Re: [DMM] FPC meetings - Cancelling tomorrow's meeting

[Satoru Matsushima]

Lyle, that sounds good.
What does update the document? Is there anything the call outcomes? Some brief 
minutes would help people to find out the points for the updates.

Cheers,
--satoru

> 2018/02/13 11:00、Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] のメール:
> 
> All,
>  
> I sent out invites for FPC meetings for 1 hour daily at 9 am CST a  few weeks 
> ago.  We are cancelling tomorrow’s meeting so that we can focus on document 
> updates.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Lyle
> 
> 
> This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for the sole 
> use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the 
> message.
> ___
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

___
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

[DMM] FPC meetings - Cancelling tomorrow's meeting

[Bertz, Lyle T [CTO]]

All,

I sent out invites for FPC meetings for 1 hour daily at 9 am CST a  few weeks 
ago.  We are cancelling tomorrow's meeting so that we can focus on document 
updates.

Thanks!

Lyle



This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for the sole 
use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the 
message.
___
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Re: [DMM] [Ila] [E] Re: review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt

[Satoru Matsushima]

Hello Kalyani,

> [..snip..]

> If you mean SRv6 Mobile Uplane draft, it is already a WG document, not my 
> draft. So I’d collect opinions on this from WG. I’m sorry for that.
> As a co-author of the draft, I’m afraid I disagree. SRv6 Mobile Uplane draft 
> specifies SRv6 functions for mobile user plane, which should be architecture 
> agnostic.
> 
> [KB] Sections 7.2, 7.3 refer to 3GPP terminology like eNB, SGW, PGW. My 
> comment was suggesting that you include 5G terminology and CUPS terminology 
> as well so it is clear how your proposal can be used in various scenarios.
> 

Now I’ve got your point. Thank you.


>> 
>> [KB] I am also still not clear if the blue icons (which I think represent 
>> IP/MPLS nodes) in your slides are included in SRv6 architecture or not.
> 
> I put some text what those icons indicate. Please find them in the slides. 
> The blue icons represent IPv6 or SRv6 node.
> [KB] Seems like the IPv6/SRv6 nodes do not interact with SMF. Is that the 
> intent? 

IPv6/SRv6 nodes interact with SMF but it’s indirect, is my idea.

Cheers,
--satoru
___
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm