Re: Choosing a JS framework to go together with Django

[Paul Menzel]

Am Dienstag, den 04.09.2012, 17:37 +0100 schrieb Tom Evans:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Paul Menzel <pm.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 04.09.2012, 12:08 -0300 schrieb Rafael E. Ferrero:
> >> Sorry paul... my bad... "without any problem" i mean.
> >>
> >> extract of index.html:
> >>
> >>  >> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;>
> >> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;>
> >>   
> >>   
> >>  ...
> >> do you see something wrong there, maybe a mistake??
> >
> > Strange. Loading it now worked without problems. Sorry for the noise,
> > although I think you should add two more »"« after html and before
> > utf-8.
> 
> No, you really shouldn't:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/charset.html#spec-char-encoding

Right. Thanks, I should have checked before suggesting something.


I will shut up now and keep wondering why Midori did not display it
correctly the first time I viewed the page.


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Choosing a JS framework to go together with Django

[Paul Menzel]

Am Dienstag, den 04.09.2012, 12:08 -0300 schrieb Rafael E. Ferrero:
> Sorry paul... my bad... "without any problem" i mean.
> 
> extract of index.html:
> 
>  "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;>
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;>
>   
>   
>  ...
> do you see something wrong there, maybe a mistake??

Strange. Loading it now worked without problems. Sorry for the noise,
although I think you should add two more »"« after html and before
utf-8.


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Choosing a JS framework to go together with Django

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Rafael,


Am Dienstag, den 04.09.2012, 11:55 -0300 schrieb Rafael E. Ferrero:
> men, i use Jquery on www.expoferiasg.com.ar and works quite well..
> with any problem.

s,with,without,?

Additionally your site does not tell my browser what character set it is
using and therefore all special signs are not displayed correctly in a
browser using UTF-8 by default.

And last but not least, though not so important on this list, plain text
messages are preferred on mailing lists [1]. ;-)


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Getting into professional django development

[Paul Menzel]

Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2011, 07:54 +0530 schrieb kenneth gonsalves:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:47 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > > > > 1.3 belongs to the stone age - since you are learning, it would be a
> > > > > good idea to work with the current svn trunk, updating every week or
> > > > > so.
> > > > > --
> > > >
> > > > s/1.2/1.3/
> > 
> > > With all due respect to Mr. Gonsalves, I do not care to work with the
> > > Django trunk unless I'm just playing around with something.  My goal
> > > is always to produce a production quality application.  Even the more
> > > stable than average Django trunk cannot provide the consistency needed
> > > to deliver an app to a customer.  Plus, I don't need the extra work of
> > > basing my code on a moving target.  When trunk becomes v1.4, I will
> > > convert my applications and upgrade.
> > 
> > Please read the message you are referring to again. Kenneth corrected
> > the post [2] (although the `sed`-command should be `s/1.3/1.2/`. »The
> > latest official version is 1.3.1.« [1], so Kenneth suggested to use
> > the current stable release. 
> 
> not right - I meant to say that 1.2 belongs to the stone age.

I thought that is what I wrote. Maybe I need to improve my English.

> I think the sed command is correct.

The to be replaced term goes first.

$ echo "1.3" | sed s/1.2/1.3/
1.3
$ echo "1.2" | sed s/1.2/1.3/
1.3

I hope I did not misunderstood something this time.


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Getting into professional django development

[Paul Menzel]

Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2011, 16:00 +0100 schrieb Tom Evans:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Paul Menzel <pm.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Dan,
> >
> >
> > [Reordering the message so that it is easier to see the connection.]
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2011, 06:46 -0700 schrieb Dan Gentry:
> >
> >> On Oct 18, 3:10 am, kenneth gonsalves <law...@thenilgiris.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:36 +0530, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> >> > > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 23:45 -0700, Kevin wrote:
> >> > > > Currently I have been focusing on the following:
> >> >
> >> > > > * Django 1.2
> >> >
> >> > > 1.3 belongs to the stone age - since you are learning, it would be a
> >> > > good idea to work with the current svn trunk, updating every week or
> >> > > so.
> >> > > --
> >> >
> >> > s/1.2/1.3/
> >
> >> With all due respect to Mr. Gonsalves, I do not care to work with the
> >> Django trunk unless I'm just playing around with something.  My goal
> >> is always to produce a production quality application.  Even the more
> >> stable than average Django trunk cannot provide the consistency needed
> >> to deliver an app to a customer.  Plus, I don't need the extra work of
> >> basing my code on a moving target.  When trunk becomes v1.4, I will
> >> convert my applications and upgrade.
> >
> > Please read the message you are referring to again. Kenneth corrected
> > the post [2] (although the `sed`-command should be `s/1.3/1.2/`. »The
> > latest official version is 1.3.1.« [1], so Kenneth suggested to use the
> > current stable release.
> >
> 
> I can't stand incorrect pedantry - this is my curse.
> 
> Kenneth actually said that "1.3 is ancient, you should be using
> trunk", which he corrected to "1.2 is ancient, you should be using
> trunk". His advice, regardless of which version you look at, is to use
> trunk - not the latest stable release.

You are right. I am sorry.

[…]


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Getting into professional django development

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Dan,


[Reordering the message so that it is easier to see the connection.]

Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2011, 06:46 -0700 schrieb Dan Gentry:

> On Oct 18, 3:10 am, kenneth gonsalves  wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:36 +0530, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 23:45 -0700, Kevin wrote:
> > > > Currently I have been focusing on the following:
> >
> > > > * Django 1.2
> >
> > > 1.3 belongs to the stone age - since you are learning, it would be a
> > > good idea to work with the current svn trunk, updating every week or
> > > so.
> > > --
> >
> > s/1.2/1.3/

> With all due respect to Mr. Gonsalves, I do not care to work with the
> Django trunk unless I'm just playing around with something.  My goal
> is always to produce a production quality application.  Even the more
> stable than average Django trunk cannot provide the consistency needed
> to deliver an app to a customer.  Plus, I don't need the extra work of
> basing my code on a moving target.  When trunk becomes v1.4, I will
> convert my applications and upgrade.

Please read the message you are referring to again. Kenneth corrected
the post [2] (although the `sed`-command should be `s/1.3/1.2/`. »The
latest official version is 1.3.1.« [1], so Kenneth suggested to use the
current stable release.

> I know - I'm a dinosaur.

That has nothing to do with this.


Thanks,

Paul


[1] https://www.djangoproject.com/download/
[2] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: forum and blog for developers

[Paul Menzel]

Am Sonntag, den 22.05.2011, 08:17 +0800 schrieb Russell Keith-Magee:
> On Sunday, May 22, 2011, fei  wrote:
> > I have been using Django for a while. The documentation for the Django
> > official web page is great, plus the free online django book. There
> > are enough documentations to get started using Django. However, I feel
> > there is a missing blog for Django developers.
> 
> Django has a blog - it's linked from the homepage.
> 
> http://djangoproject.com/weblog
> 
> However, it's only used for large project announcements (releases,
> conferences, and so on).

I guess there are already Django developers with blogs and Django
related posts. Just aggregate those into a planet (blog aggregation)

planet.djangoproject.com

like a lot of projects, for example Debian [1], Gentoo [2] or Fedora [3]
have.

[…]


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://planet.debian.org/
[2] http://planet.gentoo.org/
[3] http://planet.fedoraproject.org/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Cherokee for home developing

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Rob,


Am Freitag, den 29.10.2010, 02:45 -0700 schrieb Robbington:

[…]

> Actually I mentioned Uwsgi,
> 
> Perhaps if you are going to state potential bugs with software you
> could be so kind as to add the specifics in your posts and not just
> ambiguous statements such as "Do not use the uwsgi wizard: it's
> currently broken" we are not all as dedicated to the Cherokee mailing
> list as your good self. I had a quick look, here is a small excerpt:
> 
> "If you manually set the uWSGI source you will have no problem but the
> wizard make wrong assumptions"
> 
> Now I appreciate, as I am sure my fellow Django-ers are, that you
> brought this issue to light, but you could have saved some trouble as
> I mentioned before.

I agree. Pasting links to the archives is always beneficial for the
readers of the messages.

> I cant help but feel your tone to be slightly obnoxious, maybe that's
> just me, but these forums are to share experience and assist those who
> are new or have a problem. You would do well to acknowledge that.

I did not find Max’s style obnoxious, he stated the matter very
outright(?)/brisk. (I prefer interleaved style when replying though
[1].)

Thank you for all your input.

[…]


Thanks,

Paul


[1] 
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Posting_style#Placement_of_replies


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Django editor for Debian

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Nicolae,


Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2009, 23:58 -0800 schrieb NMarcu:
>Can you tell me a good Django editor for Debian? Something more
> pretty then default text editor. Something to can edit templates also.

what did you end up with?


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: New to Django, can't get it running on the web through http://127.0.0.1:8000/

[Paul Menzel]

Am Dienstag, den 08.12.2009, 08:54 -0800 schrieb Jenn Hughes:
> I'm not sure what you mean by box.

»box« in this case means computer or system.


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: I want to cancel the subscription for django-users group

[Paul Menzel]

Am Dienstag, den 17.11.2009, 10:17 +0100 schrieb "Gosálvez Prados, Diana":
> Quiero darme de baja la suscripción al grupo google django-users
> 
> I want to cancel  the subscription for django-users group

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Django users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
^^

Hope that helps.


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: domains vs sub-domains

[Paul Menzel]

Am Montag, den 09.11.2009, 21:38 -0800 schrieb Chris:
> I've recently been in discussion about which is better to have.
> 
> http://media.example.com OR
> http://example.com/media/
> 
> 1) The first method, I've been told, allows you to make more requests.
> IE for example can only make like 4 requests at a given time on a
> given domain. but, if you use sub-domains, you can make additional
> requests (4 additional in the example of IE).

I am not sure, but I think if you use SSL this could lead to problems
because some files are loaded from a different server.

[…]


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: Fixtures for django.contrib.sites.Site

[Paul Menzel]

Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2009, 17:49 -0400 schrieb Adam Nelson:
> How do I do a fixture for the Site model?  I've tried all sorts of
> different model names
> 
> 
> [
>   {
> "model": "sites.site",
> "pk": 1,
> "fields": {
>   "domain": "example.com",
>   "name": "Example"
> }
>   },
> ]
> 
> 
> And I get this error:
> ...
>   File
> "/Library/Python/2.5/site-packages/django/utils/simplejson/decoder.py", line 
> 221, in JSONArray
> raise ValueError(errmsg("Expecting object", s, end))
> ValueError: Expecting object: line 10 column 1 (char 124)
> 
> 
> Any ideas for the correct model name?  I've tried every possibility I
> can think of.

Is the last colon }, correct?

If that does not help, use dump the data of the database and see how the
syntax is.


Thanks,

Paul



signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil