Cast player
acts as single page browser running Javascript which are loaded by
Google servers. Google server only trust recognised players to act as
cast players (i.e.trust means content won't be copied/saved by player) .
So to make cast 2 squeeze work would require an computing intermediary
device which then has to be recognised by Google which is a complicated
solution and solution is probably dearer than a Chromecast audio device.



bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108497

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Integrate existing squeezeboxes as chromecast players

2018-01-02 Thread ModelCitizen

I've used Chrome cast audio and TV devices for a while. The audio
devices are run by both LMS an Google tech. I've now got a Google home
and my family are becoming so comfortable with voice control that I've
ordered a couple of minis. It's possible Google Home/Assistant poses the
biggest threat to my Squeezebox stuff yet, and as it becomes more
feature rich and easier to use it's possible pressing buttons might
start to seem a bit old hat. So I'm very interested in being able to
control LMS via voice, but Philip affirms my belief that this is
probably not possible. However, I mentioned Google Home here before and
a guy replied stating that he was developing some voice functionality
for Amazon's Alexa and gave the impression he might extend it to Google
tech in future so I still have a small hope it might be possible.



Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known
Last.fm/user/ModelCitizen

ModelCitizen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=446
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108497

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Integrate existing squeezeboxes as chromecast players

2018-01-02 Thread philippe_44

minscof wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to get the opposite of squeeze2cast : a cast2squeeze, so I
> can reuse my squeezeboxes from my google home. Are there any people
> interested in this ? Do you think it's the same difficulty to do it as
> squeezecast ?
> 
> Thanks

It cannot work in most cases, unfortunately, due to the way a CC device
works



LMS 7.7, 7.8 and 7.9 - 5xRadio, 3xBoom, 4xDuet, 1xTouch, 1 SB2. Sonos
PLAY:3, PLAY:5, Marantz NR1603, JBL OnBeat, XBoxOne, XBMC, Foobar2000,
ShairPortW, JRiver 21, 2xChromecast Audio, Chromecast v1 and v2, , Pi
B3, B2, Pi B+, 2xPi A+, Odroid-C1, Odroid-C2, Cubie2, Yamaha WX-010,
AppleTV 4, Airport Express, GGMM E5

philippe_44's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17261
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108497

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Integrate existing squeezeboxes as chromecast players

2018-01-02 Thread minscof

Hi,

I would like to get the opposite of squeeze2cast : a cast2squeeze, so I
can reuse my squeezeboxes from my google home. Are there any people
interested in this ? Do you think it's the same difficulty to do it as
squeezecast ?

Thanks



minscof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52139
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108497

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Net::UDAP - SqueezeBox Receiver configuration tool

2018-01-02 Thread dolodobendan

Thomas8675309 wrote: 
> 
> Then I followed the general instructions here:
> 
> http://www.practicalreason.net/item/34-squeezebox-duet-without-controller
> 

Whoever wrote this mixed up local and receiver's IP, but since he was
consistent in his misuse, it should work (if it is works at all),
despite stuff like:

> Open a command window and get the IP address of the Squeezebox Receiver
> using the following DOS command:
> 
> > 
Code:

  >   > ipconfig /all

> > 
> 
> To get the Net::UDAP application to connect to the Squeezebox Receiver
> you need to run its udap_shell.pl script and specify the IP address of
> the Receiver you determined in the previous section.
>



LMS 7.9.1@1.02 (digimaster) / QNAP 469L QTS 4.3.4

dolodobendan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=67663
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57861

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Announce: Album Catalog Creator v3

2018-01-02 Thread Pokersut

reinholdk wrote: 
> Unless Frank doesn't provide a new download site you can find it through
> the internet archive's wayback machine at https://web.archive.org/ by
> entering Frank's original download url given in the first post of this
> thread.

The download file does not seem to be available from Wayback, but I have
a copy lying around. If it is alright with Frank, I can make it
available - I will wait for his reply here before I do anything.

Mikkel



Pokersut's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14520
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74452

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Net::UDAP - SqueezeBox Receiver configuration tool

2018-01-02 Thread dolodobendan

Julf wrote: 
> Indeed. There is an "audiophile" subforum for discussing imagined
> improvements in sound quality.

Great, there I can tell the world about how my newly acquired iridium
plated remote control improved the sound of my USB headphones!

And back to Net::UDAP.


Code:


  UDAP> discover
  info: *** Broadcasting adv_discovery message to MAC address 00:00:00:00:00:00 
on 255.255.255.255
  Use of uninitialized value in length at /PerlApp/Net/UDAP/Util.pm line 57, 
 line 1.
  Use of uninitialized value in length at /PerlApp/Net/UDAP/Util.pm line 67, 
 line 1.
  Supplied string has length0(expected length: 6) at /PerlApp/Net/UDAP.pm line 
296
  Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at 
/PerlApp/Net/UDAP.pm line 297,  line 1.
  info:   adv_discovery response received from
  Use of uninitialized value in length at /PerlApp/Net/UDAP/Util.pm line 57, 
 line 1.
  Use of uninitialized value in length at /PerlApp/Net/UDAP/Util.pm line 67, 
 line 1.
  Supplied string has length0(expected length: 6) at /PerlApp/Net/UDAP.pm line 
358
  mac not found in msg at /PerlApp/Net/UDAP/Shell.pm line 156
  



Anyone else got this with udap_shell_1_0_0.exe? (And maybe even has a
solution?)



LMS 7.9.1@1.02 (digimaster) / QNAP 469L QTS 4.3.4

dolodobendan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=67663
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57861

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] The Forum's Old Days on Christmas Morning

2018-01-02 Thread reinholdk

pablolie wrote: 
> I never ever liked switching to mysb... avoided it. It was only
> necessary when the software somehow broke. These days I avoid entering
> my account info, and I eagerly await a version that ignores the
> existence of mysb altogether.

You know about the --nomysqueezebox startup argument of LMS 7.9?



reinholdk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36070
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108452

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss