Re: Resources and Representations

2007-09-05 Thread Rob Heittman

On #1, I don't know much about Atom but if it's an XML type feed, I'd extend 
XmlRepresentation, SaxRepresentation, or DomRepresentation, or at the very 
least OutputRepresentation (which the API recommends as a good starting point 
for user defined Representations). 

On #2, the incoming Representation is the request entity, so it will probably 
be org.restlet.resource.InputRepresentation. 

- Original Message - 
From: Jim Alateras [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: discuss@restlet.tigris.org 
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 10:17:42 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York 
Subject: Resources and Representations 

A couple of questions regarding Resource and Representation. 


1. I am thinking of creating an AtomFeedRepresentation by extending 
StringRepresentation. Is this the best approach? 

2. When Resource.post(Representation) is called on my resource instance 
how does the restlet framework work out the Representation type that it 
will pass across? For instance if i do a post with application/atom+xml 
media type what will be the Representation type that will be passed to 
the post method? 

cheers 
/jima 


Re: Resources and Representations

2007-09-05 Thread Thierry Boileau

Hi,

On #1 : I share Rob's point of view.

on #2 : when using an HTTP server extension such as Jetty, Simple or 
AsynchWeb, all call classes derive from the 
com.noelios.restlet.http.HttpServerCall which converts the request 
entity into an InputRepresentation (have a look the method 
getRequestEntity).
However, it's very easy to create a new Sax(or Dom)Representation from a 
Representation, since there is a constructor which accepts a 
Representation instance.


best regards,
Thierry Boileau



On #1, I don't know much about Atom but if it's an XML type feed, I'd 
extend XmlRepresentation, SaxRepresentation, or DomRepresentation, or 
at the very least OutputRepresentation (which the API recommends as a 
good starting point for user defined Representations).


On #2, the incoming Representation is the request entity, so it will 
probably be org.restlet.resource.InputRepresentation.


- Original Message -
From: Jim Alateras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 10:17:42 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Resources and Representations

A couple of questions regarding Resource and Representation.


1. I am thinking of creating an AtomFeedRepresentation by extending
StringRepresentation. Is this the best approach?

2. When Resource.post(Representation) is called on my resource instance
how does the restlet framework work out the Representation type that it
will pass across? For instance if i do a post with application/atom+xml
  media type what will be the Representation type that will be passed to
the post method?

cheers
/jima


RE: Restlet wiki (was: Resources and Representations)

2006-08-14 Thread Jerome Louvel

Hi all,

I'm considering two options for this Wiki request:

1) Install a Wiki engine on the Restlet.org machine: this will need to wait
until I migrate the machine to a new hosting service in December and until I
have some spare CPU cycles :)

2) Use the Wiki feature of Java.net
(http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Main/WebHome). FYI, we have a pending request
to join there (https://restlet.dev.java.net/). They use an infrastructure
similar to Tigris.org (CollabNet) so a migration may be possible. 

Before we get a first-class Wiki, we could use the Documents  files
feature from Tigris to share and collaborate on files (text, HTML, PDF,
etc.). I know it's a bit primitive also, but it is freely hosted and
maintained by Tigris, which is nice. Before you can contribute, you need to
be a registered member on Tigris and ask for an Observer role on the
Restlet project:
http://restlet.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList

Best regards,
Jerome  

 -Message d'origine-
 De : Piyush Purang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Envoyé : jeudi 10 août 2006 22:53
 À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org
 Objet : Re: Restlet wiki (was: Resources and Representations)
 
 Thanks John, for creating my suggestion into another discussion 
 thread. I am glad that little piece wasn't missed. 
 
 +1 JIRA would be great and once it is up and running  we can start 
 adding issue numbers directly into the changelog and every API change 
 should, from then on, be first added to JIRA as an issue. 
 
 On 8/10/06, Jerome Louvel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  
  Ok, I've entered an issue to keep track of this request: 
  http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=150 
  
  Best regards, 
  Jerome 
  
   -Message d'origine- 
   De : Chris Winters 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Envoyé : jeudi 10 août 2006 17:35 
   À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org 
   Objet : Re: Restlet wiki (was: Resources and Representations) 
   
   John D. Mitchell wrote: 
FWIW, the Atlassian folks give free licenses to open source 
   projects 
for both Jira and their wiki, Confluence. 
   
   +1, especially to Confluence in the near-term. JIRA in the 
   longer-term, 
   I think the issue tracking on tigris is a little... primitive. 
   
   Chris 
   
   -- 
   Chris Winters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
   Lead Software Developer 
   Vocollect Healthcare Systems 
   
   CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION: This e-mail is 
 private and 
   intended for the addressee(s) only. It may contain 
 privileged and/or 
   confidential information. If you have received it in error 
   you are  not 
   authorized to disseminate it in any manner; please delete 
 it and any 
   copies and reply to the sender that it was misdirected. 
   
   
   
  
 
 


Re: Resources and Representations

2006-08-10 Thread Piyush Purang

Perhaps a WIKI on restlet.org with a general/open examples section
would be great so that examples could be uploaded and discussions can
be had on the uploaded examples..

I would then upload my solution to configuring components using an XML
file (JAXB and handler classes). Chris could upload his example
there...

integrating a simple wiki with restlets would be a great example too!


Restlet wiki (was: Resources and Representations)

2006-08-10 Thread John D. Mitchell

FWIW, the Atlassian folks give free licenses to open source projects
for both Jira and their wiki, Confluence.

Take care,
John


Re: Resources and Representations

2006-08-09 Thread Chris Winters

Jerome Louvel wrote:

...
Agreed, the tutorial needs to be refocused. I'm considering writing a
separate tutorial that will focus only on Restlet Applications, Resources
and Representations, going through a more real life example. If Chris
Winters wants to contribute his BookStore application to the project, maybe
we can get this done faster :-)


I need to justify my architecture decisions this morning, but I hope to 
have something a little interesting available by this afternoon.


Chris

--
Chris Winters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lead Software Developer
Vocollect Healthcare Systems

CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION: This e-mail is private and 
intended for the addressee(s) only. It may contain privileged and/or 
confidential information. If you have received it in error you are  not 
authorized to disseminate it in any manner; please delete it and any 
copies and reply to the sender that it was misdirected.




RE: Resources and Representations

2006-08-08 Thread Jerome Louvel

Hi Piyush,

 I find that the Resource and its representations is a central part of 
 the dissertation but the tutorial somehow doesn't bring that to the 
 fore. Would you agree on that? 

I do :-) and there is a plan to fill this hole:
http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=118

The reason for this is that this part of the API was the hardest to define
and stabilize. Also, the lack of Restlet Application abstraction forces
users to manually build the whole server/container. This is not too hard but
still it distracts people from the real goal which is to work with Resources
and Representations.

 And I am still not convinced why Representation should extend 
 Resource 
 (We are talking API here)? 
This took me a while to get straight, so I understand that you are still
confused.

 Shouldn't Resource have different 
 Representations? 
Absolutely, they CAN have different representations.

 And if so shouldn't there be a mechanism of asking a 
 resource it's representation (Or a representation builder 
 that takes a 
 resource and builds a suitable representtaion for it)? 
Resource.getVariants() does exactly that. 

 Here is a snippet from a draft that I never sent maybe it brings out 
 the question(s) better than the text I wrote above. 
 
 Why is a Representation also a Resource? If I understand the 
 dissertation correctly then a Resource has a Representation but not 
 the other way around. And a resource may have different kinds of 
 representations depending on the resource identifier that is used. 

REST says that both a Resource and a Representation are Data Elements. In
addition, HTTP clearly gives URIs to representations via the optional
Content-Location header. In the end, if you think about a world of
Resources (as you would think about a world of Objects), then any
concept/idea/thing that can be usefully identified is a Resource. So
Representations are potentially Resources too which leads to the extension
declaration between the Java interfaces. We already use this facility to
support the Content-Location header for example: we simply check if the
Representation.identifier property is defined.

 It seems like a resource is a very essential part of the RESTLET 
 architecture but somehow in all the documentation that I have read 
 incl. the tutorial somehow this message doesn't come through. I 
 haven't seen any comncrete example. 

Agreed, the tutorial needs to be refocused. I'm considering writing a
separate tutorial that will focus only on Restlet Applications, Resources
and Representations, going through a more real life example. If Chris
Winters wants to contribute his BookStore application to the project, maybe
we can get this done faster :-)

Best regards,
Jerome