Hello Kalyani, > [..snip..]
> If you mean SRv6 Mobile Uplane draft, it is already a WG document, not my > draft. So I’d collect opinions on this from WG. I’m sorry for that. > As a co-author of the draft, I’m afraid I disagree. SRv6 Mobile Uplane draft > specifies SRv6 functions for mobile user plane, which should be architecture > agnostic. > > [KB] Sections 7.2, 7.3 refer to 3GPP terminology like eNB, SGW, PGW. My > comment was suggesting that you include 5G terminology and CUPS terminology > as well so it is clear how your proposal can be used in various scenarios. > Now I’ve got your point. Thank you. >> >> [KB] I am also still not clear if the blue icons (which I think represent >> IP/MPLS nodes) in your slides are included in SRv6 architecture or not. > > I put some text what those icons indicate. Please find them in the slides. > The blue icons represent IPv6 or SRv6 node. > [KB] Seems like the IPv6/SRv6 nodes do not interact with SMF. Is that the > intent? IPv6/SRv6 nodes interact with SMF but it’s indirect, is my idea. Cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
